IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_1990_num_231_1_5440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taux d'utilisation des capacités de production : un reflet des fluctuations conjoncturelles

Author

Listed:
  • Danielle Bourlange
  • Éric Chaney

Abstract

[spa] El aprovechamiento de las capacidades de producción: un reflejo de las fluctuaciones coyunturales - El aprovechamiento de las capacidades de producción industrial definidas como la diferencia existente entre la producción efectiva y la producción potencial constituyen un buen indicador coyuntural del desequilibrio entre la oferta y la demanda en el mercado de bienes. Sus evoluciones restituyen bien las fluctuaciones de coyuntura tanto en lo que se refiere al estado y desarrollo del aparato productivo como a las tensiones a las que esta sometido. A partir de las tensiones importantes que acompanaron el crecimiento de la decada de los anos sesenta, pasando por los dos choques petroleros de los años setenta hasta el despegue de la expansion desde 1 987, la evolución en un largo período del aprovechamiento de las capacidades de producción, aclara la historia económica reciente de Francia. . Una comparación de series normalizadas en 8 países industrializados permite poner en evidencia la convergencia de las evoluciones coyunturales no obstante la existencia de algunas diferencias y la estrecha imbricación de las economías. Ningún país puede mantenerse desvinculado de la coyuntura existente en las economîas de los principales países socios. [eng] The Use Rates of Productive Capacities Reflect Fluctuations in the Overall Economic Climate - The rates at which industrial productive capacities are used, which can be defined as the difference between actual production and potential production, are a good economic indicator of the disequilibrium between supply and demand on the market for goods. Their evolution reveals the present economic fluctuations both in the condition and the development of the productive system, and in the pressures that this system is subjected to. From the strong pressures which accompanied the economic growth of the sixties, through the two oil crises in the seventies, to the recovery of economic expansion since 1987, the long term evolution of equipment use rates throws light on the recent history of the French economy. . In spite of a few discrepancies, a comparison between standardized series for eight industrialized countries brings to the fore similarities in the evolution of the economic environment, and the close interrelationship between various economies. No country can keep itself apart from the economic climate prevalent in its main trading partners for a long period of time. [fre] Les taux d'utilisation des capacités de production industrielle définis comme l'écart entre la production effective et la production potentielle constituent un bon indicateur conjoncturel du déséquilibre entre l'offre et la demande sur le marché des biens. Leurs évolutions restituent bien les fluctuations conjoncturelles tant en ce qui concerne l'état et le développement de l'appareil productif que des tensions qu'il supporte. Des fortes tensions qui accompagnent la croissance des années soixante aux deux chocs pétroliers des années soixante-dix jusqu'à la reprise de l'expansion depuis 1987, l'évolution sur longue période des taux d'utilisation éclaire l'histoire économique récente de la France. . Une comparaison des séries normalisées pour huit pays industrialisés met par ailleurs en évidence la convergence des évolutions conjoncturelles, malgré quelques décalages, et l'étroite imbrication des économies. Aucun pays ne peut se tenir durablement à l'écart de la conjoncture observée chez ses principaux partenaires.

Suggested Citation

  • Danielle Bourlange & Éric Chaney, 1990. "Taux d'utilisation des capacités de production : un reflet des fluctuations conjoncturelles," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 231(1), pages 49-70.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1990_num_231_1_5440
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.1990.5440
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.1990.5440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.1990.5440
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_1990_num_231_1_5440
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.1990.5440?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berndt, Ernst R. & Hesse, Dieter M., 1986. "Measuring and assessing capacity utilization in the manufacturing sectors of nine oecd countries," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 961-989, October.
    2. Raymond Torres & John P. Martin, 1989. "Potential Output in the Seven Major OECD Countries," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 66, OECD Publishing.
    3. Martine Folly & Hani Gresh & Claude Thélot, 1981. "Les marges de capacité de production industrielle inutilisées," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 136(1), pages 17-28.
    4. Jacky Fayolle & Claude Thélot, 1981. "Capital et capacités de production dans l'industrie," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 136(1), pages 3-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marie Leclair, 2002. "La réduction du temps de travail et les tensions sur les facteurs de production," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 359(1), pages 123-147.
    2. Sylvie Mabile, 1990. "La productivité en France de 1970 à 1989 : une approche sectorielle," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 237(1), pages 69-86.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruud de Mooij & A. Bovenberg, 1998. "Environmental Taxes, International Capital Mobility and Inefficient Tax Systems: Tax Burden vs. Tax Shifting," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 5(1), pages 7-39, February.
    2. Axenbeck, Janna & Niebel, Thomas, 2021. "Climate Protection Potentials of Digitalized Production Processes: Microeconometric Evidence," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238007, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    3. Kurt Kratena & Michael Wüger, 2012. "Technological Change and Energy Demand in Europe," WIFO Working Papers 427, WIFO.
    4. Finnoff, David & Shogren, Jason F. & Leung, Brian & Lodge, David, 2005. "The importance of bioeconomic feedback in invasive species management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 367-381, February.
    5. Patricia M. Danzon & Allison Percy, 1999. "The Effects of Price Regulation on Productivity in Pharmaceuticals," NBER Chapters, in: International and Interarea Comparisons of Income, Output, and Prices, pages 371-418, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Federico Bassi, 2020. "Chronic Excess Capacity and Unemployment Hysteresis in EU Countries. A Structural Approach," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza def091, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    7. Prior, Diego, 2003. "Long- and short-run non-parametric cost frontier efficiency: An application to Spanish savings banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 655-671, April.
    8. Kurt Kratena & Michael Wüger, 2001. ""Outsourcing", Wettbewerbsfähigkeit und Beschäftigung. Abbildung der Effekte in einem Sektormodell der österreichischen Sachgüterproduktion," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 74(4), pages 269-280, April.
    9. Flaig Gebhard & Rottmann Horst, 2001. "Input Demand and the Shortand Long-Run Employment Thresholds: An Empirical Analysis for the German Manufacturing Sector," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 2(4), pages 367-384, December.
    10. Bassim Shebeb, 2003. "Measuring Capacity Utilization Using A Short-Run Cost Function: An Application to Bahrain Economy," Working Papers 0305, Economic Research Forum, revised 02 2003.
    11. Georg Erber ; Alfred Haid, 1991. "Total Factor Productivity in the Federal Republic of Germany (1970- 1989): Results for Mining and Manufacturing Industries," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 33, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    12. Kurt Kratena, 2005. "Prices and factor demand in an endogenized input-output model," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 47-56.
    13. Maskus, Keith E. & Otsuki, Tsunehiro & Wilson, John S., 2005. "The cost of compliance with product standards for firms in developing countries: an econometric study," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3590, The World Bank.
    14. Wilfried Altzinger & Peter Egger & Peter Huber & Kurt Kratena & Michael Pfaffermayr & Michael Wüger, 2000. "Teilprojekt 5: Transnationale Direktinvestitionen und Kooperationen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 19587, April.
    15. Rodríguez, Xosé A. & Loureiro, Maria L. & Arias, Carlos, 2021. "Measuring productivity in the extractive industries. Evidence from Spanish fluorite mining," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    16. Patrick Schulte & Heinz Welsch & Sascha Rexhäuser, 2016. "ICT and the Demand for Energy: Evidence from OECD Countries," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(1), pages 119-146, January.
    17. Kurt Kratena & Michael Wüger, 2005. "Energieszenarien für Österreich bis 2020," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 25657, April.
    18. Sarba Priya Ray, 2011. "Economic Efficiency in Indian Rubber Industry," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 5(4), December.
    19. H. Kim, 1999. "Economic Capacity Utilization and its Determinants: Theory and Evidence," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 15(4), pages 321-339, December.
    20. Xosé Antón Rodríguez González, 1995. "Una propuesta metodológica para medir la productividad global," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 4, pages 95-113, Diciembre.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1990_num_231_1_5440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.