IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i1p73-d124978.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic and Environmental Analysis of Scaling up Cogeneration Units Driven by Sugarcane Biomass to Enhance Power Exports

Author

Listed:
  • João Paulo Guerra

    (Chemical Engineering Department, Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes, 580, Bloco 18—Conjunto das Químicas, São Paulo 05508-000, SP, Brazil)

  • Fernando Henrique Cardoso

    (Chemical Engineering Department, Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes, 580, Bloco 18—Conjunto das Químicas, São Paulo 05508-000, SP, Brazil)

  • Alex Nogueira

    (Chemical Engineering Department, Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes, 580, Bloco 18—Conjunto das Químicas, São Paulo 05508-000, SP, Brazil)

  • Luiz Kulay

    (Chemical Engineering Department, Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes, 580, Bloco 18—Conjunto das Químicas, São Paulo 05508-000, SP, Brazil)

Abstract

When manual harvesting of sugarcane was discontinued in many regions of Brazil, interest in power generation by burning the bagasse and straw in cogeneration units rose. Exergy analysis is often applied to increase the thermodynamic yield of these plants by identifying irreversibility and work availability. Conversely, pressure for adopting clean energy requires these systems to be evaluated for suitable environmental performance. This study identified and discussed the thermodynamic and environmental effects of scaling up systems that operate according Rankine cycle with reheating. Ten scenarios have been designed considering different levels of steam pressure and addition rates of straw remaining in the sugarcane cultivation. The thermodynamic analysis revealed a 37% improvement in the exergy efficiency and 63% of increasing in power generation to raise the steam pressure from 20 to 100 bar. Moreover, the use of 50% of residual straw into units operating at 100 bar can more than double the amount of electricity exported. If addressed considering a life cycle perspective, the use of straw improves the environmental performance of the cogeneration for Climate Change and Particle Matter Formation but provides additional impacts in terms of Water and Fossil resources depletions.

Suggested Citation

  • João Paulo Guerra & Fernando Henrique Cardoso & Alex Nogueira & Luiz Kulay, 2018. "Thermodynamic and Environmental Analysis of Scaling up Cogeneration Units Driven by Sugarcane Biomass to Enhance Power Exports," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:73-:d:124978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/73/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/73/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akhil Kadiyala & Raghava Kommalapati & Ziaul Huque, 2016. "Evaluation of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Hydroelectricity Generation Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Bechara, Rami & Gomez, Adrien & Saint-Antonin, Valérie & Schweitzer, Jean-Marc & Maréchal, François, 2016. "Methodology for the optimal design of an integrated sugarcane distillery and cogeneration process for ethanol and power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P2), pages 540-549.
    3. Palacios-Bereche, Reynaldo & Mosqueira-Salazar, Klever Joao & Modesto, Marcelo & Ensinas, Adriano V. & Nebra, Silvia A. & Serra, Luis M. & Lozano, Miguel-Angel, 2013. "Exergetic analysis of the integrated first- and second-generation ethanol production from sugarcane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 46-61.
    4. Francis Chinweuba Eboh & Peter Ahlström & Tobias Richards, 2017. "Exergy Analysis of Solid Fuel-Fired Heat and Power Plants: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-29, February.
    5. Guido Colombo & William Ocampo-Duque & Fabio Rinaldi, 2014. "Challenges in Bioenergy Production from Sugarcane Mills in Developing Countries: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-25, September.
    6. Sartori, Maria Márcia Pereira & Florentino, Helenice de Oliveira, 2007. "Energy balance optimization of sugarcane crop residual biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1745-1748.
    7. Ensinas, A.V. & Modesto, M. & Nebra, S.A. & Serra, L., 2009. "Reduction of irreversibility generation in sugar and ethanol production from sugarcane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 680-688.
    8. Alves, Moises & Ponce, Gustavo H.S.F. & Silva, Maria Aparecida & Ensinas, Adriano V., 2015. "Surplus electricity production in sugarcane mills using residual bagasse and straw as fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 751-757.
    9. Lopes Silva, Diogo Aparecido & Delai, Ivete & Delgado Montes, Mary Laura & Roberto Ometto, Aldo, 2014. "Life cycle assessment of the sugarcane bagasse electricity generation in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 532-547.
    10. Pellegrini, Luiz Felipe & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2011. "Combined production of sugar, ethanol and electricity: Thermoeconomic and environmental analysis and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3704-3715.
    11. David J. Murphy & Michael Carbajales-Dale & Devin Moeller, 2016. "Comparing Apples to Apples: Why the Net Energy Analysis Community Needs to Adopt the Life-Cycle Analysis Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Dias, Marina O.S. & Modesto, Marcelo & Ensinas, Adriano V. & Nebra, Silvia A. & Filho, Rubens Maciel & Rossell, Carlos E.V., 2011. "Improving bioethanol production from sugarcane: evaluation of distillation, thermal integration and cogeneration systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3691-3703.
    13. Pellegrini, Luiz Felipe & de Oliveira Júnior, Silvio & Burbano, Juan Carlos, 2010. "Supercritical steam cycles and biomass integrated gasification combined cycles for sugarcane mills," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1172-1180.
    14. Xinhua Shen & Raghava R. Kommalapati & Ziaul Huque, 2015. "The Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Power Generation from Lignocellulosic Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-14, September.
    15. Gupta, M.K. & Kaushik, S.C. & Ranjan, K.R. & Panwar, N.L. & Reddy, V. Siva & Tyagi, S.K., 2015. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of solar and other thermal power generation systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 567-582.
    16. Akhil Kadiyala & Raghava Kommalapati & Ziaul Huque, 2016. "Evaluation of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Different Biomass Feedstock Electricity Generation Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-12, November.
    17. Seabra, Joaquim E.A. & Macedo, Isaias C., 2011. "Comparative analysis for power generation and ethanol production from sugarcane residual biomass in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 421-428, January.
    18. Marco F. Torchio, 2013. "Energy-Exergy, Environmental and Economic Criteria in Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Plants: Indexes for the Evaluation of the Cogeneration Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thilanka Ariyawansha & Dimuthu Abeyrathna & Buddhika Kulasekara & Devananda Pottawela & Dinesh Kodithuwakku & Sandya Ariyawansha & Natasha Sewwandi & WBMAC Bandara & Tofael Ahamed & Ryozo Noguchi, 2020. "A Novel Approach to Minimize Energy Requirements and Maximize Biomass Utilization of the Sugarcane Harvesting System in Sri Lanka," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Adriano da S. Marques & Monica Carvalho & Álvaro A. V. Ochoa & Ronelly J. Souza & Carlos A. C. dos Santos, 2020. "Exergoeconomic Assessment of a Compact Electricity-Cooling Cogeneration Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Isadora Luiza Climaco Cunha & Fábio Rosa & Luiz Kulay, 2021. "Green Coalescent Synthesis Based on the Design for Environment (DfE) Principles: Brazilian Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Claudia Cristina Sanchez Moore & Luiz Kulay, 2019. "Effect of the Implementation of Carbon Capture Systems on the Environmental, Energy and Economic Performance of the Brazilian Electricity Matrix," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Palacios-Bereche, M.C. & Palacios-Bereche, R. & Ensinas, A.V. & Gallego, A. Garrido & Modesto, Marcelo & Nebra, S.A., 2022. "Brazilian sugar cane industry – A survey on future improvements in the process energy management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    6. Natália de Almeida Menezes & Isadora Luiza Clímaco Cunha & Moisés Teles dos Santos & Luiz Kulay, 2022. "Obtaining bioLPG via the HVO Route in Brazil: A Prospect Study Based on Life Cycle Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Palacios-Bereche, M.C. & Palacios-Bereche, R. & Ensinas, A.V. & Gallego, A. Garrido & Modesto, Marcelo & Nebra, S.A., 2022. "Brazilian sugar cane industry – A survey on future improvements in the process energy management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Bechara, Rami & Gomez, Adrien & Saint-Antonin, Valérie & Schweitzer, Jean-Marc & Maréchal, François, 2016. "Methodology for the design and comparison of optimal production configurations of first and first and second generation ethanol with power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 247-265.
    3. Pina, Eduardo A. & Palacios-Bereche, Reynaldo & Chavez-Rodriguez, Mauro F. & Ensinas, Adriano V. & Modesto, Marcelo & Nebra, Silvia A., 2017. "Reduction of process steam demand and water-usage through heat integration in sugar and ethanol production from sugarcane – Evaluation of different plant configurations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1263-1280.
    4. Bechara, Rami & Gomez, Adrien & Saint-Antonin, Valérie & Schweitzer, Jean-Marc & Maréchal, François & Ensinas, Adriano, 2018. "Review of design works for the conversion of sugarcane to first and second-generation ethanol and electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 152-164.
    5. Santos, V.E.N. & Ely, R.N. & Szklo, A.S. & Magrini, A., 2016. "Chemicals, electricity and fuels from biorefineries processing Brazil׳s sugarcane bagasse: Production recipes and minimum selling prices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1443-1458.
    6. Copa Rey, José Ramón & Tamayo Pacheco, Jorge Jadid & António da Cruz Tarelho, Luís & Silva, Valter & Cardoso, João Sousa & Silveira, José Luz & Tuna, Celso Eduardo, 2021. "Evaluation of cogeneration alternative systems integrating biomass gasification applied to a Brazilian sugar industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 318-333.
    7. Dias, Marina O.S. & Junqueira, Tassia L. & Jesus, Charles D.F. & Rossell, Carlos E.V. & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Bonomi, Antonio, 2012. "Improving second generation ethanol production through optimization of first generation production process from sugarcane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 246-252.
    8. Díaz Pérez, Álvaro A. & Escobar Palacio, José C. & Venturini, Osvaldo J. & Martínez Reyes, Arnaldo M. & Rúa Orozco, Dimas J. & Silva Lora, Electo E. & Almazán del Olmo, Oscar A., 2018. "Thermodynamic and economic evaluation of reheat and regeneration alternatives in cogeneration systems of the Brazilian sugarcane and alcohol sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 247-262.
    9. Milão, Raquel de Freitas D. & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & de Medeiros, José Luiz, 2021. "Second Law analysis of large-scale sugarcane-ethanol biorefineries with alternative distillation schemes: Bioenergy carbon capture scenario," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    10. Fukushima, Nilton Asao & Palacios-Bereche, Milagros Cecilia & Palacios-Bereche, Reynaldo & Nebra, Silvia Azucena, 2019. "Energy analysis of the ethanol industry considering vinasse concentration and incineration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 96-109.
    11. Felipe Godoy Righetto & Carlos Eduardo Keutenedjian Mady, 2023. "Exergy Analysis of a Sugarcane Crop: A Planting-to-Harvest Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Valerii Havrysh & Antonina Kalinichenko & Edyta Szafranek & Vasyl Hruban, 2022. "Agricultural Land: Crop Production or Photovoltaic Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Murillo Vetroni Barros & Cassiano Moro Piekarski & Antonio Carlos De Francisco, 2018. "Carbon Footprint of Electricity Generation in Brazil: An Analysis of the 2016–2026 Period," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, June.
    14. He, Jiaxin & Liu, Ying & Lin, Boqiang, 2018. "Should China support the development of biomass power generation?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 416-425.
    15. Manuel Raul Pelaez-Samaniego & Juan L. Espinoza & José Jara-Alvear & Pablo Arias-Reyes & Fernando Maldonado-Arias & Patricia Recalde-Galindo & Pablo Rosero & Tsai Garcia-Perez, 2020. "Potential and Impacts of Cogeneration in Tropical Climate Countries: Ecuador as a Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-26, October.
    16. Bechara, Rami & Gomez, Adrien & Saint-Antonin, Valérie & Schweitzer, Jean-Marc & Maréchal, François, 2016. "Methodology for the optimal design of an integrated sugarcane distillery and cogeneration process for ethanol and power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P2), pages 540-549.
    17. Fan, Yee Van & Romanenko, Sergey & Gai, Limei & Kupressova, Ekaterina & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, 2021. "Biomass integration for energy recovery and efficient use of resources: Tomsk Region," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    18. Bressanin, Jéssica Marcon & Guimarães, Henrique Real & Chagas, Mateus Ferreira & Sampaio, Isabelle Lobo de Mesquita & Klein, Bruno Colling & Watanabe, Marcos Djun Barbosa & Bonomi, Antonio & Morais, E, 2021. "Advanced technologies for electricity production in the sugarcane value chain are a strategic option in a carbon reward policy context," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    19. Khatiwada, Dilip & Leduc, Sylvain & Silveira, Semida & McCallum, Ian, 2016. "Optimizing ethanol and bioelectricity production in sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 371-386.
    20. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Karimi, Keikhosro, 2016. "Exergy-based sustainability assessment of ethanol production via Mucor indicus from fructose, glucose, sucrose, and molasses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 240-252.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:73-:d:124978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.