IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i20p8740-d432462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Megatrends and Disruptors and Their Postulated Impact on Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Julie Linthorst

    (The HPO Center, 1217 JL Hilversum, The Netherlands)

  • André de Waal

    (The HPO Center, 1217 JL Hilversum, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The coming decades are expected to be extremely challenging for organizations. On the one hand, there are the United Nations Sustainable Development goals to end poverty, protect the planet and improve the lives and prospects of everyone. On the other hand, organizations are expected to have to deal with an increasing number of megatrends and disruptors, many of which are already having an impact. To help organizations in their priority setting and decision-making so they can contribute to the development goals (specifically Goal 8: decent work and economic growth), a descriptive literature review was undertaken to identify which megatrends and disruptors will impact the future of organizations and in what ways they are expected do this. From the literature, thirteen megatrends and one disruptor emerged, and for each of these their postulated impact and consequences for organizations as described in the literature were gathered. The study reveals that there is ample attention given to megatrends in the academic literature but that not much can be found about dealing with disruptors. As a consequence, academic literature currently falls short in suggesting ways in which organizations can deal with disruptors. Managerial literature offers more suggestions in this respect.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie Linthorst & André de Waal, 2020. "Megatrends and Disruptors and Their Postulated Impact on Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8740-:d:432462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8740/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8740/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ugo Colombino, 2019. "Is unconditional basic income a viable alternative to other social welfare measures?," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 128-128, March.
    2. Jayne, Thomas S. & Kwame Yeboah, Felix. & Henry, Carla., 2017. "The future of work in African agriculture trends and drivers of change," ILO Working Papers 994987492102676, International Labour Organization.
    3. André de Waal & Robert Goedegebuure, 2017. "Investigating the causal link between a management improvement technique and organizational performance," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(4), pages 429-450, April.
    4. Brougham, David & Haar, Jarrod, 2018. "Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA): Employees’ perceptions of our future workplace," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 239-257, March.
    5. Thomas Straubhaar, 2017. "On the Economics of a Universal Basic Income," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 52(2), pages 74-80, March.
    6. von der Gracht, Heiko A. & Darkow, Inga-Lena, 2010. "Scenarios for the logistics services industry: A Delphi-based analysis for 2025," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 46-59, September.
    7. Rebecca Cassells & Alan S Duncan & Astghik Mavisakalyan & John Phillimore & Richard Seymour & Yashar Tarverdi, 2018. "Future of Work in Australia: Preparing for tomorrow’s world," Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre Report series FS06, Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School.
    8. Balliester, Thereza. & Elsheikhi, Adam., 2018. "The future of work a literature review," ILO Working Papers 994987493402676, International Labour Organization.
    9. André de Waal & Julie Linthorst, 2020. "Future-Proofing the High-Performance Organization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Annunziata, Marco & Bourgeois, Hendrik, 2018. "The future of work: How G20 countries can leverage digital-industrial innovations into stronger high-quality jobs growth," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 12, pages 1-23.
    11. Annunziata, Marco & Bourgeois, Hendrik, 2018. "The future of work: How G20 countries can leverage digital-industrial innovations into stronger high-quality jobs growth," Economics Discussion Papers 2018-28, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    12. Emily Anthes, 2017. "The shape of work to come," Nature, Nature, vol. 550(7676), pages 316-319, October.
    13. Namir Anani, 2018. "Paving the Way for the Future of Work," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 44(S1), pages 167-176, November.
    14. Kaivo-oja, Jari & Roth, Steffen & Westerlund, Leo, 2016. "Futures of robotics. Human work in digital transformation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 73(4), pages 176-205.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Annedore Kanngießer & Johannes Venjakob & Jan Hicking & Christina Kockel & Emily Drewing & Marius Beckamp & Stefan Jaeger, 2021. "Triggering Local Innovation Processes for the Implementation of Sector Coupling Projects: An Integrated Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Sönke Beckmann & Sebastian Trojahn & Hartmut Zadek, 2023. "Process Model for the Introduction of Automated Buses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-36, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria-Chiara Morandini & Anna Thum-Thysen & Anneleen Vandeplas, 2020. "Facing the Digital Transformation: Are Digital Skills Enough?," European Economy - Economic Briefs 054, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    2. Gassmann, Franziska & Martorano, Bruno, 2019. "The future of work and its implications for social protection and the welfare state," MERIT Working Papers 2019-039, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    3. Marcin J. Piątkowski, 2020. "Expectations and Challenges in the Labour Market in the Context of Industrial Revolution 4.0. The Agglomeration Method-Based Analysis for Poland and Other EU Member States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-29, July.
    4. Elisa Gotesman Bercovici & Adrian Bercovici, 2019. "Israeli Labor Market and the Fourth Industrial Revolution," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(S13), pages 884-884, November.
    5. Magdalena Gorzelany-Dziadkowiec, 2021. "COVID-19: Business Innovation Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Pater, Robert & Szkola, Jaroslaw & Kozak, Marcin, 2019. "A method for measuring detailed demand for workers' competences," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 13, pages 1-30.
    7. André Waal & Enny Kraaijveld, 2022. "Learnings from a successful transformation to a high-performance organization: a longitudinal case study," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(11), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Caselli, Mauro & Fracasso, Andrea & Marcolin, Arianna & Scicchitano, Sergio, 2021. "The reassuring effect of firms' technological innovations on workers' job insecurity," GLO Discussion Paper Series 938, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    9. Yang, Senmiao & Wang, Jianda & Dong, Kangyin & Jiang, Qingzhe, 2023. "A path towards China's energy justice: How does digital technology innovation bring about a just revolution?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PA).
    10. Bokrantz, Jon & Skoogh, Anders & Berlin, Cecilia & Stahre, Johan, 2017. "Maintenance in digitalised manufacturing: Delphi-based scenarios for 2030," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 154-169.
    11. Peter Mantello & Manh-Tung Ho & Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2023. "Machines that feel: behavioral determinants of attitude towards affect recognition technology—upgrading technology acceptance theory with the mindsponge model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Islam, Nizamul & Colombino, Ugo, 2018. "The case for NIT+FT in Europe. An empirical optimal taxation exercise," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 38-69.
    13. Fabio Montobbio & Jacopo Staccioli & Maria Enrica Virgillito & Marco Vivarelli, 2022. "The empirics of technology, employment and occupations: lessons learned and challenges ahead," DISCE - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Politica Economica dipe0028, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    14. John Burgess & Julia Connell, 2020. "New technology and work: Exploring the challenges," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 31(3), pages 310-323, September.
    15. Di Zio, Simone & Bolzan, Mario & Marozzi, Marco, 2021. "Classification of Delphi outputs through robust ranking and fuzzy clustering for Delphi-based scenarios," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    16. Santana, Monica & Cobo, Manuel J., 2020. "What is the future of work? A science mapping analysis," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 846-862.
    17. Guanglu Xu & Ming Xue & Jidi Zhao, 2023. "The Association between Artificial Intelligence Awareness and Employee Depression: The Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion and the Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Anya Johnson & Shanta Dey & Helena Nguyen & Markus Groth & Sadhbh Joyce & Leona Tan & Nicholas Glozier & Samuel B Harvey, 2020. "A review and agenda for examining how technology-driven changes at work will impact workplace mental health and employee well-being," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(3), pages 402-424, August.
    19. Magnani, Riccardo & Piccoli, Luca, 2020. "Universal basic income with flat tax reform in France," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 235-249.
    20. Keller, Jonas & von der Gracht, Heiko A., 2014. "The influence of information and communication technology (ICT) on future foresight processes — Results from a Delphi survey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 81-92.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8740-:d:432462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.