IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v41y2009i6p1309-1331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Software Slump?: Digital Music, the Democratisation of Technology, and the Decline of the Recording Studio Sector within the Musical Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Leyshon

    (School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Leyshon, 2009. "The Software Slump?: Digital Music, the Democratisation of Technology, and the Decline of the Recording Studio Sector within the Musical Economy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(6), pages 1309-1331, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:41:y:2009:i:6:p:1309-1331
    DOI: 10.1068/a40352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a40352
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a40352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zeitlyn, David, 2003. "Gift economies in the development of open source software: anthropological reflections," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1287-1291, July.
    2. Gernot Grabher, 2002. "Cool Projects, Boring Institutions: Temporary Collaboration in Social Context," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 205-214.
    3. Martin Dodge & Rob Kitchin, 2004. "Flying through Code/Space: The Real Virtuality of Air Travel," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(2), pages 195-211, February.
    4. Andrew Currah, 2006. "Hollywood versus the Internet: the media and entertainment industries in a digital and networked economy," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 439-468, August.
    5. Richard J. Sexton & Ian Sheldon & Steve McCorriston & Humei Wang, 2007. "Agricultural trade liberalization and economic development: the role of downstream market power," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 36(2), pages 253-270, March.
    6. Hertel, Guido & Niedner, Sven & Herrmann, Stefanie, 2003. "Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1159-1177, July.
    7. Johannes Gluckler, 2007. "Geography of Reputation: The City as the Locus of Business Opportunity," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7), pages 949-961.
    8. Allen Scott, 2002. "A new map of Hollywood: the production and distribution of American motion pictures," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(9), pages 957-975.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rüling, Charles-Clemens & Duymedjian, Raffi, 2014. "Digital bricolage: Resources and coordination in the production of digital visual effects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 98-110.
    2. Orçun Kasap & Altug Yalcintas, 2021. "Commodification 2.0: How Does Spotify Provide Its Services for Free?," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 157-172, March.
    3. von Krogh, Georg & Geilinger, Nina, 2014. "Knowledge creation in the eco-system: Research imperatives," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 155-163.
    4. Allan Watson & Jonathan V Beaverstock, 2016. "Transnational freelancing: Ephemeral creative projects and mobility in the music recording industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(7), pages 1428-1446, July.
    5. Rémy Guichardaz & Laurent Bach & Julien Penin, 2016. "Music industry intermediation in the digital era and the resilience of the majors’ oligopoly: The role of transactional capabilities," Working Papers of BETA 2016-47, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    6. Rémy Guichardaz & Laurent Bach & Julien Penin, 2019. "Music industry intermediation in the digital era and the resilience of the Majors’ oligopoly: the role of transactional capability," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 843-869, August.
    7. Warr, Richard & Goode, Mark M.H., 2011. "Is the music industry stuck between rock and a hard place? The role of the Internet and three possible scenarios," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 126-131.
    8. Yongren Shi & Yisook Lim & Chan S Suh, 2018. "Innovation or deviation? The relationship between boundary crossing and audience evaluation in the music field," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Hendrickson, Michael & Stanley Niaah, Sonjah, 2018. "A study on the creative industry as a pillar of sustained growth and diversification : the film and music sectors in Jamaica : lessons from case studies of successful firms and ventures," Studies and Perspectives – ECLAC Subregional Headquarters for The Caribbean 43410, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    10. Arthur Price, 2016. "Leveraging Technology to Bridge the Gap between Independent Artists and Reaching the Right Consumer," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 2(2), pages 136-160, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aspers, Patrik & Kohl, Sebastian & Power, Dominic, 2008. "Economic sociology discovering economic geography," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 9(3), pages 3-16.
    2. Stam, Wouter, 2009. "When does community participation enhance the performance of open source software companies?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 1288-1299, October.
    3. Bitzer, Jurgen & Schrettl, Wolfram & Schroder, Philipp J.H., 2007. "Intrinsic motivation in open source software development," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 160-169, March.
    4. Gabriel Abu-Tayeh & Oliver Neumann & Matthias Stuermer, 2018. "Exploring the Motives of Citizen Reporting Engagement: Self-Concern and Other-Orientation," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(3), pages 215-226, June.
    5. Bjørn Asheim & Lars Coenen & Jan Vang, 2007. "Face-to-Face, Buzz, and Knowledge Bases: Sociospatial Implications for Learning, Innovation, and Innovation Policy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(5), pages 655-670, October.
    6. Leona Achtenhagen & Robert G. Picard, 2011. "Media Clusters: Development Paths and Core Issues," Chapters, in: Charlie Karlsson & Robert G. Picard (ed.), Media Clusters, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Georg von Krogh & Eric von Hippel, 2006. "The Promise of Research on Open Source Software," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 975-983, July.
    8. Chong Choi & Sae Kim & Shui Yu, 2009. "Global Ethics of Collective Internet Governance: Intrinsic Motivation and Open Source Software," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(4), pages 523-531, December.
    9. Leona Achtenhagen & Robert Picard, 2014. "Challenges and success factors in media cluster development: a review of contemporary knowledge," Chapters, in: Charlie Karlsson & Börje Johansson & Roger R. Stough (ed.), Agglomeration, Clusters and Entrepreneurship, chapter 10, pages 221-251, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Cromie, John G. & Ewing, Mike T., 2009. "The rejection of brand hegemony," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 218-230, February.
    11. Harold Bathelt, 2011. "Munich’s Media Cluster at the Crossroads," Chapters, in: Charlie Karlsson & Robert G. Picard (ed.), Media Clusters, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Schulz, Celine, 2006. "The Secret to Successful User Communities: An Analysis of Computer Associates’ User Groups," Discussion Papers in Business Administration 1257, University of Munich, Munich School of Management.
    13. Harald Bathelt & Armin Gräf, 2008. "Internal and External Dynamics of the Munich Film and TV Industry Cluster, and Limitations to Future Growth," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(8), pages 1944-1965, August.
    14. Tuba Bakici & Esteve Almirall & Jonathan Wareham, 2011. "Motives for Participation in On-Line Open Innovation Platforms," DRUID Working Papers 11-14, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    15. Sebastian Spaeth & Georg von Krogh & Fang He, 2015. "Research Note —Perceived Firm Attributes and Intrinsic Motivation in Sponsored Open Source Software Projects," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 224-237, March.
    16. Rolandsson, Bertil & Bergquist, Magnus & Ljungberg, Jan, 2011. "Open source in the firm: Opening up professional practices of software development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 576-587, May.
    17. Engelhardt, Sebastian v. & Freytag, Andreas, 2013. "Institutions, culture, and open source," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 90-110.
    18. Çakır, Metin & Nolan, James, 2015. "Revisiting Concentration in Food and Agricultural Supply Chains: The Welfare Implications of Market Power in a Complementary Input Sector," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Bitzer, Jürgen & Geishecker, Ingo, 2010. "Who contributes voluntarily to OSS? An investigation among German IT employees," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 165-172, February.
    20. Manning, Stephan, 2017. "The rise of project network organizations: Building core teams and flexible partner pools for interorganizational projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1399-1415.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:41:y:2009:i:6:p:1309-1331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.