IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v146y2021ics1366554520308504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A joint framework for modeling freight mode and destination choice: Application to the US commodity flow survey data

Author

Listed:
  • Keya, Nowreen
  • Anowar, Sabreena
  • Bhowmik, Tanmoy
  • Eluru, Naveen

Abstract

Earlier research has extensively examined freight mode and shipment weight dimensions. However, freight destination behavior at a high resolution has received scant attention. In our study, we attempt to address the limited research on destination decision processes and develop a latent segmentation-based approach that accommodates mode and destination choices in a unified framework. The proposed approach postulates that these two choices are actually sequential in nature with an infinitesimally small time gap between them. However, the actual sequence (mode-destination or destination-mode) is unknown to us. Thus, a probabilistic model that can accommodate for the two choice sequences within a single framework is proposed. The latent segmentation framework probabilistically assigns the decision maker to the two sequences. In the Mode first – Destination second (MD) sequence, the destination choice model is calibrated with choice alternatives customized to the chosen mode. In the Destination first – Mode second (DM) sequence, the destination model is calibrated without any mode information as mode is unknown to the decision maker. In the study, we used 2012 US Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) data. We found that the latent segmentation-based sequence model outperformed the independent sequence models (MD and DM). The validation exercise also confirmed the superiority of the proposed framework. Finally, an elasticity analysis is conducted to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed model system.

Suggested Citation

  • Keya, Nowreen & Anowar, Sabreena & Bhowmik, Tanmoy & Eluru, Naveen, 2021. "A joint framework for modeling freight mode and destination choice: Application to the US commodity flow survey data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:146:y:2021:i:c:s1366554520308504
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554520308504
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jensen, Anders Fjendbo & Thorhauge, Mikkel & de Jong, Gerard & Rich, Jeppe & Dekker, Thijs & Johnson, Daniel & Cabral, Manuel Ojeda & Bates, John & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2019. "A disaggregate freight transport chain choice model for Europe," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 43-62.
    2. Dong Yang & Ghim Ping Ong & Anthony Theng Heng Chin, 2014. "An exploratory study on the effect of trade data aggregation on international freight mode choice," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 212-223, May.
    3. de Jong, Gerard & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2007. "A micro-simulation model of shipment size and transport chain choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 950-965, November.
    4. Irannezhad, Elnaz & Prato, Carlo & Hickman, Mark, 2019. "A joint hybrid model of the choices of container terminals and of dwell time," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 119-133.
    5. Paleti, Rajesh & Faghih Imani, Ahmadreza & Eluru, Naveen & Hu, Hsi-Hwa & Huang, Guoxiong, 2017. "An integrated model of intensity of activity opportunities on supply side and tour destination & departure time choices on demand side," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 63-74.
    6. Gerard de Jong & Reto Tanner & Jeppe Rich & Mikkel Thorhauge & Otto Anker Nielsen & John Bates, 2017. "Modelling production-consumption flows of goods in Europe: the trade model within Transtools3," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Vincent Chakour & Naveen Eluru, 2014. "Analyzing commuter train user behavior: a decision framework for access mode and station choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 211-228, January.
    8. Keya, Nowreen & Anowar, Sabreena & Eluru, Naveen, 2019. "Joint model of freight mode choice and shipment size: A copula-based random regret minimization framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 97-115.
    9. Sobhani, Anae & Eluru, Naveen & Faghih-Imani, Ahmadreza, 2013. "A latent segmentation based multiple discrete continuous extreme value model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 154-169.
    10. McFadden, Daniel, 1987. "Regression-based specification tests for the multinomial logit model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1-2), pages 63-82.
    11. Chuan Ding & Binglei Xie & Yaowu Wang & Yaoyu Lin, 2014. "Modeling the Joint Choice Decisions on Urban Shopping Destination and Travel-to-Shop Mode: A Comparative Study of Different Structures," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-10, March.
    12. Faghih-Imani, Ahmadreza & Eluru, Naveen, 2015. "Analysing bicycle-sharing system user destination choice preferences: Chicago’s Divvy system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 53-64.
    13. Fox, James & Daly, Andrew & Hess, Stephane & Miller, Eric, 2014. "Temporal transferability of models of mode-destination choice for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 7(2), pages 41-62.
    14. Rich, J. & Holmblad, P.M. & Hansen, C.O., 2009. "A weighted logit freight mode-choice model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1006-1019, November.
    15. Scott, Darren M. & He, Sylvia Y., 2012. "Modeling constrained destination choice for shopping: a GIS-based, time-geographic approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 60-71.
    16. Abdelwahab, Walid M., 1998. "Elasticities of mode choice probabilities and market elasticities of demand: Evidence from a simultaneous mode choice/shipment-size freight transport model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 257-266, December.
    17. Cherchi, Elisabetta & Guevara, Cristian Angelo, 2012. "A Monte Carlo experiment to analyze the curse of dimensionality in estimating random coefficients models with a full variance–covariance matrix," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 321-332.
    18. Guevara, C. Angelo & Ben-Akiva, Moshe E., 2013. "Sampling of alternatives in Logit Mixture models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 185-198.
    19. Guevara, C. Angelo & Ben-Akiva, Moshe E., 2013. "Sampling of alternatives in Multivariate Extreme Value (MEV) models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 31-52.
    20. Chandra R. Bhat, 1997. "An Endogenous Segmentation Mode Choice Model with an Application to Intercity Travel," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 34-48, February.
    21. Kuriyama, Koichi & Michael Hanemann, W. & Hilger, James R., 2010. "A latent segmentation approach to a Kuhn-Tucker model: An application to recreation demand," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 209-220, November.
    22. Seyedehsan Seyedabrishami & Yousef Shafahi, 2013. "A joint model of destination and mode choice for urban trips: a disaggregate approach," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(8), pages 703-721, December.
    23. Jeffrey Newman & Vincent Bernardin, 2010. "Hierarchical ordering of nests in a joint mode and destination choice model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 677-688, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Usman Ahmed & Matthew J. Roorda, 2023. "Joint and sequential models for freight vehicle type and shipment size choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1613-1629, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hasnat, Md Mehedi & Faghih-Imani, Ahmadreza & Eluru, Naveen & Hasan, Samiul, 2019. "Destination choice modeling using location-based social media data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 22-34.
    2. Ahmadreza Faghih-Imani & Naveen Eluru, 2020. "A finite mixture modeling approach to examine New York City bicycle sharing system (CitiBike) users’ destination preferences," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 529-553, April.
    3. Crawford, Gregory S. & Griffith, Rachel & Iaria, Alessandro, 2021. "A survey of preference estimation with unobserved choice set heterogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 4-43.
    4. Pani, Agnivesh & Mishra, Sabya & Sahu, Prasanta, 2022. "Developing multi-vehicle freight trip generation models quantifying the relationship between logistics outsourcing and insourcing decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Tsoleridis, Panagiotis & Choudhury, Charisma F. & Hess, Stephane, 2022. "Utilising activity space concepts to sampling of alternatives for mode and destination choice modelling of discretionary activities," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    6. Kim, Sung Hoo & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2023. "Finite mixture (or latent class) modeling in transportation: Trends, usage, potential, and future directions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 134-173.
    7. Kalahasthi, Lokesh & Holguín-Veras, José & Yushimito, Wilfredo F., 2022. "A freight origin-destination synthesis model with mode choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Jensen, Anders Fjendbo & Thorhauge, Mikkel & de Jong, Gerard & Rich, Jeppe & Dekker, Thijs & Johnson, Daniel & Cabral, Manuel Ojeda & Bates, John & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2019. "A disaggregate freight transport chain choice model for Europe," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 43-62.
    9. Leite Mariante, Gabriel & Ma, Tai-Yu & Van Acker, Véronique, 2018. "Modeling discretionary activity location choice using detour factors and sampling of alternatives for mixed logit models," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 151-165.
    10. Sobhani, Anae & Eluru, Naveen & Faghih-Imani, Ahmadreza, 2013. "A latent segmentation based multiple discrete continuous extreme value model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 154-169.
    11. Bhat, Chandra R., 2015. "A comprehensive dwelling unit choice model accommodating psychological constructs within a search strategy for consideration set formation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 161-188.
    12. Tapia, Rodrigo Javier & dos Santos Senna, Luiz Afonso & Larranaga, Ana Margarita & Cybis, Helena Beatriz Bettella, 2019. "Joint mode and port choice for soy production in Buenos Aires province, Argentina," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 100-118.
    13. T. A. Santos & G. Lopes Santos & P. Martins & C. Guedes Soares, 2022. "A methodology for short-sea-shipping service design within intermodal transport chains," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(1), pages 138-167, March.
    14. Holguín-Veras, José & Kalahasthi, Lokesh & Campbell, Shama & González-Calderón, Carlos A. & (Cara) Wang, Xiaokun, 2021. "Freight mode choice: Results from a nationwide qualitative and quantitative research effort," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 78-120.
    15. Lu, Changxiang & Ye, Yong & Fang, Yongjun & Fang, Jiaqi, 2023. "An optimal control theory approach for freight structure path evolution post-COVID-19 pandemic," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Joubert, J.W. & Axhausen, K.W., 2011. "Inferring commercial vehicle activities in Gauteng, South Africa," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 115-124.
    17. Román, Concepción & Arencibia, Ana Isabel & Feo-Valero, María, 2017. "A latent class model with attribute cut-offs to analyze modal choice for freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 212-227.
    18. C. Angelo Guevara, 2022. "A Note on "A survey of preference estimation with unobserved choice set heterogeneity" by Gregory S. Crawford, Rachel Griffith, and Alessandro Iaria," Papers 2205.00852, arXiv.org.
    19. Megersa Abate & Inge Vierth & Rune Karlsson & Gerard Jong & Jaap Baak, 2019. "A disaggregate stochastic freight transport model for Sweden," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 671-696, June.
    20. Melstrom, Richard T., 2017. "The petroleum industry's response to an endangered species listing," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258281, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:146:y:2021:i:c:s1366554520308504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.