IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i4p580-d345312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Malmquist Productivity Analysis of Top Global Automobile Manufacturers

Author

Listed:
  • Chia-Nan Wang

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan)

  • Hector Tibo

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan
    Electrical Engineering Department, Technological University of the Philippines Taguig, Taguig 1630, Philippines)

  • Hong Anh Nguyen

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan)

Abstract

The automobile industry is one of the largest economies in the world, by revenue. Being one of the industries with higher employment output, this has become a major determinant of economic growth. In view of the declining automobile production after a period of continuous growth in the 2008 global auto crisis, the re-evaluation of automobile manufacturing is necessary. This study applies the Malmquist productivity index (MPI), one of the many models in the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), to analyze the performance of the world’s top 20 automakers over the period of 2015–2018. The researchers assessed the technical efficiency, technological progress, and the total factor productivity of global automobile manufacturers, using a variety of input and output variables which are considered to be essential financial indicators, such as total assets, shareholder’s equity, cost of revenue, operating expenses, revenue, and net income. The results show that the most productive automaker on average is Volkswagen, followed by Honda, BAIC, General Motors, and Suzuki. On the contrary, Mitsubishi and Tata Motors were the worst-performing automakers during the studied period. This study provides a general overview of the global automobile industry. This paper can be a valuable reference for car managers, policymakers, and investors, to aid their decision-making on automobile management, investment, and development. This research is also a contribution to organizational performance measurement, using the DEA Malmquist model.

Suggested Citation

  • Chia-Nan Wang & Hector Tibo & Hong Anh Nguyen, 2020. "Malmquist Productivity Analysis of Top Global Automobile Manufacturers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-21, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:4:p:580-:d:345312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/4/580/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/4/580/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johannes Van Biesebroeck & Aamir Hashmi, 2007. "Market Structure and Innovation: A Dynamic Analysis of the Global Automobile Industry," 2007 Meeting Papers 362, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    2. Chang, Young-Tae & Zhang, Ning & Danao, Denise & Zhang, Nan, 2013. "Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: A non-radial DEA approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 277-283.
    3. Bjurek, Hans, 1996. " The Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 98(2), pages 303-313, June.
    4. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    5. Chang, Hsihui & Choy, Hiu Lam & Cooper, William W. & Ruefli, Timothy W., 2009. "Using Malmquist Indexes to measure changes in the productivity and efficiency of US accounting firms before and after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 951-960, October.
    6. Aamir Rafique Hashmi & Johannes Van Biesebroeck, 2016. "The Relationship between Market Structure and Innovation in Industry Equilibrium: A Case Study of the Global Automobile Industry," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 98(1), pages 192-208, March.
    7. Chen, Yao, 2003. "A non-radial Malmquist productivity index with an illustrative application to Chinese major industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 27-35, January.
    8. Asieh Fathali, 2016. "Examining the Impact of Competitive Strategies on Corporate Innovation: An Empirical Study in Automobile Industry," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(2), pages 135-145.
    9. Kulshreshtha, Mudit & Parikh, Jyoti K., 2002. "Study of efficiency and productivity growth in opencast and underground coal mining in India: a DEA analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 439-453, September.
    10. Liu, Fuh-Hwa Franklin & Wang, Peng-hsiang, 2008. "DEA Malmquist productivity measure: Taiwanese semiconductor companies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 367-379, March.
    11. Odeck, James, 2000. "Assessing the relative efficiency and productivity growth of vehicle inspection services: An application of DEA and Malmquist indices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 501-514, November.
    12. Anatoly Pilyavsky & Matthias Staat, 2008. "Efficiency and productivity change in Ukrainian health care," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 143-154, April.
    13. Fulginiti, Lilyan E. & Perrin, Richard K., 1997. "LDC agriculture: Nonparametric Malmquist productivity indexes," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 373-390, August.
    14. Mainak Mazumdar & Meenakshi Rajeev, 2009. "A Comparative Analysis of Efficiency and Productivity of the Indian Pharmaceutical Firms: A Malmquist-Meta-Frontier Approach," Working Papers 223, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore.
    15. Asieh Fathali, 2016. "Examining the Impact of Competitive Strategies on Corporate Innovation: An Empirical Study in Automobile Industry," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(2), pages 135-145, February.
    16. Chia-Nan Wang & Xuan-Tho Nguyen & Yen-Hui Wang, 2016. "Automobile Industry Strategic Alliance Partner Selection: The Application of a Hybrid DEA and Grey Theory Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Mainak Mazumdar & Meenakshi Rajeev, 2009. "Comparing the Efficiency and Productivity of the Indian Pharmaceutical Firms: A Malmquist-Meta-Frontier Approach," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 8(2), pages 159-181, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chia-Nan Wang & Kristofer Neal Castro Imperial & Ching-Chien Huang & Thanh-Tuan Dang, 2022. "Output Targeting and Runway Utilization of Major International Airports: A Comparative Analysis Using DEA," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Monica Aureliana Petcu & Liliana Ionescu-Feleaga & Bogdan-Ștefan Ionescu & Dumitru-Florin Moise, 2023. "A Decade for the Mathematics : Bibliometric Analysis of Mathematical Modeling in Economics, Ecology, and Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-30, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarker Jewel & Jongyi Hong & Chaechang Im, 2022. "Innovation Strategies for Textile Companies in Bangladesh: Development Using Quadrant Analysis Based on a Productivity Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Hazera Akter & Suborna Barua, 2016. "International trade financing: a comparative study on the performance of state-owned and private commercial banks of Bangladesh," International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 164-186.
    3. Khoshroo, Alireza & Izadikhah, Mohammad & Emrouznejad, Ali, 2022. "Total factor energy productivity considering undesirable pollutant outputs: A new double frontier based malmquist productivity index," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    4. Liu, Fuh-Hwa Franklin & Wang, Peng-hsiang, 2008. "DEA Malmquist productivity measure: Taiwanese semiconductor companies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 367-379, March.
    5. Bojiang Yang & Youliang Zhang & Hongjun Zhang & Rui Zhang & Baoyu Xu, 2016. "Factor-specific Malmquist productivity index based on common weights DEA," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 51-70, April.
    6. Varun Mahajan & D. K. Nauriyal & S. P. Singh, 2020. "Domestic market competitiveness of Indian drug and pharmaceutical industry," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 519-559, June.
    7. Chiu, Yung-Ho & Lee, Jen-Hui & Lu, Ching-Cheng & Shyu, Ming-Kuang & Luo, Zhengying, 2012. "The technology gap and efficiency measure in WEC countries: Application of the hybrid meta frontier model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 349-357.
    8. Liao, Chun-Hsiung & Lien, Chun-Yu, 2012. "Measuring the technology gap of APEC integrated telecommunications operators," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 989-996.
    9. Jin-chi Hsieh & Ching-cheng Lu & Ying Li & Yung-ho Chiu & Ya-sue Xu, 2019. "Environmental Assessment of European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Walheer, Barnabé, 2019. "Malmquist productivity index for multi-output producers: An application to electricity generation plants," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 76-88.
    11. Hsiao-Yin Chen & Chin-wei Huang & Yung-Ho Chiu, 2017. "An intertemporal efficiency and technology measurement for tourist hotel," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 85-96, August.
    12. Fernando Gascón & Jesús Lozano & Borja Ponte & David Fuente, 2017. "Measuring the efficiency of large pharmaceutical companies: an industry analysis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(5), pages 587-608, June.
    13. Chia-Nan Wang & Han-Sung Lin & Hsien-Pin Hsu & Van-Tinh Le & Tsung-Fu Lin, 2016. "Applying Data Envelopment Analysis and Grey Model for the Productivity Evaluation of Vietnamese Agroforestry Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-15, November.
    14. Ganji, Seyedreza Seyedalizadeh & Rassafi, Amir Abbas & Bandari, Samaneh Jamshidi, 2020. "Application of evidential reasoning approach and OWA operator weights in road safety evaluation considering the best and worst practice frontiers," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    15. Phi-Hung Nguyen & Thi-Ly Nguyen & Hong-Quan Le & Thuy-Quynh Pham & Hoang-Anh Nguyen & Chi-Vinh Pham, 2023. "How Does the Competitiveness Index Promote Foreign Direct Investment at the Provincial Level in Vietnam? An Integrated Grey Delphi–DEA Model Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-30, March.
    16. Soumita Khan, 2017. "Efficiency of Indian fertilizer firms: A s tochastic frontier approach," Working Papers 396, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore.
    17. Hua Tang, 2022. "The Effect of ESG Performance on Corporate Innovation in China: The Mediating Role of Financial Constraints and Agency Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Fang, Lei, 2022. "Measuring and decomposing group performance under centralized management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1006-1013.
    19. Feyyaz Cengiz Dikmen, 2016. "Productivity Change: An Empirical Study on Turkish State Universities," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 4(1), pages 27-34, June.
    20. Md Aslam Mia & V. G. R. Chandran, 2016. "Measuring Financial and Social Outreach Productivity of Microfinance Institutions in Bangladesh," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 505-527, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:4:p:580-:d:345312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.