IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i2p393-d197516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Exploration of Factors Affecting Drivers’ Daily Fuel Consumption Efficiencies Considering Multi-Level Random Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Dawei Li

    (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS, School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
    Jiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic SiPaiLou #2, Xuanwu District, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Cheng Li

    (China Academy of Transportation Sciences, No.240, Huixinli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Tomio Miwa

    (EcoTopia Science Institute & Green Mobility Collaborative Research Center, Nagoya University, Nagoya 4648603, Japan)

  • Takayuki Morikawa

    (Graduate School of Environmental Studies & Green Mobility Collaborative Research Center, Nagoya University, Nagoya 4648603, Japan)

Abstract

This paper investigates the factors affecting drivers’ vehicle fuel consumption efficiency, which was defined as the daily average fuel consumption for a unit of driving mileage. Based on the long-term Controller Area Network (CAN) data collected from private cars during 10 months in Toyota City, Japan, we explored the relationships between drivers’ fuel consumption efficiencies, and factors including drivers’ characteristics, car attributes, date-specific environmental attributes, and travel behavior. Furthermore, a multi-level model was applied to explicitly incorporate the effects of individual-specific, date-specific, and observation-specific unobserved factors. According to the estimation results, it was found that, on working days, model fit was significantly enhanced by incorporating all three error terms. Several findings regarding the relationships between observed factors and drivers’ fuel consumption efficiencies were also obtained.

Suggested Citation

  • Dawei Li & Cheng Li & Tomio Miwa & Takayuki Morikawa, 2019. "An Exploration of Factors Affecting Drivers’ Daily Fuel Consumption Efficiencies Considering Multi-Level Random Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:393-:d:197516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/393/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/393/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marianne Hatzopoulou & Jiang Hao & Eric Miller, 2011. "Simulating the impacts of household travel on greenhouse gas emissions, urban air quality, and population exposure," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(6), pages 871-887, November.
    2. Park, Yujin & Akar, Gulsah, 2019. "Why do bicyclists take detours? A multilevel regression model using smartphone GPS data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 191-200.
    3. Massimo Delogu & Francesco Del Pero & Marco Pierini, 2016. "Lightweight Design Solutions in the Automotive Field: Environmental Modelling Based on Fuel Reduction Value Applied to Diesel Turbocharged Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Christian Ritz & Rikke Pilmann Laursen & Camilla Trab Damsgaard, 2017. "Simultaneous inference for multilevel linear mixed models—with an application to a large-scale school meal study," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(2), pages 295-311, February.
    5. Tang, Tie-Qiao & Yi, Zhi-Yan & Lin, Qing-Feng, 2017. "Effects of signal light on the fuel consumption and emissions under car-following model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 469(C), pages 200-205.
    6. Hess, Stephane & Train, Kenneth E., 2011. "Recovery of inter- and intra-personal heterogeneity using mixed logit models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 973-990, August.
    7. Hess, Stephane & Rose, John M., 2009. "Allowing for intra-respondent variations in coefficients estimated on repeated choice data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 708-719, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kai Liu & Dong Liu & Cheng Li & Toshiyuki Yamamoto, 2019. "Eco-Speed Guidance for the Mixed Traffic of Electric Vehicles and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles at an Isolated Signalized Intersection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Sai Chand & Emily Moylan & S. Travis Waller & Vinayak Dixit, 2020. "Analysis of Vehicle Breakdown Frequency: A Case Study of New South Wales, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Jian Gong & Junzhu Shang & Lei Li & Changjian Zhang & Jie He & Jinhang Ma, 2021. "A Comparative Study on Fuel Consumption Prediction Methods of Heavy-Duty Diesel Trucks Considering 21 Influencing Factors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Naif Alsaadi, 2021. "Comparative Analysis and Statistical Optimization of Fuel Economy for Sustainable Vehicle Routings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krueger, Rico & Bierlaire, Michel & Daziano, Ricardo A. & Rashidi, Taha H. & Bansal, Prateek, 2021. "Evaluating the predictive abilities of mixed logit models with unobserved inter- and intra-individual heterogeneity," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    2. Calastri, Chiara & Hess, Stephane & Daly, Andrew & Carrasco, Juan Antonio & Choudhury, Charisma, 2018. "Modelling the loss and retention of contacts in social networks: The role of dyad-level heterogeneity and tie strength," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 63-77.
    3. Becker, Felix & Danaf, Mazen & Song, Xiang & Atasoy, Bilge & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2018. "Bayesian estimator for Logit Mixtures with inter- and intra-consumer heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 1-17.
    4. Dawei Li & Tomio Miwa & Takayuki Morikawa, 2014. "Considering En-Route Choices in Utility-Based Route Choice Modelling," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 581-604, December.
    5. Bujosa, Angel & Torres, Cati & Riera, Antoni, 2018. "Framing Decisions in Uncertain Scenarios: An Analysis of Tourist Preferences in the Face of Global Warming," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 36-42.
    6. Rico Krueger & Prateek Bansal & Michel Bierlaire & Ricardo A. Daziano & Taha H. Rashidi, 2019. "Variational Bayesian Inference for Mixed Logit Models with Unobserved Inter- and Intra-Individual Heterogeneity," Papers 1905.00419, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2020.
    7. Swait, Joffre & Brigden, Neil & Johnson, Richard D., 2014. "Categories shape preferences: A model of taste heterogeneity arising from categorization of alternatives," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 3-23.
    8. Seo, Youngguk & Kim, Seong-Min, 2013. "Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from road traffic: A case study in Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 777-787.
    9. Qingxu Huang & Dawn C Parker & Tatiana Filatova & Shipeng Sun, 2014. "A Review of Urban Residential Choice Models Using Agent-Based Modeling," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 41(4), pages 661-689, August.
    10. Anoek Castelein & Dennis Fok & Richard Paap, 2020. "A multinomial and rank-ordered logit model with inter- and intra-individual heteroscedasticity," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 20-069/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    11. Mulley, Corinne & Ho, Chinh & Ho, Loan & Hensher, David & Rose, John, 2018. "Will bus travellers walk further for a more frequent service? An international study using a stated preference approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 88-97.
    12. Djiby Racine Thiam & Ariel Dinar & Hebert Ntuli, 2021. "Promotion of residential water conservation measures in South Africa: the role of water-saving equipment," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(1), pages 173-210, January.
    13. Czajkowski, Mikolaj & Hanley, Nicholas & LaRiviere, Jacob, 2012. "The Effects of Experience on Preference Uncertainty: Theory and Empirics for Public and Quasi-Public Goods," Stirling Economics Discussion Papers 2012-17, University of Stirling, Division of Economics.
    14. Carson, Richard T. & Czajkowski, Mikołaj, 2019. "A new baseline model for estimating willingness to pay from discrete choice models," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 57-61.
    15. Ortúzar, Juan de Dios & Bascuñán, Raúl & Rizzi, Luis Ignacio & Salata, Andrés, 2021. "Assessing the potential acceptability of road pricing in Santiago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 153-169.
    16. Hackbarth, André & Madlener, Reinhard, 2016. "Willingness-to-pay for alternative fuel vehicle characteristics: A stated choice study for Germany," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 89-111.
    17. Hess, Stephane & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2013. "Linking response quality to survey engagement: A combined random scale and latent variable approach," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 1-12.
    18. Hong il Yoo, 2012. "The perceived unreliability of rank-ordered data: an econometric origin and implications," Discussion Papers 2012-46, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    19. Hongxing Zhao & Ruichun He & Xiaoyan Jia, 2019. "Estimation and Analysis of Vehicle Exhaust Emissions at Signalized Intersections Using a Car-Following Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-25, July.
    20. Mohammad Anwar Alattar & Caitlin Cottrill & Mark Beecroft, 2021. "Sources and Applications of Emerging Active Travel Data: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:393-:d:197516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.