IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i3p431-d333215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stability of Replicator Dynamics with Bounded Continuously Distributed Time Delay

Author

Listed:
  • Chongyi Zhong

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Hui Yang

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Zixin Liu

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Juanyong Wu

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

Abstract

In this paper, we consider evolutionary games and construct a model of replicator dynamics with bounded continuously distributed time delay. In many circumstances, players interact simultaneously while impacts of their choices take place after some time, which implies a time delay exists. We consider the time delay as bounded continuously distributed other than some given constant. Then, we investigate the stability of the evolutionarily stable strategy in the replicator dynamics with bounded continuously distributed time delay in two-player game contexts. Some stability conditions of the unique interior Nash equilibrium are obtained. Finally, the simple but important Hawk–Dove game is used to verify our results.

Suggested Citation

  • Chongyi Zhong & Hui Yang & Zixin Liu & Juanyong Wu, 2020. "Stability of Replicator Dynamics with Bounded Continuously Distributed Time Delay," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:431-:d:333215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/3/431/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/3/431/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hofbauer, Josef & Weibull, Jorgen W., 1996. "Evolutionary Selection against Dominated Strategies," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 558-573, November.
    2. Effrosyni Diamantoudi & Licun Xue, 2003. "Farsighted stability in hedonic games," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 21(1), pages 39-61, August.
    3. Bogomolnaia, Anna & Jackson, Matthew O., 2002. "The Stability of Hedonic Coalition Structures," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 201-230, February.
    4. Mertikopoulos, Panayotis & Sandholm, William H., 2018. "Riemannian game dynamics," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 315-364.
    5. Sung-Ha Hwang & Jonathan Newton, 2017. "Payoff-dependent dynamics and coordination games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 64(3), pages 589-604, October.
    6. Friedman, Daniel, 1991. "Evolutionary Games in Economics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 637-666, May.
    7. Nesrine Ben Khalifa & Rachid El-Azouzi & Yezekael Hayel & Issam Mabrouki, 2017. "Evolutionary Games in Interacting Communities," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 131-156, June.
    8. Jonathan Newton, 2018. "Evolutionary Game Theory: A Renaissance," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-67, May.
    9. Nesrine Ben-Khalifa & Rachid El-Azouzi & Yezekael Hayel, 2018. "Discrete and Continuous Distributed Delays in Replicator Dynamics," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 713-732, December.
    10. Aumann, Robert J., 1997. "Rationality and Bounded Rationality," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 21(1-2), pages 2-14, October.
    11. James Burridge & Yu Gao & Yong Mao, 2017. "Delayed response in the Hawk Dove game," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 90(1), pages 1-6, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan, Hairui & Meng, Xinzhu, 2022. "Replicator dynamics of division of labor games with delayed payoffs in infinite populations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Yuwei Yan & Xiaomeng Ma & Yi Song & Ajay Kumar & Ruixian Yang, 2023. "Exploring the interaction and choice behavior of organization and individuals in the crowd logistics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 1021-1040, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan Newton, 2018. "Evolutionary Game Theory: A Renaissance," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-67, May.
    2. Srinivas Arigapudi & Omer Edhan & Yuval Heller & Ziv Hellman, 2022. "Mentors and Recombinators: Multi-Dimensional Social Learning," Papers 2205.00278, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    3. Mauleon, Ana & Roehl, Nils & Vannetelbosch, Vincent, 2019. "Paths to stability for overlapping group structures," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 19-24.
    4. Imamura, Kenzo & Konishi, Hideo & Pan, Chen-Yu, 2023. "Stability in matching with externalities: Pairs competition and oligopolistic joint ventures," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 270-286.
    5. Sandholm,W.H., 2003. "Excess payoff dynamics, potential dynamics, and stable games," Working papers 5, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.
    6. Viossat, Yannick, 2008. "Evolutionary dynamics may eliminate all strategies used in correlated equilibrium," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 27-43, July.
    7. Hwang, Sung-Ha & Rey-Bellet, Luc, 2021. "Positive feedback in coordination games: Stochastic evolutionary dynamics and the logit choice rule," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 355-373.
    8. Bettina Klaus & Flip Klijn & Markus Walzl, 2011. "Farsighted Stability for Roommate Markets," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 13(6), pages 921-933, December.
    9. Ray, Debraj & Vohra, Rajiv, 2015. "Coalition Formation," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,, Elsevier.
    10. Shao Sung & Dinko Dimitrov, 2007. "On Myopic Stability Concepts for Hedonic Games," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 31-45, February.
    11. Dinko Dimitrov & Shao Chin Sung, 2006. "A Taxonomy of Myopic Stability Concepts for Hedonic Games," Working Papers 2006.10, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    12. Alison Watts, 2007. "Formation of segregated and integrated groups," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 35(4), pages 505-519, April.
    13. Hwang, Sung-Ha & Lim, Wooyoung & Neary, Philip & Newton, Jonathan, 2018. "Conventional contracts, intentional behavior and logit choice: Equality without symmetry," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 273-294.
    14. Barbera, Salvador & Gerber, Anke, 2003. "Corrigendum to "On coalition formation: durable coalition structures": [Mathematical Social Sciences 45 (2003) 185-203]," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 355-356, December.
    15. Kenzo Imamura & Hideo Konishi, 2023. "Assortative Matching with Externalities and Farsighted Agents," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 497-509, June.
    16. Atay, Ata & Mauleon, Ana & Vannetelbosch, Vincent, 2021. "A bargaining set for roommate problems," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    17. Iehle, Vincent, 2007. "The core-partition of a hedonic game," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 176-185, September.
    18. Debraj Ray & Rajiv Vohra, 2013. "The Farsighted Stable Set," Working Papers 2013-11, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    19. Diamantoudi, Effrosyni & Xue, Licun, 2007. "Coalitions, agreements and efficiency," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 105-125, September.
    20. Saeed Hadikhanloo & Rida Laraki & Panayotis Mertikopoulos & Sylvain Sorin, 2022. "Learning in nonatomic games, part Ⅰ: Finite action spaces and population games," Post-Print hal-03767995, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:431-:d:333215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.