IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p2966-d1061643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Association Network Evolution and Variance Decomposition of Economic Sustainability Development Efficiency in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Fang

    (School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China)

  • Yun Cao

    (School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
    Marine Development Studies Institute of OUC, Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences at Universities, Ministry of Education, Qingdao 266100, China)

Abstract

The economy’s sustainable development has become a national strategic deployment in China. Research on the difference between the economic sustainable development efficiency (ESDE) and the spatial network will assist the government with the deployment of sustainable development strategies and the achievement of the “peak carbon dioxide emissions”. This paper designs the input–output indicator system of sustainable economic development efficiency and builds an unexpected output super-EBM-Malmquist model to measure the ESDE of 30 provinces in China from 2008–2020. According to the ranking of ESDE, the 30 provinces in China are classified into four groups by applying the quartile method, and the difference in the ESDE in different regions and the temporal variation of different provinces are studied by using the Dagum Gini coefficient and Gaussian Kernel density. Moreover, the relationship between ESDE in different provinces is studied based on the revised gravity model and social network analysis method. The connections between provinces with related relations constitute the ESDE network. Results show that (1) the average ESDE in China shows an upward trend, the eastern region is in a leading position, the central and western regions are trying to catch up with the eastern region, and the development of the northeast region is lagging behind. (2) The level of ESDE in different provinces is clearly arranged from high to low, illuminating a distinct pattern. Moreover, provinces with high levels of development are much higher than provinces with low levels of development, presenting a phenomenon of polarization. (3) The regional ESDE development imbalance is prominent, and the ESDE in the eastern region is closely related, while the connection in the western region is lower. (4) Beijing–Tianjin Urban Agglomeration and the Yangtze River Delta have significant spatial spillover effects in the association network, while the northeast, northwest, southwest and central regions have significant spatial benefit relationships. These findings provide important enlightenment for promoting the sustainable and balanced development of China’s economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Fang & Yun Cao, 2023. "Spatial Association Network Evolution and Variance Decomposition of Economic Sustainability Development Efficiency in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:2966-:d:1061643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/2966/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/2966/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Per Andersen & Niels Christian Petersen, 1993. "A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1261-1264, October.
    2. P. Eko Prasetyo & N. Rahayu Kistanti, 2020. "Human capital, institutional economics and entrepreneurship as a driver for quality & sustainable economic growth," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(4), pages 2575-2589, June.
    3. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2010. "An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA - A third pole of technical efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1554-1563, December.
    4. Illge, Lydia & Schwarze, Reimund, 2009. "A matter of opinion--How ecological and neoclassical environmental economists and think about sustainability and economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 594-604, January.
    5. Khan, Irfan & Zakari, Abdulrasheed & Dagar, Vishal & Singh, Sanjeet, 2022. "World energy trilemma and transformative energy developments as determinants of economic growth amid environmental sustainability," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Brock, William A. & Taylor, M. Scott, 2005. "Economic Growth and the Environment: A Review of Theory and Empirics," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 28, pages 1749-1821, Elsevier.
    7. Robert Barro, 2002. "Quantity and Quality of Economic Growth," Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies Book Series, in: Norman Loayza & Raimundo Soto & Norman Loayza (Series Editor) & Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel (Series Editor) (ed.),Economic Growth: Sources, Trends, and Cycles, edition 1, volume 6, chapter 5, pages 135-162, Central Bank of Chile.
    8. Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich & Fischer, Wolfgang & Venghaus, Sandra & Weckenbrock, Christoph, 2015. "The German Energiewende – History and status quo," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 532-546.
    9. Bali Swain, Ranjula & Ranganathan, Shyam, 2021. "Modeling interlinkages between sustainable development goals using network analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    10. Qu, Jingjing & Wang, Baohui & Liu, Xiaohong, 2022. "A modified super-efficiency network data envelopment analysis: Assessing regional sustainability performance in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    11. Liu, S. & Xiao, Q., 2021. "An empirical analysis on spatial correlation investigation of industrial carbon emissions using SNA-ICE model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    12. K Tone, 2002. "A strange case of the cost and allocative efficiencies in DEA," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(11), pages 1225-1231, November.
    13. Tao, Xueping & Wang, Ping & Zhu, Bangzhu, 2016. "Provincial green economic efficiency of China: A non-separable input–output SBM approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 58-66.
    14. Scott, John C., 2017. "From the Editor," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 327-328, September.
    15. Scott, John C., 2017. "From the Editor," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-2, March.
    16. Bartelmus, Peter, 2010. "Use and usefulness of sustainability economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 2053-2055, September.
    17. Kaoru Tone & Miki Tsutsui, 2010. "An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA revisited -A third pole of technical efficiency," GRIPS Discussion Papers 09-21, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    18. Scott, John C., 2017. "From the Editor," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 141-143, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcel Broersma & Scott A. Eldridge II, 2019. "Journalism and Social Media: Redistribution of Power?," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 193-197.
    2. Zhou, Anhua & Li, Jun, 2021. "Investigate the impact of market reforms on the improvement of manufacturing energy efficiency under China’s provincial-level data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    3. Scott A. Eldridge II & Lucía García-Carretero & Marcel Broersma, 2019. "Disintermediation in Social Networks: Conceptualizing Political Actors’ Construction of Publics on Twitter," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 271-285.
    4. Chloé Cherrier & Robert Courtois & Emmanuel Rusch & Catherine Potard, 2023. "Dysfunctional Attitudes, Sociotropy–Autonomy, and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization in Emerging Adulthood," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Ognjen Arandjelović, 2023. "A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Votes of People with Short Life Expectancy from Being a Long-Term Burden to Their Country," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-8, March.
    6. Yiyang Sun & Guolin Hou, 2021. "Analysis on the Spatial-Temporal Evolution Characteristics and Spatial Network Structure of Tourism Eco-Efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-29, March.
    7. An, Qingxian & Tao, Xiangyang & Xiong, Beibei & Chen, Xiaohong, 2022. "Frontier-based incentive mechanisms for allocating common revenues or fixed costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 294-308.
    8. Danyu Liu & Ke Zhang, 2022. "Analysis of Spatial Differences and the Influencing Factors in Eco-Efficiency of Urban Agglomerations in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Florence Appiah-Twum & Xingle Long, 2023. "Human Capital, Trade Competitiveness and Environmental Efficiency Convergence Across Asia Pacific Countries," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 85(1), pages 109-132, May.
    10. Zhou, Anhua & Xin, Ling & Li, Jun, 2022. "Assessing the impact of the carbon market on the improvement of China's energy and carbon emission performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    11. Jenelle Rouse & Amelia Palmer & Amy Parsons, 2023. "Reconstruct(ing) a Hidden History: Black Deaf Canadian Relat(ing) Identity," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Luo, Yusen & Lu, Zhengnan & Wu, Chao, 2023. "Can internet development accelerate the green innovation efficiency convergence: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. A. M. Aldanondo & V. L. Casasnovas, 2015. "Input aggregation bias in technical efficiency with multiple criteria analysis," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 430-435, April.
    14. Zebin Zheng & Wenjun Xiao & Ziye Cheng, 2023. "China’s Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency Assessment Based on Coordinated Reduction in Pollution and Carbon Emission: From the 11th to the 13th Five-Year Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Gómez-Calvet, Roberto & Conesa, David & Gómez-Calvet, Ana Rosa & Tortosa-Ausina, Emili, 2014. "Energy efficiency in the European Union: What can be learned from the joint application of directional distance functions and slacks-based measures?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 137-154.
    16. Xiangqian Wang & Shudong Wang & Yongqiu Xia, 2022. "Evaluation and Dynamic Evolution of the Total Factor Environmental Efficiency in China’s Mining Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Zhicheng Lai & Lei Li & Zhuomin Tao & Tao Li & Xiaoting Shi & Jialing Li & Xin Li, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Ecological Well-Being Performance from the Perspective of Strong Sustainability: A Case Study of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    18. Wang, Ke-Liang & Sun, Ting-Ting & Xu, Ru-Yu & Miao, Zhuang & Cheng, Yun-He, 2022. "How does internet development promote urban green innovation efficiency? Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    19. Ze Tian & Fang-Rong Ren & Qin-Wen Xiao & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tai-Yu Lin, 2019. "Cross-Regional Comparative Study on Carbon Emission Efficiency of China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on the Meta-Frontier," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Mehmet Pinar & Thanasis Stengos & Nikolas Topaloglou, 2022. "Stochastic dominance spanning and augmenting the human development index with institutional quality," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(1), pages 341-369, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:2966-:d:1061643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.