IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11176-d1196401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Management of Railway Companies Amid Inflation and Reduced Government Subsidies: A System Dynamics Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shohreh Moradi

    (School of Railway Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 16844, Iran)

  • Hamid Reza Ahadi

    (School of Railway Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 16844, Iran)

  • Grzegorz Sierpiński

    (Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

Abstract

Sustainable transport is a critical and complex issue that the world is currently facing. Managers of railway companies in particular face significant challenges in achieving self-sustainable management of their assets. This paper introduces a new causal loop and explores the interaction among company dimensions—including financial, social, and environmental aspects—in order to assess the financially sustainable management of Raja Corporation, one of the largest railway companies in Iran. Our main contribution is the proposed system dynamics (SD) model, which can aid in policy analysis for Raja, a company that operates multiple routes within the country. The presented model compares different strategies employed by Raja using economic, social, and environmental indicators to evaluate the financial sustainability of the company. Our findings demonstrate that government subsidies may boost the company’s revenue, but they also hinder the rate of profits. Additionally, we highlight the impact of inflation on the company’s financial sustainability, showing that higher ticket prices may have a considerable impact on profits. The proposed approach of using the SD model may help specialists evaluate the sustainability management of transport sector corporations and significantly enhance their performance. This study highlights the importance of taking a comprehensive approach to assess the financial sustainability of railway companies, considering the interdependencies among various dimensions of each company. The findings of this study may have implications for policymakers, managers, and researchers in the transport sector, especially those who are interested in sustainable management practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Shohreh Moradi & Hamid Reza Ahadi & Grzegorz Sierpiński, 2023. "Sustainable Management of Railway Companies Amid Inflation and Reduced Government Subsidies: A System Dynamics Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11176-:d:1196401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11176/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11176/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aleksandra Kuzior & Marek Staszek, 2021. "Energy Management in the Railway Industry: A Case Study of Rail Freight Carrier in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Reinhart Buenk & Sara S (Saartjie) Grobbelaar & Isabel Meyer, 2019. "A Framework for the Sustainability Assessment of (Micro)transit Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Małgorzata Ćwil & Witold Bartnik & Sebastian Jarzębowski, 2021. "Railway Vehicle Energy Efficiency as a Key Factor in Creating Sustainable Transportation Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Jean-Pierre Nicolas & Pascal Pochet & Hélène Poimboeuf, 2003. "Towards Sustainable Mobility Indicators: Application to the Lyons Conurbation," Post-Print halshs-00068232, HAL.
    5. Wang, Wei & Cai, Kaiquan & Du, Wenbo & Wu, Xin & Tong, Lu (Carol) & Zhu, Xi & Cao, Xianbin, 2020. "Analysis of the Chinese railway system as a complex network," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    6. Lane, David C. & Oliva, Rogelio, 1998. "The greater whole: Towards a synthesis of system dynamics and soft systems methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 214-235, May.
    7. Shohreh Moradi & Grzegorz Sierpiński & Houshmand Masoumi, 2022. "System Dynamics Modeling and Fuzzy MCDM Approach as Support for Assessment of Sustainability Management on the Example of Transport Sector Company," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, July.
    8. Grzegorz Sierpiński & Marcin Staniek & Marcin Jacek Kłos, 2020. "Decision Making Support for Local Authorities Choosing the Method for Siting of In-City EV Charging Stations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-28, September.
    9. Fraszczyk, Anna & Lamb, Thomas & Marinov, Marin, 2016. "Are railways really that bad? An evaluation of rail systems performance in Europe with a focus on passenger rail," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 573-591.
    10. Hasselwander, Marc & Bigotte, Joao F. & Antunes, Antonio P. & Sigua, Ricardo G., 2022. "Towards sustainable transport in developing countries: Preliminary findings on the demand for mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) in Metro Manila," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 501-518.
    11. Agnes Wanjiku Wangai & Daniel Rohacs & Anita Boros, 2020. "Supporting the Sustainable Development of Railway Transport in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Chou, Jui-Sheng & Yeh, Chun-Pin, 2013. "Influential constructs, mediating effects, and moderating effects on operations performance of high speed rail from passenger perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 207-219.
    13. A. Awasthi & H. Omrani, 2009. "A hybrid approach based on AHP and belief theory for evaluating sustainable transportation solutions," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 212-226.
    14. Lisa Kane, 2010. "Sustainable transport indicators for Cape Town, South Africa: Advocacy, negotiation and partnership in transport planning practice," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 34(4), pages 289-302, November.
    15. Linda E. Karjalainen & Sirkku Juhola, 2019. "Framework for Assessing Public Transportation Sustainability in Planning and Policy-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Nicolas, J. -P. & Pochet, P. & Poimboeuf, H., 2003. "Towards sustainable mobility indicators: application to the Lyons conurbation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 197-208, July.
    17. Hörcher, Daniel & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "A review of public transport economics," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    18. Todd Litman & David Burwell, 2006. "Issues in sustainable transportation," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(4), pages 331-347.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shohreh Moradi & Grzegorz Sierpiński & Houshmand Masoumi, 2022. "System Dynamics Modeling and Fuzzy MCDM Approach as Support for Assessment of Sustainability Management on the Example of Transport Sector Company," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, July.
    2. repec:hal:journl:halshs-04145598 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Pietro Lanzini & Andrea Stocchetti, 2017. "The evolution of the conceptual basis for the assessment of urban mobility sustainability impacts," Working Papers 02, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    4. Rodrigues da Silva, Antônio Nélson & Azevedo Filho, Mario Angelo Nunes de & Macêdo, Márcia Helena & Sorratini, José Aparecido & da Silva, Ary Ferreira & Lima, Josiane Palma & Pinheiro, Ana Maria Guerr, 2015. "A comparative evaluation of mobility conditions in selected cities of the five Brazilian regions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 147-156.
    5. Miranda, Hellem de Freitas & Rodrigues da Silva, Antônio Nélson, 2012. "Benchmarking sustainable urban mobility: The case of Curitiba, Brazil," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 141-151.
    6. Charles Raux, 2008. "Tradable driving rights in urban areas: their potential for tackling congestion and traffic-related pollution," Post-Print halshs-00185012, HAL.
    7. Nicolas, Jean-Pierre & Pelé, Nicolas, 2018. "Reprint of Measuring trends in household expenditures for daily mobility. The case in Lyon, France, between 1995 and 2015," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 19-29.
    8. Marletto, Gerardo & Mameli, Francesca, 2012. "A participative procedure to select indicators of policies for sustainable urban mobility. Outcomes of a national test," MPRA Paper 36433, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Nicolas, Jean-Pierre & Pelé, Nicolas, 2017. "Measuring trends in household expenditures for daily mobility. The case in Lyon, France, between 1995 and 2015," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 82-92.
    10. Jaime Larumbe, 2021. "Measuring Customer Reservation Price for Maintenance, Repair and Operations of the Metro Public Transport System in Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Adu-Gyamfi, Albert, 2020. "Planning for peri urbanism: Navigating the complex terrain of transport services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    12. Mariateresa Ciommi & Francesco M. Chelli & Luca Salvati, 2019. "Integrating parametric and non-parametric multivariate analysis of urban growth and commuting patterns in a European metropolitan area," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 957-979, March.
    13. An, Shi & Hu, Xiaowei & Wang, Jian, 2011. "Urban taxis and air pollution: a case study in Harbin, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 960-967.
    14. Idlir Licaj & Mohamed Mouloud Haddak & Pascal Pochet & Mireille Chiron, 2012. "Individual and contextual socioeconomic disadvantages and car driving between 16 and 24 years of age: a multilevel study in the Rhône Département (France)," Post-Print halshs-00657323, HAL.
    15. Hussain, Shahid & Ahonen, Valtteri & Karasu, Taha & Leviäkangas, Pekka, 2023. "Sustainability of smart rural mobility and tourism: A key performance indicators-based approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    16. Monika Roman, 2022. "Sustainable Transport: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Dominique Gillis & Ivana Semanjski & Dirk Lauwers, 2015. "How to Monitor Sustainable Mobility in Cities? Literature Review in the Frame of Creating a Set of Sustainable Mobility Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-30, December.
    18. Giulio Mario Cappelletti & Luca Grilli & Carlo Russo & Domenico Santoro, 2023. "Benchmarking Sustainable Mobility in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, March.
    19. Licaj, Idlir & Haddak, Mouloud & Pochet, Pascal & Chiron, Mireille, 2012. "Individual and contextual socioeconomic disadvantages and car driving between 16 and 24years of age: a multilevel study in the Rhône Département (France)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 19-27.
    20. Claudia Kettner & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig & Angela Köppl & Katharina Köberl, 2012. "Indicators for Sustainable Energy Development. The PASHMINA Approach," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 45903, April.
    21. Tatiana Petrova & Andrey Grunin & Arthur Shakhbazyan, 2020. "Integral Index of Traffic Planning: Case-Study of Moscow City’s Transportation System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11176-:d:1196401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.