Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Logistics Managers' Stated Preferences For Freight Service Attributes: A Comparative Research Method Analysis

Contents:

Author Info

  • Edoardo Marcucci

    (Università degli Studi di Roma Tre)

Abstract

This paper reviews a set of articles, based on stated preferences techniques, focusing on logistics managers' preferences for freight transport attributes with the intent of assessing the quality of knowledge applied research has produced, its reliability and transferability. Transport choices are relevant in a globalized economy where aggressive marketing strategies are often used to acquire a competitive advantage in the market. Freight transport modeling has been derived out of the classical four step approach developed for passenger transport. A new behavioral approach is progressively gaining popularity thanks to the specific behavioral focus it is based upon. The review performed indicates that there are some evident shortcomings in the way research has been performed so far but, at the same time, there is also a high potential if corrective actions are taken. In particular substantial improvements could be obtained by: 1) clearly defining research and reporting protocols; 2) define and circumscribe who has to be interviewed in the different freight contexts studied; 3) reporting the contractual relationships governing freight movements; 4) reporting freight details (e.g. volume, value, weight); 5) motivating the attribute selection method used. In summary, there is a need for systematizing the procedures and reporting adopted in applied research by introducing a much higher level of detail and rigor in both defying the object of measurement as well in the experimental design protocols employed.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://host.uniroma3.it/centri/crei/pubblicazioni/workingpapers2013/CREI_02_2013.pdf
File Function: First version, 2013
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by CREI Università degli Studi Roma Tre in its series Working Papers with number 0213.

as in new window
Length: 29 pages
Date of creation: 2013
Date of revision: 2013
Handle: RePEc:rcr:wpaper:02_13

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Via Ostiense, 161, 00154 ROMA
Phone: 06.57067248
Email:
Web page: http://host.uniroma3.it/centri/crei/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Transport demand; Stated Preferences; Logistics.;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Becky Loo, 2010. "Cross-boundary container truck congestion: the case of the Hong Kong-Pearl River Delta region," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 257-274, March.
  2. M. Beuthe & Ch. Bouffioux, 2008. "Analysing Qualitative Attributes of Freight Transport from Stated Orders of Preference Experiment," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and University of Bath, vol. 42(1), pages 105-128, January.
  3. Arunotayanun, Kriangkrai & Polak, John W., 2011. "Taste heterogeneity and market segmentation in freight shippers' mode choice behaviour," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 138-148, March.
  4. Garrido, Rodrigo A., 2000. "Spatial interaction between the truck flows through the Mexico-Texas border," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 23-33, January.
  5. Danielis, Romeo & Marcucci, Edoardo & Rotaris, Lucia, 2005. "Logistics managers' stated preferences for freight service attributes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 201-215, May.
  6. David Hensher & Sean Puckett, 2005. "Refocusing the Modelling of Freight Distribution: Development of an Economic-Based Framework to Evaluate Supply Chain Behaviour in Response to Congestion Charging," Transportation, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 573-602, November.
  7. Leandro García-Menéndez & Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso & Delia Pinero De Miguel, 2004. "Determinants of Mode Choice between Road and Shipping for Freight Transport: Evidence for Four Spanish Exporting Sectors," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and University of Bath, vol. 38(3), pages 447-466, September.
  8. Simona Bolis & Rico Maggi, 2003. "Logistics Strategy and Transport Service Choices: An Adaptive Stated Preference Experiment," Growth and Change, Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, vol. 34(4), pages 490-504.
  9. Winston, Clifford, 1981. "A Disaggregate Model of the Demand for Intercity Freight Transportation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 49(4), pages 981-1006, June.
  10. Angela Stefania Bergantino & Simona Bolis, 2008. "Monetary values of transport service attributes: land versus maritime ro-ro transport. An application using adaptive stated preferences," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 159-174, April.
  11. Liedtke, Gernot, 2009. "Principles of micro-behavior commodity transport modeling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 795-809, September.
  12. Edoardo Marcucci & Amanda Stathopoulos & Lucia Rotaris & Romeo Danielis, 2011. "Comparing single and joint preferences: a choice experiment on residential location in three-member households," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 43(5), pages 1209-1225, May.
  13. O. Norojono & W. Young, 2003. "A Stated preference freight mode choice model," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 1-1, April.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rcr:wpaper:02_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Francesca Vaino).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.