IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v117y2018icp190-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

One Belt one Road, but several routes: A case study of new emerging trade corridors connecting the Far East to Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Dong
  • Jiang, Liping
  • Ng, Adolf K.Y.

Abstract

Under the Belt and Road (B&R) initiative, two new emerging trade corridors connecting the Far East to Europe have been built. One is the China-Europe Sea-Land Express Line (CESEL) and the other is the New Eurasian Land Bridge (NELB). This paper aims to understand the attitude of relevant stakeholders towards the performance of the Traditional Sea-Land Line (TSLL) alongside the two emerging container routes under the B&R initiative. To achieve this objective, we first of all built a performance evaluation system to understand the relative performance of these trade routes. A questionnaire survey was carried out to reveal the differing views on route performance, and Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) was then used to examine and interpret the survey data. Secondly, by dividing the interviewees into two groups, we examined whether the government’s development priorities are at variance with the preferences of industry practitioners. Thirdly, we explored the reasons for the variance by conducting an intensive interview with ten key stakeholders and then explain the findings from the perspective of institutional theories. Finally, we addressed the uncertainty and dynamics of route development under three different scenarios. Several managerial implications are proposed on the basis of our findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Dong & Jiang, Liping & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2018. "One Belt one Road, but several routes: A case study of new emerging trade corridors connecting the Far East to Europe," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 190-204.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:117:y:2018:i:c:p:190-204
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856417308443
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bergantino, Angela S. & Bierlaire, Michel & Catalano, Mario & Migliore, Marco & Amoroso, Salvatore, 2013. "Taste heterogeneity and latent preferences in the choice behaviour of freight transport operators," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 77-91.
    2. Dong Yang & Ghim Ping Ong & Anthony Theng Heng Chin, 2014. "An exploratory study on the effect of trade data aggregation on international freight mode choice," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 212-223, May.
    3. Mary R Brooks & Sean M Puckett & David A Hensher & Adrian Sammons, 2012. "Understanding mode choice decisions: A study of Australian freight shippers," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 14(3), pages 274-299, September.
    4. Mary R. Brooks & Valerie Trifts, 2008. "Short sea shipping in North America: understanding the requirements of Atlantic Canadian shippers," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 145-158, April.
    5. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. & Kumar, Sushil, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 1-29, February.
    6. Leandro García-Menéndez & Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso & Delia Pinero De Miguel, 2004. "Determinants of Mode Choice between Road and Shipping for Freight Transport: Evidence for Four Spanish Exporting Sectors," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 38(3), pages 447-466, September.
    7. Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Zhi-Hua Hu & Sang-Jeong Lee & Kyoung-Suk Choi & Sung-Ho Shin, 2018. "Research trends and agenda on the Belt and Road (B&R) initiative with a focus on maritime transport," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 282-300, April.
    8. Sánchez-Lozano, Juan M. & Teruel-Solano, Jerónimo & Soto-Elvira, Pedro L. & Socorro García-Cascales, M., 2013. "Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in south-eastern Spain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 544-556.
    9. Elvira Haezendonck, 2008. "Transport Project Evaluation: Extending the Social Cost Benefit Approach," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 10(3), pages 322-324, September.
    10. Puckett, Sean M. & Hensher, David A. & Brooks, Mary R. & Trifts, Valerie, 2011. "Preferences for alternative short sea shipping opportunities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 182-189, March.
    11. John Child & Suzana B. Rodrigues & Kenneth K-T. Tse, 2012. "The Dynamics of Influence in Corporate Co-Evolution," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(7), pages 1246-1273, November.
    12. Juelin Yin & Yuli Zhang, 2012. "Institutional Dynamics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in an Emerging Country Context: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 301-316, December.
    13. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2012. "Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 2, number 978-1-4614-3597-6, September.
    14. Peter C. Wong & Hong Yan & Colin Bamford, 2008. "Evaluation of factors for carrier selection in the China Pearl River delta," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 27-52, February.
    15. Joanicjusz Nazarko & Katarzyna Czerewacz-Filipowicz & Katarzyna Anna Kuźmicz, 2017. "Comparative analysis of the Eastern European countries as participants of the new silk road," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 1212-1227, November.
    16. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2012. "Sailing speed optimization for container ships in a liner shipping network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 701-714.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Dong & Li, Chengkun & Li, Lu & Lai, Kee-hung & Lun, Venus Y.H., 2022. "Maritime cluster relatedness and policy implications," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 76-88.
    2. Chen, Jihong & Fei, Yijie & Wan, Zheng & Yang, Zaili & Li, Haobo & Choi, Kyoung-Suk & Xie, Xiaoke, 2020. "Allometric relationship and development potential comparison of ports in a regional cluster: A case study of ports in the Pearl River Delta in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 80-90.
    3. Zhu, Siying & Cai, Yutong & Wang, Mengtong & Wang, Hua & Meng, Qiang, 2023. "How will China–Singapore International Land–Sea Trade Corridor affect route choice behaviour? A discrete choice model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 11-22.
    4. Abdolrasoul Ghasemi & Elnaz Miandoabchi & Shiva Soroushnia, 2021. "The attractiveness of seaport-based transport corridors: an integrated approach based on scenario planning and gravity models," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(3), pages 522-547, September.
    5. Carlucci, Fabio & Corcione, Carlo & Mazzocchi, Paolo & Trincone, Barbara, 2021. "The role of logistics in promoting Italian agribusiness: The Belt and Road Initiative case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Gong, Xu & Li, Zhi-Chun, 2022. "Determination of subsidy and emission control coverage under competition and cooperation of China-Europe Railway Express and liner shipping," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 323-335.
    7. Wenqian Liu & Xiaoning Zhu & Li Wang, 2019. "Distribution Organization Optimization for Inbound China Railway Express at Alataw Pass Railway Station," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2019. "Analyzing the effect of government subsidy on shippers’ mode switching behavior in the Belt and Road strategic context," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 175-202.
    9. Pierre Cariou & Ali Cheaitou & Olivier Faury & Sadeque Hamdan, 2021. "The feasibility of Arctic container shipping: the economic and environmental impacts of ice thickness," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(4), pages 615-631, December.
    10. Zhang, Yilin & Zhang, Anming & Wang, Kun & Zheng, Shiyuan & Yang, Hangjun & Hong, Junjie, 2023. "Impact of CR Express and intermodal freight transport competition on China-Europe Route: Emission and welfare implications," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    11. Mau, Karsten & Seuren, Rosalie, 2020. "One Belt, One Road, One Way?," Research Memorandum 024, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    12. Zhu, Siying & Jia, Shuai & Sun, Qinghe & Meng, Qiang, 2023. "An empirical study of China–Singapore International Land–Sea Trade Corridor: Analysis from supply and demand sides," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1-10.
    13. Weidong Li & Olli-Pekka Hilmola, 2019. "Belt and Road Initiative and Railway Sector Efficiency—Application of Networked Benchmarking Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, April.
    14. Ghulam Abbas & Zhiming Liu & Shahbaz Hassan Wasti & Uzma Munir & Muhammad Abbas, 2019. "CPEC’s Utility and Concerns under OBOR Initiative: A Pakistani Industrial Perspective," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, September.
    15. Wang, Kelly Yujie & Wen, Yuan & Yip, Tsz Leung & Fan, Zuojun, 2021. "Carrier-shipper risk management and coordination in the presence of spot freight market," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    16. Du, Yiying & Zhou, Wenyuan & Lian, Feng, 2022. "A scheme for passenger service-like backhaul for China railway express trains," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 56-68.
    17. Fang, Zheng & Tan, Xing & Liu, Genshuo & Zhou, Zijie & Pan, Yajia & Ahmed, Ammar & Zhang, Zutao, 2022. "A novel vibration energy harvesting system integrated with an inertial pendulum for zero-energy sensor applications in freight trains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    18. Wang, Chao & Lim, Ming K. & Zhang, Xinyi & Zhao, Longfeng & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2020. "Railway and road infrastructure in the Belt and Road Initiative countries: Estimating the impact of transport infrastructure on economic growth," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 288-307.
    19. Ryuichi Shibasaki & Satoshi Tanabe & Hironori Kato & Paul Tae-Woo Lee, 2019. "Could Gwadar Port in Pakistan Be a New Gateway? A Network Simulation Approach in the Context of the Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-28, October.
    20. Karsten Mau & Rosalie Seuren, 2023. "One belt, one road, one way? Where European exporters benefit from the new silkroad," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 159(2), pages 257-297, May.
    21. Felipe Lobo Umbelino Souza & Cira Souza Pitombo & Dong Yang, 2021. "Port choice in Brazil: a qualitative research related to in-depth interviews," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Rong & Zhu, Lichao, 2019. "Threshold incorporating freight choice modeling for hinterland leg transportation chain of export containers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 858-872.
    2. Tao, Xuezong & Zhu, Lichao, 2020. "Meta-analysis of value of time in freight transportation: A comprehensive review based on discrete choice models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 213-233.
    3. Konstantinus, Abisai & Zuidgeest, Mark & Hess, Stephane & de Jong, Gerard, 2020. "Assessing inter-urban freight mode choice preference for short-sea shipping in the Southern African Development Community region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Feo-Valero, María & Arencibia, Ana Isabel & Román, Concepción, 2016. "Analyzing discrepancies between willingness to pay and willingness to accept for freight transport attributes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 151-164.
    5. Bergantino, Angela S. & Bierlaire, Michel & Catalano, Mario & Migliore, Marco & Amoroso, Salvatore, 2013. "Taste heterogeneity and latent preferences in the choice behaviour of freight transport operators," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 77-91.
    6. Vega, Amaya & Feo-Valero, Maria & Espino-Espino, Raquel, 2018. "The potential impact of Brexit on Ireland's demand for shipping services to continental Europe," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-13.
    7. Verena Maria Stockhammer & Sarah Pfoser & Karin Markvica & Jürgen Zajicek & Matthias Prandtstetter, 2021. "Behavioural Biases Distorting the Demand for Environmentally Friendly Freight Transport Modes: An Overview and Potential Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-34, October.
    8. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.
    9. Nzotcha, Urbain & Kenfack, Joseph & Blanche Manjia, Marceline, 2019. "Integrated multi-criteria decision making methodology for pumped hydro-energy storage plant site selection from a sustainable development perspective with an application," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 930-947.
    10. Román, Concepción & Arencibia, Ana Isabel & Feo-Valero, María, 2017. "A latent class model with attribute cut-offs to analyze modal choice for freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 212-227.
    11. Yılmaz, Kutay & Dinçer, Ali Ersin & Ayhan, Elif N., 2023. "Exploring flood and erosion risk indices for optimal solar PV site selection and assessing the influence of topographic resolution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    12. Noorollahi, Younes & Ghenaatpisheh Senani, Ali & Fadaei, Ahmad & Simaee, Mobina & Moltames, Rahim, 2022. "A framework for GIS-based site selection and technical potential evaluation of PV solar farm using Fuzzy-Boolean logic and AHP multi-criteria decision-making approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 89-104.
    13. Ralf Elbert & Lowis Seikowsky, 2017. "The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight tra," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1083-1123, November.
    14. Zsuzsanna Katalin Szabo & Zsombor Szádoczki & Sándor Bozóki & Gabriela C. Stănciulescu & Dalma Szabo, 2021. "An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritisation of Strategic Objectives of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    15. Romero-Ramos, J.A. & Gil, J.D. & Cardemil, J.M. & Escobar, R.A. & Arias, I. & Pérez-García, M., 2023. "A GIS-AHP approach for determining the potential of solar energy to meet the thermal demand in southeastern Spain productive enclaves," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    16. Edoardo Marcucci, 2013. "Logistics Managers' Stated Preferences For Freight Service Attributes: A Comparative Research Method Analysis," Working Papers 0213, CREI Università degli Studi Roma Tre, revised 2013.
    17. Haddad, M. & Sanders, D. & Tewkesbury, G., 2020. "Selecting a discrete multiple criteria decision making method for Boeing to rank four global market regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-15.
    18. Miguel Ángel López-Navarro, 2014. "Environmental Factors and Intermodal Freight Transportation: Analysis of the Decision Bases in the Case of Spanish Motorways of the Sea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-23, March.
    19. Flitsch, Verena & Brümmerstedt, Katrin, 2015. "Freight Transport Modelling of Container Hinterland Supply Chains," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 233-266, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    20. Bury Alan & Paraskevadakis Dimitrios & Ren Jun & Saeed Farhan, 2017. "A framework for use in modelling the modal choice decision making process in North West England’s Atlantic Gateway," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 19-30, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:117:y:2018:i:c:p:190-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.