IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v172y2023ics0965856423000861.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Cooperative Intelligent Transportation System scenarios for resilience in transportation using type-2 neutrosophic fuzzy VIKOR

Author

Listed:
  • Deveci, Muhammet
  • Gokasar, Ilgin
  • Pamucar, Dragan
  • Zaidan, Aws Alaa
  • Wen, Xin
  • Gupta, Brij B.

Abstract

There is a critical need for research in proactive and predictive management of the resilience of transportation systems implementing new technologies. Cooperative Intelligent Transportation System (C-ITS) uses wireless technology to allow vehicles and infrastructure to talk to each other in real-time. This makes it easier for people to work together on the road and makes it possible to make safer and more efficient traffic flows. Significant progress may be made in the transportation industry as a result of the incorporation of self-powered sensors into C-ITS providing resilience in transportation operation. One advantageous feature is that these sensors, which generate their power, could be deployed in a variety of C-ITS implementation scenarios. To assist decision-makers in making the most informed choice possible concerning investments and implementations, a type-2 neutrosophic number (T2NN) based VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) method is used to perform advantage prioritization. To accomplish this goal, a case study is carried out to determine which of the three alternatives is the most suitable based on a set of twelve criteria that is divided into four aspects. According to the findings, the applicability and short-term benefits are the most crucial factors in determining which option is the most advantageous for the use of self-powered sensors in C-ITS. This is because both of these factors have an immediate impact on the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Deveci, Muhammet & Gokasar, Ilgin & Pamucar, Dragan & Zaidan, Aws Alaa & Wen, Xin & Gupta, Brij B., 2023. "Evaluation of Cooperative Intelligent Transportation System scenarios for resilience in transportation using type-2 neutrosophic fuzzy VIKOR," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:172:y:2023:i:c:s0965856423000861
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856423000861
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103666?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maurizio Capra & Riccardo Peloso & Guido Masera & Massimo Ruo Roch & Maurizio Martina, 2019. "Edge Computing: A Survey On the Hardware Requirements in the Internet of Things World," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Peter Bogetoft, 2000. "DEA and Activity Planning under Asymmetric Information," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 7-48, January.
    3. Quadrelli, Roberta & Peterson, Sierra, 2007. "The energy-climate challenge: Recent trends in CO2 emissions from fuel combustion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5938-5952, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anas A. Makki & Reda M. S. Abdulaal, 2023. "A Hybrid MCDM Approach Based on Fuzzy MEREC-G and Fuzzy RATMI," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bogetoft, Peter & Nielsen, Kurt, 2003. "Yardstick Based Procurement Design In Natural Resource Management," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25910, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Bogetoft, Peter & Leth Hougaard, Jens, 2004. "Super efficiency evaluations based on potential slack," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(1), pages 14-21, January.
    3. K. Narayanan & Santosh K. Sahu, 2014. "Energy Consumption Response to Climate Change: Policy Options for India," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 3(2), pages 123-133, July.
    4. Bermudez, Bladimir Carrillo & Santos Branco, Danyelle Karine & Trujillo, Juan Carlos & de Lima, Joao Eustaquio, 2015. "Deforestation and Infant Health: Evidence from an Environmental Conservation Policy in Brazil," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 229064, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Finn Førsund & Nikias Sarafoglou, 2002. "On the Origins of Data Envelopment Analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 23-40, January.
    6. Aprea, Ciro & Maiorino, Angelo, 2011. "An experimental investigation of the global environmental impact of the R22 retrofit with R422D," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 1161-1170.
    7. Jan Wrana & Wojciech Struzik & Bartłomiej Kwiatkowski & Piotr Gleń, 2022. "Release of Energy from Groundwater/with Reduction in CO 2 Emissions of More Than 50% from HVAC in the Extension and Revitalization of the Former Palace of the Sobieski Family in Lublin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-11, September.
    8. Kerstens, Kristiaan & Sadeghi, Jafar & Toloo, Mehdi & Van de Woestyne, Ignace, 2022. "Procedures for ranking technical and cost efficient units: With a focus on nonconvexity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 269-281.
    9. repec:fth:calaec:11-02 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Heinz Ahn & Peter Bogetoft & Ana Lopes, 2019. "Measuring potential sub-unit efficiency to counter the aggregation bias in benchmarking," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 53-77, February.
    11. Peter Bogetoft & Dexiang Wang, 2005. "Estimating the Potential Gains from Mergers," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 145-171, May.
    12. Korhonen, Pekka & Tainio, Risto & Wallenius, Jyrki, 2001. "Value efficiency analysis of academic research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 121-132, April.
    13. Lovell, Knox, 2001. "Future Research Opportunities in Efficiency and Productivity Analysis," Efficiency Series Papers 2001/01, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    14. Angelo Zago, 2005. "Tecnhnology estimation for quality pricing in supply-chain relationships," Working Papers 27/2005, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    15. Blázquez-Gómez, Leticia & Grifell-Tatjé, Emili, 2011. "Evaluating the regulator: Winners and losers in the regulation of Spanish electricity distribution," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 807-815, September.
    16. Ali, Ghaffar & Pumijumnong, Nathsuda & Cui, Shenghui, 2018. "Valuation and validation of carbon sources and sinks through land cover/use change analysis: The case of Bangkok metropolitan area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 471-478.
    17. Emili GRIFELL‐TATJÉ & Kristiaan KERSTENS, 2008. "Incentive Regulation And The Role Of Convexity In Benchmarking Electricity Distribution: Economists Versus Engineers," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(2), pages 227-248, June.
    18. Fidelis. I. Abam & Ogheneruona E. Diemuodeke & Ekwe. B. Ekwe & Mohammed Alghassab & Olusegun D. Samuel & Zafar A. Khan & Muhammad Imran & Muhammad Farooq, 2020. "Exergoeconomic and Environmental Modeling of Integrated Polygeneration Power Plant with Biomass-Based Syngas Supplemental Firing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-27, November.
    19. repec:cdl:ucsbec:11-02 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. HOSSEINZADEH LOTFI, Farhad & HATAMI-MARBINI, Adel & AGRELL, Per & GHOLAMI, Kobra, 2013. "Centralized resource reduction and target setting under DEA control," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2013005, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    21. Thambiran, Tirusha & Diab, Roseanne D., 2011. "Air quality and climate change co-benefits for the industrial sector in Durban, South Africa," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 6658-6666, October.
    22. Peter Bogetoft & Kurt Nielsen, 2002. "DEA Based Yardstick Competition in Natural Resource Management," CIE Discussion Papers 2002-04, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Industrial Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:172:y:2023:i:c:s0965856423000861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.