IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i13p4917-d856255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

System Dynamics Modeling and Fuzzy MCDM Approach as Support for Assessment of Sustainability Management on the Example of Transport Sector Company

Author

Listed:
  • Shohreh Moradi

    (Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Sierpiński

    (Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Houshmand Masoumi

    (Center for Technology and Society, Technische Universität Berlin, Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 104, 10553 Berlin, Germany
    Department of Transport and Supply Chain Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Kingsway Campus, Cnr Kingsway and University Road Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

Abstract

Contemporary challenges for development should involve a sustainable approach. One of the important sectors where such challenges are observed is transport. In a wide range of studies addressing environmental, social, and economic dimensions of sustainability, an approach that combines these dimensions as an integrated technique to assess sustainable development of passenger rail transport organizations is still lacking. The first aim of the presented research is to offer a relatively comprehensive collection of railway sustainability indicators as well as a novel causal loop. The second aim is to assess and improve sustainable management using a case study of a passenger rail transport company. To model the relationships inside and around the transport company, the system dynamics (SD) methodology was chosen, being the primary contribution of the study. Additionally, the Fuzzy-TOPSIS logic is required to find the most appropriate scenarios that may change future strategies by making them more socially and environmentally friendly. The proposed research may support experts in assessing sustainability management in transport companies and improve their performance considerably.

Suggested Citation

  • Shohreh Moradi & Grzegorz Sierpiński & Houshmand Masoumi, 2022. "System Dynamics Modeling and Fuzzy MCDM Approach as Support for Assessment of Sustainability Management on the Example of Transport Sector Company," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:13:p:4917-:d:856255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/13/4917/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/13/4917/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aleksandra Kuzior & Marek Staszek, 2021. "Energy Management in the Railway Industry: A Case Study of Rail Freight Carrier in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    2. A. Awasthi & H. Omrani, 2009. "A hybrid approach based on AHP and belief theory for evaluating sustainable transportation solutions," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 212-226.
    3. Małgorzata Ćwil & Witold Bartnik & Sebastian Jarzębowski, 2021. "Railway Vehicle Energy Efficiency as a Key Factor in Creating Sustainable Transportation Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Lisa Kane, 2010. "Sustainable transport indicators for Cape Town, South Africa: Advocacy, negotiation and partnership in transport planning practice," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 34(4), pages 289-302, November.
    5. Elzbieta Broniewicz & Karolina Ogrodnik, 2021. "A Comparative Evaluation of Multi-Criteria Analysis Methods for Sustainable Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Marletto, Gerardo & Mameli, Francesca, 2012. "A participative procedure to select indicators of policies for sustainable urban mobility. Outcomes of a national test," MPRA Paper 36433, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Arquitt, Steve & Johnstone, Ron, 2008. "Use of system dynamics modelling in design of an environmental restoration banking institution," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 63-75, March.
    8. Jeroen Struben & John D. Sterman, 2008. "Transition Challenges for Alternative Fuel Vehicle and Transportation Systems," Post-Print hal-02312277, HAL.
    9. Linda E. Karjalainen & Sirkku Juhola, 2019. "Framework for Assessing Public Transportation Sustainability in Planning and Policy-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Jean-Pierre Nicolas & Pascal Pochet & Hélène Poimboeuf, 2003. "Towards Sustainable Mobility Indicators: Application to the Lyons Conurbation," Post-Print halshs-00068232, HAL.
    11. Nicolas, J. -P. & Pochet, P. & Poimboeuf, H., 2003. "Towards sustainable mobility indicators: application to the Lyons conurbation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 197-208, July.
    12. Paweł Ziemba, 2021. "Selection of Electric Vehicles for the Needs of Sustainable Transport under Conditions of Uncertainty—A Comparative Study on Fuzzy MCDA Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-25, November.
    13. Todd Litman & David Burwell, 2006. "Issues in sustainable transportation," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(4), pages 331-347.
    14. Lane, David C. & Oliva, Rogelio, 1998. "The greater whole: Towards a synthesis of system dynamics and soft systems methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 214-235, May.
    15. Robert Joumard & Jean-Pierre Nicolas, 2010. "Transport project assessment methodology within the framework of sustainable development," Post-Print halshs-00456645, HAL.
    16. Grzegorz Sierpiński & Marcin Staniek & Marcin Jacek Kłos, 2020. "Decision Making Support for Local Authorities Choosing the Method for Siting of In-City EV Charging Stations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-28, September.
    17. Fraszczyk, Anna & Lamb, Thomas & Marinov, Marin, 2016. "Are railways really that bad? An evaluation of rail systems performance in Europe with a focus on passenger rail," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 573-591.
    18. Chou, Jui-Sheng & Yeh, Chun-Pin, 2013. "Influential constructs, mediating effects, and moderating effects on operations performance of high speed rail from passenger perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 207-219.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shohreh Moradi & Hamid Reza Ahadi & Grzegorz Sierpiński, 2023. "Sustainable Management of Railway Companies Amid Inflation and Reduced Government Subsidies: A System Dynamics Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene & Dalia Streimikiene, 2022. "Sustainable Development of Road Transport in the EU: Multi-Criteria Analysis of Countries’ Achievements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-25, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shohreh Moradi & Hamid Reza Ahadi & Grzegorz Sierpiński, 2023. "Sustainable Management of Railway Companies Amid Inflation and Reduced Government Subsidies: A System Dynamics Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Pietro Lanzini & Andrea Stocchetti, 2017. "The evolution of the conceptual basis for the assessment of urban mobility sustainability impacts," Working Papers 02, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    3. repec:hal:journl:halshs-04145598 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Miranda, Hellem de Freitas & Rodrigues da Silva, Antônio Nélson, 2012. "Benchmarking sustainable urban mobility: The case of Curitiba, Brazil," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 141-151.
    5. Dharmalingam Marimuthu & Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Ghanshaym S. Mahapatra & Renata Činčikaitė & Pratik Roy & Aidas Vasilis Vasiliauskas, 2022. "Sustainable Urban Conveyance Selection through MCGDM Using a New Ranking on Generalized Interval Type-2 Trapezoidal Fuzzy Number," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Rodrigues da Silva, Antônio Nélson & Azevedo Filho, Mario Angelo Nunes de & Macêdo, Márcia Helena & Sorratini, José Aparecido & da Silva, Ary Ferreira & Lima, Josiane Palma & Pinheiro, Ana Maria Guerr, 2015. "A comparative evaluation of mobility conditions in selected cities of the five Brazilian regions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 147-156.
    7. Smith, T.W. & Axon, C.J. & Darton, R.C., 2013. "A methodology for measuring the sustainability of car transport systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 308-317.
    8. Nicolas, Jean-Pierre & Pelé, Nicolas, 2017. "Measuring trends in household expenditures for daily mobility. The case in Lyon, France, between 1995 and 2015," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 82-92.
    9. Adu-Gyamfi, Albert, 2020. "Planning for peri urbanism: Navigating the complex terrain of transport services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Mariateresa Ciommi & Francesco M. Chelli & Luca Salvati, 2019. "Integrating parametric and non-parametric multivariate analysis of urban growth and commuting patterns in a European metropolitan area," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 957-979, March.
    11. Bulckaen, Jeroen & Keseru, Imre & Macharis, Cathy, 2016. "Sustainability versus stakeholder preferences: Searching for synergies in urban and regional mobility measures," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 40-49.
    12. Idlir Licaj & Mohamed Mouloud Haddak & Pascal Pochet & Mireille Chiron, 2012. "Individual and contextual socioeconomic disadvantages and car driving between 16 and 24 years of age: a multilevel study in the Rhône Département (France)," Post-Print halshs-00657323, HAL.
    13. Hussain, Shahid & Ahonen, Valtteri & Karasu, Taha & Leviäkangas, Pekka, 2023. "Sustainability of smart rural mobility and tourism: A key performance indicators-based approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    14. Monika Roman, 2022. "Sustainable Transport: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-14, November.
    15. Giulio Mario Cappelletti & Luca Grilli & Carlo Russo & Domenico Santoro, 2023. "Benchmarking Sustainable Mobility in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, March.
    16. Licaj, Idlir & Haddak, Mouloud & Pochet, Pascal & Chiron, Mireille, 2012. "Individual and contextual socioeconomic disadvantages and car driving between 16 and 24years of age: a multilevel study in the Rhône Département (France)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 19-27.
    17. Mohammadreza Zolfagharian & Bob Walrave & A. Georges L. Romme & Rob Raven, 2020. "Toward the Dynamic Modeling of Transition Problems: The Case of Electric Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    18. Jones, Steven & Tefe, Moses & Appiah-Opoku, Seth, 2013. "Proposed framework for sustainability screening of urban transport projects in developing countries: A case study of Accra, Ghana," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 21-34.
    19. Idlir Licaj & Mouloud Haddak & Pascal Pochet & Mireille Chiron, 2011. "Contextual deprivation, daily travel and road traffic injuries among the young in the Rhône Département (France)," Post-Print halshs-00579719, HAL.
    20. Chakhtoura, Céline & Pojani, Dorina, 2016. "Indicator-based evaluation of sustainable transport plans: A framework for Paris and other large cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 15-28.
    21. Hadi Jahanshahi & Zahra Alijani & Sanda Florentina Mihalache, 2023. "Towards Sustainable Transportation: A Review of Fuzzy Decision Systems and Supply Chain Serviceability," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:13:p:4917-:d:856255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.