IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v167y2023icp261-274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Booking cum rationing strategy for equitable travel demand management in road networks

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xinwei
  • Yang, Hai
  • Ke, Jintao

Abstract

Trip booking and traffic rationing have been proposed as two alternative travel demand management (TDM) strategies over the last two decades. Through artificially restricting demand (vehicle travel) by booking or rationing the scarce road capacity during the peak periods, the negative externalities generated by travel demand over available supply or road capacity can be reduced. In many cases, the two strategies also have the main goal of reduction of air pollution. Trip booking system allows vehicles/drivers to reserve prescribed areas or some lanes/segments of freeways/roads for their use during specific time periods, thereby maintaining a certain level of service of the roadway space. It is often in the form of a permit to control the number of reservations issued. On the other hand, traffic rationing is often achieved in reality through restricting access into an urban cordoned-off area or city center based on the last digits of the license number on pre-established days and during certain periods, usually the peak hours. However, theoretical studies and practical implementation of the two strategies have been conducted separately. Taking their advantages, this paper proposes and demonstrates a novel hybrid strategy of booking cum rationing for efficient and equitable TDM. We show that the problem of interest can be simply formulated as a convenient linear programming problem in a general network. Simple examples are provided to elucidate how this hybrid strategy can achieve a traffic flow distribution pattern prescribed by the traffic planner while maintaining the fairness, efficiency, and flexibility of individual choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xinwei & Yang, Hai & Ke, Jintao, 2023. "Booking cum rationing strategy for equitable travel demand management in road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 261-274.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:167:y:2023:i:c:p:261-274
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2022.12.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261522002065
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2022.12.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lamotte, Raphaël & de Palma, André & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2017. "On the use of reservation-based autonomous vehicles for demand management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 205-227.
    2. Zhao, Y. & Triantis, K. & Teodorovic, D. & Edara, P., 2010. "A travel demand management strategy: The downtown space reservation system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 584-594, September.
    3. Nie, Yu & Zhang, H. M. & Lee, Der-Horng, 2004. "Models and algorithms for the traffic assignment problem with link capacity constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 285-312, May.
    4. Chen, Yinghao & Song, Xiaopeng & Cheng, Qixiu & An, Qinhe & Zhang, Yuan, 2021. "A cordon-based reservation system for urban traffic management," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 582(C).
    5. Arnott, Richard & de Palma, Andre & Lindsey, Robin, 1990. "Economics of a bottleneck," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 111-130, January.
    6. Praveen Edara & Dušan Teodorović & Konstantinos Triantis & Shankar Natarajan, 2011. "A simulation-based methodology to compare the performance of highway space inventory control and ramp metering control," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(7), pages 705-715, April.
    7. Chung, Younshik & Song, Taijin & Park, Jungsik, 2012. "Freeway booking policy: Public discourse and acceptability analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 223-231.
    8. Wada, Kentaro & Akamatsu, Takashi, 2013. "A hybrid implementation mechanism of tradable network permits system which obviates path enumeration: An auction mechanism with day-to-day capacity control," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 94-112.
    9. Nakamura, Katsuhiko & Kockelman, Kara Maria, 2002. "Congestion pricing and roadspace rationing: an application to the San Francisco Bay Bridge corridor," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 403-417, June.
    10. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1995. "A pareto optimum congestion reduction scheme," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 139-154, April.
    11. Wong, Jinn-Tsai, 1997. "Basic concepts for a system for advance booking for highway use," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 109-114, April.
    12. Yang, Hai & Bell, Michael G. H., 1997. "Traffic restraint, road pricing and network equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 303-314, August.
    13. Yang, Hai & Wang, Xiaolei, 2011. "Managing network mobility with tradable credits," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 580-594, March.
    14. Han, Deren & Yang, Hai & Wang, Xiaolei, 2010. "Efficiency of the plate-number-based traffic rationing in general networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1095-1110, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Hai & Wang, Xiaolei, 2011. "Managing network mobility with tradable credits," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 580-594, March.
    2. Nie, Yu (Marco) & Yin, Yafeng, 2013. "Managing rush hour travel choices with tradable credit scheme," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1-19.
    3. Yu Nie, 2015. "A New Tradable Credit Scheme for the Morning Commute Problem," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 719-741, September.
    4. Fan, Wenbo & Xiao, Feng & Nie, Yu (Macro), 2022. "Managing bottleneck congestion with tradable credits under asymmetric transaction cost," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Takayama, Yuki, 2020. "Who gains and who loses from congestion pricing in a monocentric city with a bottleneck?," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    6. Takayama, Yuki, 2015. "Bottleneck congestion and distribution of work start times: The economics of staggered work hours revisited," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 830-847.
    7. Yusuke Hara & Eiji Hato, 2019. "Analysis of dynamic decision-making in a bicycle-sharing auction using a dynamic discrete choice model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 147-173, February.
    8. Li, Zhi-Chun & Huang, Hai-Jun & Yang, Hai, 2020. "Fifty years of the bottleneck model: A bibliometric review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 311-342.
    9. Takayama, Yuki & Kuwahara, Masao, 2017. "Bottleneck congestion and residential location of heterogeneous commuters," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 65-79.
    10. Zhu, Shanjiang & Du, Longyuan & Zhang, Lei, 2013. "Rationing and pricing strategies for congestion mitigation: Behavioral theory, econometric model, and application in Beijing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 210-224.
    11. Ren-Yong Guo & Hai Yang & Hai-Jun Huang & Zhijia Tan, 2016. "Day-to-Day Flow Dynamics and Congestion Control," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 982-997, August.
    12. Michael W. Levin, 2019. "A Combinatorial Dynamic Network Trajectory Reservation Algorithm for Connected Autonomous Vehicles," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 27-55, March.
    13. Yu Ding & Huapu Lu & Lei Zhang, 2016. "An analysis of activity time use on vehicle usage rationed days," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 145-158, January.
    14. Yu Ding & Huapu Lu & Lei Zhang, 2016. "An analysis of activity time use on vehicle usage rationed days," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 145-158, January.
    15. de Palma, André & Kilani, Moez & Lindsey, Robin, 2005. "Congestion pricing on a road network: A study using the dynamic equilibrium simulator METROPOLIS," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(7-9), pages 588-611.
    16. Lamotte, Raphaël & de Palma, André & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2017. "On the use of reservation-based autonomous vehicles for demand management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 205-227.
    17. Hara, Yusuke & Hato, Eiji, 2018. "A car sharing auction with temporal-spatial OD connection conditions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 723-739.
    18. Zhao, Chuan-Lin & Leclercq, Ludovic, 2018. "Graphical solution for system optimum dynamic traffic assignment with day-based incentive routing strategies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 87-100.
    19. Carrion, Carlos & Levinson, David, 2012. "Value of travel time reliability: A review of current evidence," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 720-741.
    20. Bao, Yue & Verhoef, Erik T. & Koster, Paul, 2019. "Regulating dynamic congestion externalities with tradable credit schemes: Does a unique equilibrium exist?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 225-236.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:167:y:2023:i:c:p:261-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.