IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i7p657-d73800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Sustainability of Community-Based Long-Term Care Programmes: A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Baoan Song

    (School of Philosophy and Society, Jilin University, Chang Chun 130012, China)

  • Qiyu Sun

    (School of Philosophy and Society, Jilin University, Chang Chun 130012, China
    School of Social Work, University of Michigan, 1080 S. University, Room B660, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1106, USA)

  • Ying Li

    (School of Social Work, University of Michigan, 1080 S. University, Room B660, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1106, USA)

  • Chuanqi Que

    (School of Philosophy and Society, Jilin University, Chang Chun 130012, China)

Abstract

Sustainability is a crucial factor in Long-Term Care (LTC) programmes, which implies whether the programmes have the capability of sustaining a quality service over the long term. To evaluate the sustainability of community-based LTC programmes, a novel hybrid framework has been demonstrated with a mixed Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) technique. According to extensive literature review and the fuzzy Delphi method, four pillars of initial criteria and twelve sub-criteria have been determined. Then a weighted hierarchy has been constructed with Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to constitute the evaluation index system. In order to prove our framework, a case study of four community-based LTC programmes in Michigan is presented by applying the fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. The results indicate that programme P2 has the best potential of sustainability, and sub-criteria associated with economy outweigh other sub-criteria. The sensitivity analysis verifies that the result of the ranking remains stable regardless of the fluctuation in sub-criteria weights, which proves the evaluation results and proposed model to be accurate and effective. This study develops a comprehensive and effective framework for evaluating community-based LTC programmes from the sustainability perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Baoan Song & Qiyu Sun & Ying Li & Chuanqi Que, 2016. "Evaluating the Sustainability of Community-Based Long-Term Care Programmes: A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:7:p:657-:d:73800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/7/657/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/7/657/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pi-Fang Hsu & Mei-Ghing Hsu, 2008. "Optimizing the Information Outsourcing Practices of Primary Care Medical Organizations Using Entropy and TOPSIS," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 181-201, April.
    2. Pluye, Pierre & Potvin, Louise & Denis, Jean-Louis, 2004. "Making public health programs last: conceptualizing sustainability," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 121-133, May.
    3. Huiru Zhao & Nana Li, 2016. "Performance Evaluation for Sustainability of Strong Smart Grid by Using Stochastic AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Scheirer, M.A. & Dearing, J.W., 2011. "An agenda for research on the sustainability of Public Health Programs," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(11), pages 2059-2067.
    5. Jan Dijk, 1986. "Methods in applied social research: special characteristics and quality standards," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 357-370, December.
    6. Norman Dalkey & Olaf Helmer, 1963. "An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 458-467, April.
    7. Chan, Felix T.S. & Kumar, Niraj, 2007. "Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 417-431, August.
    8. Cengiz Kahraman, 2008. "Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods and Fuzzy Sets," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Cengiz Kahraman (ed.), Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making, pages 1-18, Springer.
    9. Rakesh Verma & Saroj Koul & Kannan Govindan, 2009. "Vendor selection and uncertainty," International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 333-345.
    10. Johnson, Knowlton & Hays, Carol & Center, Hayden & Daley, Charlotte, 2004. "Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: a sustainability planning model," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 135-149, May.
    11. de Belvis, Antonio Giulio & Ferrè, Francesca & Specchia, Maria Lucia & Valerio, Luca & Fattore, Giovanni & Ricciardi, Walter, 2012. "The financial crisis in Italy: Implications for the healthcare sector," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 10-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Doorga, Jay R.S. & Rughooputh, Soonil D.D.V. & Boojhawon, Ravindra, 2019. "Multi-criteria GIS-based modelling technique for identifying potential solar farm sites: A case study in Mauritius," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1201-1219.
    2. Chia-Nan Wang & Chao-Fen Pan & Hoang-Phu Nguyen & Pei-Chun Fang, 2023. "Integrating Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Methods to Evaluate Operation Efficiency of Daycare Centers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Xiaocang Xu & Linhong Chen, 2019. "Projection of Long-Term Care Costs in China, 2020–2050: Based on the Bayesian Quantile Regression Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Ta-Ching Liang & Szu-Hsien Peng, 2017. "Using Analytic Hierarchy Process to Examine the Success Factors of Autonomous Landscape Development in Rural Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Keun-Sik Park & Young-Joon Seo & A-Rom Kim & Min-Ho Ha, 2018. "Ship Acquisition of Shipping Companies by Sale & Purchase Activities for Sustainable Growth: Exploratory Fuzzy-AHP Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, May.
    6. Osman, Ibrahim H. & Zablith, Fouad, 2021. "Re-evaluating electronic government development index to monitor the transformation toward achieving sustainable development goals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 426-440.
    7. Giacomo Di Ruocco & Antonio Nesticò, 2018. "Archaeological Site Conservation and Enhancement: An Economic Evaluation Model for the Selection of Investment Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Douglas S. Gardner & Jacob M. Marszalek, 2014. "Does the Sustainability of Comprehensive Intervention Programs Depend on Parent Involvement?," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(3), pages 21582440145, August.
    2. Alfonso, Moya L. & Nickelson, Jen & Hogeboom, David L. & French, Jennifer & Bryant, Carol A. & McDermott, Robert J. & Baldwin, Julie A., 2008. "Assessing local capacity for health intervention," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 145-159, May.
    3. Riki Savaya & Gerald Elsworth & Patricia Rogers, 2009. "Projected Sustainability of Innovative Social Programs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 33(2), pages 189-205, April.
    4. Sridharan, Sanjeev & Go, Sodam & Zinzow, Heidi & Gray, Aracelis & Gutierrez Barrett, Melissa, 2007. "Analysis of strategic plans to assess planning for sustainability of comprehensive community initiatives," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 105-113, February.
    5. Swati Goyal & Shivi Agarwal & Narinderjit Singh Sawaran Singh & Trilok Mathur & Nirbhay Mathur, 2022. "Analysis of Hybrid MCDM Methods for the Performance Assessment and Ranking Public Transport Sector: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Chao, Ching-Cheng & Kao, Ko-Ting, 2015. "Selection of strategic cargo alliance by airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 29-36.
    7. Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Cristian Eugen Luchian & Iuliana Luchian, 2018. "Community Based Programs Sustainability. A Multidimensional Analysis of Sustainability Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Johnson, K.W. & Grube, J.W. & Ogilvie, K.A. & Collins, D. & Courser, M. & Dirks, L.G. & Ogilvie, D. & Driscoll, D., 2012. "A community prevention model to prevent children from inhaling and ingesting harmful legal products," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 113-123.
    9. Chin-Tsai Lin & Pin-Ju Juan, 2010. "Measuring location selection factors for international resort parks," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1257-1270, October.
    10. Mooss, Angela & Hartman, Megan & Ibañez, Gladys, 2015. "Manual development: A strategy for identifying core components of integrated health programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 57-64.
    11. Scheirer, Mary Ann & Hartling, Gretchen & Hagerman, Diane, 2008. "Defining sustainability outcomes of health programs: Illustrations from an on-line survey," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 335-346, November.
    12. Dong, Qingxing & Cooper, Orrin, 2016. "An orders-of-magnitude AHP supply chain risk assessment framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 144-156.
    13. Williams, Randi M. & Zhang, Jing & Woodard, Nathaniel & Slade, Jimmie & Santos, Sherie Lou Zara & Knott, Cheryl L., 2020. "Development and validation of an instrument to assess institutionalization of health promotion in faith-based organizations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Marcus V. C. Fagundes & Bernd Hellingrath & Francisco G. M. Freires, 2021. "Supplier Selection Risk: A New Computer-Based Decision-Making System with Fuzzy Extended AHP," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Najafizada, Said Ahmad Maisam & Labonté, Ronald & Bourgeault, Ivy Lynn, 2017. "Stakeholder’s perspective: Sustainability of a community health worker program in Afghanistan," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 123-129.
    16. Madon, Shirin & Malecela, Mwele Ntuli & Mashoto, Kijakazi & Donohue, Rose & Mubyazi, Godfrey & Michael, Edwin, 2018. "The role of community participation for sustainable integrated neglected tropical diseases and water, sanitation and hygiene intervention programs: A pilot project in Tanzania," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 28-37.
    17. Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu, 2019. "Community-Based Healthcare Programs Sustainability Impact on the Sustainability of Host Organizations: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Bennett, Sara & Ozawa, Sachiko & Rodriguez, Daniela & Paul, Amy & Singh, Kriti & Singh, Suneeta, 2015. "Monitoring and evaluating transition and sustainability of donor-funded programs: Reflections on the Avahan experience," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 148-158.
    19. Johnson, Knowlton & Collins, David & Wandersman, Abraham, 2023. "Developing a sustainability readiness strategy for health systems: Toolkit, interactive tools, and virtual support system," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    20. Sridharan, Sanjeev & Nakaima, April, 2011. "Ten steps to making evaluation matter," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 135-146, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:7:p:657-:d:73800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.