IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ijb/journl/v18y2019i1p97-119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Affecting Political Marketing in Rural and Urban Bangladesh: A Multi-Dimensional Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Tamgid Ahmed Chowdhury

    (Department of Marketing and International Business, School of Business and Economics, North South University, Bangladesh)

  • Shahneela Naheed

    (Department of Marketing and International Business, School of Business and Economics, North South University, Bangladesh)

Abstract

This study argues that applying political marketing models of developed countries on developing nations is not realistic, and thus its main purpose is to offer separate multidimensional political marketing mix models for rural and urban Bangladesh in order to find differences in voters’ priorities. We use the Structural Equation Modeling approach to develop and validate the models, based on 1284 and 1372 primary data observations collected from rural and urban electoral , respectively. This paper offers one 39-item eight-dimensional political mix model and another 39-item eleven-dimensional political mix model for rural and urban areas, respectively, presenting 24 common and 30 uncommon variables between the models. Both groups show importance towards using celebrities, national icons, and national leaders in campaigns as well as modesty and articulation power of the candidates. As the proposed model development method is highly significant and valid, the applicability of the instrument can be tested in other developing countries. This study recommends nominating local candidates with strong political background and candidates with a better social image, using party leaders (preferably party chair), utilizing posters, postal mails, and billboards to showcase achievements, and building up a sophisticated voter information system to identify the requirements of the electorates .

Suggested Citation

  • Tamgid Ahmed Chowdhury & Shahneela Naheed, 2019. "Factors Affecting Political Marketing in Rural and Urban Bangladesh: A Multi-Dimensional Approach," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 18(1), pages 97-119, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ijb:journl:v:18:y:2019:i:1:p:97-119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijbe.fcu.edu.tw/assets/ijbe/past_issue/No.18-1/pdf/vol_18-1-6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ijbe.fcu.edu.tw/assets/ijbe/past_issue/No.18-1/abstract/06.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nitin Patwa & Christopher Abraham & Alison D¡¦Cruz, 2018. "The Brand Inside: Fulfilling the Needs of the New Employee Generation to Create Brand Advocates," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 17(2), pages 143-162, September.
    2. Heather Savigny & Mick Temple, 2010. "Political Marketing Models: The Curious Incident of the Dog that Doesn't Bark," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58, pages 1049-1064, December.
    3. Gerber, Alan S. & Gimpel, James G. & Green, Donald P. & Shaw, Daron R., 2011. "How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 105(1), pages 135-150, February.
    4. Brett R. Gordon & Wesley R. Hartmann, 2013. "Advertising Effects in Presidential Elections," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 19-35, June.
    5. Ryo Takashima, 2007. "The Impact of Trade and Factor Flows on Domestic Taxation," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 6(1), pages 47-62, April.
    6. Heather Savigny & Mick Temple, 2010. "Political Marketing Models: The Curious Incident of the Dog that Doesn't Bark," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(5), pages 1049-1064, December.
    7. Stokes, Susan C., 2005. "Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 99(3), pages 315-325, August.
    8. Amresh Kumar & S. L. Gupta & Nawal Kishore, 2014. "Measuring Retailer Store Image: A Scale Development Study," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 13(1), pages 25-38, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Danie Ferreira, 2023. "Marketing Political Parties: Political Branding Elements and Voters' Preference: A Hypothesised Model ," GATR Journals jmmr320, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brett Gordon & Mitchell Lovett & Ron Shachar & Kevin Arceneaux & Sridhar Moorthy & Michael Peress & Akshay Rao & Subrata Sen & David Soberman & Oleg Urminsky, 2012. "Marketing and politics: Models, behavior, and policy implications," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 391-403, June.
    2. Horacio A Larreguy & John Marshall & James M SnyderJr, 2018. "Leveling the playing field: How campaign advertising can help non-dominant parties," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 16(6), pages 1812-1849.
    3. Pinar Yildirim & Andrei Simonov & Maria Petrova & Ricardo Perez-Truglia, 2020. "Are Political and Charitable Giving Substitutes? Evidence from the United States," NBER Working Papers 26616, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Brett R. Gordon & Wesley R. Hartmann, 2016. "Advertising competition in presidential elections," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-40, March.
    5. Sarah Moshary, 2020. "Price discrimination in political advertising: Evidence from the 2012 presidential election," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 51(3), pages 615-649, September.
    6. Dr. Veronica N. Ndubuisi, 2023. "Political Marketing: A Third Force in Political Campaign," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(9), pages 444-455, September.
    7. Wilson Law, 2021. "Decomposing political advertising effects on vote choices," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 188(3), pages 525-547, September.
    8. Avidit Acharya & Takuo Sugaya & Eray Turkel, 2022. "Electoral Campaigns as Dynamic Contests," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0293, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    9. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow, 2017. "Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election," NBER Working Papers 23089, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Mitchell J. Lovett, 2019. "Empirical Research on Political Marketing: a Selected Review," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 6(3), pages 49-56, December.
    11. Winchester, Tiffany M. & Hall, John & Binney, Wayne, 2014. "Young adult voting decision-making: Studying the effect of usage from a consumer behaviour perspective," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 144-154.
    12. Juan Pablo Atal & José Ignacio Cuesta & Felipe González & Cristóbal Otero, 2024. "The Economics of the Public Option: Evidence from Local Pharmaceutical Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(3), pages 615-644, March.
    13. Lehmann, M. Christian & Matarazzo, Hellen, 2019. "Voters’ response to in-kind transfers: Quasi-experimental evidence from prescription drug cost-sharing in Brazil," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    14. Gustavo J. Bobonis & Paul J. Gertler & Marco Gonzalez-Navarro & Simeon Nichter, 2022. "Vulnerability and Clientelism," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(11), pages 3627-3659, November.
    15. Ardanaz, Martín & Leiras, Marcelo & Tommasi, Mariano, 2012. "The Politics of Federalism in Argentina: Implications for Governance and Accountability," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 3977, Inter-American Development Bank.
    16. Bardhan, Pranab, 2022. "Clientelism and governance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    17. Ritwik Banerjee & Nabanita Datta Gupta, 2015. "Awareness Programs and Change in Taste-Based Caste Prejudice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Nicole M. Mason & Thomas S. Jayne & Nicolas van de Walle, 2017. "The Political Economy of Fertilizer Subsidy Programs in Africa: Evidence from Zambia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(3), pages 705-731.
    19. Julia Cage & Edgard Dewitte, 2021. "It Takes Money to Make MPs: Evidence from 150 Years of British Campaign Spending," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03384143, HAL.
    20. Robert Akerlof & Hongyi Li & Jonathan Yeo, 2022. "Ruling the Roost: The Vicious Circle and the Emergence of Pecking Order," Discussion Papers 2023-03, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    political marketing; marketing mix; multi-dimensional model; developing countries; Bangladesh;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M38 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • M39 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ijb:journl:v:18:y:2019:i:1:p:97-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Szu-Hsien Ho (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbfcutw.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.