IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/hcarem/v25y2022i4d10.1007_s10729-022-09607-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Country versus pharmaceutical company interests for hepatitis C treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Roy Lothan

    (Tel Aviv University)

  • Noa Gutman

    (Tel Aviv University)

  • Dan Yamin

    (Tel Aviv University)

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is one of the leading causes of liver disease and is responsible for massive health and economic burden worldwide. The disease is asymptomatic in its early stages, but it can progress over time to fatal end-stage liver disease. Thus, the majority of individuals infected with HCV are unaware of their chronic condition. Recent treatment options for HCV can completely cure the infection but are costly. We developed a game model between a pharmaceutical company (PC) and a country striving to maximize its citizens' utility. First, the PC determines the price of HCV treatment; then, the country responds with corresponding screening and treatment strategies. We employed an analytical framework to calculate the utility of the players for each selected strategy. Calibrated to detailed HCV data from Israel, we found that the PC will gain higher revenue by offering a quantity discount rather than using standard fixed pricing per treatment, by indirectly forcing the country to conduct more screening than it desired. By contrast, risk-sharing agreements, in which the country pays only for successful treatments are beneficial for the country. Our findings underscore that policy makers worldwide should prudently consider recent offers by PCs to increase screening either directly, via covering HCV screening, or indirectly, by providing discounts following a predetermined volume of sales. More broadly, our approach is applicable in other healthcare settings where screening is essential to determine treatment strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Roy Lothan & Noa Gutman & Dan Yamin, 2022. "Country versus pharmaceutical company interests for hepatitis C treatment," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 725-749, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:25:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10729-022-09607-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10729-022-09607-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10729-022-09607-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10729-022-09607-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pedro Pita Barros, 2011. "The simple economics of risk‐sharing agreements between the NHS and the pharmaceutical industry," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 461-470, April.
    2. Swathi Iyengar & Kiu Tay-Teo & Sabine Vogler & Peter Beyer & Stefan Wiktor & Kees de Joncheere & Suzanne Hill, 2016. "Prices, Costs, and Affordability of New Medicines for Hepatitis C in 30 Countries: An Economic Analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Shan Liu & Michaël Schwarzinger & Fabrice Carrat & Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert, 2011. "Cost Effectiveness of Fibrosis Assessment Prior to Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis C Patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(12), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Stephen E. Chick & Sameer Hasija & Javad Nasiry, 2017. "Information Elicitation and Influenza Vaccine Production," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 75-96, February.
    5. Lauren E Cipriano & Gregory S Zaric & Mark Holodniy & Eran Bendavid & Douglas K Owens & Margaret L Brandeau, 2012. "Cost Effectiveness of Screening Strategies for Early Identification of HIV and HCV Infection in Injection Drug Users," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Shan Liu & Margaret L. Brandeau & Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert, 2017. "Optimizing patient treatment decisions in an era of rapid technological advances: the case of hepatitis C treatment," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 16-32, March.
    7. Edward H. Kaplan, 1995. "Probability Models of Needle Exchange," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 558-569, August.
    8. J.Robert Beck & Stephen G. Pauker, 1983. "The Markov Process in Medical Prognosis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 3(4), pages 419-458, December.
    9. Charles A. Holt & Susan K. Laury, 2002. "Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(5), pages 1644-1655, December.
    10. Stephen E. Chick & Sameer Hasija & Javad Nasiry, 2017. "Information Elicitation and Influenza Vaccine Production," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 75-96, February.
    11. Drew Fudenberg & David Levine, 2008. "Subgame–Perfect Equilibria of Finite– and Infinite–Horizon Games," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Drew Fudenberg & David K Levine (ed.), A Long-Run Collaboration On Long-Run Games, chapter 1, pages 3-20, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    12. Elodie Adida, 2021. "Outcome-Based Pricing for New Pharmaceuticals via Rebates," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 892-913, February.
    13. Gregory J. Critchley & Gregory S. Zaric, 2019. "The impact of pharmaceutical marketing on market access, treatment coverage, pricing, and social welfare," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(8), pages 1035-1051, August.
    14. Arieh Gavious & Dan Greenberg & Ariel Hammerman & Ella Segev, 2014. "Impact of a financial risk-sharing scheme on budget-impact estimations: a game-theoretic approach," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(5), pages 553-561, June.
    15. Trevor Jozef Piatkiewicz & Janine Marie Traulsen & Tove Holm-Larsen, 2018. "Risk-Sharing Agreements in the EU: A Systematic Review of Major Trends," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 109-123, June.
    16. Ramani, Shyama V. & Urias, Eduardo, 2015. "Access to critical medicines: When are compulsory licenses effective in price negotiations?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 75-83.
    17. Stephen E. Chick & Hamed Mamani & David Simchi-Levi, 2008. "Supply Chain Coordination and Influenza Vaccination," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 1493-1506, December.
    18. Osman Y. Özaltın & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Andrew J. Schaefer, 2018. "Optimal Design of the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine with Manufacturing Autonomy," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 371-387, May.
    19. Harris, Christopher J, 1985. "Existence and Characterization of Perfect Equilibrium in Games of Perfect Information," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(3), pages 613-628, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Qi & Zhao, Qiuhong & Lev, Benjamin, 2022. "Influenza vaccine supply chain coordination under uncertain supply and demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 930-948.
    2. Guo, Feiyu & Cao, Erbao, 2021. "Can reference points explain vaccine hesitancy? A new perspective on their formation and updating," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Westerink-Duijzer, L.E. & Schlicher, L.P.J. & Musegaas, M., 2019. "Fair allocations for cooperation problems in vaccination," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2019-06, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    4. Lotty E. Westerink‐Duijzer & Loe P. J. Schlicher & Marieke Musegaas, 2020. "Core Allocations for Cooperation Problems in Vaccination," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1720-1737, July.
    5. Muckstadt, John A. & Klein, Michael G. & Jackson, Peter L. & Gougelet, Robert M. & Hupert, Nathaniel, 2023. "Efficient and effective large-scale vaccine distribution," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    6. Alexandar Angelus & Özalp Özer, 2022. "On the large‐scale production of a new vaccine," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 3043-3060, July.
    7. Xie, Lei & Hou, Pengwen & Han, Hongshuai, 2021. "Implications of government subsidy on the vaccine product R&D when the buyer is risk averse," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    8. Duijzer, Lotty Evertje & van Jaarsveld, Willem & Dekker, Rommert, 2018. "Literature review: The vaccine supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 174-192.
    9. Choudhury, Nishat Alam & Ramkumar, M. & Schoenherr, Tobias & Singh, Shalabh, 2023. "The role of operations and supply chain management during epidemics and pandemics: Potential and future research opportunities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    10. Feiyu Guo & Erbao Cao, 2020. "Does Reference Dependence Impact Intervention Mechanisms in Vaccine Markets?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    11. Tinglong Dai & Jing-Sheng Song, 2021. "Transforming COVID-19 vaccines into vaccination," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 455-459, September.
    12. Lin, Qi & Zhao, Qiuhong & Lev, Benjamin, 2020. "Cold chain transportation decision in the vaccine supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 182-195.
    13. Ho‐Yin Mak & Tinglong Dai & Christopher S. Tang, 2022. "Managing two‐dose COVID‐19 vaccine rollouts with limited supply: Operations strategies for distributing time‐sensitive resources," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4424-4442, December.
    14. Wettstein, Dominik J. & Boes, Stefan, 2022. "How value-based policy interventions influence price negotiations for new medicines: An experimental approach and initial evidence," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 112-121.
    15. Hui Zhang & Tao Huang & Tao Yan, 2022. "A quantitative analysis of risk-sharing agreements with patient support programs for improving medication adherence," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 253-274, June.
    16. Alós-Ferrer, Carlos & Ritzberger, Klaus, 2017. "Does backwards induction imply subgame perfection?," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 19-29.
    17. Shuli Brammli-Greenberg & Ira Yaari & Elad Daniels & Ariella Adijes-Toren, 2021. "How Managed Entry Agreements can improve allocation in the public health system: a mechanism design approach," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(5), pages 699-709, July.
    18. Echenique, Federico, 2004. "Extensive-form games and strategic complementarities," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 348-364, February.
    19. Francesco Caruso & Maria Carmela Ceparano & Jacqueline Morgan, 2022. "Asymptotic Behavior of Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibria in Stackelberg Games," CSEF Working Papers 661, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    20. Wei He & Yeneng Sun, 2015. "Dynamic Games with Almost Perfect Information," Papers 1503.08900, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:25:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10729-022-09607-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.