IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i8p3591-d1129261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physics-Based Prediction for the Consumption and Emissions of Passenger Vehicles and Light Trucks up to 2050

Author

Listed:
  • Manfred Dollinger

    (Chair of Measurement and Control Systems, Center of Energy Technology (ZET), Universität Bayreuth, Universitätsstr. 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany)

  • Gerhard Fischerauer

    (Chair of Measurement and Control Systems, Center of Energy Technology (ZET), Universität Bayreuth, Universitätsstr. 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany)

Abstract

The increasing market share of electric vehicles and the politically intended phase-out of the internal combustion engine require reliable and realistic predictions for future consumption and greenhouse gas emissions as a function of technological solutions. This also includes the consumption- and emission-intensive transport of goods. We consider both passenger vehicles and commercial vehicle traffic in our study and have investigated whether there are drive alternatives to the battery electric vehicle that enable uninterrupted trips with a long range, especially for regional delivery services and internationally active freight forwarders. To this end, we have analysed three system architectures and their expected technological progress until 2050: battery electric vehicles (BEV), fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV), and internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV) running on compressed natural gas (CNG). The latter case serves as a best-practice reference from a combustion technology perspective. The analysis is based on a validated and proven physical model and predicts that the BEV2050 will consume 3.5 times less energy and emit 15 times fewer greenhouse gases than the ICEV-CNG2020, whereas the FCEV2050 will consume 2.5 times less energy and emit 6.5 times fewer greenhouse gases than the ICEV-CNG2020 on the road (hilly terrain, transition season, and WLTP triple-mixed drive cycle). The advantages of the BEV result from the shorter drive train with lower total losses. Our results thus confirm the expected role of the BEV as the dominant drive technology in the future, and light vehicles with low-to-medium-range requirements will especially benefit from it. On the other hand, since the greenhouse gas emissions of the FCEV2050 are lower by a factor of 6.5 than those of the ICEV-CNG2020, it is reasonable to conclude that the FCEV can play a significant role in transport until 2050 when long distances have to be covered. Our model-based approach also allows us to determine the energy fractions of the acting physical forces and thus calculate the consumption shares: electric drive recuperation increases BEV and FCEV range by about 15% in 2020 and will increase it by about 20% in 2050, depending on drive technology and vehicle type. Air and rolling resistance contribute 20% each to the total consumption. The consumption of the accessories of modern vehicles with a share of about 10% of the total consumption cannot be neglected.

Suggested Citation

  • Manfred Dollinger & Gerhard Fischerauer, 2023. "Physics-Based Prediction for the Consumption and Emissions of Passenger Vehicles and Light Trucks up to 2050," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-29, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:8:p:3591-:d:1129261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/8/3591/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/8/3591/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tri Cuong Do & Hoai Vu Anh Truong & Hoang Vu Dao & Cong Minh Ho & Xuan Dinh To & Tri Dung Dang & Kyoung Kwan Ahn, 2019. "Energy Management Strategy of a PEM Fuel Cell Excavator with a Supercapacitor/Battery Hybrid Power Source," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Sara Luciani & Andrea Tonoli, 2022. "Control Strategy Assessment for Improving PEM Fuel Cell System Efficiency in Fuel Cell Hybrid Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    3. José Luis Sampietro & Vicenç Puig & Ramon Costa-Castelló, 2019. "Optimal Sizing of Storage Elements for a Vehicle Based on Fuel Cells, Supercapacitors, and Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, March.
    4. Manfred Dollinger & Gerhard Fischerauer, 2021. "Model-Based Range Prediction for Electric Cars and Trucks under Real-World Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-27, September.
    5. Christoph Kern & Andreas Jess, 2021. "Reducing Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions to Meet Climate Targets—A Comprehensive Quantification and Reasonable Options," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Simon Randau & Dominik A. Weber & Olaf Kötz & Raimund Koerver & Philipp Braun & André Weber & Ellen Ivers-Tiffée & Torben Adermann & Jörn Kulisch & Wolfgang G. Zeier & Felix H. Richter & Jürgen Janek, 2020. "Benchmarking the performance of all-solid-state lithium batteries," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(3), pages 259-270, March.
    7. Jacek Pielecha & Kinga Skobiej & Karolina Kurtyka, 2020. "Exhaust Emissions and Energy Consumption Analysis of Conventional, Hybrid, and Electric Vehicles in Real Driving Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Min Soo Kim & Joo Hee Song & Dong Kyu Kim, 2020. "Development of Optimal Conditioning Method to Improve Economic Efficiency of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-11, June.
    9. Cedric De Cauwer & Joeri Van Mierlo & Thierry Coosemans, 2015. "Energy Consumption Prediction for Electric Vehicles Based on Real-World Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Gert Berckmans & Maarten Messagie & Jelle Smekens & Noshin Omar & Lieselot Vanhaverbeke & Joeri Van Mierlo, 2017. "Cost Projection of State of the Art Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles Up to 2030," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Eugenio Meloni & Giuseppina Iervolino & Concetta Ruocco & Simona Renda & Giovanni Festa & Marco Martino & Vincenzo Palma, 2022. "Electrified Hydrogen Production from Methane for PEM Fuel Cells Feeding: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-34, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gábor Horváth & Attila Bai & Sándor Szegedi & István Lázár & Csongor Máthé & László Huzsvai & Máté Zakar & Zoltán Gabnai & Tamás Tóth, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review of the Distinctive Tendencies of the Diffusion of E-Mobility in Central Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-29, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cox, Brian & Bauer, Christian & Mendoza Beltran, Angelica & van Vuuren, Detlef P. & Mutel, Christopher L., 2020. "Life cycle environmental and cost comparison of current and future passenger cars under different energy scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    2. Manfred Dollinger & Gerhard Fischerauer, 2021. "Model-Based Range Prediction for Electric Cars and Trucks under Real-World Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Ghulam E Mustafa Abro & Saiful Azrin B. M. Zulkifli & Kundan Kumar & Najib El Ouanjli & Vijanth Sagayan Asirvadam & Mahmoud A. Mossa, 2023. "Comprehensive Review of Recent Advancements in Battery Technology, Propulsion, Power Interfaces, and Vehicle Network Systems for Intelligent Autonomous and Connected Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-31, March.
    4. Marc Wentker & Matthew Greenwood & Jens Leker, 2019. "A Bottom-Up Approach to Lithium-Ion Battery Cost Modeling with a Focus on Cathode Active Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Thorne, Rebecca Jayne & Hovi, Inger Beate & Figenbaum, Erik & Pinchasik, Daniel Ruben & Amundsen, Astrid Helene & Hagman, Rolf, 2021. "Facilitating adoption of electric buses through policy: Learnings from a trial in Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    6. Rivera, Nilza & Guzmán, Juan Ignacio & Jara, José Joaquín & Lagos, Gustavo, 2021. "Evaluation of econometric models of secondary refined copper supply," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    7. Hossein Pourrahmani & Hamed Shakeri & Jan Van herle, 2022. "Thermoelectric Generator as the Waste Heat Recovery Unit of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell: A Numerical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Katsaprakakis, Dimitris Al & Voumvoulakis, Manolis, 2018. "A hybrid power plant towards 100% energy autonomy for the island of Sifnos, Greece. Perspectives created from energy cooperatives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 680-698.
    9. Slavin Viktor & Shuba Yevheniy & Korpach Anatolii & Gutarevych Serhiy & Caban Jacek & Matijosius Jonas & Rimkus Alfredas, 2022. "The Performance of a Car with Various Engine Power Systems – Part II," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 141-151, January.
    10. Zhu, Tao & Wills, Richard G.A. & Lot, Roberto & Ruan, Haijun & Jiang, Zhihao, 2021. "Adaptive energy management of a battery-supercapacitor energy storage system for electric vehicles based on flexible perception and neural network fitting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    11. Wang, Hua & Zhao, De & Meng, Qiang & Ong, Ghim Ping & Lee, Der-Horng, 2020. "Network-level energy consumption estimation for electric vehicles considering vehicle and user heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 30-46.
    12. Jarosław Ziółkowski & Mateusz Oszczypała & Jerzy Małachowski & Joanna Szkutnik-Rogoż, 2021. "Use of Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Fuel Consumption on the Basis of Technical Parameters of Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, May.
    13. Ren, Danhong & Li, Xuan & Zhao, Xinhao & Liu, Baocheng & Yang, Zhengchun & He, Jie & Li, Tong & Pan, Peng, 2022. "Development and evaluation of Zn2+ ions hybrid supercapacitor based on ZnxMnO2-CNTs cathode," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    14. Hsieh, I-Yun Lisa & Pan, Menghsuan Sam & Chiang, Yet-Ming & Green, William H., 2019. "Learning only buys you so much: Practical limits on battery price reduction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 218-224.
    15. Hsieh, I-Yun Lisa & Pan, Menghsuan Sam & Green, William H., 2020. "Transition to electric vehicles in China: Implications for private motorization rate and battery market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    16. Michael Bohm & Josef Stetina & David Svida, 2022. "Exhaust Gas Temperature Pulsations of a Gasoline Engine and Its Stabilization Using Thermal Energy Storage System to Reduce Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Horn, Michael & MacLeod, Jennifer & Liu, Meinan & Webb, Jeremy & Motta, Nunzio, 2019. "Supercapacitors: A new source of power for electric cars?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 93-103.
    18. Yunna Wu & Meng Yang & Haobo Zhang & Kaifeng Chen & Yang Wang, 2016. "Optimal Site Selection of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Based on a Cloud Model and the PROMETHEE Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Jacek Pielecha & Kinga Skobiej & Przemyslaw Kubiak & Marek Wozniak & Krzysztof Siczek, 2022. "Exhaust Emissions from Plug-in and HEV Vehicles in Type-Approval Tests and Real Driving Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-38, March.
    20. Costa, C.M. & Barbosa, J.C. & Castro, H. & Gonçalves, R. & Lanceros-Méndez, S., 2021. "Electric vehicles: To what extent are environmentally friendly and cost effective? – Comparative study by european countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:8:p:3591-:d:1129261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.