IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i9p5192-d801555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Driving Factors of Public Participation in Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Projects—A Case Study of China

Author

Listed:
  • Ziqian Luo

    (School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China)

  • Junjie Li

    (Underground Polis Academy, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Zezhou Wu

    (Underground Polis Academy, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
    Key Laboratory for Resilient Infrastructures of Coastal Cities (Shenzhen University), Ministry of Education, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
    Sino-Australia Joint Research Centre in BIM and Smart Construction, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Shenghan Li

    (Underground Polis Academy, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
    Key Laboratory for Resilient Infrastructures of Coastal Cities (Shenzhen University), Ministry of Education, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
    Sino-Australia Joint Research Centre in BIM and Smart Construction, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Guoqiang Bi

    (Jinan Haiying Real Estate Development Company, Jinan 250000, China)

Abstract

Public participation is an important procedure of the environmental impact assessment. Effective public participation is essential to the Public–Private Partnership (PPP) projects as such projects usually exert tremendous impacts on the environment and society. However, in literature, there are few studies investigating the driving factors of public participation in PPP projects, especially in the context of China. To bridge this research gap, this study proposed a theoretical model, which incorporates contextual factors (i.e., perceived benefit and perceived risk) into the classical Theory of Planned Behavior model, to explore the determinants. The initial proposed model was tested using structural equation modeling. Analysis results indicated that attitude towards behavior, subjective norm, perceived risk and perceived behavioral control were the four significant driving factors of public participation in PPP projects, whereas perceived benefit had limited impact. Furthermore, this study evaluated eight public participation approaches in PPP projects. Results revealed that the public were more willing to participate in public decisions through the internet platform, followed by the information disclosure or consultation provided by the government. The research findings derived in this study can provide valuable reference for the government to promulgate proper policies to attract more public participation in PPP projects. Moreover, the research idea and methods used in this study can be popularized in other countries to enhance the public participation in PPP projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziqian Luo & Junjie Li & Zezhou Wu & Shenghan Li & Guoqiang Bi, 2022. "Investigating the Driving Factors of Public Participation in Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Projects—A Case Study of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5192-:d:801555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5192/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5192/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Cheng Chen & Michael Hubbard & Chun-Sung Liao, 2013. "When Public-Private Partnerships Fail," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(6), pages 839-857, September.
    3. Jing Ma & Keith W. Hipel & Mark L. Hanson, 2017. "Public participation in municipal solid waste source-separated collection in Guilin, China: status and influencing factors," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(12), pages 2174-2191, December.
    4. Dongliang Zhang & Guangqing Huang & Xiaoling Yin & Qinghua Gong, 2015. "Residents’ Waste Separation Behaviors at the Source: Using SEM with the Theory of Planned Behavior in Guangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Rivera-Camino, Jaime, 2012. "Corporate environmental market responsiveness: A model of individual and organizational drivers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 402-411.
    6. Li, Jingru & Tam, Vivian W.Y. & Zuo, Jian & Zhu, Jiaolan, 2015. "Designers’ attitude and behaviour towards construction waste minimization by design: A study in Shenzhen, China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 29-35.
    7. Zezhou Wu & Ann T.W. Yu & Chi Sun Poon, 2020. "Promoting effective construction and demolition waste management towards sustainable development: A case study of Hong Kong," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1713-1724, November.
    8. Congdong Li & Xiaoli Li & Yu Wang, 2016. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Supervision Behavior for Public-Private Partnership Projects with Public Participation," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-8, October.
    9. Simon French & Clare Bayley, 2011. "Public participation: comparing approaches," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 241-257, February.
    10. Magdalena Miśkowiec & Katarzyna Maria Gorczyca, 2018. "Public Participation in Local Regeneration Programmes in Poland: Case Study of Olkusz," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 7(4), pages 44-60, October.
    11. Liu, Zhilin & Liao, Lu & Mei, Ciqi, 2018. "Not-in-my-backyard but let’s talk: Explaining public opposition to facility siting in urban China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 471-478.
    12. Nae-Wen Kuo & You-Yu Dai, 2012. "Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Low-Carbon Tourism Behavior: A Modified Model from Taiwan," International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), IGI Global, vol. 8(4), pages 45-62, October.
    13. Hui Sun & Yingzi Liang & Yuning Wang, 2019. "Grey Clustering Evaluation for the Cooperation Efficiency of PPP Project: Taking Beijing Metro Line 4 as an Example," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-13, April.
    14. Nancy G. Boyd & George S. Vozikis, 1994. "The Influence of Self-Efficacy on the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 18(4), pages 63-77, July.
    15. Jingfeng Yuan & Wei Li & Jiyue Guo & Xianbo Zhao & Mirosław J. Skibniewski, 2018. "Social Risk Factors of Transportation PPP Projects in China: A Sustainable Development Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, June.
    16. Peter Hemmersam & Nicole Martin & Even Westvang & Jonny Aspen & Andrew Morrison, 2015. "Exploring Urban Data Visualization and Public Participation in Planning," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 45-64, October.
    17. Marilena Bogheanu, 2013. "Public - private partnership, development alternative for health tourism," International Journal for Responsible Tourism, Fundatia Amfiteatru, vol. 1(1), pages 39-53, January.
    18. Sheau-Fen, Yap & Sun-May, Leong & Yu-Ghee, Wee, 2012. "Store brand proneness: Effects of perceived risks, quality and familiarity," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 48-58.
    19. Paul, Justin & Modi, Ashwin & Patel, Jayesh, 2016. "Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 123-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Calza, Francesco & Cannavale, Chiara & Zohoorian Nadali, Iman, 2020. "How do cultural values influence entrepreneurial behavior of nations? A behavioral reasoning approach," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    2. Nketiah, Emmanuel & Song, Huaming & Cai, Xiang & Adjei, Mavis & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Obuobi, Bright, 2022. "Citizens’ intention to invest in municipal solid waste to energy projects in Ghana: The impact of direct and indirect effects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    3. Fayolle, Alain & Liñán, Francisco, 2014. "The future of research on entrepreneurial intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 663-666.
    4. Zellweger, Thomas & Sieger, Philipp & Halter, Frank, 2011. "Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 521-536, September.
    5. Wei Zheng & Hongliang Qiu & Alastair M. Morrison, 2023. "Applying a Combination of SEM and fsQCA to Predict Tourist Resource-Saving Behavioral Intentions in Rural Tourism: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Hsu, Chia-Lin & Chang, Chi-Ya & Yansritakul, Chutinart, 2017. "Exploring purchase intention of green skincare products using the theory of planned behavior: Testing the moderating effects of country of origin and price sensitivity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 145-152.
    7. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Analysis of Consumers’ Electric Vehicle Purchase Intentions: An Expansion of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, September.
    8. Jaiswal, Deepak & Kant, Rishi, 2018. "Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 60-69.
    9. Menrad, K. & Emberger-Klein, A. & Schops, J., 2018. "Factors influencing consumers behavioral intention towards climate-friendly food consumption in Southern Germany," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277108, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Yu Hao & Yingting Wang & Qiuwei Wu & Shiwei Sun & Weilu Wang & Menglin Cui, 2020. "What affects residents' participation in the circular economy for sustainable development? Evidence from China," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1251-1268, September.
    11. Giuseppe Criaco & Philipp Sieger & Karl Wennberg & Francesco Chirico & Tommaso Minola, 2017. "Parents’ performance in entrepreneurship as a “double-edged sword” for the intergenerational transmission of entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 841-864, December.
    12. Jana Hojnik & Mitja Ruzzier & Tatiana S. Manolova, 2020. "Sustainable development: Predictors of green consumerism in Slovenia," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1695-1708, July.
    13. Meng, Bo & Choi, Kyuhwan, 2016. "The role of authenticity in forming slow tourists' intentions: Developing an extended model of goal-directed behavior," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 397-410.
    14. Maria Rodrigues & João F. Proença & Rita Macedo, 2023. "Determinants of the Purchase of Secondhand Products: An Approach by the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Anca-Otilia Dodescu & Elena-Aurelia Botezat & Alexandru Constăngioară & Ioana-Crina Pop-Cohuţ, 2021. "A Partial Least-Square Mediation Analysis of the Contribution of Cross-Campus Entrepreneurship Education to Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    16. Dan Wang & Lili Wang & Ling Chen, 2018. "Unlocking the influence of family business exposure on entrepreneurial intentions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 951-974, December.
    17. Thi Thu Tra Pham & Thai Vu Hong Nguyen & Son Kien Nguyen & Hieu Thi Hoang Nguyen, 2023. "Does planned innovation promote financial access? Evidence from Vietnamese SMEs," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(2), pages 281-307, June.
    18. Nik Masdek Nik Rozana & Wong Kelly Kai Seng & Mohd Nawi Nolila & Sharifuddin Juwaidah & Wong Wang Li, 2023. "Antecedents of sustainable food waste management behaviour: Empirical evidence from urban households in Malaysia," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 53-77, March.
    19. Xingwei Li & Jiachi Dai & Xiaowen Zhu & Jingru Li & Jinrong He & Yicheng Huang & Xiang Liu & Qiong Shen, 2023. "Mechanism of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control influence the green development behavior of construction enterprises," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Nketiah, Emmanuel & Song, Huaming & Obuobi, Bright & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Adjei, Mavis & Cudjoe, Dan, 2022. "Citizens' willingness to pay for local anaerobic digestion energy: The influence of altruistic value and knowledge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5192-:d:801555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.