IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i24p8120-d1302160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Sustainability Implications and Economic Prosperity of Integrated Renewable Solutions in Urban Development

Author

Listed:
  • Yigit Kazancoglu

    (Department of Logistics Management, Yasar University, Universite Caddesi, No:37-39, 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey)

  • Yalcin Berberoglu

    (Department of Business Administration, Yasar University, Universite Caddesi, No:37-39, 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey)

  • Cisem Lafci

    (Department of Logistics Management, Yasar University, Universite Caddesi, No:37-39, 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey)

  • Oleksander Generalov

    (Department of World Economy, State University of Trade and Economics, 19 Kyoto Str., 02156 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Denys Solohub

    (Educational and Scientific Institute of Management, Economics and Business, Interregional Academy of Personnel Management, 03039 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Viktor Koval

    (Department of Business and Tourism Management, Izmail State University of Humanities, 68601 Izmail, Ukraine)

Abstract

The increasing urbanization and growth of cities worldwide have led to a significant increase in energy demand. As a transition to a low carbon environment occurs, the role of renewable and sustainable energy systems in urban areas is benefiting industry and the environment alike. From this perspective, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have a lot to offer to the energy industry, particularly the integration of renewable and sustainable energy systems for environmental protection in cities. This study presents a comprehensive view that integrates technological, economic, political, and social challenges confronted with the effective implementation of renewable and sustainable energy in urban cities and proposes a solution agenda to overcome these hurdles with the aid of the SDGs. The weights for the challenges of adopting renewable and sustainable energy systems were determined using the Fuzzy Best-Worst Method. The SDGs were then ranked using the fuzzy TOPSIS technique to overcome predetermined challenges. The originality of this study lies in finding solutions to the determined challenges by adopting SDGs, emphasizing the need for integrated solutions that address energy-related concerns, and highlighting the role and importance of SDGs in environmental protection. The study highlights the importance of SDGs in promoting renewable energy integration in urban areas, with SDG 11 being the most crucial to mitigate harmful environmental occurrences related to energy-related issues in urban areas, followed by SDG 7 and SDG 13.

Suggested Citation

  • Yigit Kazancoglu & Yalcin Berberoglu & Cisem Lafci & Oleksander Generalov & Denys Solohub & Viktor Koval, 2023. "Environmental Sustainability Implications and Economic Prosperity of Integrated Renewable Solutions in Urban Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:24:p:8120-:d:1302160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/8120/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/8120/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chi Zhang & Zhongchang Sun & Qiang Xing & Jialong Sun & Tianyu Xia & Hao Yu, 2021. "Localizing Indicators of SDG11 for an Integrated Assessment of Urban Sustainability—A Case Study of Hainan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Brown, Marilyn A., 2001. "Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(14), pages 1197-1207, November.
    3. Molyneaux, Lynette & Wagner, Liam & Froome, Craig & Foster, John, 2012. "Resilience and electricity systems: A comparative analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 188-201.
    4. Kling, Gerhard & Volz, Ulrich & Murinde, Victor & Ayas, Sibel, 2021. "The impact of climate vulnerability on firms’ cost of capital and access to finance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Amani G. Rweyendela, 2022. "Getting closer to SDG12: incorporating industrial ecology principles into project EIA," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(6), pages 953-974, May.
    6. Michael Cabanillas-Carbonell & Jorge Pérez-Martínez & Joselyn Zapata-Paulini, 2023. "Contributions of the 5G Network with Respect to Poverty (SDG1), Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-25, July.
    7. Ghimire, Laxman Prasad & Kim, Yeonbae, 2018. "An analysis on barriers to renewable energy development in the context of Nepal using AHP," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 446-456.
    8. Schleich, Joachim, 2009. "Barriers to energy efficiency: A comparison across the German commercial and services sector," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 2150-2159, May.
    9. Manfren, Massimiliano & Caputo, Paola & Costa, Gaia, 2011. "Paradigm shift in urban energy systems through distributed generation: Methods and models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1032-1048, April.
    10. Suberu, Mohammed Yekini & Mustafa, Mohd Wazir & Bashir, Nouruddeen & Muhamad, Nor Asiah & Mokhtar, Ahmad Safawi, 2013. "Power sector renewable energy integration for expanding access to electricity in sub-Saharan Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 630-642.
    11. Haoran Zhao & Huiru Zhao & Sen Guo, 2018. "Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Electricity Grid Corporations Employing a Novel MCDM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Asif Raihan & Mamunur Rashid & Liton Chandra Voumik & Salma Akter & Miguel Angel Esquivias, 2023. "The Dynamic Impacts of Economic Growth, Financial Globalization, Fossil Fuel, Renewable Energy, and Urbanization on Load Capacity Factor in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Jonathan Rutherford & Olivier Coutard, 2014. "Urban Energy Transitions: Places, Processes and Politics of Socio-technical Change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(7), pages 1353-1377, May.
    14. Satya Widya Yudha & Benny Tjahjono, 2019. "Stakeholder Mapping and Analysis of the Renewable Energy Industry in Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Hanna Hrinchenko & Viktor Koval & Nadiia Shmygol & Oleksandr Sydorov & Oksana Tsimoshynska & Dominika Matuszewska, 2023. "Approaches to Sustainable Energy Management in Ensuring Safety of Power Equipment Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    16. U. Riebesell & K. G. Schulz & R. G. J. Bellerby & M. Botros & P. Fritsche & M. Meyerhöfer & C. Neill & G. Nondal & A. Oschlies & J. Wohlers & E. Zöllner, 2007. "Enhanced biological carbon consumption in a high CO2 ocean," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7169), pages 545-548, November.
    17. Yalcin Berberoglu & Yigit Kazancoglu & Muhittin Sagnak, 2023. "Circularity assessment of logistics activities for green business performance management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4734-4749, November.
    18. Kikegawa, Yukihiro & Genchi, Yutaka & Yoshikado, Hiroshi & Kondo, Hiroaki, 2003. "Development of a numerical simulation system toward comprehensive assessments of urban warming countermeasures including their impacts upon the urban buildings' energy-demands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(4), pages 449-466, December.
    19. Alhamwi, Alaa & Medjroubi, Wided & Vogt, Thomas & Agert, Carsten, 2017. "GIS-based urban energy systems models and tools: Introducing a model for the optimisation of flexibilisation technologies in urban areas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 1-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharifi, Ayyoob & Yamagata, Yoshiki, 2016. "Principles and criteria for assessing urban energy resilience: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1654-1677.
    2. Ziyi Wang & Zengqiao Chen & Cuiping Ma & Ronald Wennersten & Qie Sun, 2022. "Nationwide Evaluation of Urban Energy System Resilience in China Using a Comprehensive Index Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-36, February.
    3. Apriani Soepardi & Pratikto Pratikto & Purnomo Budi Santoso & Ishardita Pambudi Tama & Patrik Thollander, 2018. "Linking of Barriers to Energy Efficiency Improvement in Indonesia’s Steel Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Michiel Fremouw & Annamaria Bagaini & Paolo De Pascali, 2020. "Energy Potential Mapping: Open Data in Support of Urban Transition Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Guglielmina Mutani & Valeria Todeschi & Simone Beltramino, 2020. "Energy Consumption Models at Urban Scale to Measure Energy Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-31, July.
    6. Anna Dahlqvist & Patrik S derholm, 2019. "Industrial Energy Use, Management Practices and Price Signals: The Case of Swedish Process Industry," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 30-45.
    7. Bukarica, Vesna & Robić, Slavica, 2013. "Implementing energy efficiency policy in Croatia: Stakeholder interactions for closing the gap," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 414-422.
    8. Fleiter, Tobias & Schleich, Joachim & Ravivanpong, Ployplearn, 2012. "Adoption of energy-efficiency measures in SMEs—An empirical analysis based on energy audit data from Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 863-875.
    9. Gliedt, Travis & Hoicka, Christina E., 2015. "Energy upgrades as financial or strategic investment? Energy Star property owners and managers improving building energy performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 430-443.
    10. Tobias Fleitera & Joachim Schleich & Ployplearn Ravivanpong, 2012. "Adoption of energy-efficiency measures in SMEs - An empirical analysis based on energy audit data," Post-Print hal-00805748, HAL.
    11. Paweł Modrzyński & Robert Karaszewski, 2022. "Urban Energy Management—A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Jafarzadeh, Sepideh & Utne, Ingrid Bouwer, 2014. "A framework to bridge the energy efficiency gap in shipping," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 603-612.
    13. Christopher Dixon-O’Mara & L. (Lisa B.) Ryan, 2017. "Energy efficiency in the food retail sector: Barriers, drivers, and acceptable policies," Working Papers 201716, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    14. Rehmatulla, Nishatabbas & Smith, Tristan, 2015. "Barriers to energy efficiency in shipping: A triangulated approach to investigate the principal agent problem," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 44-57.
    15. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Kalantzis, Fotios & Revoltella, Debora, 2019. "How energy audits promote SMEs' energy efficiency investment," EIB Working Papers 2019/02, European Investment Bank (EIB).
    17. Jun Dong & Dongxue Wang & Dongran Liu & Palidan Ainiwaer & Linpeng Nie, 2019. "Operation Health Assessment of Power Market Based on Improved Matter-Element Extension Cloud Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-25, October.
    18. Bukarica, Vesna & Tomšić, Željko, 2017. "Energy efficiency policy evaluation by moving from techno-economic towards whole society perspective on energy efficiency market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 968-975.
    19. Olsthoorn, Mark & Schleich, Joachim & Klobasa, Marian, 2015. "Barriers to electricity load shift in companies: A survey-based exploration of the end-user perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 32-42.
    20. Chlechowitz, Mara & Reuter, Matthias & Eichhammer, Wolfgang, 2022. "An Indicator based Approach to the Energy Efficiency First Principle," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S10/2021, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI), revised 2022.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:24:p:8120-:d:1302160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.