IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i24p6941-d294631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From the Perspective of Battery Production: Energy–Environment–Economy (3E) Analysis of Lithium-Ion Batteries in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yixuan Wang

    (Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
    School of Materials Science & Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
    School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
    Beijing Key Lab of Energy Economics and Environmental Management, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Yajuan Yu

    (School of Materials Science & Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Kai Huang

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Baojun Tang

    (Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
    School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
    Beijing Key Lab of Energy Economics and Environmental Management, Beijing 100081, China
    Sustainable Development Research Institute for Economy and Society of Beijing, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

With the wide use of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), battery production has caused many problems, such as energy consumption and pollutant emissions. Although the life-cycle impacts of LIBs have been analyzed worldwide, the production phase has not been separately studied yet, especially in China. Therefore, this research focuses on the impacts of battery production and builds an energy–environment–economy (3E) evaluation system. Two battery factories in China were selected for an applied research. Case 1 annually produces 0.22 GWh lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, while case 2 produces 0.024 GWh lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NCM) batteries. The results demonstrate that electricity consumption per GWh LIBs production is 5.24 × 10 4 and 4.13 × 10 4 kWh for case 1 and 2, respectively. Major water pollutant emissions come from employees’ lives, and domestic waste accounts for 82%–83% of the total waste. Material costs per GWh NCM battery are 2.77 × 10 5 yuan, which is more expensive than the LFP battery, whose cathode material is relatively cheaper. Moreover, the cradle-to-gate carbon footprints (CFs) of the GWh LIBs are 41392.17 and 32254.57 kg CO 2 eq. The lithium compounds are major contributors to carbon emission for two LIBs. Some measures such as cleaner production, scale expansion and increase of environmental protection investment can effectively promote the development of a 3E system for LIB factories.

Suggested Citation

  • Yixuan Wang & Yajuan Yu & Kai Huang & Baojun Tang, 2019. "From the Perspective of Battery Production: Energy–Environment–Economy (3E) Analysis of Lithium-Ion Batteries in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:6941-:d:294631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/6941/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/6941/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lenzen, Manfred & Dey, Christopher J., 2002. "Economic, energy and greenhouse emissions impacts of some consumer choice, technology and government outlay options," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 377-403, July.
    2. Lazzaretto, A. & Toffolo, A. & Reini, M. & Taccani, R. & Zaleta-Aguilar, A. & Rangel-Hernandez, V. & Verda, V., 2006. "Four approaches compared on the TADEUS (thermoeconomic approach to the diagnosis of energy utility systems) test case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1586-1613.
    3. Ordoñez, J. & Gago, E.J. & Girard, A., 2016. "Processes and technologies for the recycling and recovery of spent lithium-ion batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 195-205.
    4. Guangwen Zhang & Zhongxing Du & Yaqun He & Haifeng Wang & Weining Xie & Tao Zhang, 2019. "A Sustainable Process for the Recovery of Anode and Cathode Materials Derived from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-11, April.
    5. Han Hao & Zhexuan Mu & Shuhua Jiang & Zongwei Liu & Fuquan Zhao, 2017. "GHG Emissions from the Production of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, April.
    6. Arno Kwade & Wolfgang Haselrieder & Ruben Leithoff & Armin Modlinger & Franz Dietrich & Klaus Droeder, 2018. "Current status and challenges for automotive battery production technologies," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(4), pages 290-300, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lawrence Fulton & Bradley Beauvais & Matthew Brooks & Scott Kruse & Kimberly Lee, 2020. "Sustainable Residential Building Considerations for Rural Areas: A Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Ren, Zhijun & Li, Huajie & Yan, Wenyi & Lv, Weiguang & Zhang, Guangming & Lv, Longyi & Sun, Li & Sun, Zhi & Gao, Wenfang, 2023. "Comprehensive evaluation on production and recycling of lithium-ion batteries: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tendai Tawonezvi & Myalelo Nomnqa & Leslie Petrik & Bernard Jan Bladergroen, 2023. "Recovery and Recycling of Valuable Metals from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-33, January.
    2. Chitnis, Mona & Sorrell, Steve & Druckman, Angela & Firth, Steven K. & Jackson, Tim, 2014. "Who rebounds most? Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for different UK socioeconomic groups," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 12-32.
    3. Silva, J.A.M. & Venturini, O.J. & Lora, E.E.S. & Pinho, A.F. & Santos, J.J.C.S., 2011. "Thermodynamic information system for diagnosis and prognosis of power plant operation condition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4072-4079.
    4. Abdollahifar, M. & Molaiyan, P. & Lassi, U. & Wu, N.L. & Kwade, A., 2022. "Multifunctional behaviour of graphite in lithium–sulfur batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Usón, Sergio & Valero, Antonio & Correas, Luis, 2010. "Energy efficiency assessment and improvement in energy intensive systems through thermoeconomic diagnosis of the operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(6), pages 1989-1995, June.
    6. Chitnis, Mona & Sorrell, Steve, 2015. "Living up to expectations: Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(S1), pages 100-116.
    7. Nenming Wang & Guwen Tang, 2022. "A Review on Environmental Efficiency Evaluation of New Energy Vehicles Using Life Cycle Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-35, March.
    8. Moreno, Blanca & López, Ana Jesús, 2008. "The effect of renewable energy on employment. The case of Asturias (Spain)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 732-751, April.
    9. Orea, Luis & Llorca, Manuel & Filippini, Massimo, 2015. "A new approach to measuring the rebound effect associated to energy efficiency improvements: An application to the US residential energy demand," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 599-609.
    10. Mostafaeipour, Ali, 2010. "Productivity and development issues of global wind turbine industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 1048-1058, April.
    11. Entwistle, Jake & Ge, Ruihuan & Pardikar, Kunal & Smith, Rachel & Cumming, Denis, 2022. "Carbon binder domain networks and electrical conductivity in lithium-ion battery electrodes: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    12. Wang, Mengmeng & Liu, Kang & Dutta, Shanta & Alessi, Daniel S. & Rinklebe, Jörg & Ok, Yong Sik & Tsang, Daniel C.W., 2022. "Recycling of lithium iron phosphate batteries: Status, technologies, challenges, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Riccardo Iacobucci & Benjamin McLellan & Tetsuo Tezuka, 2018. "The Synergies of Shared Autonomous Electric Vehicles with Renewable Energy in a Virtual Power Plant and Microgrid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    14. Maria A. Franco & Stefan N. Groesser, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review of the Solar Photovoltaic Value Chain for a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-35, August.
    15. Tang, Yanyan & Zhang, Qi & Li, Yaoming & Li, Hailong & Pan, Xunzhang & Mclellan, Benjamin, 2019. "The social-economic-environmental impacts of recycling retired EV batteries under reward-penalty mechanism," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Figus, Gioele & Turner, Karen & McGregor, Peter & Katris, Antonios, 2017. "Making the case for supporting broad energy efficiency programmes: Impacts on household incomes and other economic benefits," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 157-165.
    17. Lin, Shunda & Liu, Renlong & Guo, Shenghui, 2022. "High temperature microwave dielectric and thermochemical properties of waste LixMn2O4 battery cathode materials reduced by moso bamboo," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 714-724.
    18. César Torres & Antonio Valero, 2021. "The Exergy Cost Theory Revisited," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-42, March.
    19. Golmohammadzadeh, Rabeeh & Faraji, Fariborz & Jong, Brian & Pozo-Gonzalo, Cristina & Banerjee, Parama Chakraborty, 2022. "Current challenges and future opportunities toward recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    20. Kriegler, Johannes & Hille, Lucas & Stock, Sandro & Kraft, Ludwig & Hagemeister, Jan & Habedank, Jan Bernd & Jossen, Andreas & Zaeh, Michael F., 2021. "Enhanced performance and lifetime of lithium-ion batteries by laser structuring of graphite anodes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:6941-:d:294631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.