IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/terumm/v8y2013i1p30-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconceptualisation Of Urban Management: Evidence From Eu Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Irena BA?LIJA

    (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences, Kardeljeva ploS?ad 5, Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

The paper explains urban management as a reform of city administration and claims that the primary task is to bring about a much-needed balance between the social and economic development of the city. Empirical research, presented in the paper offers several conclusions. The most relevant conclusion is that EU cities already commonly employ this concept of urban management, despite the lack of academic consensus. Other conclusions are that if a city is large, there is a greater possibility that the city administration will adopt urban management; that if the city is more successful economically, there is a greater possibility that the city administration will adopt urban management; and that the city’s power and urban management are not correlated. Based on the survey conducted, we conclude that applying the urban management concept, when that concept is defined as proposed in this paper, has a positive effect on some aspects of a city’s performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Irena BA?LIJA, 2013. "Reconceptualisation Of Urban Management: Evidence From Eu Cities," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 30-50, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:8:y:2013:i:1:p:30-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://um.ase.ro/no81/2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Goldfrank, 2002. "The Fragile Flower of Local Democracy: a Case Study of Decentralization/Participation in Montevideo," Politics & Society, , vol. 30(1), pages 51-83, March.
    2. David Swindell & Janet Kelly, 2005. "Performance Measurement Versus City Service Satisfaction: Intra‐City Variations in Quality?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 86(3), pages 704-723, September.
    3. Armstrong, J. Scott & Lusk, Edward J., 1987. "Return Postage in Mail Surveys: A Meta Analysis," MPRA Paper 81693, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Christopher Pollitt, 2001. "CLARIFYING CONVERGENCE. Striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 471-492, December.
    5. Dubravka Jurlina Alibegović & Željka Kordej De Villa, 2008. "The role of urban indicators in city management: a proposal for Croatian cities," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 15(1), pages 63-80, July.
    6. Frannie Léautier, 2006. "Cities in a Globalizing World : Governance, Performance, and Sustainability," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6930, December.
    7. Meine Pieter van Dijk, 2006. "Managing Cities in Developing Countries," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 4209.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cipolletta, Germano & Fiorani, Gloria & Matei, Ani & Matei, Lucica & Meneguzzo, Marco & Mititelu, Cristina, 2010. "Public Sector Modernization Trends of the Member States of European Union.Trajectories of reforms in Italy and Romania," Apas Papers 267, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
    2. Meine Pieter Van Dijk, 2006. "DIFFERENT EFFECTS OF GLOBALISATION FOR WORKERS AND the POOR IN CHINA AND INDIA, COMPARING COUNTRIES, CITIES AND ICT CLUSTERS," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 97(5), pages 503-514, December.
    3. Aijaz Ali & Farhad Analoui, 2023. "Decentralisation by military regimes and challenges to citizen participation: an empirical reflection from Pakistan," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. World Bank Group, 2014. "Strategic Framework for Mainstreaming Citizen Engagement in World Bank Group Operations," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 21113, December.
    5. JS Armstrong, 2005. "Class of Mail Does Affect Response Rates to Mailed," General Economics and Teaching 0502039, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Armstrong, J. Scott, 1996. "Heuristics, biases and improvement strategies in judgmental time series : P. Goodwin and G. Wright, 1994, Omega, 22, 553-568," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 319-321, June.
    7. Erwin Heurkens & Fred Hobma, 2014. "Private Sector-led Urban Development Projects: Comparative Insights from Planning Practices in the Netherlands and the UK," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 350-369, August.
    8. Rowe, Gene & Wright, George, 1999. "The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 353-375, October.
    9. Shah, Anwar, 2012. "Grant financing of metropolitan areas : a review of principles and worldwide practices," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6002, The World Bank.
    10. McMillan, Brian & Green, Josephine M. & Woolridge, Michael W. & Dyson, Lisa & Renfrew, Mary J. & Clarke, Graham P., 2009. "Studying the infant feeding intentions of pregnant women experiencing material deprivation: Methodology of the Looking at Infant Feeding Today (LIFT) study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 845-849, March.
    11. Suwarno, Aritta & Hein, Lars & Sumarga, Elham, 2015. "Governance, Decentralisation and Deforestation: The Case of Central Kalimantan Province, Indonesia," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 54(1), pages 1-24, February.
    12. Benjamin Goldfrank & Andrew Schrank, 2009. "Municipal Neoliberalism and Municipal Socialism: Urban Political Economy in Latin America," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 443-462, June.
    13. Antonio Postigo, 2011. "Accounting for Outcomes in Participatory Urban Governance through State–Civil-society Synergies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(9), pages 1945-1967, July.
    14. Urquhart, Julie & Courtney, Paul, 2011. "Seeing the owner behind the trees: A typology of small-scale private woodland owners in England," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(7), pages 535-544, September.
    15. Ferri, Paolo & Zan, Luca, 2014. "Ten years after: The rise and fall of managerial autonomy in Pompeii," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 368-387.
    16. Speer, Johanna, 2012. "Participatory Governance Reform: A Good Strategy for Increasing Government Responsiveness and Improving Public Services?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(12), pages 2379-2398.
    17. Olivier Borraz & Anne‐Laure Beaussier & Mara Wesseling & David Demeritt & Henry Rothstein & Marijke Hermans & Michael Huber & Regine Paul, 2022. "Why regulators assess risk differently: Regulatory style, business organization, and the varied practice of risk‐based food safety inspections across the EU," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 274-292, January.
    18. Shah, Faisal Tehseen & Syed, Zaineb & Imam, Abeer & Raza, Aiman, 2020. "The impact of airline service quality on passengers’ behavioral intentions using passenger satisfaction as a mediator," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    19. Independent Evaluation Group, 2009. "Improving Municipal Management for Cities to Succeed : An IEG Special Study," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2655, December.
    20. Naomi Aoki, 2015. "Institutionalization of New Public Management: The case of Singapore's education system," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 165-186, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:8:y:2013:i:1:p:30-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.