IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v11y2021i3p66-d587288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project Governance in State-Owned Enterprises: The Case of Major Public Projects’ Governance Arrangements and Quality Assurance Schemes

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Strand Alfredsen Larsen

    (Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, 6026 Ålesund, Norway
    Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Gro Holst Volden

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Bjørn Andersen

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

Societal development is increasingly undertaken as major public projects in different sectors. Project governance is important for strategically successful outcomes; thus, a broad societal perspective should be kept throughout the governance process. State ownership exists in many forms, and major public projects’ governance arrangements differ. Quality assurance is a recommended part of the arrangements, yet knowledge of them is limited. This study investigates relatively recent governance arrangements in state-owned enterprises in Norway, emphasizing their content and organization of quality assurance. The arrangements are compared with the more established “State Project Model”, a governance arrangement set up by the Ministry of Finance in 2000, including major public projects with budgets exceeding USD 110 million. Through case studies, comprising documents and interviews, and using the State Project Model as a reference frame, differences in the studied arrangements’ comprehensiveness were found. Finding the appropriate level of governance is challenging, yet potential for mutual learning and improvement across different arrangements is revealed. For state-owned enterprises with sectoral policy objectives, the government should ensure that political control is not undermined. This study provides recommendations for further improvement of governance arrangements and adds to the general understanding of state-owned enterprises and major public projects’ front-end phase.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Strand Alfredsen Larsen & Gro Holst Volden & Bjørn Andersen, 2021. "Project Governance in State-Owned Enterprises: The Case of Major Public Projects’ Governance Arrangements and Quality Assurance Schemes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-27, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:66-:d:587288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/3/66/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/3/66/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. K. Narayanan & Robert DeFillippi, 2012. "The Influence of Strategic Context on Project Management Systems: A Senior Management Perspective," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Terry M. Williams & Knut Samset (ed.), Project Governance, chapter 1, pages 3-45, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. B. S. Frey, 2005. "Public Governance and Private Governance: Exchanging Ideas," Springer Books, in: Peter Gijsel & Hans Schenk (ed.), Multidisciplinary Economics, pages 167-186, Springer.
    3. Ioana-Andreea CIOLOMIC & Ioana Natalia BELEIU, 2020. "State-Owned Enterprises in the Context of Contemporary Transformations," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(2), pages 177-187, May.
    4. Knut Samset & Tom Christensen, 2017. "Ex Ante Project Evaluation and the Complexity of Early Decision-Making," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Edoardo Ongaro & Ewan Ferlie, 2019. "Exploring Strategy-Making in ‘Non-New Public Management’ Public Services Settings: The Case of European Union Agencies," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Sjors Overman, 2016. "Great Expectations of Public Service Delegation: A systematic review," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 1238-1262, September.
    7. Knut Samset, 2010. "Early Project Appraisal," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-28992-5, September.
    8. Asadullah Khan & Muhammad Waris & Ishak Ismail & Mirza Rizwan Sajid & Mehfooz Ullah & Faisal Usman, 2019. "Deficiencies in Project Governance: An Analysis of Infrastructure Development Program," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Luc BERNIER & Eoin REEVES, 2018. "The Continuing Importance Of State‐Owned Enterprise In The Twenty‐First Century: Challenges For Public Policy," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(3), pages 453-458, September.
    10. Carole RENTSCH & Matthias FINGER, 2015. "Yes, No, Maybe: The Ambiguous Relationships Between State-Owned Enterprises And The State," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 86(4), pages 617-640, December.
    11. Knut Samset, 2009. "Projects, Their Quality at Entry and Challenges in the Front-end Phase," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Terry M. Williams & Knut Samset & Kjell J. Sunnevåg (ed.), Making Essential Choices with Scant Information, chapter 2, pages 18-35, Palgrave Macmillan.
    12. Vagliasindi, Maria, 2008. "Governance arrangements for state owned enterprises," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4542, The World Bank.
    13. Bent Flyvbjerg, 2014. "What You Should Know About Megaprojects, and Why: An Overview," Papers 1409.0003, arXiv.org.
    14. Peter W. G. Morris, 2009. "Implementing Strategy Through Project Management: The Importance of Managing the Project Front-end," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Terry M. Williams & Knut Samset & Kjell J. Sunnevåg (ed.), Making Essential Choices with Scant Information, chapter 3, pages 39-67, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dao T. T. Thuy & Truong Quoc Viet & Vu Van Phuc & Thi-Hong-Diep Pham & Nguyen Thi Ngoc Lan & Huong Ho, 2022. "Impact of Leadership Behavior on Entrepreneurship in State-Owned Enterprises: Evidence from Civil Servant Management Aimed at Improving Accountability," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Juan David González-Ruiz & Juan Camilo Mejia-Escobar & Giovanni Franco-Sepúlveda, 2021. "Towards an Understanding of Project Finance in the Mining Sector in the Sustainability Context: A Scientometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-27, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Zeeshan Fareed & Qin Su, 2022. "Project Governance and Project Performance: The Moderating Role of Top Management Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Pierre BAUBY, 2019. "The governance of State-owned Enterprises (SOEs) operating under monopoly situation," CIRIEC Working Papers 1931, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    3. Bloomfield, Katherine & Williams, Terry & Bovis, Chris & Merali, Yasmin, 2019. "Systemic risk in major public contracts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 667-676.
    4. Volden, Gro Holst, 2018. "Public project success as seen in a broad perspective," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 109-117.
    5. Diane Coyle & Marianne Sensier, 2020. "The imperial treasury: appraisal methodology and regional economic performance in the UK," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 283-295, March.
    6. Schreiner, Lena & Madlener, Reinhard, 2022. "Investing in power grid infrastructure as a flexibility option: A DSGE assessment for Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    7. Alexander Budzier & Bent Flyvbjerg & Andi Garavaglia & Andreas Leed, 2019. "Quantitative Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis of Nuclear Waste Storage," Papers 1901.11123, arXiv.org.
    8. Francesco Di Maddaloni & Roya Derakhshan, 2019. "A Leap from Negative to Positive Bond. A Step towards Project Sustainability," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Afia Malik, 2021. "Corporate Governance in the State-Owned Electricity Distribution Companies," PIDE Knowledge Brief 2021:40, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    10. Love, Peter E.D. & Ika, Lavagnon A. & Ahiaga-Dagbui, Dominic D., 2019. "On de-bunking ‘fake news’ in a post truth era: Why does the Planning Fallacy explanation for cost overruns fall short?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 397-408.
    11. Love, Peter E.D. & Ahiaga-Dagbui, Dominic & Welde, Morten & Odeck, James, 2017. "Light rail transit cost performance: Opportunities for future-proofing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 27-39.
    12. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier, 2018. "Report for the Edinburgh Tram Inquiry," Papers 1805.12106, arXiv.org.
    13. Karen Lucas & Ian Philips & Ersilia Verlinghieri, 2022. "A mixed methods approach to the social assessment of transport infrastructure projects," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 271-291, February.
    14. Águeda Gil-López & Unai Arzubiaga & Elena San Román & Alfredo Massis, 2022. "The Visible Hand of corporate entrepreneurship in state-owned enterprises: a longitudinal study of the Spanish National Postal Operator," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1033-1071, September.
    15. Shutian Zhou & Guofang Zhai & Yijun Shi, 2018. "What Drives the Rise of Metro Developments in China? Evidence from Nantong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Mingyue Fang & Rui Ruan, 2023. "State‐owned Enterprises in China as Macroeconomic Stabilizers: Their Special Function in Times of Economic Policy Uncertainty," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 31(5), pages 87-115, September.
    17. Jin, Zhizhou & Zeng, Saixing & Chen, Hongquan & Shi, Jonathan Jingsheng, 2022. "Explaining the expansion performance in technological capability of participants in megaprojects: A configurational approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    18. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    19. Jintao Lu & Licheng Ren & Siqin Yao & Jiayuan Qiao & Wadim Strielkowski & Justas Streimikis, 2019. "Comparative Review of Corporate Social Responsibility of Energy Utilities and Sustainable Energy Development Trends in the Baltic States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    20. Ginés de Rus, 2015. "La política de infraestructuras en España. Una reforma pendiente," Policy Papers 2015-08, FEDEA.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:66-:d:587288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.