IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12611-d933124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Spatial Differences and the Influencing Factors in Eco-Efficiency of Urban Agglomerations in China

Author

Listed:
  • Danyu Liu

    (School of Economics, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China)

  • Ke Zhang

    (School of Economics, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China)

Abstract

In the context of climate change, studying the ecological efficiency (EE) of urban agglomerations is of great significance in promoting sustainable development. First, night light data are used as the expected output to build an evaluation index system based on the five major urban agglomerations, namely, the Yangtze River Delta, Pearl River Delta, Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei, the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, and Chengdu–Chongqing urban agglomerations. Second, the super-efficient Epsilon-based (super-EBM) model and the input–output redundancy rates are used to measure the EE of the five major urban agglomerations from 2006 to 2018. Then, their spatial differences are explored with the help of the Gini coefficient. Finally, the spatial differences in the EE drivers of urban agglomerations are analyzed using Geodetector. The results reveal the following. (1) The EE of the five major urban agglomerations present the decline fluctuation trend of “∧”. However, this trend has slowed down. From the perspective of urban agglomeration, Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei > The Pearl River Delta > Chengdu–Chongqing > Yangtze River Delta > the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. The lowest efficiency of the Yangtze River’s middle reaches has “high investment, low output, and high pollution” characteristics. (2) The EE of the five major urban agglomerations had weak synergistic development and noticeable spatial differences. The primary sources are inter-group differences and hypervariable density. (3) From the perspective of influencing, the difference in technological innovation levels (TEC) is the single leading factor in the differences in the EE space of urban agglomerations. In addition, the interaction combination of industrial structure upgrades (IDS) and traffic infrastructure (TRAF) is a crucial combination driver. However, the core influencing factors of spatial differences in EE in five urban agglomerations are heterogeneous. Among them, the nature-influencing factors of the EE space differences in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei and the Chengdu–Chongqing urban agglomerations are environmental regulations (ER). Meanwhile, the influencing factor in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration is the development of urbanization (URB). Moreover, the prominent factor in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River and the Pearl River Delta urban agglomerations is foreign direct investment (FDI). On this basis, this study aims to promote ecological civilization construction in urban agglomerations and optimize regional integrated spatial patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Danyu Liu & Ke Zhang, 2022. "Analysis of Spatial Differences and the Influencing Factors in Eco-Efficiency of Urban Agglomerations in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12611-:d:933124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathan Nunn & Nancy Qian, 2011. "The Potato's Contribution to Population and Urbanization: Evidence From A Historical Experiment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 126(2), pages 593-650.
    2. Per Andersen & Niels Christian Petersen, 1993. "A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1261-1264, October.
    3. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2010. "An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA - A third pole of technical efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1554-1563, December.
    4. Ciccone, Antonio & Hall, Robert E, 1996. "Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(1), pages 54-70, March.
    5. Andreoni, James & Levinson, Arik, 2001. "The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 269-286, May.
    6. Yiyang Sun & Guolin Hou & Zhenfang Huang & Yi Zhong, 2020. "Spatial-Temporal Differences and Influencing Factors of Tourism Eco-Efficiency in China’s Three Major Urban Agglomerations Based on the Super-EBM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Hsu, Fang-Ming & Hsueh, Chao-Chih, 2009. "Measuring relative efficiency of government-sponsored R&D projects: A three-stage approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 178-186, May.
    8. J. Vernon Henderson & Adam Storeygard & David N. Weil, 2012. "Measuring Economic Growth from Outer Space," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(2), pages 994-1028, April.
    9. Jingtao Wang & Haibin Liu & Di Peng & Qian Lv & Yu Sun & Hui Huang & Hao Liu, 2021. "The County-Scale Economic Spatial Pattern and Influencing Factors of Seven Urban Agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin—A Study Based on the Integrated Nighttime Light Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.
    10. Chen, Shiyi & Golley, Jane, 2014. "‘Green’ productivity growth in China's industrial economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 89-98.
    11. Goto, Mika & Otsuka, Akihiro & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2014. "DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) assessment of operational and environmental efficiencies on Japanese regional industries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 535-549.
    12. Defeng Zheng & Shuai Hao & Caizhi Sun & Leting Lyu, 2019. "Spatial Correlation and Convergence Analysis of Eco-Efficiency in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, April.
    13. H. Fried & C. Lovell & S. Schmidt & S. Yaisawarng, 2002. "Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 157-174, January.
    14. Kaoru Tone & Miki Tsutsui, 2010. "An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA revisited -A third pole of technical efficiency," GRIPS Discussion Papers 09-21, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    15. Dagum, Camilo, 1997. "A New Approach to the Decomposition of the Gini Income Inequality Ratio," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 515-531.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu Zhang & Xi Cai & Yanying Mao & Liudan Jiao & Liu Wu, 2023. "What Is the State of Development of Eco-Wellbeing Performance in China? An Analysis from a Three-Stage Network Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Shuting Xue & Chao Wang & Shibin Zhang & Chuyao Weng & Yuxi Zhang, 2023. "Eco-Efficiency of the Urban Agglomerations: Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Determinations," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Jun Zhao & Wenyu Rong & Di Liu, 2023. "Urban Agglomeration High-Speed Railway Backbone Network Planning: A Case Study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yiyang Sun & Guolin Hou, 2021. "Analysis on the Spatial-Temporal Evolution Characteristics and Spatial Network Structure of Tourism Eco-Efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-29, March.
    2. Ping Lu & Jianhui Liu & Yunxuan Wang & Lei Ruan, 2021. "Can industrial agglomeration improve regional green total factor productivity in China? An empirical analysis based on spatial econometrics," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 1011-1039, June.
    3. Castells-Quintana, David & Dienesch, Elisa & Krause, Melanie, 2021. "Air pollution in an urban world: A global view on density, cities and emissions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Zhou, Anhua & Li, Jun, 2021. "Investigate the impact of market reforms on the improvement of manufacturing energy efficiency under China’s provincial-level data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Geng Peng & Xiaodan Zhang & Fang Liu & Lijuan Ruan & Kaiyou Tian, 2021. "Spatial–temporal evolution and regional difference decomposition of urban environmental governance efficiency in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 8974-8990, June.
    6. Xin Fang & Yun Cao, 2023. "Spatial Association Network Evolution and Variance Decomposition of Economic Sustainability Development Efficiency in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Fanchao Kong & Kaixiao Zhang & Hengshu Fu & Lina Cui & Yang Li & Tengteng Wang, 2023. "Temporal–Spatial Variations and Convergence Analysis of Land Use Eco-Efficiency in the Urban Agglomerations of the Yellow River Basin in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Feng Dong & Chang Qin & Xiaoyun Zhang & Xu Zhao & Yuling Pan & Yujin Gao & Jiao Zhu & Yangfan Li, 2021. "Towards Carbon Neutrality: The Impact of Renewable Energy Development on Carbon Emission Efficiency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-23, December.
    9. An, Qingxian & Tao, Xiangyang & Xiong, Beibei & Chen, Xiaohong, 2022. "Frontier-based incentive mechanisms for allocating common revenues or fixed costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 294-308.
    10. Haiyan Luo & Xiaoe Qu, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution Trends of Urban Total Factor Carbon Efficiency under the Dual-Carbon Background," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Liangen Zeng, 2021. "China’s Eco-Efficiency: Regional Differences and Influencing Factors Based on a Spatial Panel Data Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Florence Appiah-Twum & Xingle Long, 2023. "Human Capital, Trade Competitiveness and Environmental Efficiency Convergence Across Asia Pacific Countries," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 85(1), pages 109-132, May.
    13. Zhou, Anhua & Xin, Ling & Li, Jun, 2022. "Assessing the impact of the carbon market on the improvement of China's energy and carbon emission performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    14. Luo, Yusen & Lu, Zhengnan & Wu, Chao, 2023. "Can internet development accelerate the green innovation efficiency convergence: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    15. Hongwei Liu & Ronglu Yang & Zhixiang Zhou & Dacheng Huang, 2020. "Regional Green Eco-Efficiency in China: Considering Energy Saving, Pollution Treatment, and External Environmental Heterogeneity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Simar, Leopold & Wilson, Paul W., 2007. "Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 31-64, January.
    17. A. M. Aldanondo & V. L. Casasnovas, 2015. "Input aggregation bias in technical efficiency with multiple criteria analysis," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 430-435, April.
    18. Ruijing Zheng & Yu Cheng & Haimeng Liu & Wei Chen & Xiaodong Chen & Yaping Wang, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Distribution and Drivers of Urban Carbon Emission Efficiency: The Role of Technological Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-22, July.
    19. Barzin,Samira & Avner,Paolo & Maruyama Rentschler,Jun Erik & O’Clery,Neave, 2022. "Where Are All the Jobs ? A Machine Learning Approach for High Resolution Urban Employment Prediction inDeveloping Countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9979, The World Bank.
    20. Zebin Zheng & Wenjun Xiao & Ziye Cheng, 2023. "China’s Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency Assessment Based on Coordinated Reduction in Pollution and Carbon Emission: From the 11th to the 13th Five-Year Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12611-:d:933124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.