IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mfa/journl/v28y2020i1p65-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global and Local Commodity Prices: A Further Look at the Indonesian Agricultural Commodities

Author

Listed:
  • Pradita Nareswari

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia)

  • Sigit S. Wibowo

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia)

Abstract

Research Question: This paper examines whether global commodity futures prices can be used to enrich the prediction of local commodity spot prices in the absence of local commodity futures prices information. Motivation: Our objective is to investigate whether global prices can be used as a reference if commodity futures prices are unavailable or limited. Indonesia as a producer for several major commodities only has a small number of trades in the commodity futures exchanges which is not sufficient yet to create market liquidity in the local futures market or price reference for local spot trading. Idea: This research proposes the use of global commodity prices to improve the prediction of local commodity prices where the local futures prices are limited or not available. Data: This research employs daily spot prices for CPO (crude palm oil), TSR (technically specified rubber), and cacao, which are obtained from Indonesia Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (BAPPEBTI) from 2005 to 2017. Global commodity price will use daily commodity futures prices for the same commodity obtained from Thomson Reuters Eikon database. Method/Tools: We conduct the cointegration and non-linear causality tests between Indonesia local commodity spot prices and global commodity futures prices using bi-variate VAR/VECM methodology. Findings: The results show that using Indonesian commodity prices, local commodity spot prices and global commodity futures prices are cointegrated and have bi-directional causality, which contains important information about commodity pricing. Therefore, global commodity futures prices could be used as a reference when local commodity futures prices information is less reliable. Our results also imply that the relationship between local and global commodity markets is efficient, which can be beneficial for market participants to lower the cost for information search. Contribution: This paper expands existing finance literature mainly in emerging economies, particularly for commodity markets where the price information is unavailable or limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Pradita Nareswari & Sigit S. Wibowo, 2020. "Global and Local Commodity Prices: A Further Look at the Indonesian Agricultural Commodities," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 28(1), pages 65-76.
    • Handle: RePEc:mfa:journl:v:28:y:2020:i:1:p:65-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mfa.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/v28_i1_a4_pg65-76.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cup:cbooks:9781107034662 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Erik Hjalmarsson & Pär Österholm, 2010. "Testing for cointegration using the Johansen methodology when variables are near-integrated: size distortions and partial remedies," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 51-76, August.
    3. Brian M. Dillon & Christopher B. Barrett, 2016. "Global Oil Prices and Local Food Prices: Evidence from East Africa," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(1), pages 154-171.
    4. Eduardo Schwartz & James E. Smith, 2000. "Short-Term Variations and Long-Term Dynamics in Commodity Prices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(7), pages 893-911, July.
    5. Brooks,Chris, 2014. "Introductory Econometrics for Finance," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107661455, December.
    6. William J. Crowder & Anas Hamed, 1993. "A cointegration test for oil futures market efficiency," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(8), pages 933-941, December.
    7. Arnade, Carlos & Cooke, Bryce & Gale, Fred, 2017. "Agricultural price transmission: China relationships with world commodity markets," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 28-40.
    8. Bekiros, Stelios D. & Diks, Cees G.H., 2008. "The relationship between crude oil spot and futures prices: Cointegration, linear and nonlinear causality," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 2673-2685, September.
    9. Imad A. Moosa, 2002. "Price Discovery and Risk Transfer in the Crude Oil Futures Market: Some Structural Time Series Evidence," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 31(1), pages 155-165, February.
    10. Nicolau, Mihaela & Palomba, Giulio, 2015. "Dynamic relationships between spot and futures prices. The case of energy and gold commodities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 130-143.
    11. Lin Sun & Mingxian Qi & Michael R. Reed, 2018. "The effects of soybean trade policies on domestic soybean market in China during the food crisis," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(3), pages 372-385, July.
    12. Hakkio, Craig S. & Rush, Mark, 1989. "Market efficiency and cointegration: an application to the sterling and deutschemark exchange markets," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 75-88, March.
    13. Abdur R. Chowdhury, 1991. "Futures market efficiency: Evidence from cointegration tests," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(5), pages 577-589, October.
    14. Garbade, Kenneth D & Silber, William L, 1983. "Price Movements and Price Discovery in Futures and Cash Markets," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 65(2), pages 289-297, May.
    15. Dimpfl, Thomas & Flad, Michael & Jung, Robert C., 2017. "Price discovery in agricultural commodity markets in the presence of futures speculation," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 50-62.
    16. Param Silvapulle & Imad A. Moosa, 1999. "The relationship between spot and futures prices: Evidence from the crude oil market," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(2), pages 175-193, April.
    17. Gary B. Gorton & Fumio Hayashi & K. Geert Rouwenhorst, 2013. "The Fundamentals of Commodity Futures Returns," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 17(1), pages 35-105.
    18. Mundlak, Yair & Larson, Donald F, 1992. "On the Transmission of World Agricultural Prices," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 6(3), pages 399-422, September.
    19. Miao Li & Tao Xiong, 2019. "Do Bubbles Alter Contributions to Price Discovery? Evidence from the Chinese Soybean Futures and Spot Markets," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(15), pages 3417-3432, December.
    20. Kawaller, Ira G & Koch, Paul D & Koch, Timothy W, 1987. "The Temporal Price Relationship between S&P 500 Futures and the S and P 500 Index," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 42(5), pages 1309-1329, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jena, Sangram Keshari & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Hammoudeh, Shawkat & Roubaud, David, 2019. "Distributional predictability between commodity spot and futures: Evidence from nonparametric causality-in-quantiles tests," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 615-628.
    2. Salman Sarwat & Muhammad Kashif & Muhammad Aqil & Farhan Ahmed, 2019. "Determination of Causality in Prices of Crude Oil," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(4), pages 298-304.
    3. Raushan Kumar, 2017. "Price Discovery in Some Primary Commodity Markets in India," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(3), pages 1817-1829.
    4. Pradhan, Rudra P. & Hall, John H. & du Toit, Elda, 2021. "The lead–lag relationship between spot and futures prices: Empirical evidence from the Indian commodity market," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Chen, Pei-Fen & Lee, Chien-Chiang & Zeng, Jhih-Hong, 2014. "The relationship between spot and futures oil prices: Do structural breaks matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 206-217.
    6. Scott, Ayesha & Schoen, Tilman & Fernandez-Perez, Adrian, 2020. "The Predictive Power of NZX Dairy Futures," 2020 Conference (64th), February 12-14, 2020, Perth, Western Australia 305230, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    7. Cagli, Efe Caglar & Taskin, Dilvin & Evrim Mandaci, Pınar, 2019. "The short- and long-run efficiency of energy, precious metals, and base metals markets: Evidence from the exponential smooth transition autoregressive models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Carlotta Penone & Elisa Giampietri & Samuele Trestini, 2022. "Futures–spot price transmission in EU corn markets," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(3), pages 679-709, July.
    9. Guglielmo Maria Caporale & Davide Ciferri & Alessandro Girardi, 2014. "Time-Varying Spot and Futures Oil Price Dynamics," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 61(1), pages 78-97, February.
    10. Joseph, Anto & Sisodia, Garima & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar, 2014. "A frequency domain causality investigation between futures and spot prices of Indian commodity markets," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 250-258.
    11. Kao, Chung-Wei & Wan, Jer-Yuh, 2009. "Information transmission and market interactions across the Atlantic -- an empirical study on the natural gas market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 152-161, January.
    12. Guo, Yaoqi & Yao, Shanshan & Cheng, Hui & Zhu, Wensong, 2020. "China's copper futures market efficiency analysis: Based on nonlinear Granger causality and multifractal methods," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Chang, Kuang-Liang & Lee, Chingnun, 2020. "The asymmetric spillover effect of the Markov switching mechanism from the futures market to the spot market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 374-388.
    14. Zhuo Chen & Bo Yan, 2022. "The impact of trade policy on soybean futures in China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(4), pages 1152-1163, June.
    15. Arfaoui, Mongi, 2018. "On the spot-futures relationship in crude-refined petroleum prices: New evidence from an ARDL bounds testing approach," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 48-58.
    16. Nidhi Choudhary & Girish K. Nair & Harsh Purohit, 2015. "Volatility In Copper Prices In India," Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(02), pages 1-26, December.
    17. Asche, Frank & Misund, Bard & Oglend, Atle, 2015. "The Spot-Forward Relationship in the Atlantic Salmon Market," UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2015/16, University of Stavanger.
    18. Xu Xiaojie, 2018. "Linear and Nonlinear Causality between Corn Cash and Futures Prices," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Xiaojie Xu, 2018. "Intraday price information flows between the CSI300 and futures market: an application of wavelet analysis," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 1267-1295, May.
    20. Balcilar, Mehmet & Gungor, Hasan & Hammoudeh, Shawkat, 2015. "The time-varying causality between spot and futures crude oil prices: A regime switching approach," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 51-71.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Commodity price; cointegration; causality; Jakarta Future Exchange;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • Q02 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Commodity Market

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mfa:journl:v:28:y:2020:i:1:p:65-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Capital Market Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.