IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v157y2022icp175-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity analysis for transit equilibrium assignment and applications to uncertainty analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Du, Muqing
  • Chen, Anthony

Abstract

Systematic uncertainty analysis can be used to quantitatively evaluate variation in model outputs and identify the critical sources of uncertainty to improve the reliability and stability of a system. To analyze the effects of uncertainties in transit networks that may be caused by probabilistic travel demand, congestion, or vehicle frequencies, this study develops a sensitivity-based uncertainty analysis approach as a post-analysis tool for equilibrium transit systems. The congestion effect is considered in the waiting time and in-vehicle travel time of a passengers’ route-choice model. The hyperpath concept is used to manage passengers’ riding strategies due to the common-line problem at transit stops. A hyperpath-based gradient projection (GP) solution algorithm is developed for the solution of the variational inequality formulation of the transit equilibrium assignment problem (TEAP). A restricted sensitivity analysis approach originally developed for road networks is re-developed for the TEAP in transit networks. An analytical sensitivity-based approach is derived to conduct uncertainty analysis for the TEAP, which enables the simultaneous propagation of uncertainties from different input sources to the model outputs. Numerical examples are provided for the following purposes. (1) To demonstrate three applications of the sensitivity analysis of the TEAP, namely the perturbed solution estimation problem, the critical parameter identification problem, and the paradox analysis problem. (2) To illustrate the use of uncertainty analysis of the TEAP, such as estimating the variance and confidence level of model outputs with respect to various model inputs/parameters as random variables, and ranking the importance of arcs using sensitivity-based uncertainty analysis. (3) To demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach to real transit networks. The findings demonstrate not only the importance of the analytical sensitivity analysis development for the TEAP, but also for the practical applications of sensitivity and uncertainty analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Du, Muqing & Chen, Anthony, 2022. "Sensitivity analysis for transit equilibrium assignment and applications to uncertainty analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 175-202.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:157:y:2022:i:c:p:175-202
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2022.02.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261522000200
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2022.02.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamdouch, Younes & Szeto, W.Y. & Jiang, Y., 2014. "A new schedule-based transit assignment model with travel strategies and supply uncertainties," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 35-67.
    2. Zhi-Chun Li & William Lam & S. Wong, 2009. "The Optimal Transit Fare Structure under Different Market Regimes with Uncertainty in the Network," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 191-216, June.
    3. Schmöcker, Jan-Dirk & Bell, Michael G.H. & Kurauchi, Fumitaka, 2008. "A quasi-dynamic capacity constrained frequency-based transit assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 925-945, December.
    4. Spiess, Heinz & Florian, Michael, 1989. "Optimal strategies: A new assignment model for transit networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 83-102, April.
    5. Muqing Du & Xiaowei Jiang & Lin Cheng, 2015. "Estimating the Capacity of Urban Transportation Networks with an Improved Sensitivity Based Method," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-13, March.
    6. Shu Lu, 2008. "Sensitivity of Static Traffic User Equilibria with Perturbations in Arc Cost Function and Travel Demand," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 105-123, February.
    7. Jiang Qian Ying & Toshihiko Miyagi, 2001. "Sensitivity Analysis for Stochastic User Equilibrium Network Flows—A Dual Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 124-133, May.
    8. Jia Hao Wu & Michael Florian & Patrice Marcotte, 1994. "Transit Equilibrium Assignment: A Model and Solution Algorithms," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 193-203, August.
    9. Hamdouch, Younes & Lawphongpanich, Siriphong, 2008. "Schedule-based transit assignment model with travel strategies and capacity constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(7-8), pages 663-684, August.
    10. Bar-Gera, Hillel & Hellman, Fredrik & Patriksson, Michael, 2013. "Computational precision of traffic equilibria sensitivities in automatic network design and road pricing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 485-500.
    11. Cepeda, M. & Cominetti, R. & Florian, M., 2006. "A frequency-based assignment model for congested transit networks with strict capacity constraints: characterization and computation of equilibria," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 437-459, July.
    12. Jayakrishnan, R. & Tsai, Wei T. & Prashker, Joseph N. & Rajadhyaksha, Subodh, 1994. "A Faster Path-Based Algorithm for Traffic Assignment," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2hf4541x, University of California Transportation Center.
    13. Sumalee, Agachai & Tan, Zhijia & Lam, William H.K., 2009. "Dynamic stochastic transit assignment with explicit seat allocation model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(8-9), pages 895-912, September.
    14. Wang, Jian & Peeta, Srinivas & He, Xiaozheng, 2019. "Multiclass traffic assignment model for mixed traffic flow of human-driven vehicles and connected and autonomous vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 139-168.
    15. Cortés, Cristián E. & Jara-Moroni, Pedro & Moreno, Eduardo & Pineda, Cristobal, 2013. "Stochastic transit equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 29-44.
    16. Stephen M. Robinson, 2006. "Strong Regularity and the Sensitivity Analysis of Traffic Equilibria: A Comment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 540-542, November.
    17. Gao, Ziyou & Sun, Huijun & Shan, Lian Long, 2004. "A continuous equilibrium network design model and algorithm for transit systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 235-250, March.
    18. Michael Patriksson & R. Tyrrell Rockafellar, 2003. "Sensitivity Analysis of Aggregated Variational Inequality Problems, with Application to Traffic Equilibria," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 56-68, February.
    19. Roberto Cominetti & José Correa, 2001. "Common-Lines and Passenger Assignment in Congested Transit Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 250-267, August.
    20. Nguyen, S. & Pallottino, S., 1988. "Equilibrium traffic assignment for large scale transit networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 176-186, November.
    21. Connors, Richard D. & Sumalee, Agachai & Watling, David P., 2007. "Sensitivity analysis of the variable demand probit stochastic user equilibrium with multiple user-classes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 593-615, July.
    22. Nicholson, Alan & Du, Zhen-Ping, 1997. "Degradable transportation systems: An integrated equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 209-223, June.
    23. Chootinan, Piya & Chen, Anthony, 2011. "Confidence interval estimation for path flow estimator," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1680-1698.
    24. Josefsson, Magnus & Patriksson, Michael, 2007. "Sensitivity analysis of separable traffic equilibrium equilibria with application to bilevel optimization in network design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 4-31, January.
    25. Yang, Chao & Chen, Anthony, 2009. "Sensitivity analysis of the combined travel demand model with applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 909-921, November.
    26. Roger L. Tobin & Terry L. Friesz, 1988. "Sensitivity Analysis for Equilibrium Network Flow," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 242-250, November.
    27. Jiang, Y. & Szeto, W.Y., 2016. "Reliability-based stochastic transit assignment: Formulations and capacity paradox," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 181-206.
    28. Cho, Hsun-Jung & Smith, Tony E. & Friesz, Terry L., 2000. "A reduction method for local sensitivity analyses of network equilibrium arc flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 31-51, January.
    29. Leurent, F., 1998. "Sensitivity and error analysis of the dual criteria traffic assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 189-204, April.
    30. Xu, Zhandong & Xie, Jun & Liu, Xiaobo & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2020. "Hyperpath-based algorithms for the transit equilibrium assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    31. Sun, S. & Szeto, W.Y., 2018. "Logit-based transit assignment: Approach-based formulation and paradox revisit," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 191-215.
    32. Michael Patriksson, 2004. "Sensitivity Analysis of Traffic Equilibria," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 258-281, August.
    33. Paramet Luathep & Agachai Sumalee & H. Ho & Fumitaka Kurauchi, 2011. "Large-scale road network vulnerability analysis: a sensitivity analysis based approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(5), pages 799-817, September.
    34. Kenetsu Uchida & Agachai Sumalee & David Watling & Richard Connors, 2007. "A Study on Network Design Problems for Multi-modal Networks by Probit-based Stochastic User Equilibrium," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 213-240, September.
    35. Chen, Anthony & Yang, Hai & Lo, Hong K. & Tang, Wilson H., 2002. "Capacity reliability of a road network: an assessment methodology and numerical results," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 225-252, March.
    36. Lam, W. H. K. & Gao, Z. Y. & Chan, K. S. & Yang, H., 1999. "A stochastic user equilibrium assignment model for congested transit networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 351-368, June.
    37. Chen, Anthony & Lee, Der-Horng & Jayakrishnan, R., 2002. "Computational study of state-of-the-art path-based traffic assignment algorithms," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 509-518.
    38. Joaquín de Cea & Enrique Fernández, 1993. "Transit Assignment for Congested Public Transport Systems: An Equilibrium Model," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 133-147, May.
    39. Ying, Jiang Qian & Yang, Hai, 2005. "Sensitivity analysis of stochastic user equilibrium flows in a bi-modal network with application to optimal pricing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 769-795, November.
    40. Clark, Stephen D. & Watling, David P., 2002. "Sensitivity analysis of the probit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 617-635, August.
    41. Carlos F. Daganzo & Yosef Sheffi, 1977. "On Stochastic Models of Traffic Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 253-274, August.
    42. Chen, Anthony & Choi, Keechoo, 2017. "Solving the combined modal split and traffic assignment problem with two types of transit impedance functionAuthor-Name: Ryu, Seungkyu," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 870-880.
    43. Yuping Qiu & Thomas L. Magnanti, 1989. "Sensitivity Analysis for Variational Inequalities Defined on Polyhedral Sets," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 410-432, August.
    44. Yang, Chao & Chen, Anthony & Xu, Xiangdong & Wong, S.C., 2013. "Sensitivity-based uncertainty analysis of a combined travel demand model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 225-244.
    45. Wang, Jian & He, Xiaozheng & Peeta, Srinivas, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis based approximation models for day-to-day link flow evolution process," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PA), pages 35-53.
    46. Tam, M. L. & Lam, William H. K., 2000. "Maximum car ownership under constraints of road capacity and parking space," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 145-170, April.
    47. Stella Dafermos, 1988. "Sensitivity Analysis in Variational Inequalities," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 421-434, August.
    48. Hamdouch, Younes & Ho, H.W. & Sumalee, Agachai & Wang, Guodong, 2011. "Schedule-based transit assignment model with vehicle capacity and seat availability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1805-1830.
    49. Clark, Stephen D. & Watling, David P., 2006. "Applications of sensitivity analysis for probit stochastic network equilibrium," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 894-911, December.
    50. Yang, Hai, 1997. "Sensitivity analysis for the elastic-demand network equilibrium problem with applications," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 55-70, February.
    51. W. Burke Jackson & James V. Jucker, 1982. "An Empirical Study of Travel Time Variability and Travel Choice Behavior," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 460-475, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peiwen Zhang & Rui Ding & Wenke Zhao & Liaodong Zhang & Hong Sun, 2022. "Passenger Travel Path Selection Based on the Characteristic Value of Transport Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Jing Gao & Sen Li, 2023. "Regulating For-Hire Autonomous Vehicles for An Equitable Multimodal Transportation Network," Papers 2301.05798, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    3. Huo, Jinbiao & Liu, Zhiyuan & Chen, Jingxu & Cheng, Qixiu & Meng, Qiang, 2023. "Bayesian optimization for congestion pricing problems: A general framework and its instability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1-28.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, Y. & Szeto, W.Y., 2016. "Reliability-based stochastic transit assignment: Formulations and capacity paradox," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 181-206.
    2. Xu, Zhandong & Xie, Jun & Liu, Xiaobo & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2020. "Hyperpath-based algorithms for the transit equilibrium assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    3. Sun, S. & Szeto, W.Y., 2018. "Logit-based transit assignment: Approach-based formulation and paradox revisit," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 191-215.
    4. Sun, S. & Szeto, W.Y., 2019. "Optimal sectional fare and frequency settings for transit networks with elastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 147-177.
    5. Szeto, W.Y. & Jiang, Y., 2014. "Transit route and frequency design: Bi-level modeling and hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 235-263.
    6. Byung Chung & Hsun-Jung Cho & Terry Friesz & Henh Huang & Tao Yao, 2014. "Sensitivity Analysis of User Equilibrium Flows Revisited," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 183-207, June.
    7. Josefsson, Magnus & Patriksson, Michael, 2007. "Sensitivity analysis of separable traffic equilibrium equilibria with application to bilevel optimization in network design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 4-31, January.
    8. Khani, Alireza, 2019. "An online shortest path algorithm for reliable routing in schedule-based transit networks considering transfer failure probability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 549-564.
    9. Trozzi, Valentina & Gentile, Guido & Bell, Michael G.H. & Kaparias, Ioannis, 2013. "Dynamic user equilibrium in public transport networks with passenger congestion and hyperpaths," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 266-285.
    10. Hamdouch, Younes & Szeto, W.Y. & Jiang, Y., 2014. "A new schedule-based transit assignment model with travel strategies and supply uncertainties," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 35-67.
    11. Ren, Hualing & Song, Yingjie & Long, Jiancheng & Si, Bingfeng, 2021. "A new transit assignment model based on line and node strategies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 121-142.
    12. Li, Guoyuan & Chen, Anthony, 2023. "Strategy-based transit stochastic user equilibrium model with capacity and number-of-transfers constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 164-183.
    13. Canca, David & Andrade-Pineda, José Luis & De los Santos, Alicia & Calle, Marcos, 2018. "The Railway Rapid Transit frequency setting problem with speed-dependent operation costs," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 494-519.
    14. Cortés, Cristián E. & Jara-Moroni, Pedro & Moreno, Eduardo & Pineda, Cristobal, 2013. "Stochastic transit equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 29-44.
    15. Connors, Richard D. & Sumalee, Agachai & Watling, David P., 2007. "Sensitivity analysis of the variable demand probit stochastic user equilibrium with multiple user-classes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 593-615, July.
    16. Kenetsu Uchida & Agachai Sumalee & David Watling & Richard Connors, 2007. "A Study on Network Design Problems for Multi-modal Networks by Probit-based Stochastic User Equilibrium," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 213-240, September.
    17. Valentina Trozzi & Guido Gentile & Ioannis Kaparias & Michael Bell, 2015. "Effects of Countdown Displays in Public Transport Route Choice Under Severe Overcrowding," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 823-842, September.
    18. Tian, Qingyun & Wang, David Z.W. & Lin, Yun Hui, 2021. "Service operation design in a transit network with congested common lines," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 81-102.
    19. Cats, Oded & West, Jens & Eliasson, Jonas, 2016. "A dynamic stochastic model for evaluating congestion and crowding effects in transit systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 43-57.
    20. S. Mahmassani, Hani & F. Hyland, Michael, 2016. "Gap-based transit assignment algorithm with vehicle capacity constraints: Simulation-based implementation and large-scale applicationAuthor-Name: Verbas, Ömer," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 1-16.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:157:y:2022:i:c:p:175-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.