IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v7y2019i10p906-d271447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Multiple Attribute Decision Model for Key Parameters of Online Group Buying Product

Author

Listed:
  • Shen-Tsu Wang

    (Department of Commerce Automation and Management, National Pingtung University, No.51, Minsheng E. Rd., Pingtung City, Pingtung County 90004, Taiwan)

  • Meng-Hua Li

    (Department of Industrial Management & Institute of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Formosa University, Huwei, Yunlin 63201, Taiwan
    Smart Machine and Intelligent Manufacturing Research Center, National Formosa University, Huwei, Yunlin 63201, Taiwan)

  • Chun-Chi Lien

    (Department of Business Administrator, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan)

Abstract

The rise of the internet has led to rapid development of online group buying, and with the various functions and analysis tools provided on the internet, consumers are making more purchases than ever before. In addition to attracting consumers to buy products or services via online shopping platforms, the industry’s online group buying market allows customers to enjoy preferential prices together. Consumers can bargain through large-scale purchases. Through quantity-based pricing, the effect of the decline on consumers’ expected price will be enhanced, and consumers will be able to purchase products at lower prices, which encourages more consumers to join group buying schemes. In terms of product cost, online shopping operations enable manufacturers to save shop setup and inventory costs, and some of these cost savings may be reflected in the selling price, which can enable customers to obtain products at lower prices. The grey decision model is used for further in-depth exploration. The purpose of this study is to use the grey correlation ranking and grey multi-attribute decision-making (TOPSIS) process to further determine the optimal shelf-time, inventory quantity, and selling price (key parameters) of commodities, in order to design a plan that makes maximum profit for the industry and provides the best service to customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Shen-Tsu Wang & Meng-Hua Li & Chun-Chi Lien, 2019. "Optimal Multiple Attribute Decision Model for Key Parameters of Online Group Buying Product," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:7:y:2019:i:10:p:906-:d:271447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/7/10/906/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/7/10/906/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kahneman, Daniel & Knetsch, Jack L & Thaler, Richard H, 1986. "Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(4), pages 285-300, October.
    2. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Mukherjee, Subhasis & Balan, Chidambaram V., 1997. "An order-level lot size inventory model with inventory-level dependent demand and deterioration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 227-236, February.
    3. Krishnan S. Anand & Ravi Aron, 2003. "Group Buying on the Web: A Comparison of Price-Discovery Mechanisms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(11), pages 1546-1562, November.
    4. Shiming Deng & Xuan Jiang & Yanhai Li, 2018. "Optimal price and maximum deal size on group-buying websites for sellers with finite capacity," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(5), pages 1918-1933, March.
    5. Cui, Li & Chan, Hing Kai & Zhou, Yizhuo & Dai, Jing & Lim, Jia Jia, 2019. "Exploring critical factors of green business failure based on Grey-Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 450-461.
    6. Guanqun Ni & Yinfeng Xu & Jiuping Xu & Yucheng Dong, 2015. "Optimal decisions for fixed-price group-buying business originated in China: a game theoretic perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(10), pages 2995-3005, May.
    7. Saad Ahmed Javed & Sifeng Liu & Amin Mahmoudi & Muhammad Nawaz, 2019. "Patients' satisfaction and public and private sectors' health care service quality in Pakistan: Application of grey decision analysis approaches," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 168-182, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lang Xiong & Tingting Xiao & Fuhai Nie, 2022. "Group Buying of Competing Retailers with Strategic Inventory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guanqun Ni, 2019. "A pricing model for group buying based on network effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Michael Seiler, 2014. "The Effect of Perceived Lender Characteristics and Market Conditions on Strategic Mortgage Defaults," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 256-270, February.
    3. Burks, Stephen V. & Carpenter, Jeffrey P. & Verhoogen, Eric, 2003. "Playing both roles in the trust game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 195-216, June.
    4. David Rea & Craig Froehle & Suzanne Masterson & Brian Stettler & Gregory Fermann & Arthur Pancioli, 2021. "Unequal but Fair: Incorporating Distributive Justice in Operational Allocation Models," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2304-2320, July.
    5. Seema Kacker & Tin Aung & Dominic Montagu & David Bishai, 2021. "Providers preferences towards greater patient health benefit is associated with higher quality of care," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 271-294, September.
    6. Emin Karagözoğlu & Elif Tosun, 2022. "Endogenous Game Choice and Giving Behavior in Distribution Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-32, November.
    7. Zhang, Lu & Cui, Li & Chen, Lujie & Dai, Jing & Jin, Ziyi & Wu, Hao, 2023. "A hybrid approach to explore the critical criteria of online supply chain finance to improve supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    8. Bradley J. Ruffle, 2005. "Buyer Countervailing Power: A Survey of Experimental Evidence," Working Papers 0512, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    9. Antonides, Gerrit & Kroft, Maaike, 2005. "Fairness judgments in household decision making," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 902-913, December.
    10. Huang, Jen-Hung & Chang, Ching-Te & Chen, Cathy Yi-Hsuan, 2005. "Perceived fairness of pricing on the Internet," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 343-361, June.
    11. Hendrik Dalen & Kène Henkens, 2013. "Dilemmas of Downsizing During the Great Recession: Crisis Strategies of European Employers," De Economist, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 307-329, September.
    12. Bodo Schlegelmilch & Magdalena Oberseder, 2007. "Ethical Issues in Global Supply Chains," Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, University of Milano-Bicocca, issue 2 Ethics .
    13. Erhao Xie, 2019. "Monetary Payoff and Utility Function in Adaptive Learning Models," Staff Working Papers 19-50, Bank of Canada.
    14. Charness, Gary & Du, Ninghua & Yang, Chun-Lei, 2011. "Trust and trustworthiness reputations in an investment game," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 361-375, June.
    15. Stefano DellaVigna, 2009. "Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 315-372, June.
    16. Yuan-Wei Du & Wen Zhou, 2019. "DSmT-Based Group DEMATEL Method with Reaching Consensus," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1201-1230, December.
    17. Tim Benning & Els Breugelmans & Benedict Dellaert, 2012. "Consumers’ evaluation of allocation policies for scarce health care services: Vested interest activation trumps spatial and temporal distance," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 531-543, September.
    18. James C. Cox & Vjollca Sadiraj, 2018. "Incentives," Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series 2018-01, Experimental Economics Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    19. Handgraaf, Michel J.J. & Dijk, Eric van & Wilke, Henk A.M. & Vermunt, Riel C., 2004. "Evaluability of outcomes in ultimatum bargaining," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 97-106, September.
    20. Nebiyou Tilahun & David Levinson, 2013. "Selfishness and altruism in the distribution of travel time and income," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(5), pages 1043-1061, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:7:y:2019:i:10:p:906-:d:271447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.