IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2110-d1044271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Game Strategy Study on Innovation Efficiency of China’s Listed Charging Pile Companies: Based on Generalized Fuzzy DEA Method

Author

Listed:
  • Shanwei Li

    (School of Science, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China)

  • Jingjie Li

    (School of Science, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China)

  • Junli Ding

    (School of Science, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China)

  • Mochen Sun

    (School of Science, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China)

  • Chenying Cui

    (School of Science, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China)

Abstract

As a necessary infrastructure for new energy vehicles (NEV), charging piles have become a hot topic of social concern. Studying the innovation efficiency of charging pile companies can help to solve the development dilemma of the charging pile industry. This paper uses the generalized fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA) method based on game theory to study 23 Chinese listed charging pile manufacturing companies’ innovation efficiency from 2019 to 2021. On this basis, 15 charging pile technological interrelatedness companies are joined to establish a new game environment and to discuss the possibility of charging pile product manufacturing companies shifting to a new business model led by value-added service provision. The results show that the innovation efficiency of each company is significantly improved in the cooperative state, while the opposite is true in the competitive state, so cooperation is the company’s priority choice. Charging pile product manufacturing companies are more inclined to cooperate with technologically interrelated companies. The business model dominated by value-added service provision is conducive to improving the level of industrial innovation. The competition will easily lead to the decline of their innovation efficiency. Hence, companies should carefully choose their competition strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Shanwei Li & Jingjie Li & Junli Ding & Mochen Sun & Chenying Cui, 2023. "A Game Strategy Study on Innovation Efficiency of China’s Listed Charging Pile Companies: Based on Generalized Fuzzy DEA Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2110-:d:1044271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2110/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2110/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wolfgang Keller, 2002. "Geographic Localization of International Technology Diffusion," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(1), pages 120-142, March.
    2. Frank M.H. Neffke & Martin Henning & Ron Boschma, 2012. "The impact of aging and technological relatedness on agglomeration externalities: a survival analysis," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 485-517, March.
    3. Siran Fang & Xiaoshan Xue & Ge Yin & Hong Fang & Jialin Li & Yongnian Zhang, 2020. "Evaluation and Improvement of Technological Innovation Efficiency of New Energy Vehicle Enterprises in China Based on DEA-Tobit Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Wolfgang Keller, 2004. "International Technology Diffusion," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 42(3), pages 752-782, September.
    5. Banker, Rajiv D., 1980. "A game theoretic approach to measuring efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 262-266, October.
    6. Paul Almeida & Bruce Kogut, 1999. "Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(7), pages 905-917, July.
    7. Zvi Griliches, 1998. "Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth," NBER Chapters, in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 17-45, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Kang, Taewon & Baek, Chulwoo & Lee, Jeong-Dong, 2017. "The persistency and volatility of the firm R&D investment: Revisited from the perspective of technological capability," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1570-1579.
    9. Luo, Yugong & Feng, Guixuan & Wan, Shuang & Zhang, Shuwei & Li, Victor & Kong, Weiwei, 2020. "Charging scheduling strategy for different electric vehicles with optimization for convenience of drivers, performance of transport system and distribution network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    10. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    11. Jun Yin & Qingmei Tan, 2019. "Study on Urban Efficiency Measurement and Spatiotemporal Evolution of Cities in Northwest China Based on the DEA–Malmquist Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    12. Caroline Hussler, 2004. "Culture and knowledge spillovers in Europe : new perspectives for innovation and convergence policies ?," Post-Print hal-00278985, HAL.
    13. Yi Zhou & Shengjun Zhu & Canfei He, 2019. "Learning from yourself or learning from neighbours: knowledge spillovers, institutional context and firm upgrading," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(10), pages 1397-1409, October.
    14. C. A. Hidalgo & B. Klinger & A. -L. Barabasi & R. Hausmann, 2007. "The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations," Papers 0708.2090, arXiv.org.
    15. Caroline Hussler, 2004. "Culture and knowledge spillovers in Europe: New perspectives for innovation and convergence policies?," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 523-541.
    16. Nakabayashi, Ken & Tone, Kaoru, 2006. "Egoist's dilemma: a DEA game," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 135-148, April.
    17. Chen, Yufeng & Ni, Liangfu & Liu, Kelong, 2022. "Innovation efficiency and technology heterogeneity within China's new energy vehicle industry: A two-stage NSBM approach embedded in a three-hierarchy meta-frontier framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Wadho, Waqar & Chaudhry, Azam, 2018. "Innovation and firm performance in developing countries: The case of Pakistani textile and apparel manufacturers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(7), pages 1283-1294.
    19. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergey Lychagin & Joris Pinkse & Margaret E. Slade & John Van Reenen, 2016. "Spillovers in Space: Does Geography Matter?," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 295-335, June.
    2. Wang, Elizabeth Yi & Kafouros, Mario, 2020. "Location still matters! How does geographic configuration influence the performance-enhancing advantages of FDI spillovers?," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(3).
    3. Kafouros, Mario I. & Buckley, Peter J. & Clegg, Jeremy, 2012. "The effects of global knowledge reservoirs on the productivity of multinational enterprises: The role of international depth and breadth," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 848-861.
    4. Dieter F. Kogler & Ronald B. Davies & Changjun Lee & Keungoui Kim, 2023. "Regional knowledge spaces: the interplay of entry-relatedness and entry-potential for technological change and growth," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 645-668, April.
    5. Zacchia, Paolo, 2018. "Benefiting colleagues but not the city: Localized effects from the relocation of superstar inventors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 992-1005.
    6. Dietmar Harhoff & Elisabeth Mueller & John Van Reenen, 2014. "What are the Channels for Technology Sourcing? Panel Data Evidence from German Companies," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 204-224, March.
    7. Hyuk-Soo Kwon & Jihong Lee & Sokbae Lee & Ryungha Oh, 2022. "Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: trends in geographic localization, 1976–2015," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 123-147, April.
    8. Pedro de Faria & Francisco Lima, 2012. "Interdependence and spillovers: is firm performance affected by others’ innovation activities?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(36), pages 4765-4775, December.
    9. Michael K. Fung, 2019. "Fraudulent Financial Reporting and Technological Capability in the Information Technology Sector: A Resource-Based Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 577-589, May.
    10. Bahar, Dany & Hausmann, Ricardo & Hidalgo, Cesar A., 2014. "Neighbors and the evolution of the comparative advantage of nations: Evidence of international knowledge diffusion?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 111-123.
    11. Zsolt Csáfordi & László Lőrincz & Balázs Lengyel & Károly Miklós Kiss, 2020. "Productivity spillovers through labor flows: productivity gap, multinational experience and industry relatedness," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 86-121, February.
    12. Chongfeng Wang & Gupeng Zhang, 2019. "Examining the moderating effect of technology spillovers embedded in the intra- and inter-regional collaborative innovation networks of China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 561-593, May.
    13. Aldieri, Luigi & Bruno, Bruna & Makkonen, Teemu & Vinci, Concetto Paolo, 2023. "Environmental innovations, geographically mediated knowledge spillovers, economic and environmental performance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    14. Ron Boschma & Simona Iammarino & Raffaele Paci & Jordy Suriñach & Corinne Autant-Bernard & Sylvie Chalaye & Elisa Gagliardini & Stefano Usai, 2017. "European Knowledge Neighbourhood: Knowledge Production in EU Neighbouring Countries and Intensity of the Relationship with EU Countries," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(1), pages 52-75, February.
    15. Hala Abou-Ali & Mohammed Belhaj, 2008. "Cost Benefit Analysis of Desert Locusts Control: A Multicountry Perspective," Working Papers 801, Economic Research Forum, revised 01 Jan 2008.
    16. Frank Neffke & Martin Henning, 2011. "Inter-industry linkages in local economies," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1075, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Jürgen Antony & Thomas Grebel, 2012. "Technology flows between sectors and their impact on large-scale firms," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(20), pages 2637-2651, July.
    18. Pami Dua & B. N. GOLDAR & SMRUTI RANJAN BEHERA, 2011. "Foreign Direct Investment And Technology Spillover-- An Evaluation Across Different Clusters In India," Working papers 200, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    19. Dany Bahar & Hillel Rapoport, 2018. "Migration, Knowledge Diffusion and the Comparative Advantage of Nations," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(612), pages 273-305, July.
    20. Olivier Parent & James P. LeSage, 2008. "Using the variance structure of the conditional autoregressive spatial specification to model knowledge spillovers," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(2), pages 235-256.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2110-:d:1044271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.