IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p10666-d643218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

HRM Practices and Work Engagement Relationship: Differences Concerning Individual Adaptability

Author

Listed:
  • Flavio Urbini

    (Department of Human Science, European University of Rome, 00163 Rome, Italy)

  • Antonio Chirumbolo

    (Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Gabriele Giorgi

    (Department of Human Science, European University of Rome, 00163 Rome, Italy)

  • Emanuela Caracuzzo

    (Department of Human Science, LUMSA University of Rome, 00198 Rome, Italy)

  • Antonino Callea

    (Department of Human Science, LUMSA University of Rome, 00198 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

The importance of human resource management (HRM) practices to improve organizational attitudes and behaviors is not yet widely acknowledged. However, is not clear whether the effect of HRM practices on outcomes vary depending on the level of specific personal resources. The present paper aims to examine the relationship between HRM practices and work engagement by focusing on the moderating role of adaptability. We used cross-sectional data with surveys from 1219 Italian employees in public, private, and non-profit organizations. The results of structural equation models (SEM) showed that HRM practices were positively related to work engagement overall for employees with low adaptability. Therefore, adaptability moderated the relationship between HRM practices and work engagement. In terms of originality, this study is based on the paucity of empirical studies linking developmental HR practices to employees’ work engagement. Hence, the present study addressed this gap by examining the relationship between the perception of HRM practices and work engagement, as well as how adaptability moderated this relationship. These findings are discussed in terms of their theoretical and practical implications for HRM.

Suggested Citation

  • Flavio Urbini & Antonio Chirumbolo & Gabriele Giorgi & Emanuela Caracuzzo & Antonino Callea, 2021. "HRM Practices and Work Engagement Relationship: Differences Concerning Individual Adaptability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-11, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10666-:d:643218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10666/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10666/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julian Gould-Williams & Fiona Davies, 2005. "Using social exchange theory to predict the effects of hrm practice on employee outcomes," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Amelia Manuti & Maria Luisa Giancaspro, 2019. "People Make the Difference: An Explorative Study on the Relationship between Organizational Practices, Employees’ Resources, and Organizational Behavior Enhancing the Psychology of Sustainability and ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Andreas Klein & Helfried Moosbrugger, 2000. "Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 457-474, December.
    4. Paul Turner, 2020. "Employee Engagement in Contemporary Organizations," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-36387-1, June.
    5. Alfes, Kerstin & Shantz, Amanda & Truss, Catherine & Soane, Emma, 2013. "The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 42345, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. P. Matthijs Bal & Dorien T. A. M. Kooij & Simon B. De Jong, 2013. "How Do Developmental and Accommodative HRM Enhance Employee Engagement and Commitment? The Role of Psychological Contract and SOC Strategies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(4), pages 545-572, June.
    7. Umair Ahmed & Kabiru Maitama Kura & Waheed Ali Umrani & Munwar Hussain Pahi, 2020. "Modelling the Link Between Developmental Human Resource Practices and Work Engagement: The Moderation Role of Service Climate," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(1), pages 31-53, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amelia Manuti & Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Monica Molino & Emanuela Ingusci & Vincenzo Russo & Fulvio Signore & Margherita Zito & Claudio Giovanni Cortese, 2020. "“Everything Will Be Fine”: A Study on the Relationship between Employees’ Perception of Sustainable HRM Practices and Positive Organizational Behavior during COVID19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Emmanuel Oppong Peprah, 2020. "The Impact Of High-Performance Work Systems On Employee Engagement: The Moderating Role Of Organizational Justice," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(4), pages 5-22, December.
    3. Chiradip Bandyopadhyay & Kailash B. L. Srivastava, 2022. "The Mediating Role of Relational and Transactional Psychological Contract Fulfilment on the Relationship between Strength of the HR Signals and Job Satisfaction," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 47(4), pages 288-302, December.
    4. Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Amelia Manuti & Alessandro Lo Presti & Assunta De Rosa, 2021. "Human Resource Management Practices Perception and Career Success: The Mediating Roles of Employability and Extra-Role Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Hyo Sun Jung & Kyung Hwa Seo & Hye Hyun Yoon, 2020. "The Importance of Leader Integrity on Family Restaurant Employees’ Engagement and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Exploring Sustainability of Employees’ Generational Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, March.
    6. Mohammad Rabiul Basher Rubel & Nadia Newaz Rimi & Tim Walters, 2017. "Roles of Emerging HRM and Employee Commitment: Evidence from the Banking Industry of Bangladesh," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(4), pages 876-894, August.
    7. Son K. Lam & Thomas E. DeCarlo & Ashish Sharma, 2019. "Salesperson ambidexterity in customer engagement: do customer base characteristics matter?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 659-680, July.
    8. Kaifeng Jiang & Riki Takeuchi & David P. Lepak, 2013. "Where do We Go From Here? New Perspectives on the Black Box in Strategic Human Resource Management Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(8), pages 1448-1480, December.
    9. Sally Sambrook & Delia Wainwright, 2010. "The Psychological Contract: Who's Contracting with Whom? Towards a Conceptual Model," Working Papers 10013, Bangor Business School, Prifysgol Bangor University (Cymru / Wales).
    10. Vatankhah, Sanaz & Javid, Elyeh & Raoofi, Ali, 2017. "Perceived organizational support as the mediator of the relationships between high-performance work practices and counter-productive work behavior: Evidence from airline industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 107-115.
    11. Gregorio Sánchez-Marín & Gabriel Lozano-Reina & Mané Beglaryan, 2022. "HRM Policies and SMEs Performance: The Moderating Role of CSR Orientation," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(1), pages 85-110.
    12. Anastasia Stathopoulou & Tommy Kweku Quansah & George Balabanis, 2022. "The Blinding Effects of Team Identification on Sports Corruption: Cross-Cultural Evidence from Sub-Saharan African Countries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 511-529, August.
    13. Maggioni, Isabella & Sands, Sean & Kachouie, Reza & Tsarenko, Yelena, 2019. "Shopping for well-being: The role of consumer decision-making styles," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 21-32.
    14. Daniele Binci, 2013. "L?equilibrio organizzativo attraverso il clima. L?evidenza empirica di un ente locale," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 65-97.
    15. Miguel A. Hernandez, 2019. "Unveiling International New Ventures’ Success: Employee’s Entrepreneurial Behavior," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-32, August.
    16. Abd Al-Aziz Al-refaei & Hairuddin Bin Mohd Ali & Ali Ahmed Ateeq & Mohammed Alzoraiki, 2023. "An Integrated Mediating and Moderating Model to Improve Service Quality through Job Involvement, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    17. Sarker, Moniruzzaman & Mohd-Any, Amrul Asraf & Kamarulzaman, Yusniza, 2021. "Validating a consumer-based service brand equity (CBSBE) model in the airline industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    18. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Ratzmann, Martin & Kraus, Sascha, 2021. "Anti-aging: How innovation is shaped by firm age and mutual knowledge creation in an alliance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 422-429.
    19. Isada Mahmutovic & Adisa Delic, 2022. "Human Resource Management Practices And Policies And Employee Organizational Commitment In Bosnia And Herzegovina Companies," Economic Review: Journal of Economics and Business, University of Tuzla, Faculty of Economics, vol. 20(1), pages 17-30, May.
    20. Seon, Youngwoon & Smith-Adcock, Sondra, 2023. "Adolescents’ meaning in life as a resilience factor between bullying victimization and life satisfaction," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10666-:d:643218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.