IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i9p3959-d1141976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renewable Energy Potential and CO 2 Performance of Main Biomasses Used in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Elem Patricia Rocha Alves

    (Department of Science and Technology, Federal University of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys (UFVJM), Janaúba 39440-000, MG, Brazil)

  • Orlando Salcedo-Puerto

    (Department of Energy Technology, School of Energy Systems, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (LUT), 53850 Lappeenranta, Finland)

  • Jesús Nuncira

    (Department of Energy Technology, School of Energy Systems, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (LUT), 53850 Lappeenranta, Finland)

  • Samuel Emebu

    (Department of Automatic Control and Informatics, Faculty of Applied Informatics, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, 760 05 Zlín, Czech Republic)

  • Clara Mendoza-Martinez

    (Department of Energy Technology, School of Energy Systems, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (LUT), 53850 Lappeenranta, Finland)

Abstract

This review investigates the effects of the Brazilian agriculture production and forestry sector on carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions. Residual biomasses produced mainly in the agro-industrial and forestry sector as well as fast-growing plants were studied. Possibilities to minimize source-related emissions by sequestering part of carbon in soil and by producing biomass as a substitute for fossil fuel were extensively investigated. The lack of consistency among literature reports on residual biomass makes it difficult to compare CO 2 emission reductions between studies and sectors. Data on chemical composition, heating value, proximate and ultimate analysis of the biomasses were collected. Then, the carbon sequestration potential of the biomasses as well as their usability in renewable energy practices were studied. Over 779.6 million tons of agricultural residues were generated in Brazil between 2021 and 2022. This implies a 12.1 million PJ energy potential, while 4.95 million tons of forestry residues was generated in 2019. An estimated carbon content of 276 Tg from these residues could lead to the production of approximately 1014.2 Tg of CO 2 . Brazilian biomasses, with a particular focus on agro-forest waste, can contribute to the development of sustainable alternative energy sources. Moreover, agro-waste can provide carbon credits for sustainable Brazilian agricultural development.

Suggested Citation

  • Elem Patricia Rocha Alves & Orlando Salcedo-Puerto & Jesús Nuncira & Samuel Emebu & Clara Mendoza-Martinez, 2023. "Renewable Energy Potential and CO 2 Performance of Main Biomasses Used in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-59, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:9:p:3959-:d:1141976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/9/3959/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/9/3959/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Naqvi, Muhammad & Yan, Jinyue & Dahlquist, Erik & Naqvi, Salman Raza, 2017. "Off-grid electricity generation using mixed biomass compost: A scenario-based study with sensitivity analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 363-370.
    2. Toscano Miranda, Nahieh & Lopes Motta, Ingrid & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Wolf Maciel, Maria Regina, 2021. "Sugarcane bagasse pyrolysis: A review of operating conditions and products properties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    3. Namsaraev, Z.B. & Gotovtsev, P.M. & Komova, A.V. & Vasilov, R.G., 2018. "Current status and potential of bioenergy in the Russian Federation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 625-634.
    4. Yongzhong Jiang & Valerii Havrysh & Oleksandr Klymchuk & Vitalii Nitsenko & Tomas Balezentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "Utilization of Crop Residue for Power Generation: The Case of Ukraine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Zhang, Congyu & Yang, Wu & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Ho, Shih-Hsin & Pétrissans, Anelie & Pétrissans, Mathieu, 2022. "Effect of torrefaction on the structure and reactivity of rice straw as well as life cycle assessment of torrefaction process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    6. Usmani, Zeba & Sharma, Minaxi & Karpichev, Yevgen & Pandey, Ashok & Chander Kuhad, Ramesh & Bhat, Rajeev & Punia, Rajesh & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Gupta, Vijai Kumar, 2020. "Advancement in valorization technologies to improve utilization of bio-based waste in bioeconomy context," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    7. Grzegorz Maj & Joanna Szyszlak-Bargłowicz & Grzegorz Zając & Tomasz Słowik & Paweł Krzaczek & Wiesław Piekarski, 2019. "Energy and Emission Characteristics of Biowaste from the Corn Grain Drying Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Jerzak, Wojciech & Kuźnia, Monika, 2021. "Examination of inorganic gaseous species and condensed phases during coconut husk combustion based on thermodynamic equilibrium predictions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 497-507.
    9. Pena-Vergara, Gabriel & Castro, Luis Roberto & Gasparetto, Carlos Alberto & Bizzo, Waldir Antonio, 2022. "Energy from planted forest and its residues characterization in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    10. Mendoza Martinez, Clara Lisseth & Saari, Jussi & Melo, Yara & Cardoso, Marcelo & de Almeida, Gustavo Matheus & Vakkilainen, Esa, 2021. "Evaluation of thermochemical routes for the valorization of solid coffee residues to produce biofuels: A Brazilian case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohsen Jamali & Esmaeil Bakhshandeh & Mohammad Yaghoubi Khanghahi & Carmine Crecchio, 2021. "Metadata Analysis to Evaluate Environmental Impacts of Wheat Residues Burning on Soil Quality in Developing and Developed Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Anna Duczkowska & Ewa Kulińska & Zbigniew Plutecki & Joanna Rut, 2022. "Sustainable Agro-Biomass Market for Urban Heating Using Centralized District Heating System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Clara Lisseth Mendoza Martinez & Ekaterina Sermyagina & Esa Vakkilainen, 2021. "Hydrothermal Carbonization of Chemical and Biological Pulp Mill Sludges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Oleg Bazaluk & Valerii Havrysh & Vitalii Nitsenko & Tomas Baležentis & Dalia Streimikiene & Elena A. Tarkhanova, 2020. "Assessment of Green Methanol Production Potential and Related Economic and Environmental Benefits: The Case of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Oleg Bazaluk & Valerii Havrysh & Mykhailo Fedorchuk & Vitalii Nitsenko, 2021. "Energy Assessment of Sorghum Cultivation in Southern Ukraine," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny & Dominika Siwiec & Robert Ulewicz & Peter Bindzár, 2020. "Studying the Level of Sustainable Energy Development of the European Union Countries and Their Similarity Based on the Economic and Demographic Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-31, December.
    7. Ekaterina S. Titova, 2019. "Biofuel Application as a Factor of Sustainable Development Ensuring: The Case of Russia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-30, October.
    8. Valerii Havrysh & Antonina Kalinichenko & Grzegorz Mentel & Tadeusz Olejarz, 2020. "Commercial Biogas Plants: Lessons for Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Xu, Hao & Cheng, Shuo & Hungwe, Douglas & Yoshikawa, Kunio & Takahashi, Fumitake, 2022. "Co-pyrolysis coupled with torrefaction enhances hydrocarbons production from rice straw and oil sludge: The effect of torrefaction on co-pyrolysis synergistic behaviors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    10. Grzegorz Maj & Paweł Krzaczek & Wojciech Gołębiowski & Tomasz Słowik & Joanna Szyszlak-Bargłowicz & Grzegorz Zając, 2022. "Energy Consumption and Quality of Pellets Made of Waste from Corn Grain Drying Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Tatiana Nevzorova, 2020. "Biogas Production in the Russian Federation: Current Status, Potential, and Barriers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Francis Kemausuor & Muyiwa S. Adaramola & John Morken, 2018. "A Review of Commercial Biogas Systems and Lessons for Africa," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Katarzyna Chudy-Laskowska & Tomasz Pisula & Mirosław Liana & László Vasa, 2020. "Taxonomic Analysis of the Diversity in the Level of Wind Energy Development in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Alina Zh. Sakun & Kateryna A. Pylypenko & Svitlana V. Skrypnyk & Oleksandr S. Prystemskyi & Inesa V. Shepel, 2022. "Accounting and analytical space of providing the depreciation policy of Ukrainian enterprises," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 247-270.
    15. Ji, Ling & Liang, Xiaolin & Xie, Yulei & Huang, Guohe & Wang, Bing, 2021. "Optimal design and sensitivity analysis of the stand-alone hybrid energy system with PV and biomass-CHP for remote villages," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    16. Martillo Aseffe, José Alfonso & Martínez González, Aldemar & Jaén, René Lesme & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo, 2021. "The corn cob gasification-based renewable energy recovery in the life cycle environmental performance of seed-corn supply chain: An Ecuadorian case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1523-1535.
    17. Kang, Yating & Yang, Qing & Bartocci, Pietro & Wei, Hongjian & Liu, Sylvia Shuhan & Wu, Zhujuan & Zhou, Hewen & Yang, Haiping & Fantozzi, Francesco & Chen, Hanping, 2020. "Bioenergy in China: Evaluation of domestic biomass resources and the associated greenhouse gas mitigation potentials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    18. Hongpeng Guo & Shuang Xu & Xiaotong Wang & Wen Shu & Jia Chen & Chulin Pan & Cheng Guo, 2021. "Driving Mechanism of Farmers’ Utilization Behaviors of Straw Resources—An Empirical Study in Jilin Province, the Main Grain Producing Region in the Northeast Part of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, February.
    19. Cyril Anak John & Lian See Tan & Jully Tan & Peck Loo Kiew & Azmi Mohd Shariff & Hairul Nazirah Abdul Halim, 2021. "Selection of Renewable Energy in Rural Area Via Life Cycle Assessment-Analytical Hierarchy Process (LCA-AHP): A Case Study of Tatau, Sarawak," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Jung Eun Park & Gi Bbum Lee & Cheol Jin Jeong & Ho Kim & Choong Gon Kim, 2021. "Determination of Relationship between Higher Heating Value and Atomic Ratio of Hydrogen to Carbon in Spent Coffee Grounds by Hydrothermal Carbonization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-11, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:9:p:3959-:d:1141976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.