IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v17y2006i1p599-629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chapter 25 Issues in Measuring Port Devolution Program Performance: A Managerial Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Brooks, Mary R.

Abstract

One of the premises of devolution is that productivity gains will result from better management of the resources of the entity devolved. The success of a devolution program, however, is difficult to measure and may be a product of many variables. A review of the literature on port devolution indicates mixed results. The literature on port performance measurement provides a myriad of efficiency measures with little emphasis on whether these ports are effective or meet customer or stakeholder needs. This paper examines the literature on performance measurement, both at the firm level (public and private) and at the program level, and explores what constructs may be suitable to measure the performance of devolution programs for ports from a strategic management perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Brooks, Mary R., 2006. "Chapter 25 Issues in Measuring Port Devolution Program Performance: A Managerial Perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 599-629, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:17:y:2006:i:1:p:599-629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739-8859(06)17025-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlos Pestana Barros, 2003. "Incentive Regulation and Efficiency of Portuguese Port Authorities," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 5(1), pages 55-69, March.
    2. Paul E. Kent & Anatoly Hochstein, 1998. "Port reform and privatization in conditions of limited competition: the experience in Colombia, Costa Rica and Nicaragua," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 313-333, October.
    3. Estache, Antonio & Gonzalez, Marianela & Trujillo, Lourdes, 2002. "Efficiency Gains from Port Reform and the Potential for Yardstick Competition: Lessons from Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 545-560, April.
    4. Beatrice Tovar & Sergio Jara-Diaz & Lourdes Trujillo, 2003. "Production and cost functions and their application to the port sector : a literature survey," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3123, The World Bank.
    5. T C Lirn & H A Thanopoulou & M J Beynon & A K C Beresford, 2004. "An Application of AHP on Transhipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 6(1), pages 70-91, March.
    6. Oum, Tae Hoon & Yu, Chunyan, 2004. "Measuring airports' operating efficiency: a summary of the 2003 ATRS global airport benchmarking report," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 515-532, November.
    7. Oum, Tae Hoon & Yu, Chunyan & Fu, Xiaowen, 2003. "A comparative analysis of productivity performance of the world's major airports: summary report of the ATRS global airport benchmarking research report—2002," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 9(5), pages 285-297.
    8. Tomás Serebrisky * & Lourdes Trujillo, 2005. "An assessment of port reform in Argentina: outcomes and challenges ahead," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 191-207, July.
    9. repec:idb:brikps:20958 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Francis, Graham & Humphreys, Ian & Fry, Jackie, 2002. "The benchmarking of airport performance," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 239-247.
    11. Hauser, John R. & Katz, Gerald M. & International Center for Research on the Management of Technology., 1998. "Metrics : you are what you measure!," Working papers 172-98, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    12. repec:idb:brikps:21158 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Khalid Bichou & Richard Gray, 2004. "A logistics and supply chain management approach to port performance measurement," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 47-67, January.
    14. Hugh S. Turner, 2000. "Evaluating seaport policy alternatives: a simulation study of terminal leasing policy and system performance," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 283-301.
    15. Mary R. Brooks, 2000. "Performance evaluation of carriers by North American companies," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 205-218, January.
    16. Baird, Alfred J, 1995. "Privatisation of trust ports in the United Kingdom: Review and analysis of the first sales," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 135-143, April.
    17. Michael C. Ircha, 1997. "Reforming Canadian ports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 123-144, January.
    18. Turner, Hugh & Windle, Robert & Dresner, Martin, 2004. "North American containerport productivity: 1984-1997," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 339-356, July.
    19. Richard Saundry & Peter Turnbull, 1997. "Private profit, public loss: The financial and economic performance of U.K. ports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 319-334, January.
    20. Richard Morris, 2000. "A watershed on the Australian waterfront? The 1998 stevedoring dispute," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 107-120, April.
    21. Hauser, John & Katz, Gerald, 1998. "Metrics: you are what you measure!," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 517-528, October.
    22. Tao Chen, 1998. "Land utilization in the container terminal: a global perpective," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 289-303, October.
    23. Oum, Tae Hoon & Yu, Chunyan, 2004. "Airport Performance: A Summary of the 2003 ATRS Global Airport Benchmarking Report," 45th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Evanston, Illinois, March 21-23, 2004 208226, Transportation Research Forum.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Dong & Li, Lu & Notteboom, Theo, 2022. "Chinese investment in overseas container terminals: The role of investor attributes in achieving a higher port competitiveness," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 112-122.
    2. Ha, Min-Ho & Yang, Zaili & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2019. "Port performance in container transport logistics: A multi-stakeholder perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 25-40.
    3. Mary R. Brooks & Tony Schellinck, 2015. "Measuring port effectiveness: what really determines cargo interests' evaluations of port service delivery?," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7), pages 699-711, October.
    4. Zhang, Qiang & Geerlings, Harry & El Makhloufi, Abdel & Chen, Shun, 2018. "Who governs and what is governed in port governance: A review study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 51-60.
    5. Ha, Min-Ho & Yang, Zaili & Notteboom, Theo & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Heo, Man-Wook, 2017. "Revisiting port performance measurement: A hybrid multi-stakeholder framework for the modelling of port performance indicators," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 1-16.
    6. Ha, Min-Ho & Yang, Zaili, 2017. "Comparative analysis of port performance indicators: Independency and interdependency," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 264-278.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bichou, Khalid, 2006. "Chapter 24 Review of Port Performance Approaches and a Supply Chain Framework to Port Performance Benchmarking," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 567-598, January.
    2. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford & Dong-Wook Kwak, 2012. "Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 351-377, January.
    3. Wang, Zhanwei & Song, Woon-Kyung, 2020. "Sustainable airport development with performance evaluation forecasts: A case study of 12 Asian airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Lourdes Trujillo & Marianela Gonzalez, 2011. "Maritime Ports," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 17, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Woo, Su-Han & Pettit, Stephen J. & Kwak, Dong-Wook & Beresford, Anthony K.C., 2011. "Seaport research: A structured literature review on methodological issues since the 1980s," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 667-685, August.
    6. Paraschi, Elen Paraskevi & Georgopoulos, Antonios & Papatheodorou, Andreas, 2020. "Abiotic determinants of airport performance: Insights from a global survey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 33-53.
    7. Baltazar, Maria Emília & Rosa, Tiago & Silva, Jorge, 2018. "Global decision support for airport performance and efficiency assessment," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 220-242.
    8. Gong, Stephen X.H. & Cullinane, Kevin & Firth, Michael, 2012. "The impact of airport and seaport privatization on efficiency and performance: A review of the international evidence and implications for developing countries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 37-47.
    9. Myung Je Lee & Changhee Kim, 2018. "A network DEA aeronautical and non-aeronautical production model: an application to South Korea airports," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Lai, Po‐Lin & Potter, Andrew & Beynon, Malcolm & Beresford, Anthony, 2015. "Evaluating the efficiency performance of airports using an integrated AHP/DEA-AR technique," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 75-85.
    11. González, MarI´a Manuela & Trujillo, Lourdes, 2008. "Reforms and infrastructure efficiency in Spain's container ports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 243-257, January.
    12. Tae Hoon Oum & Katsuhiro Yamaguchi & Yuichiro Yoshida, 2011. "Efficiency Measurement Theory and its Application to Airport Benchmarking," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Fan, L.W. & Wu, F. & Zhou, P., 2014. "Efficiency measurement of Chinese airports with flight delays by directional distance function," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 140-145.
    14. Vogel, Hans-Arthur & Graham, Anne, 2013. "Devising airport groupings for financial benchmarking," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 32-38.
    15. Itani, Nadine & O’Connell, John F. & Mason, Keith, 2015. "Towards realizing best-in-class civil aviation strategy scenarios," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 42-54.
    16. Volodymyr Bilotkach & Joseph Clougherty & Juergen Mueller & Anming Zhang, 2012. "Regulation, privatization, and airport charges: panel data evidence from European airports," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 73-94, August.
    17. Oum, Tae H. & Yan, Jia & Yu, Chunyan, 2008. "Ownership forms matter for airport efficiency: A stochastic frontier investigation of worldwide airports," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 422-435, September.
    18. Adler, Nicole & Ülkü, Tolga & Yazhemsky, Ekaterina, 2013. "Small regional airport sustainability: Lessons from benchmarking," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 22-31.
    19. Pestana Barros, Carlos & Managi, Shunsuke & Yoshida, Yuichiro, 2010. "Productivity growth and biased technological change in Japanese airports," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 259-265, August.
    20. Adler, Nicole & Liebert, Vanessa & Yazhemsky, Ekaterina, 2013. "Benchmarking airports from a managerial perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 442-458.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:17:y:2006:i:1:p:599-629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.