IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v13y2020i9p195-d407294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Portfolio Theory in Solving the Problem Structural Choice

Author

Listed:
  • Oleg S. Sukharev

    (Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 32 Nakhimovsky Prospekt, 117218 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to reveal the problem (and to determine the possibility of solving the structural choice problem) as one of the areas in modern portfolio theory development. The article also argues that portfolio analysis is a method of structural analysis for various economic units. The research methodology is defined by the portfolio theory, optimization models implemented by the numerical gradient projection method, the empirical static method of analysis and simulation cases when the models are implemented. The research supported by the above- mentioned methodology aimed to reach the goal results in substantiating the structural choice. This choice differs from the classical portfolio choice as it is necessary to find how the investments are allocated for the portfolio units, and the same should be done for the characteristics points, where it is a challenge to apply the efficient set theorem, because different structures for the allocation of the resources, investments give the same or nearly the same combination of the expected return and total portfolio risk. Economic sectors characterized by the profitability and business risk are seen to be the portfolio units in terms of the macroeconomic approach from the portfolio theory developed by Tobin. Total income maximization model and total portfolio risk minimization demonstrate both the structural choice problem, including at the characteristic points, and choice dependence on the expansion of the resource allocated to the portfolio, and on the number of portfolio units. The analysis and model simulations enhance the efficient set theorem with the criteria for structural choice—income and risk correlation on the effective distribution curve, among other factors. A portfolio with two real sectors of the Russian economy illustrates that profitability and risk ratio determines the resource allocation between them under the income maximization model, so one sector grabs a more substantial resource. Thus, being a tool to support the structural choice, portfolio analysis gives structural diagnostics for the resource distribution, investments allocation by portfolio units.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleg S. Sukharev, 2020. "Portfolio Theory in Solving the Problem Structural Choice," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:13:y:2020:i:9:p:195-:d:407294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/13/9/195/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/13/9/195/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumhof, Michael, 2018. "On the theory of international currency portfolios," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 376-396.
    2. Carmona, Itsaso & Ansuategi, Alberto & Chamorro, José Manuel & Escapa, Marta & Gallastegui, María Carmen & Murillas, Arantza & Prellezo, Raúl, 2020. "Measuring the value of ecosystem-based fishery management using financial portfolio theory," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Markowitz, Harry M., 1991. "Individual versus institutional investing," Financial Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 1-8.
    4. Fahmy, Hany, 2020. "Mean-variance-time: An extension of Markowitz's mean-variance portfolio theory," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Andrew Grant & Steve Satchell, 2020. "Investment decisions when utility depends on wealth and other attributes," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 499-513, March.
    6. Brainard, William C & Tobin, James, 1992. "On the Internationalization of Portfolios," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(4), pages 533-565, October.
    7. Shinzato, Takashi, 2018. "Maximizing and minimizing investment concentration with constraints of budget and investment risk," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 986-993.
    8. Zhang, Shuang & Zhao, Tao & Xie, Bai-Chen, 2018. "What is the optimal power generation mix of China? An empirical analysis using portfolio theory," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 522-536.
    9. van Bilsen, Servaas & Laeven, Roger J.A., 2020. "Dynamic consumption and portfolio choice under prospect theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 224-237.
    10. James Tobin, 1955. "A Dynamic Aggregative Model," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 63(2), pages 103-103.
    11. Li, Jiang-Cheng & Mei, Dong-Cheng, 2014. "The returns and risks of investment portfolio in a financial market," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 406(C), pages 67-72.
    12. Puntsag, Davgadorj, 2020. "Mongolian mineral export basket risk: A Portfolio theory approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Fu, Yufen & Blazenko, George W., 2017. "Normative portfolio theory," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 240-251.
    14. Cuchiero, Christa, 2019. "Polynomial processes in stochastic portfolio theory," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 129(5), pages 1829-1872.
    15. Alvarez, Sergio & Larkin, Sherry L. & Ropicki, Andrew, 2017. "Optimizing provision of ecosystem services using modern portfolio theory," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PA), pages 25-37.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Todor Stoilov & Krasimira Stoilova, 2022. "An Algorithm for Business Management Based on Portfolio Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Spyridon D. Mourtas & Vasilios N. Katsikis, 2022. "V-Shaped BAS: Applications on Large Portfolios Selection Problem," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(4), pages 1353-1373, December.
    2. David Itkin & Martin Larsson, 2021. "On A Class Of Rank-Based Continuous Semimartingales," Papers 2104.04396, arXiv.org.
    3. Shiller, Robert J., 1999. "Social security and institutions for intergenerational, intragenerational, and international risk-sharing," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 165-204, June.
    4. Jeffrey A. Frankel, 1994. "The Internationalization of Equity Markets," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number fran94-1, March.
    5. Jonathan Heathcote & Fabrizio Perri, 2013. "The International Diversification Puzzle Is Not as Bad as You Think," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 121(6), pages 1108-1159.
    6. Boermans, Martijn A. & Burger, John D., 2023. "Fickle emerging market flows, stable euros, and the dollar risk factor," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    7. James Tobin, 1993. "Price Flexibility and Output Stability: An Old Keynesian View," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 7(1), pages 45-65, Winter.
    8. Maurice Obstfeld, 1993. "International Capital Mobility in the 1990s," NBER Working Papers 4534, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Edge, Rochelle M., 2007. "Time-to-build, time-to-plan, habit-persistence, and the liquidity effect," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1644-1669, September.
    10. Christa Cuchiero & Sara Svaluto-Ferro, 2021. "Infinite-dimensional polynomial processes," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 383-426, April.
    11. Bali, Turan G., 2000. "U.S. money demand and the welfare cost of inflation in a currency-deposit model," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 233-258.
    12. Frank Figge & Andrea Stevenson Thorpe & Siarhei Manzhynski & Melissa Gutberlet, 2022. "The us in reUSe. Theorizing the how and why of the circular economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 2741-2753, September.
    13. Earl A. Thompson, 1976. "A Reformulation of Macroeconomic Theory," UCLA Economics Working Papers 075, UCLA Department of Economics.
    14. Nicolas Coeurdacier & Robert Kollmann & Philippe Martin, 2009. "International Portfolios with Supply, Demand, and Redistributive Shocks," NBER Chapters, in: NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics 2007, pages 231-263, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Yu, Xing & Zhang, Wei Guo & Liu, Yong Jun & Wang, Xinxin & Wang, Chao, 2020. "Hedging the exchange rate risk for international portfolios," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 85-104.
    16. Christa Cuchiero & Sara Svaluto-Ferro, 2019. "Infinite dimensional polynomial processes," Papers 1911.02614, arXiv.org.
    17. Miles S. Kimball & John G. Fernald & Susanto Basu, 2006. "Are Technology Improvements Contractionary?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1418-1448, December.
    18. Robert Barsky & Christopher House & Miles Kimball, 2003. "Do Flexible Durable Goods Prices Undermine Sticky Price Models?," Macroeconomics 0302003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/c8dmi8nm4pdjkuc9g7485ckbm is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Ogawa, Shogo, 2022. "Monetary growth with disequilibrium: A non-Walrasian baseline model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 512-528.
    21. Thomas J. Sargent, 1976. "Interest Rates and Expected Inflation: A Selective Summary of Recent Research," NBER Chapters, in: Explorations in Economic Research, Volume 3, number 3, pages 303-325, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:13:y:2020:i:9:p:195-:d:407294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.