IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v9y2021i3p48-d511498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Transactions Using FINTECH during the Covid-19 Crisis in Bulgaria

Author

Listed:
  • Ivanka Vasenska

    (Department of Tourism, South-West University, 2700 Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria)

  • Preslav Dimitrov

    (Department of Tourism, South-West University, 2700 Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria)

  • Blagovesta Koyundzhiyska-Davidkova

    (Department of Economics, South-West University, 2700 Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria)

  • Vladislav Krastev

    (Department of Economics, South-West University, 2700 Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria)

  • Pavol Durana

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Zilina, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia)

  • Ioulia Poulaki

    (Department of Tourism Management, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece)

Abstract

In the context of current crises following COVID-19 and growing global economic uncertainties, the issues regarding financial transactions with FINTECH are increasingly apparent. Consequently, in our opinion, the utilization of FINTECH financial transactions leads to a risk-reduction approach when in contact with other people. Moreover, financial transactions with FINTECH can save up customers’ pecuniary funds. Therefore, during crises, FINTECH applications can be perceived as more competitive than the traditional banking system. All the above have provoked us to conduct research related to the utilization of financial transactions with FINTECH before and after the COVID-19 crisis outbreak. The aim of the article is to present a survey analysis of FINTECH utilization of individual customers before and after the crisis in Bulgaria. The methodology includes a questionnaire survey of 242 individual respondents. For the data processing, we implemented statistical measures and quantitative methods, including two-sample paired t -tests, Levene’s test, and ANOVAs performed through the computer language Python in a web-based interactive computing environment for creating documents, Jupyter Notebook. The findings bring out the main issues related to the implementation of financial transactions with FINTECH under the conditions of the crisis. The findings include the identification of problems related to FINTECH transactions during the COVID-19 crisis in Bulgaria.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivanka Vasenska & Preslav Dimitrov & Blagovesta Koyundzhiyska-Davidkova & Vladislav Krastev & Pavol Durana & Ioulia Poulaki, 2021. "Financial Transactions Using FINTECH during the Covid-19 Crisis in Bulgaria," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-28, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:3:p:48-:d:511498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/3/48/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/3/48/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bryane Michael & Tamara Latkovska, 2021. "The FinTech Dividend: How Much Money Is FinTech Likely to Mobilize for Sustainable Development?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(5), pages 677-688, November.
    2. Peter Gomber & Jascha-Alexander Koch & Michael Siering, 2017. "Digital Finance and FinTech: current research and future research directions," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(5), pages 537-580, July.
    3. Jovana Zoroja & Igor Klopotan & Ana-Marija Stjepic, 2020. "Quality of e-commerce practices in European enterprises: cluster analysis approach," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 18(2-B), pages 312-326.
    4. Ulrike Gretzel & Matthias Fuchs & Rodolfo Baggio & Wolfram Hoepken & Rob Law & Julia Neidhardt & Juho Pesonen & Markus Zanker & Zheng Xiang, 2020. "e-Tourism beyond COVID-19: a call for transformative research," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 187-203, June.
    5. Bruno S. Frey & Stephan Meier, 2004. "Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior: Testing "Conditional Cooperation" in a Field Experiment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(5), pages 1717-1722, December.
    6. Athanasios Koutras & Alkiviadis Panagopoulos & Ioannis A. Nikas, 2016. "Forecasting Tourism Demand Using Linear and Nonlinear Prediction Models," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 9(1), pages 85-98.
    7. Dariusz Wójcik & Stefanos Ioannou, 2020. "COVID‐19 and Finance: Market Developments So Far and Potential Impacts on the Financial Sector and Centres," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 111(3), pages 387-400, July.
    8. Dimitar Blagoev & Radostin Boyadzhiev, 2020. "Methodological Aspects of Management of Portfolios of Investment Projects for Real Assets of Business Organizations," Economic Archive, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 3 Year 20, pages 71-90.
    9. Katharine G. Abraham & John C. Haltiwanger & Kristin Sandusky & James R. Spletzer, 2017. "Measuring the Gig Economy: Current Knowledge and Open Issues," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring and Accounting for Innovation in the Twenty-First Century, pages 257-298, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Kuo Chuen, David LEE & Teo, Ernie G.S., 2015. "Emergence of FinTech and the LASIC principles," Journal of Financial Perspectives, EY Global FS Institute, vol. 3(3), pages 24-36.
    11. Jovana Zoroja & Igor Klopotan & Ana-Marija Stjepic, 2020. "Quality of e-commerce practices in European enterprises: cluster analysis approach," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 18(2B), pages 312-327.
    12. Michael B. Imerman & Frank J. Fabozzi, 2020. "Cashing in on innovation: a taxonomy of FinTech," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 167-177, May.
    13. Dimitar Ivanov, 2020. "Macroeconomic Challenges and Risks Posed by the Global Coronavirus Crisis," Economic Archive, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 3 Year 20, pages 3-28.
    14. Elisabeth Deutskens & Ad Jong & Ko Ruyter & Martin Wetzels, 2006. "Comparing the generalizability of online and mail surveys in cross-national service quality research," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 119-136, April.
    15. Liang, Sai & Li, Chunxiao & Zhang, Xiaoxia & Li, Hui, 2020. "The snowball effect in online travel platforms: How does peer influence affect review posting decisions?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Liu, Jiajia & Li, Xuerong & Wang, Shouyang, 2020. "What have we learnt from 10 years of fintech research? a scientometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    17. Atanas Damyanov, 2020. "Eclectic Views on the Consequences of Covid-19," Economic Archive, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 3 Year 20, pages 29-40.
    18. Bruno Frey & Stephan Meier, 2004. "In a field experiment," Natural Field Experiments 00243, The Field Experiments Website.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barbara Będowska-Sójka & Agata Kliber & Laivi Laidroo, 2023. "Has the pandemic changed the relationships between fintechs and banks?," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 33(4), pages 15-33.
    2. Agnessa O. Inshakova & Anastasia A. Sozinova & Tatiana N. Litvinova, 2021. "Corporate Fight against the COVID-19 Risks Based on Technologies of Industry 4.0 as a New Direction of Social Responsibility," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Peterson K. Ozili & David Mhlanga & Rym Ammar & Marwa Fersi, 2024. "Information Effect of Fintech and Digital Finance on Financial Inclusion during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Global Evidence," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Łukasz Gębski, 2021. "The Impact of the Crisis Triggered by the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Actions of Regulators on the Consumer Finance Market in Poland and Other European Union Countries," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Sharma, Gagan Deep & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Singh, Sanjeet & Chopra, Ritika & Cifuentes-Faura, Javier, 2023. "Investigating the nexus between green economy, sustainability, bitcoin and oil prices: Contextual evidence from the United States," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Vijaya Krishna Kanaparthi, 2024. "Navigating Uncertainty: Enhancing Markowitz Asset Allocation Strategies through Out-of-Sample Analysis," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Modgil, Sachin & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Rana, Nripendra P. & Gupta, Shivam & Kamble, Sachin, 2022. "Has Covid-19 accelerated opportunities for digital entrepreneurship? An Indian perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deli Wang & Ke Peng & Kaiye Tang & Yewei Wu, 2022. "Does Fintech Development Enhance Corporate ESG Performance? Evidence from an Emerging Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Luiz Antonio Joia & Rodrigo Proença, 2022. "The social representation of fintech from the perspective of traditional financial sector professionals: evidence from Brazil," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Wojciech Hardy & Michal Krawczyk & Joanna Tyrowicz, 2015. ""Thou shalt not leech" Are digital pirates conditional cooperators?," Working Papers 2015-26, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    4. Nikolova, Milena & Roman, Monica & Zimmermann, Klaus F., 2017. "Left behind but doing good? Civic engagement in two post-socialist countries," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 658-684.
    5. Laure Kuhfuss & Raphaële Préget & Sophie Thoyer & Nick Hanley & Philippe Le Coent & Mathieu Désolé, 2016. "Nudges, Social Norms, and Permanence in Agri-environmental Schemes," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 92(4), pages 641-655.
    6. Schnellenbach, Jan & Schubert, Christian, 2015. "Behavioral political economy: A survey," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 40(PB), pages 395-417.
    7. Daniel Jones & Sera Linardi, 2014. "Wallflowers: Experimental Evidence of an Aversion to Standing Out," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(7), pages 1757-1771, July.
    8. Dean Karlan & John A. List, 2007. "Does Price Matter in Charitable Giving? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(5), pages 1774-1793, December.
    9. Bruno S. Frey & Alois Stutzer, 2006. "Environmental Morale and Motivation," CREMA Working Paper Series 2006-17, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    10. Deck, Cary & Murphy, James J., 2019. "Donors change both their level and pattern of giving in response to contests among charities," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 91-106.
    11. Kimbrough, E.O. & Vostroknutov, A., 2012. "Rules, rule-following and cooperation," Research Memorandum 053, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    12. Leibbrandt, Andreas & Lynham, John, 2018. "Does the allocation of property rights matter in the commons?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 201-217.
    13. Urs Fischbacher & Simon Gachter, 2010. "Social Preferences, Beliefs, and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(1), pages 541-556, March.
    14. Simon Gächter & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2013. "Peer Effects In Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms Or Social Preferences?," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 548-573, June.
    15. Markussen, Thomas & Sharma, Smriti & Singhal, Saurabh & Tarp, Finn, 2021. "Inequality, institutions and cooperation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    16. Cattaneo, Cristina & D’Adda, Giovanna & Tavoni, Massimo & Bonan, Jacopo, 2019. "Can We Make Social Information Programs More Effective? The Role of Identity and Values," RFF Working Paper Series 19-21, Resources for the Future.
    17. Katherine L. Dickinson & Hannah Brenkert-Smith & Greg Madonia & Nicholas E. Flores, 2020. "Risk interdependency, social norms, and wildfire mitigation: a choice experiment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 1327-1354, August.
    18. Drouvelis, Michalis & Marx, Benjamin M., 2022. "Can charitable appeals identify and exploit belief heterogeneity?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 631-649.
    19. Bartke, Simon & Friedl, Andreas & Gelhaar, Felix & Reh, Laura, 2017. "Social comparison nudges—Guessing the norm increases charitable giving," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 73-75.
    20. Phu Nguyen-Van & Anne Stenger & Tuyen Tiet, 2021. "Social incentive factors in interventions promoting sustainable behaviors: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-27, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:3:p:48-:d:511498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.