IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p8070-d421972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple Utility Analyses for Sustainable Public Transport Planning and Management: Evidence from GPS-Equipped Taxi Data in Haikou

Author

Listed:
  • Jiawei Gui

    (College of Transportation Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
    School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
    Center of Comprehensive Transportation Economic Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Qunqi Wu

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
    Center of Comprehensive Transportation Economic Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

Abstract

The transportation utility values calculated by traditional utility methods are not comprehensive. Some objects and factors are ignored in traditional utility methods, and this narrow perspective is their primary drawback. In intelligent transportation systems, it is necessary to calculate transportation utility for promoting public traffic planning and management. To build a sustainable intelligent transportation system, modified utility methods are essential to analyze transportation utility in a comprehensive way with innovative technologies and efficient communication systems. To solve the disadvantages of traditional utility methods, it is necessary to establish a new method to build sustainable public transport in the future. In this study, the Multiple Utility Method and Transportation Utility Method are proposed for public transport planning and management from multiple perspectives. A sample is presented to provide a better description, and 69,174 GPS-equipped taxi data in Haikou are adopted for the application of the Transportation Utility Method. The results show that the transportation utility values calculated by the Transportation Utility Method are more comprehensive than the transportation utility calculated by traditional utility methods. This indicates that it is necessary to calculate transportation utility from multiple perspectives based on the Transportation Utility Method. Future directions could include improving the methods, considering more factors, expanding the data used, and extrapolating this research to other cities around the world with similar urban metrics and urban form.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiawei Gui & Qunqi Wu, 2020. "Multiple Utility Analyses for Sustainable Public Transport Planning and Management: Evidence from GPS-Equipped Taxi Data in Haikou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-46, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8070-:d:421972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8070/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8070/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gustav Bösehans & Ian Walker, 2020. "Do supra-modal traveller types exist? A travel behaviour market segmentation using Goal framing theory," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 243-273, February.
    2. Arto O Salonen & Noora Haavisto, 2019. "Towards Autonomous Transportation. Passengers’ Experiences, Perceptions and Feelings in a Driverless Shuttle Bus in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Algaba, Encarnación & Fragnelli, Vito & Llorca, Natividad & Sánchez-Soriano, Joaquin, 2019. "Horizontal cooperation in a multimodal public transport system: The profit allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 659-665.
    4. Elena Cigu & Daniela Tatiana Agheorghiesei & Anca Florentina Gavriluță (Vatamanu) & Elena Toader, 2018. "Transport Infrastructure Development, Public Performance and Long-Run Economic Growth: A Case Study for the Eu-28 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Xylia, Maria & Silveira, Semida, 2018. "The role of charging technologies in upscaling the use of electric buses in public transport: Experiences from demonstration projects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 399-415.
    6. Young Dae Ko & Yonghui Oh, 2020. "Efficient Deployment Design of Wireless Charging Electric Tram System with Battery Management Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-11, April.
    7. Frick, Susanne A. & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2018. "Change in urban concentration and economic growth," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 156-170.
    8. Susanne A. Frick & Andrés Rodríguez†Pose, 2018. "Big or Small Cities? On city size and economic growth," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 4-32, March.
    9. Chansoo Kim & Segun Goh & Myeong Seon Choi & Keumsook Lee & M. Y. Choi, 2020. "Hub-Periphery Hierarchy in Bus Transportation Networks: Gini Coefficients and the Seoul Bus System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    10. Liu, Tao & (Avi) Ceder, Avishai, 2017. "Deficit function related to public transport: 50 year retrospective, new developments, and prospects," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 1-19.
    11. Tang, Jinjun & Liu, Fang & Wang, Yinhai & Wang, Hua, 2015. "Uncovering urban human mobility from large scale taxi GPS data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 438(C), pages 140-153.
    12. Paulley, Neil & Balcombe, Richard & Mackett, Roger & Titheridge, Helena & Preston, John & Wardman, Mark & Shires, Jeremy & White, Peter, 2006. "The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 295-306, July.
    13. Bibhuti Sharma & Mark Hickman & Neema Nassir, 2019. "Park-and-ride lot choice model using random utility maximization and random regret minimization," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 217-232, February.
    14. Pavón, Nicolás & Rizzi, Luis Ignacio, 2019. "Road infrastructure and public bus transport service provision under different funding schemes: A simulation analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 89-105.
    15. Hasnine, Md Sami & Graovac, Ana & Camargo, Felipe & Habib, Khandker Nurul, 2019. "A random utility maximization (RUM) based measure of accessibility to transit: Accurate capturing of the first-mile issue in urban transit," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 313-320.
    16. Li, Xiaopeng & Medal, Hugh & Qu, Xiaobo, 2019. "Connected infrastructure location design under additive service utilities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 99-124.
    17. Campos, Javier & de Rus, Ginés, 2009. "Some stylized facts about high-speed rail: A review of HSR experiences around the world," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 19-28, January.
    18. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Frick, Susanne, 2017. "Big or small cities? On city size and economic growth," CEPR Discussion Papers 12324, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Francesco Pinna & Roberto Murrau, 2018. "Age Factor and Pedestrian Speed on Sidewalks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, November.
    20. Plano, Christopher & Behrens, Roger & Zuidgeest, Mark, 2020. "Towards evening paratransit services to complement scheduled public transport in Cape Town: A driver attitudinal survey of alternative policy interventions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 273-289.
    21. Sun, Lijun & Axhausen, Kay W., 2016. "Understanding urban mobility patterns with a probabilistic tensor factorization framework," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 511-524.
    22. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili & Yan, Kesheng, 2019. "Vulnerability analysis and critical area identification of public transport system: A case of high-speed rail and air transport coupling system in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 55-70.
    23. Young Dae Ko & Byung Duk Song & Yonghui Oh, 2019. "Mathematical Analysis of Environmental Effects of Forming a Platoon of Smart Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-10, January.
    24. Patrick A. Singleton, 2019. "Discussing the “positive utilities” of autonomous vehicles: will travellers really use their time productively?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 50-65, January.
    25. Chowdhury, Subeh & van Wee, Bert, 2020. "Examining women's perception of safety during waiting times at public transport terminals," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 102-108.
    26. Neil Cuthill & Mengqiu Cao & Yuqi Liu & Xing Gao & Yuerong Zhang, 2019. "The Association between Urban Public Transport Infrastructure and Social Equity and Spatial Accessibility within the Urban Environment: An Investigation of Tramlink in London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, February.
    27. Francesco Pinna & Francesca Masala & Chiara Garau, 2017. "Urban Policies and Mobility Trends in Italian Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, March.
    28. Sungtaek Choi & Sangho Choo & Sujae Kim, 2020. "Is the Relationship between Transportation and Communications Industries Complementary or Substitutional? An Asian Countries-Based Empirical Analysis Using Input-Output Accounts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, April.
    29. Fernando Martín Poó & Rubén Daniel Ledesma & Soledad Susana López, 2018. "The taxi industry: working conditions and health of drivers, a literature review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 394-411, May.
    30. Elżbieta Macioszek & Agata Kurek, 2020. "The Use of a Park and Ride System—A Case Study Based on the City of Cracow (Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-26, July.
    31. Cantelmo, Guido & Viti, Francesco, 2019. "Incorporating activity duration and scheduling utility into equilibrium-based Dynamic Traffic Assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 365-390.
    32. Duran-Micco, Javier & Vermeir, Evert & Vansteenwegen, Pieter, 2020. "Considering emissions in the transit network design and frequency setting problem with a heterogeneous fleet," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 580-592.
    33. Elżbieta Macioszek & Paulina Świerk & Agata Kurek, 2020. "The Bike-Sharing System as an Element of Enhancing Sustainable Mobility—A Case Study based on a City in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-29, April.
    34. Zhiru Wang & Wubin Ma & Albert Chan, 2020. "Exploring the Relationships between the Topological Characteristics of Subway Networks and Service Disruption Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    35. Jinjun Tang & Fan Gao & Fang Liu & Wenhui Zhang & Yong Qi, 2019. "Understanding Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Urban Travel Demand Based on the Combination of GWR and GLM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, October.
    36. Liu, Tao & Ceder, Avishai (Avi), 2018. "Integrated public transport timetable synchronization and vehicle scheduling with demand assignment: A bi-objective bi-level model using deficit function approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 935-955.
    37. Alexander Bigazzi & Robin Lindsey, 2019. "A utility-based bicycle speed choice model with time and energy factors," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 995-1009, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongliang Deng & Haolun Guo & Miaomiao Meng & Ying Zhang & Shuangshuang Pei, 2020. "Exploring the Effects of Safety Climate on Worker’s Safety Behavior in Subway Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose & Jamie Griffiths, 2021. "Developing intermediate cities," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 441-456, June.
    3. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Michael Storper, 2020. "Housing, urban growth and inequalities: The limits to deregulation and upzoning in reducing economic and spatial inequality," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 223-248, February.
    4. Roberto Ganau & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2022. "Does urban concentration matter for changes in country economic performance?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 1275-1299, May.
    5. Jorge Díaz-Lanchas & Peter Mulder, 2021. "Does decentralization of governance promote urban diversity? Evidence from Spain," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(6), pages 1111-1128, June.
    6. Kostas Rontos & Barbara Ermini & Luca Salvati, 2023. "Enlarging the divide? Per-Capita Income as a measure of social inequalities in a southern European City," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 345-361, February.
    7. Guo, Bingnan & Wang, Yu & Zhang, Hao & Liang, Chunyan & Feng, Yu & Hu, Feng, 2023. "Impact of the digital economy on high-quality urban economic development: Evidence from Chinese cities," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Seyed Peyman Asadi & Ahmad Jafari Samimi, 2019. "Lagging-behind Areas as a Challenge to the Regional Development Strategy: What Insights can New and Evolutionary Economic Geography Offer?," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1923, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2019.
    9. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2017. "The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it)," CEPR Discussion Papers 12473, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Isabel del Arco & Anabel Ramos-Pla & Gabriel Zsembinszki & Alvaro de Gracia & Luisa F. Cabeza, 2021. "Implementing SDGs to a Sustainable Rural Village Development from Community Empowerment: Linking Energy, Education, Innovation, and Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    11. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili, 2021. "Impacts of service feature on vulnerability analysis of high-speed rail network," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 238-253.
    12. David Castells‐Quintana & Vicente Royuela & Paolo Veneri, 2020. "Inequality and city size: An analysis for OECD functional urban areas," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(4), pages 1045-1064, August.
    13. Kilroy,Austin Francis Louis & Ganau,Roberto, 2020. "Economic Growth in European Union NUTS-3 Regions," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9494, The World Bank.
    14. Obaco, Moisés & Pontarollo, Nicola & Mendieta Muñoz, Rodrigo & Díaz-Sánchez, Juan Pablo, 2022. "On the association between housing deprivation and urban size: Evidence from South Asia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    15. Elżbieta Macioszek & Agata Kurek, 2021. "The Analysis of the Factors Determining the Choice of Park and Ride Facility Using a Multinomial Logit Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-33, January.
    16. Sameeh Alarabi & Fawaz Alasmari, 2023. "Challenges and Opportunities for Small Cities in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Study of Expert Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Elżbieta Macioszek & Agata Kurek, 2020. "The Use of a Park and Ride System—A Case Study Based on the City of Cracow (Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-26, July.
    18. Mohsen Momenitabar & Zhila Dehdari Ebrahimi & Mohammad Arani, 2020. "A Systematic and Analytical Review of the Socioeconomic and Environmental Impact of the Deployed High-Speed Rail (HSR) Systems on the World," Papers 2003.04452, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
    19. Andres Rodriguez-Pose, 2018. "The revenge of the places that don?t matter (and what to do about it)," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1805, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jan 2018.
    20. Fadyushin Alexey & Zakharov Dmitrii, 2020. "Influence of the Parameters of the Bus Lane and the Bus Stop on the Delays of Private and Public Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8070-:d:421972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.