IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i3p816-d203502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Trust on the Approach to Management—A Case Study of Creative Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Radomska

    (Wrocław University of Economics, ul. Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Przemysław Wołczek

    (Wrocław University of Economics, ul. Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Letycja Sołoducho-Pelc

    (Wrocław University of Economics, ul. Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Susana Silva

    (Wrocław University of Economics, ul. Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland
    Católica Porto Business School, Rua de Diogo Botelho, 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Companies operating in the creative industries are struggling with the simultaneous pressure to be innovative and creative, which requires access to unique resources (such as knowledge and creative potential), but also means they must be effective in actions taken. To find a balance between those tensions, they are using the networking approach. Therefore, it seems that networking is becoming a high priority and that being involved in networks is a crucial part of such companies’ business models. Nevertheless, their competitive advantage is based on creative potential, which means that they are rooted in building and maintaining internal relations. As a result, in creative industries, relationships with internal and external stakeholders are crucial, but are strongly based on trust. Thus, the main aim of this paper is to investigate whether trust is the main factor influencing the approach to management. Moreover, we tried to understand the impact of trust on the managerial actions taken. We used the multiple case study research method to examine the role of trust in cooperation, as well as in shaping internal relations in companies operating in the creative industries. To achieve that goal, 10 companies from Poland and Portugal (5 from each country) were investigated in order to find any regularities. By analyzing the research results, it was possible to identify consistencies among the sample and present the main findings. Therefore, four approaches distinguished by the degree of trust were identified. When the level of trust is low, companies are operating within their network based on close relationships, as well as using collective participation where the team is perceived as a key success factor. On the other hand, when the level of trust is higher, companies move towards cooperative management (where the role of competitors is crucial) as well as individual participation (where an employee is engaged in the creative, as well as the decision-making, process). As a result, a theoretical model is proposed that includes the level of trust and the external and internal stakeholders’ perspective. Based on our research, trust can also be added as a fourth ‘T’ to the ‘3T’ (talent, tolerance and technology) concept proposed by Florida (2003).

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Radomska & Przemysław Wołczek & Letycja Sołoducho-Pelc & Susana Silva, 2019. "The Impact of Trust on the Approach to Management—A Case Study of Creative Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:816-:d:203502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/816/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/816/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joanna Cygler & Włodzimierz Sroka & Marina Solesvik & Katarzyna Dębkowska, 2018. "Benefits and Drawbacks of Coopetition: The Roles of Scope and Durability in Coopetitive Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Enkel, Ellen & Heil, Sebastian & Hengstler, Monika & Wirth, Henning, 2017. "Exploratory and exploitative innovation: To what extent do the dimensions of individual level absorptive capacity contribute?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 60, pages 29-38.
    3. Lampaki, Antonia & Papadakis, Vassilis, 2018. "The impact of organisational politics and trust in the top management team on strategic decision implementation success: A middle-manager's perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 627-637.
    4. Michelle Greenwood & Harry Buren III, 2010. "Trust and Stakeholder Theory: Trustworthiness in the Organisation–Stakeholder Relationship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 425-438, September.
    5. Mitchell P. Koza & Arie Y. Lewin, 1998. "The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 255-264, June.
    6. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang, 2013. "Greenwash and Green Trust: The Mediation Effects of Green Consumer Confusion and Green Perceived Risk," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 489-500, May.
    7. Markus Hasel & Steven L. Grover, 2017. "An Integrative Model of Trust and Leadership," Post-Print hal-02312009, HAL.
    8. Gaglio, Connie Marie & Katz, Jerome A, 2001. "The Psychological Basis of Opportunity Identification: Entrepreneurial Alertness," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 95-111, March.
    9. T. K. Das & Bing‐Sheng Teng, 2002. "The Dynamics of Alliance Conditions in the Alliance Development Process," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 725-746, July.
    10. Akbar Zaheer & N. Venkatraman, 1995. "Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 373-392.
    11. Renzl, Birgit, 2008. "Trust in management and knowledge sharing: The mediating effects of fear and knowledge documentation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 206-220, April.
    12. Laura Poppo & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Julie J. Li, 2016. "When can you trust “trust”? Calculative trust, relational trust, and supplier performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 724-741, April.
    13. Pappas, Nikolaos, 2016. "Marketing strategies, perceived risks, and consumer trust in online buying behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 92-103.
    14. Patrick Biernacki & Dan Waldorf, 1981. "Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 10(2), pages 141-163, November.
    15. Ken Starkey & Christopher Barnatt & Sue Tempest, 2000. "Beyond Networks and Hierarchies: Latent Organizations in the U.K. Television Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 299-305, June.
    16. Michael Fritsch & Martina Kauffeld-Monz, 2010. "The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: an application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 44(1), pages 21-38, February.
    17. Li, Peter Ping, 2007. "Towards an Interdisciplinary Conceptualization of Trust: A Typological Approach," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(3), pages 421-445, November.
    18. Jeffrey H. Dyer & Wujin Chu, 2003. "The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 57-68, February.
    19. Satyanarayana Parayitam & Chris Papenhausen, 2018. "Strategic decision-making," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(1), pages 2-28, January.
    20. N. A. Mozumder, 2018. "A Multilevel Trust-based Model of Ethical Public Leadership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 167-184, November.
    21. L. J. Bourgeois, III & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 1988. "Strategic Decision Processes in High Velocity Environments: Four Cases in the Microcomputer Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(7), pages 816-835, July.
    22. Peter Ping Li, 2007. "Towards an Interdisciplinary Conceptualization of Trust: A Typological Approach," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 3(3), pages 421-445, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Łukasz Jarosław Kozar & Robert Matusiak & Marta Paduszyńska & Adam Sulich, 2022. "Green Jobs in the EU Renewable Energy Sector: Quantile Regression Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Helena Bulińska-Stangrecka & Anna Bagieńska, 2019. "HR Practices for Supporting Interpersonal Trust and Its Consequences for Team Collaboration and Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Di Wu & Zhongming Wang, 2020. "Be Careful How You Do It: The Distinct Effects of Observational Monitoring and Interactional Monitoring on Employee Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-10, July.
    4. Cabeza-Pullés, Dainelis & Fernández-Pérez, Virginia & Roldán-Bravo, María Isabel, 2020. "Internal networking and innovation ambidexterity: The mediating role of knowledge management processes in university research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 450-461.
    5. Rafał Trzaska & Adam Sulich & Michał Organa & Jerzy Niemczyk & Bartosz Jasiński, 2021. "Digitalization Business Strategies in Energy Sector: Solving Problems with Uncertainty under Industry 4.0 Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Marzena Smol & Paulina Marcinek & Eugeniusz Koda, 2021. "Drivers and Barriers for a Circular Economy (CE) Implementation in Poland—A Case Study of Raw Materials Recovery Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S M A Moin & James F. Devlin & Sally McKechnie, 2017. "Trust in financial services: the influence of demographics and dispositional characteristics," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 64-76, June.
    2. Jiang, Xu & Li, Yuan & Gao, Shanxing, 2008. "The stability of strategic alliances: Characteristics, factors and stages," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 173-189, June.
    3. Abubakr Saeed & Hammad Riaz, 2021. "Navigating through firm–environmental groups' relationships: The impact of societal trust on corporate environmental strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3552-3568, December.
    4. Mukherjee, Debmalya & Gaur, Ajai S. & Gaur, Sanjaya S. & Schmid, Florian, 2013. "External and internal influences on R&D alliance formation: Evidence from German SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(11), pages 2178-2185.
    5. Håvard Ness, 2009. "Governance, Negotiations, and Alliance Dynamics: Explaining the Evolution of Relational Practice," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 451-480, May.
    6. Han, Shaojie & Su, Jingqin & Lyu, Yibo & Liu, Qing, 2022. "How do business incubators govern incubation relationships with different new ventures?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    7. M. Meuleman & S. Manigart & A. Lockett & M. Wright, 2006. "Transaction costs, behavioral uncertainty and the formation of interfirm cooperations: Syndication in the UK private equity market," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/359, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    8. Peter Ping Li, 2017. "The time for transition: Future trust research," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Ho, Mia Hsiao-Wen & Wang, Fatima, 2015. "Unpacking knowledge transfer and learning paradoxes in international strategic alliances: Contextual differences matter," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 287-297.
    10. Ranjay Gulati & Maxim Sytch, 2008. "Does familiarity breed trust? Revisiting the antecedents of trust," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2-3), pages 165-190.
    11. Martinez-Noya, Andrea & Narula, Rajneesh, 2018. "What more can we learn from R&D alliances? : A review and research agenda," MERIT Working Papers 2018-022, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    12. João José M. Ferreira & Cristina I. Fernandes & Vanessa Ratten, 2016. "A co-citation bibliometric analysis of strategic management research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(1), pages 1-32, October.
    13. Bill McEvily & Akbar Zaheer & Darcy K. Fudge Kamal, 2017. "Mutual and Exclusive: Dyadic Sources of Trust in Interorganizational Exchange," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 74-92, February.
    14. repec:dgr:rugsom:03g23 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Cabeza-Pullés, Dainelis & Fernández-Pérez, Virginia & Roldán-Bravo, María Isabel, 2020. "Internal networking and innovation ambidexterity: The mediating role of knowledge management processes in university research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 450-461.
    16. Bettina Distel & Holger Koelmann & Ralf Plattfaut & Jörg Becker, 2022. "Watch who you trust! A structured literature review to build a typology of e-government risks," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 789-818, December.
    17. Jianhua Yang & Yuying Liu & Yajun Jia, 2022. "Influence of Trust Relationships with Suppliers on Manufacturer Resilience in COVID-19 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    18. Maurizio Massaro & Andrea Moro & Ewald Aschauer & Matthias Fink, 2019. "Trust, control and knowledge transfer in small business networks," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 267-301, April.
    19. Jha, Anand & Kim, YoungJun & Gutierrez-Wirsching, Sandra, 2019. "Formation of cross-border corporate strategic alliances: The roles of trust and cultural, institutional, and geographical distances," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 22-38.
    20. Nielsen, Bo Bernhard, 2001. "Trust and Learning in International Strategic Alliances," Working Papers 8-2001, Copenhagen Business School, Department of International Economics and Management.
    21. Denise Rossato Quatrin & Breno Augusto Diniz Pereira, 2017. "Who Should They Relate To? A Study For the Identification and Analysis of Criteria to the Partners’ Selection in Inter-Organizational Networks," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(3), pages 321-335, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:816-:d:203502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.