Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Faut-il réguler l'encombrement des sites récréatifs ? Un modèle de choix discret avec participation

Contents:

Author Info

  • Mélody Leplat

    ()
    (Agrocampus Ouest, UMR 1302 SMART, 4 allée Adolphe Bobierre CS 61103, F-35011 Rennes cedex, INRA, UMR1302, F-35000 Rennes, France)

  • Philippe Le Goffe

    (Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1302, F-35000 Rennes, France, INRA, UMR1302, F-35000 Rennes, France)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    En France, les sites récréatifs sont généralement en accès libre, ce qui explique qu’ils sont souvent encombrés, notamment quand ils sont attractifs et proches des zones peuplées. La théorie prévoit que l’équilibre de fréquentation est alors non optimal en raison d’un effet externe d’encombrement. Alors que des travaux anciens ont caractérisé équilibre et optimum dans le cadre de modèles mono-site à demande continue (Fisher et Krutilla, 1972), les rares articles récents utilisant les modèles de choix discret se sont limités à étudier empiriquement l’équilibre et la répartition des visites entre les sites. Notre modèle théorique permet de formaliser l’équilibre et l’optimum de fréquentation, dans le cadre d’un modèle de choix discret à deux sites intégrant la décision de participation des individus, ainsi que certains instruments de gestion permettant d’améliorer le bien-être. Il a été nécessaire de recourir à une formulation générale du bien-être définie par Erlander (2005). On montre que les individus participent trop et visitent trop le site de meilleure qualité (et pas assez le site de qualité inférieure) à l’équilibre. En exprimant les désutilités collectives liées à la participation et à la mauvaise répartition des visites entre les sites, le modèle permet d’en déduire les taxes optimales et les effets sur le bien-être collectif d’une augmentation de la qualité des sites. Une illustration simplifiée est proposée à partir d’un modèle logit multinomial estimé sur des données de pêche récréative

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.raestud.eu/pdf/051_078.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by INRA Department of Economics in its journal Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies.

    Volume (Year): 90 (2009)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 51-77

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:rae:jourae:v:90:y:2009:i:1:p:51-77

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 4, Allée Adolphe Bobierre, CS 61103, 35011 Rennes Cedex
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.necplus.eu/action/displayJournal?jid=RAE
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: endogenous congestion; optimum; equilibrium; Random Utility Model; recreation demand;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Kenneth E. McConnell, 1977. "Congestion and Willingness to Pay: A Study of Beach Use," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 53(2), pages 185-195.
    2. Boxall, Peter C. & Hauer, Grant & Adamowicz, Wiktor L., 2005. "Modeling Congestion as a Form of Interdependence in Random Utility Models," Staff Paper Series 24078, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    3. Harvey S. Rosen & Kenneth A. Small, 1979. "Applied Welfare Economics with Discrete Choice Models," NBER Working Papers 0319, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Richardson, Martin, 2002. "Quality and Congestion in Environmental Goods: The Road to the Wangapeka," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 477-496, May.
    5. Anderson, Lee G., 1980. "Estimating the benefits of recreation under conditions of congestion: Comments and extension," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 401-406, December.
    6. Timmins, Christopher & Murdock, Jennifer, 2007. "A revealed preference approach to the measurement of congestion in travel cost models," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 230-249, March.
    7. Hwa Nyeon Kim & W. Douglass Shaw & Richard T. Woodward, 2007. "The Distributional Impacts of Recreational Fees: A Discrete Choice Model with Incomplete Data," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 83(4), pages 561-574.
    8. Hugh Sibly, 2001. "Pricing and Management of Recreational Activities Which Use Natural Resources," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 18(3), pages 339-354, March.
    9. Bayer, Patrick & Timmins, Christopher, 2005. "On the equilibrium properties of locational sorting models," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 462-477, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as in new window

    Cited by:
    1. Abildtrup, Jens & Garcia, Serge & Olsen, Søren Bøye & Stenger, Anne, 2013. "Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 67-77.
    2. Asma BEN OTHMEN, 2014. "De la mise à contribution des bénéficiaires au financement de la préservation des espaces naturels : tarification de l’accès ou augmentation de taxe?," Cahiers du GREThA 2014-10, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée.

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rae:jourae:v:90:y:2009:i:1:p:51-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nathalie Saux-Nogues).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.