IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i3p1173-d1042860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Considering Forward Electricity Prices for a Hydro Power Plant Risk Analysis in the Brazilian Electricity Market

Author

Listed:
  • Arthur Lauro

    (Electrical Energy Department, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, UFJF, Juiz de Fora 36036-330, Brazil)

  • Daniel Kitamura

    (Electrical Energy Department, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, UFJF, Juiz de Fora 36036-330, Brazil)

  • Waleska Lima

    (Electrical Energy Department, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, UFJF, Juiz de Fora 36036-330, Brazil)

  • Bruno Dias

    (Electrical Energy Department, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, UFJF, Juiz de Fora 36036-330, Brazil)

  • Tiago Soares

    (Center for Power and Energy Systems, Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

The Brazilian Power System is mainly composed of renewable generation from hydroelectric and wind. Hence, spot and forward electricity prices tend to represent the inherently stochastic nature of these resources, while risk management is a measure taken by agents, especially hydro power plants (HPPs) to hedge against deep financial losses. A HPP goal is to maximize its profit considering uncertainties in forward electricity prices, spot prices, and generation scaling factor (GSF) for years ahead. Therefore, the objective of this work is to simulate the real decision-making process of a HPP, where they need to have a perspective of the forward market and future spot price assessment to negotiate forward electricity contracts. To do so, the present work models the uncertainty in electricity forward prices via two-stage stochastic programming, assessing the benefits of the stochastic solution in comparison to the deterministic one. In addition, different risk aversion levels are assessed using conditional value at risk (CVaR). An important conclusion is that the results show that the greater the HPP risk aversion is, the greater the energy selling via electricity forward contracts. Moreover, the proposed model has benefits in comparison to a deterministic approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Arthur Lauro & Daniel Kitamura & Waleska Lima & Bruno Dias & Tiago Soares, 2023. "Considering Forward Electricity Prices for a Hydro Power Plant Risk Analysis in the Brazilian Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1173-:d:1042860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1173/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1173/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Machado, Bruno Goulart F. & Bhagwat, Pradyumna C., 2020. "The impact of the generation mix on the current regulatory framework for hydropower remuneration in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    2. Maier, Sebastian & Street, Alexandre & McKinnon, Ken, 2016. "Risk-averse portfolio selection of renewable electricity generator investments in Brazil: An optimised multi-market commercialisation strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1331-1343.
    3. Boroumand, Raphaël Homayoun & Goutte, Stéphane & Porcher, Simon & Porcher, Thomas, 2015. "Hedging strategies in energy markets: The case of electricity retailers," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 503-509.
    4. Rego, Erik Eduardo & Parente, Virginia, 2013. "Brazilian experience in electricity auctions: Comparing outcomes from new and old energy auctions as well as the application of the hybrid Anglo-Dutch design," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 511-520.
    5. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    6. Lak, Omidreza & Rastegar, Mohammad & Mohammadi, Mohammad & Shafiee, Soroush & Zareipour, Hamidreza, 2021. "Risk-constrained stochastic market operation strategies for wind power producers and energy storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    7. Laís Domingues Leonel & Mateus Henrique Balan & Dorel Soares Ramos & Erik Eduardo Rego & Rodrigo Ferreira de Mello, 2021. "Financial Risk Control of Hydro Generation Systems through Market Intelligence and Stochastic Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Gomes, I.L.R. & Melicio, R. & Mendes, V.M.F. & Pousinho, H.M.I., 2019. "Decision making for sustainable aggregation of clean energy in day-ahead market: Uncertainty and risk," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 692-702.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Souhir, Ben Amor & Heni, Boubaker & Lotfi, Belkacem, 2019. "Price risk and hedging strategies in Nord Pool electricity market evidence with sector indexes," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 635-655.
    2. Shin, Hunyoung & Baldick, Ross, 2018. "Mitigating market risk for wind power providers via financial risk exchange," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 344-358.
    3. Lak, Omidreza & Rastegar, Mohammad & Mohammadi, Mohammad & Shafiee, Soroush & Zareipour, Hamidreza, 2021. "Risk-constrained stochastic market operation strategies for wind power producers and energy storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    4. Zhu, Dafeng & Yang, Bo & Ma, Chengbin & Wang, Zhaojian & Zhu, Shanying & Ma, Kai & Guan, Xinping, 2022. "Stochastic gradient-based fast distributed multi-energy management for an industrial park with temporally-coupled constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    5. Chai, Shanglei & Zhou, P., 2018. "The Minimum-CVaR strategy with semi-parametric estimation in carbon market hedging problems," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 64-75.
    6. Sofiane Aboura, 2014. "When the U.S. Stock Market Becomes Extreme?," Risks, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Winter, Peter, 2007. "Managerial Risk Accounting and Control – A German perspective," MPRA Paper 8185, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Cui, Xueting & Zhu, Shushang & Sun, Xiaoling & Li, Duan, 2013. "Nonlinear portfolio selection using approximate parametric Value-at-Risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2124-2139.
    9. Jay Cao & Jacky Chen & John Hull & Zissis Poulos, 2021. "Deep Hedging of Derivatives Using Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2103.16409, arXiv.org.
    10. Giovanni Bonaccolto & Massimiliano Caporin & Sandra Paterlini, 2018. "Asset allocation strategies based on penalized quantile regression," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-32, January.
    11. Dimitrios G. Konstantinides & Georgios C. Zachos, 2019. "Exhibiting Abnormal Returns Under a Risk Averse Strategy," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 551-566, June.
    12. Parrini, Alessandro, 2013. "Importance Sampling for Portfolio Credit Risk in Factor Copula Models," MPRA Paper 103745, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    14. Boonen, Tim J. & Liu, Fangda, 2022. "Insurance with heterogeneous preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. Arturo Cortés Aguilar, 2011. "Estimación del residual de un bono respaldado por hipotecas mediante un modelo de riesgo crédito: una comparación de resultados de la teoría de cópulas y el modelo IRB de Basilea II en datos del merca," Revista de Administración, Finanzas y Economía (Journal of Management, Finance and Economics), Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Ciudad de México, vol. 5(1), pages 50-64.
    16. Furman, Edward & Landsman, Zinoviy, 2010. "Multivariate Tweedie distributions and some related capital-at-risk analyses," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 351-361, April.
    17. Marco Rocco, 2011. "Extreme value theory for finance: a survey," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 99, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    18. Valdez, Emiliano A. & Chernih, Andrew, 2003. "Wang's capital allocation formula for elliptically contoured distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 517-532, December.
    19. Kull, Andreas, 2009. "Sharing Risk – An Economic Perspective," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 591-613, November.
    20. Schumacher Johannes M., 2018. "Distortion risk measures, ROC curves, and distortion divergence," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 35(1-2), pages 35-50, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1173-:d:1042860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.