IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3279-d1375783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Degree of Sustainability in Extractive Reserves in the Amazon Biome Using the Fuzzy Logic Tool for Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Raimundo Valdan Pereira Lopes

    (Institute of Nature and Culture, Federal University of Amazonas, Benjamin Constant 69630-000, Brazil
    Postgraduate Programme in Society, Technology, and the Environment, Evangelical University of Goiás, Anápolis 75083-515, Brazil)

  • Francisco Leonardo Tejerina-Garro

    (Postgraduate Programme in Society, Technology, and the Environment, Evangelical University of Goiás, Anápolis 75083-515, Brazil
    Postgraduate Programme in Environmental Sciences and Health, Pontifical Catholic University of Goiás, Goiânia 74605-010, Brazil)

  • Jandecy Cabral Leite

    (Postgraduate Programme in Engineering, Processes, Systems and Environmental Management, Galileo Institute of Technology and Education in Amazonia, Manaus 69020-030, Brazil)

  • Manoel Henrique Reis Nascimento

    (Postgraduate Programme in Engineering, Processes, Systems and Environmental Management, Galileo Institute of Technology and Education in Amazonia, Manaus 69020-030, Brazil)

  • Aline Santos do Nascimento

    (Postgraduate Programme in Engineering, Processes, Systems and Environmental Management, Galileo Institute of Technology and Education in Amazonia, Manaus 69020-030, Brazil)

Abstract

The Extractive Reserve (RESEX) was designed to protect rubber tapping communities and their livelihoods, thus guaranteeing environmental health. This study was carried out between 2021 and 2023 and aimed to propose a methodology based on the fuzzy logic method to assess the degree of sustainability in RESEXs in the state of Amazonas, Brazil. For this assessment, 10 indicators were used, represented through input variables in the fuzzy inference systems represented by the Environmental Subsystem (ES), Economic Subsystem (ECS), Social Subsystem (SS), and Institutional Subsystem (IS), with performances that converged so that the Sustainability System in the RESEX (SRE) system reached a performance value of 30.0, on a scale of 0 to 100, which translates into low sustainability in these spaces in the state of Amazonas. The methodology’s ability to represent the main phenomena that impact sustainability in the RESEX studied through linguistic variables and weight them in their complexities, as well as inferring a set of decision rules that reflect the knowledge of experts and which aim to quantitatively contextualise sustainability under uncertainty and imprecision in these areas, makes it a viable instrument to be applied and used by managers and decision-makers in the management of these spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Raimundo Valdan Pereira Lopes & Francisco Leonardo Tejerina-Garro & Jandecy Cabral Leite & Manoel Henrique Reis Nascimento & Aline Santos do Nascimento, 2024. "Assessing the Degree of Sustainability in Extractive Reserves in the Amazon Biome Using the Fuzzy Logic Tool for Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3279-:d:1375783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3279/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3279/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arraes, Ronaldo de Albuquerque e & Mariano, Francisca Zilania & Simonassi, Andrei Gomes, 2012. "Causas do Desmatamento no Brasil e seu Ordenamento no Contexto Mundial," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 50(1), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Andriantiatsaholiniaina, Luc A. & Kouikoglou, Vassilis S. & Phillis, Yannis A., 2004. "Evaluating strategies for sustainable development: fuzzy logic reasoning and sensitivity analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 149-172, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tonnang, Henri E.Z. & Hervé, Bisseleua D.B. & Biber-Freudenberger, Lisa & Salifu, Daisy & Subramanian, Sevgan & Ngowi, Valentine B. & Guimapi, Ritter Y.A. & Anani, Bruce & Kakmeni, Francois M.M. & Aff, 2017. "Advances in crop insect modelling methods—Towards a whole system approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 354(C), pages 88-103.
    2. Todorov, Vladislav & Marinova, Dora, 2011. "Modelling sustainability," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 81(7), pages 1397-1408.
    3. Tsoutsos, Theocharis & Drandaki, Maria & Frantzeskaki, Niki & Iosifidis, Eleftherios & Kiosses, Ioannis, 2009. "Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1587-1600, May.
    4. Низамутдинов М.М. & Орешников В.В., 2016. "Определение Параметров Управления Региональным Развитием На Основе Алгоритмов Нечеткой Логики," Журнал Экономика и математические методы (ЭММ), Центральный Экономико-Математический Институт (ЦЭМИ), vol. 52(2), pages 30-39, апрель.
    5. Carlo Alberto Magni & Stefano Malagoli & Andrea Marchioni & Giovanni Mastroleo, 2020. "Rating firms and sensitivity analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(12), pages 1940-1958, December.
    6. M. A. Quaddus & M. A.B. Siddique (ed.), 2013. "Handbook of Sustainable Development Planning," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14372.
    7. Mattia Amadio & Jaroslav Mysiak & Sepehr Marzi, 2019. "Mapping Socioeconomic Exposure for Flood Risk Assessment in Italy," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(4), pages 829-845, April.
    8. Vassilis S. Kouikoglou & Yannis A. Phillis, 2011. "Application of a fuzzy hierarchical model to the assessment of corporate social and environmental sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 209-219, July.
    9. Ghada A. Altarawneh & Ahmad B. Hassanat & Ahmad S. Tarawneh & David Carfì & Abdullah Almuhaimeed, 2022. "Fuzzy Win-Win: A Novel Approach to Quantify Win-Win Using Fuzzy Logic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Karabulut, Yağmur, 2017. "Energy project performance evaluation with sustainability perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 549-560.
    11. Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Larisa Ivascu & Attila Turi & Alin Artene & George Artur Găman, 2019. "Sustainable Development Model for the Automotive Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    12. Phillis, Yannis A. & Kouikoglou, Vassilis S., 2012. "System-of-Systems hierarchy of biodiversity conservation problems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 235, pages 36-48.
    13. Tafuro, Alessandra & Dammacco, Giuseppe & Esposito, Paolo & Mastroleo, Giovanni, 2022. "Rethinking performance measurement models using a fuzzy logic system approach: a performative exploration on ownership in waste management," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Wenfei Luan & Ling Lu & Xin Li & Chunfeng Ma, 2017. "Weight Determination of Sustainable Development Indicators Using a Global Sensitivity Analysis Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-13, February.
    15. Lixiao Hao & Vasilios I. Manousiouthakis, 2021. "Sustainability over sets and the business cycle," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(6), pages 1-26, June.
    16. Roberto Gerundo & Alessandra Marra & Viviana De Salvatore, 2020. "Construction of a Composite Vulnerability Index to Map Peripheralization Risk in Urban and Metropolitan Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, June.
    17. Phillis, Yannis A. & Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Kouikoglou, Vassilis S., 2011. "Sustainability ranking and improvement of countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 542-553, January.
    18. Bohong Zheng & Komi Bernard Bedra, 2018. "Recent Sustainability Performance in China: Strength-Weakness Analysis and Ranking of Provincial Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    19. Beynon, Malcolm J. & Munday, Max, 2008. "Considering the effects of imprecision and uncertainty in ecological footprint estimation: An approach in a fuzzy environment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 373-383, October.
    20. Tony Prato, 2015. "Conceptual Framework for Assessing the Sustainability of Forest Fuel Reduction Treatments and Their Adaptation to Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3279-:d:1375783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.