IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v34y2016i8p1369-1386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bundling the procurement of sports infrastructure projects: How neither public nor private actors really benefit

Author

Listed:
  • Martijn van den Hurk

Abstract

Public-private partnerships for infrastructure development are often conceived as puzzling governance tools. A peculiar case in Belgium has been the procurement of multiple similar projects to single private sector partners who design, build, finance and maintain infrastructure for a fixed period— bundled procurement . Under the umbrella of the Flemish Sports Infrastructure Program, several of these bundles were tendered, particularly in order to achieve economies of scale. However, bundled procurement came at a price. This article scrutinizes its tense relationship with local governments' interests and competitive tendering. It shows that competition was hampered to a certain extent, but an equally important role in this respect was played by high contractual demands. As for local interests, in some cases the voice of local governments was given too much weight during the procurement phase. Consequently, political interests intervened and uncertainty arose.

Suggested Citation

  • Martijn van den Hurk, 2016. "Bundling the procurement of sports infrastructure projects: How neither public nor private actors really benefit," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1369-1386, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:34:y:2016:i:8:p:1369-1386
    DOI: 10.1177/0263774X15614672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0263774X15614672
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0263774X15614672?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Estache, Antonio & Iimi, Atsushi, 2011. "(Un)bundling infrastructure procurement: Evidence from water supply and sewage projects," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 104-114, June.
    2. Calvin Jones, 2001. "A Level Playing Field? Sports Stadium Infrastructure and Urban Development in the United Kingdom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(5), pages 845-861, May.
    3. Tim Busscher & Taede Tillema & Jos Arts, 2013. "Revisiting a programmatic planning approach: managing linkages between transport and land use planning," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 492-508, December.
    4. Kit Van Gestel & Tom Willems & Koen Verhoest & Joris Voets & Steven Van Garsse, 2014. "Public-private partnerships in Flemish schools: a complex governance structure in a complex context," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 363-370, September.
    5. Trautmann, Gerhard & Bals, Lydia & Hartmann, Evi, 2009. "Global sourcing in integrated network structures: The case of hybrid purchasing organizations," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 194-208, June.
    6. Oecd, 2011. "Procurement by Utilities," SIGMA Public Procurement Briefs 16, OECD Publishing.
    7. Willem Salet & Luca Bertolini & Mendel Giezen, 2013. "Complexity and Uncertainty: Problem or Asset in Decision Making of Mega Infrastructure Projects?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 1984-2000, November.
    8. Flyvbjerg,Bent & Bruzelius,Nils & Rothengatter,Werner, 2003. "Megaprojects and Risk," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521009461.
    9. Nuno Ferreira da Cruz & Pedro Simões & Rui Cunha Marques, 2013. "The Hurdles of Local Governments with Ppp Contracts in the Waste Sector," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(2), pages 292-307, April.
    10. David Pickernell & Adrian Kay & Gary Packham & Christopher Miller, 2011. "Competing Agendas in Public Procurement: An Empirical Analysis of Opportunities and Limits in the UK for SMEs," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(4), pages 641-658, August.
    11. Choi, Jay Pil, 1996. "Standardization and experimentation: Ex ante vs. ex post standardization," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 273-290, September.
    12. Kim Loader, 2007. "The Challenge of Competitive Procurement: Value for Money Versus Small Business Support," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 307-314, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Yongmin & Li, Jianpei, 2018. "Bundled procurement," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 116-127.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim Loader, 2018. "Small- and medium-sized enterprises and public procurement: A review of the UK coalition government's policies and their impact," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(1), pages 47-66, February.
    2. Qiao, Yu & Labi, Samuel & Fricker, Jon D., 2021. "Does highway project bundling policy affect bidding competition? Insights from a mixed ordinal logistic model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 228-242.
    3. Kim Loader, 2013. "Is Public Procurement a Successful Small Business Support Policy? A Review of the Evidence," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(1), pages 39-55, February.
    4. Long Li & Zhongfu Li & Lei Jiang & Guangdong Wu & Daojin Cheng, 2018. "Enhanced Cooperation among Stakeholders in PPP Mega-Infrastructure Projects: A China Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Tammi, Timo & Saastamoinen, Jani & Reijonen, Helen, 2020. "Public procurement as a vehicle of innovation – What does the inverted-U relationship between competition and innovativeness tell us?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    6. Federico Savini, 2017. "Planning, uncertainty and risk: The neoliberal logics of Amsterdam urbanism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 857-875, April.
    7. van Winden, Willem & Carvalho, Luís, 2019. "Intermediation in public procurement of innovation: How Amsterdam’s startup-in-residence programme connects startups to urban challenges," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    8. Ridderstedt, Ivan & Nilsson, Jan-Eric, 2022. "Economies of scale versus the costs of bundling in the procurement of highway pavement replacement," Working Papers 2022:4, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI).
    9. Timo Tammi & Helen Reijonen & Jani Saastamoinen, 2017. "Are entrepreneurial and market orientations of small and medium-sized enterprises associated with targeting different tiers of public procurement?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(3), pages 457-475, May.
    10. Joshua Steinfeld & Kouliga Koala & Ron Carlee, 2019. "Contracting for public stewardship in public-private partnerships," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 135-155.
    11. Anthony Flynn & Paul Davis, 2016. "The policy–practice divide and SME-friendly public procurement," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(3), pages 559-578, May.
    12. Giuseppe F Gori & Patrizia Lattarulo & Marco Mariani, 2017. "Understanding the procurement performance of local governments: A duration analysis of public works," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(5), pages 809-827, August.
    13. Elvira Uyarra & Kieron Flanagan & Edurne Magro & Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, 2017. "Anchoring the innovation impacts of public procurement to place: The role of conversations," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(5), pages 828-848, August.
    14. Detlef Müller-Mahn & Kennedy Mkutu & Eric Kioko, 2021. "Megaprojects—mega failures? The politics of aspiration and the transformation of rural Kenya," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(4), pages 1069-1090, August.
    15. Annalisa Caloffi & Francesca Gambarotto, 2017. "Cognitive distance in public procurement and public–private partnerships: An analysis of the construction sector," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(5), pages 765-783, August.
    16. Schreiner, Lena & Madlener, Reinhard, 2022. "Investing in power grid infrastructure as a flexibility option: A DSGE assessment for Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    17. Ahsan Nawaz & Xing Su & Qaiser Mohi Ud Din & Muhammad Irslan Khalid & Muhammad Bilal & Syyed Adnan Raheel Shah, 2020. "Identification of the H&S (Health and Safety Factors) Involved in Infrastructure Projects in Developing Countries-A Sequential Mixed Method Approach of OLMT-Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Cantarelli, C.C. & Flyvbjerg, B. & Buhl, S.L., 2012. "Geographical variation in project cost performance: the Netherlands versus worldwide," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 324-331.
    19. Islam, Asif & Hyland, Marie, 2019. "The drivers and impacts of water infrastructure reliability – a global analysis of manufacturing firms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 143-157.
    20. Zhao, Na, 2019. "Managing interactive collaborative mega project supply chains under infectious risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 275-286.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:34:y:2016:i:8:p:1369-1386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.