IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v41y2007i6p593-615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity analysis of the variable demand probit stochastic user equilibrium with multiple user-classes

Author

Listed:
  • Connors, Richard D.
  • Sumalee, Agachai
  • Watling, David P.

Abstract

This paper presents a formulation of the multiple user class, variable demand, probit stochastic user equilibrium model (SUE). Sufficient conditions are stated for differentiability of the equilibrium flows of this model. This justifies the derivation of sensitivity expressions for the equilibrium flows. This paper then considers the network design problem (NDP), assuming that users' responses to changes in the design variables follow the probit SUE. With probit SUE stated as a fixed-point condition, the NDP is a mathematical program with equilibrium constraints (MPEC). The probit SUE sensitivity expressions provide the information necessary to adopt a gradient-based approach to solving the probit SUE NDP. Numerical examples verify the sensitivity expressions, and the NDP solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Connors, Richard D. & Sumalee, Agachai & Watling, David P., 2007. "Sensitivity analysis of the variable demand probit stochastic user equilibrium with multiple user-classes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 593-615, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:41:y:2007:i:6:p:593-615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191-2615(06)00128-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fisk, Caroline, 1980. "Some developments in equilibrium traffic assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 243-255, September.
    2. Chen, Anthony & Yang, Hai & Lo, Hong K. & Tang, Wilson H., 2002. "Capacity reliability of a road network: an assessment methodology and numerical results," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 225-252, March.
    3. Carlos F. Daganzo, 1983. "Stochastic Network Equilibrium with Multiple Vehicle Types and Asymmetric, Indefinite Link Cost Jacobians," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 282-300, August.
    4. T. L. Magnanti & R. T. Wong, 1984. "Network Design and Transportation Planning: Models and Algorithms," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 1-55, February.
    5. Chaisak Suwansirikul & Terry L. Friesz & Roger L. Tobin, 1987. "Equilibrium Decomposed Optimization: A Heuristic for the Continuous Equilibrium Network Design Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 254-263, November.
    6. Stephen M. Robinson, 2006. "Strong Regularity and the Sensitivity Analysis of Traffic Equilibria: A Comment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 540-542, November.
    7. Clark, Stephen D. & Watling, David P., 2002. "Sensitivity analysis of the probit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 617-635, August.
    8. Nathan H. Gartner, 1980. "Optimal Traffic Assignment with Elastic Demands: A Review Part I. Analysis Framework," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 174-191, May.
    9. Carlos F. Daganzo & Yosef Sheffi, 1977. "On Stochastic Models of Traffic Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 253-274, August.
    10. Giulio Erberto Cantarella, 1997. "A General Fixed-Point Approach to Multimode Multi-User Equilibrium Assignment with Elastic Demand," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 107-128, May.
    11. Michael Patriksson & R. Tyrrell Rockafellar, 2003. "Sensitivity Analysis of Aggregated Variational Inequality Problems, with Application to Traffic Equilibria," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 56-68, February.
    12. Yang, Hai & Sasaki, Tsuna & Iida, Yasunori & Asakura, Yasuo, 1992. "Estimation of origin-destination matrices from link traffic counts on congested networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 417-434, December.
    13. Sheffi, Yosef & Powell, Warren, 1981. "A comparison of stochastic and deterministic traffic assignment over congested networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 53-64, February.
    14. Du, Zhen-Ping & Nicholson, Alan, 1997. "Degradable transportation systems: Sensitivity and reliability analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 225-237, June.
    15. Yang, Hai & Bell, Michael G. H., 1997. "Traffic restraint, road pricing and network equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 303-314, August.
    16. Davis, Gary A., 1994. "Exact local solution of the continuous network design problem via stochastic user equilibrium assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 61-75, February.
    17. Josefsson, Magnus & Patriksson, Michael, 2007. "Sensitivity analysis of separable traffic equilibrium equilibria with application to bilevel optimization in network design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 4-31, January.
    18. Michael Patriksson & R. Tyrrell Rockafellar, 2002. "A Mathematical Model and Descent Algorithm for Bilevel Traffic Management," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 271-291, August.
    19. Roger L. Tobin & Terry L. Friesz, 1988. "Sensitivity Analysis for Equilibrium Network Flow," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 242-250, November.
    20. Leurent, F., 1998. "Sensitivity and error analysis of the dual criteria traffic assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 189-204, April.
    21. Yang, Hai, 1997. "Sensitivity analysis for the elastic-demand network equilibrium problem with applications," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 55-70, February.
    22. Yai, Tetsuo & Iwakura, Seiji & Morichi, Shigeru, 1997. "Multinomial probit with structured covariance for route choice behavior," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 195-207, June.
    23. Maher, M. J. & Hughes, P. C., 1997. "A probit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 341-355, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Du, Muqing & Chen, Anthony, 2022. "Sensitivity analysis for transit equilibrium assignment and applications to uncertainty analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 175-202.
    2. Richard Connors & David Watling, 2015. "Assessing the Demand Vulnerability of Equilibrium Traffic Networks via Network Aggregation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 367-395, June.
    3. Patriksson, Michael, 2008. "On the applicability and solution of bilevel optimization models in transportation science: A study on the existence, stability and computation of optimal solutions to stochastic mathematical programs," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 843-860, December.
    4. Luathep, Paramet & Sumalee, Agachai & Lam, William H.K. & Li, Zhi-Chun & Lo, Hong K., 2011. "Global optimization method for mixed transportation network design problem: A mixed-integer linear programming approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 808-827, June.
    5. Sumalee, Agachai & Tan, Zhijia & Lam, William H.K., 2009. "Dynamic stochastic transit assignment with explicit seat allocation model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(8-9), pages 895-912, September.
    6. Liu, Yang & Li, Yuanyuan & Hu, Lu, 2018. "Departure time and route choices in bottleneck equilibrium under risk and ambiguity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 774-793.
    7. Adriaan Hendrik van der Weijde & Vincent A.C. van den Berg, 2013. "Stochastic User Equilibrium Traffic Assignment with Price-sensitive Demand: Do Methods matter (much)?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-209/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    8. Qiang Meng & Zhiyuan Liu, 2011. "Trial-and-error method for congestion pricing scheme under side-constrained probit-based stochastic user equilibrium conditions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(5), pages 819-843, September.
    9. Ukkusuri, Satish V. & Patil, Gopal, 2009. "Multi-period transportation network design under demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 625-642, July.
    10. Eri Nakamura & Fumitoshi Mizutani, 2019. "Necessary demand and extra demand of public utility product: identification using the stochastic frontier model," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 46(1), pages 45-64, March.
    11. François Gilbert & Patrice Marcotte & Gilles Savard, 2014. "Mixed-logit network pricing," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 105-127, January.
    12. Jiang Qian Ying, 2015. "Optimization for Multiclass Residential Location Models with Congestible Transportation Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 452-471, August.
    13. Watling, D.P. & Shepherd, S.P. & Koh, A., 2015. "Cordon toll competition in a network of two cities: Formulation and sensitivity to traveller route and demand responses," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 93-116.
    14. Paramet Luathep & Agachai Sumalee & H. Ho & Fumitaka Kurauchi, 2011. "Large-scale road network vulnerability analysis: a sensitivity analysis based approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(5), pages 799-817, September.
    15. Qi, Jin & Sim, Melvyn & Sun, Defeng & Yuan, Xiaoming, 2016. "Preferences for travel time under risk and ambiguity: Implications in path selection and network equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 264-284.
    16. Zhang, Fang & Lu, Jian & Hu, Xiaojian, 2022. "Integrated path controlling and subsidy scheme for mobility and environmental management in automated transportation networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Josefsson, Magnus & Patriksson, Michael, 2007. "Sensitivity analysis of separable traffic equilibrium equilibria with application to bilevel optimization in network design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 4-31, January.
    2. Du, Muqing & Chen, Anthony, 2022. "Sensitivity analysis for transit equilibrium assignment and applications to uncertainty analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 175-202.
    3. Clark, Stephen D. & Watling, David P., 2002. "Sensitivity analysis of the probit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 617-635, August.
    4. Patriksson, Michael, 2008. "On the applicability and solution of bilevel optimization models in transportation science: A study on the existence, stability and computation of optimal solutions to stochastic mathematical programs," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 843-860, December.
    5. Clark, Stephen D. & Watling, David P., 2006. "Applications of sensitivity analysis for probit stochastic network equilibrium," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 894-911, December.
    6. Paramet Luathep & Agachai Sumalee & H. Ho & Fumitaka Kurauchi, 2011. "Large-scale road network vulnerability analysis: a sensitivity analysis based approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(5), pages 799-817, September.
    7. Michael Patriksson, 2004. "Sensitivity Analysis of Traffic Equilibria," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 258-281, August.
    8. Yang, Chao & Chen, Anthony & Xu, Xiangdong & Wong, S.C., 2013. "Sensitivity-based uncertainty analysis of a combined travel demand model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 225-244.
    9. Byung Chung & Hsun-Jung Cho & Terry Friesz & Henh Huang & Tao Yao, 2014. "Sensitivity Analysis of User Equilibrium Flows Revisited," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 183-207, June.
    10. Jian Wang & Muqing Du & Lili Lu & Xiaozheng He, 2018. "Maximizing Network Throughput under Stochastic User Equilibrium with Elastic Demand," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 115-143, March.
    11. Castillo, Enrique & Menéndez, José María & Sánchez-Cambronero, Santos, 2008. "Predicting traffic flow using Bayesian networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 482-509, June.
    12. Yang, Hai & Bell, Michael G. H., 2001. "Transport bilevel programming problems: recent methodological advances," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-4, January.
    13. S. Dempe & A. Zemkoho, 2012. "Bilevel road pricing: theoretical analysis and optimality conditions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 223-240, July.
    14. Meng, Qiang & Liu, Zhiyuan & Wang, Shuaian, 2012. "Optimal distance tolls under congestion pricing and continuously distributed value of time," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 937-957.
    15. Eikenbroek, Oskar A.L. & Still, Georg J. & van Berkum, Eric C., 2022. "Improving the performance of a traffic system by fair rerouting of travelers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 195-207.
    16. Richard Connors & David Watling, 2015. "Assessing the Demand Vulnerability of Equilibrium Traffic Networks via Network Aggregation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 367-395, June.
    17. Guido Gentile, 2018. "New Formulations of the Stochastic User Equilibrium with Logit Route Choice as an Extension of the Deterministic Model," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 1531-1547, December.
    18. Ahipaşaoğlu, Selin Damla & Meskarian, Rudabeh & Magnanti, Thomas L. & Natarajan, Karthik, 2015. "Beyond normality: A cross moment-stochastic user equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 333-354.
    19. Du, Muqing & Tan, Heqing & Chen, Anthony, 2021. "A faster path-based algorithm with Barzilai-Borwein step size for solving stochastic traffic equilibrium models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 982-999.
    20. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Miandoabchi, Elnaz & Szeto, W.Y. & Rashidi, Hannaneh, 2013. "A review of urban transportation network design problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 281-302.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:41:y:2007:i:6:p:593-615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.