IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/terumm/v13y2018i3p37-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Scientometric Review Of Citizen Participation Research: World Trend

Author

Listed:
  • Nasim Gholami

    (ROSTAM Faculty Art & Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran)

  • Mojtaba ANSARI

    (Faculty Art & Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran)

  • Mohammadjavad MAHDAVINEJAD

    (Faculty Art & Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran)

Abstract

Nowadays, Citizen Participation (CP) has changed our societies and attracted a wide range of researchers, practitioners, and even politicians although few studies have outlined the global research trends in CP. This study conducts a scientometric review of global CP research in 1990-2017 based on the Citizen Participation keyword, through analyzing: i) the productivity of the countries, ii) the most cited publications, and iii) the co-author based on the countries, institutes, and authors. Totally 280 articles from the Science Direct (Elsevier) website were analyzed. The results illustrate that the Arnstein's article A ladder of citizen participation was the most cited publication and that the USA and the University of Kentucky were the most active country and university in the CP research field. In the case of co-author, the European articles with two or more authors from different countries were the most in comparison with others. Furthermore, the number of this kind of research has risen since 2000.

Suggested Citation

  • Nasim Gholami & Mojtaba ANSARI & Mohammadjavad MAHDAVINEJAD, 2018. "A Scientometric Review Of Citizen Participation Research: World Trend," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(3), pages 37-53, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:13:y:2018:i:3:p:37-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://um.ase.ro/no133/3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bryan, Valerie & Collins-Camargo, Crystal & Jones, Blake, 2011. "Reflections on citizen-state child welfare partnerships: Listening to citizen review panel volunteers and agency liaisons," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 612-621, May.
    2. Olivier Rousse & Benoît Sévi, 2013. "Citizen's participation in permit markets and social welfare under uncertainty," Post-Print halshs-00814000, HAL.
    3. Lehoux, P. & Daudelin, G. & Abelson, J., 2012. "The unbearable lightness of citizens within public deliberation processes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(12), pages 1843-1850.
    4. Bryan, Valerie & Jones, Blake & Allen, Erin & Collins-Camargo, Crystal, 2007. "Civic engagement or token participation? Perceived impact of the citizen review panel initiative," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(10), pages 1286-1300, October.
    5. Primmer, Eeva & Kyllonen, Simo, 2006. "Goals for public participation implied by sustainable development, and the preparatory process of the Finnish National Forest Programme," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(8), pages 838-853, November.
    6. Collins-Camargo, Crystal & Buckwalter, Neal & Jones, Blake, 2016. "Perceptions of state child welfare administrators regarding federally-mandated citizen review panels," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 83-89.
    7. Díaz-Cayeros, Alberto & Magaloni, Beatriz & Ruiz-Euler, Alexander, 2014. "Traditional Governance, Citizen Engagement, and Local Public Goods: Evidence from Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 80-93.
    8. Rousse, Olivier, 2008. "Environmental and economic benefits resulting from citizens' participation in CO2 emissions trading: An efficient alternative solution to the voluntary compensation of CO2 emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 388-397, January.
    9. Litva, Andrea & Coast, Joanna & Donovan, Jenny & Eyles, John & Shepherd, Michael & Tacchi, Jo & Abelson, Julia & Morgan, Kieran, 2002. "'The public is too subjective': public involvement at different levels of health-care decision making," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1825-1837, June.
    10. Mingers, John & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2015. "A review of theory and practice in scientometrics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 1-19.
    11. Jami, Anahita A.N. & Walsh, Philip R., 2014. "The role of public participation in identifying stakeholder synergies in wind power project development: The case study of Ontario, Canada," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 194-202.
    12. John F. Forester, 1999. "The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262561220, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mihaela Păceşilă & Sofia Elena Colesca, 2020. "Insights on Social Responsibility of NGOS," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 311-339, June.
    2. Marin N. Alina-Andreea, 2020. "The Impact Of The Digital Society On Human Capital," Junior Scientific Researcher, SC Research Publishing SRL, vol. 6(1), pages 15-24, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miller, J. Jay & Vaughn, LaToya Burns, 2018. "Training child welfare citizen review panel members: A promising approach?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 94-97.
    2. Collins-Camargo, Crystal & Buckwalter, Neal & Jones, Blake, 2016. "Perceptions of state child welfare administrators regarding federally-mandated citizen review panels," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 83-89.
    3. McBeath, Bowen & Jolles, Mónica Pérez & Chuang, Emmeline & Bunger, Alicia C. & Collins-Camargo, Crystal, 2014. "Organizational responsiveness to children and families: Findings from a national survey of nonprofit child welfare agencies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 123-132.
    4. Primmer, Eeva, 2011. "Policy, project and operational networks: Channels and conduits for learning in forest biodiversity conservation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 132-142.
    5. Degeling, Chris & Carter, Stacy M. & Rychetnik, Lucie, 2015. "Which public and why deliberate? – A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 114-121.
    6. Miller, J. Jay & Jones, Blake, 2015. "Using concept mapping as a planning tool: Child welfare citizen review panels," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 99-106.
    7. Sheely, Ryan, 2015. "Mobilization, Participatory Planning Institutions, and Elite Capture: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Rural Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 251-266.
    8. Miller, J. Jay & Collins-Camargo, Crystal & Jones, Blake, 2017. "Exploring the university partnership model for child welfare citizen review panels: A research brief," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-4.
    9. Kobulsky, Julia M. & Cage, Jamie & Celeste, Gabriella, 2018. "The perceived effects of volunteer use by public child welfare agencies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 27-33.
    10. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Sven E. Hug, 2018. "Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 427-437, February.
    11. Deming Lin & Tianhui Gong & Wenbin Liu & Martin Meyer, 2020. "An entropy-based measure for the evolution of h index research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2283-2298, December.
    12. E. Melanie DuPuis & Brian J. Gareau, 2008. "Neoliberal Knowledge: The Decline of Technocracy and the Weakening of the Montreal Protocol," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 89(5), pages 1212-1229, December.
    13. Makena Coffman & Karen Umemoto, 2010. "The triple-bottom-line: framing of trade-offs in sustainability planning practice," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 12(5), pages 597-610, October.
    14. Ramírez-Álvarez, Aurora Alejandra, 2019. "Land titling and its effect on the allocation of public goods: Evidence from Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    15. te Brömmelstroet, Marco, 2017. "Towards a pragmatic research agenda for the PSS domain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 77-83.
    16. Primmer, Eeva & Kyllonen, Simo, 2006. "Goals for public participation implied by sustainable development, and the preparatory process of the Finnish National Forest Programme," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(8), pages 838-853, November.
    17. Keeheon Lee, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Social Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence in Product Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-29, March.
    18. Liz Barry, 2022. "Community science and the design of climate governance," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Davies-Colley, Christian & Smith, Willie, 2012. "Implementing environmental technologies in development situations: The example of ecological toilets," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-8.
    20. Biró, Tamás S. & Telcs, András & Józsa, Máté & Néda, Zoltán, 2023. "Gintropic scaling of scientometric indexes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 618(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:13:y:2018:i:3:p:37-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.