IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v46y2015icp41-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking yields of energy crops: A meta-analysis using direct and indirect comparisons

Author

Listed:
  • Laurent, A.
  • Pelzer, E.
  • Loyce, C.
  • Makowski, D.

Abstract

Many crops are candidate sources of renewable energy. Energy crop yields vary between species, but no global study has been carried out to rank energy crops on the basis of existing yield data. In this study, we analyzed a large set of yield data obtained for 36 energy crop species and ranked these species according to their productivity. We carried out a systematic literature review and extracted 856 yield data from 28 published papers for 36 different crop species. A statistical analysis, based on direct and indirect comparisons, was performed to compare the mean yield values of the species included in the database. For direct comparisons, the difference between crops grown at the same site was determined, whereas indirect comparisons involved estimation of the differences between crops grown at different sites (making use of a third reference crop grown at the same sites as the crops to be compared). Overall, direct and indirect comparisons generated similar crop species rankings. Miscanthus x giganteus was significantly more productive than most of the other energy crops included in our database. Arundo donax and Pennisetum purpureum were significantly more productive than Miscanthus x giganteus, but both were studied at a limited number of sites. By contrast, Erianthus, Phragmites australis, Phalaris arundinacea, Miscanthus sacchariflorus and Miscanthus sinensis were the least productive crop species. Our database is made freely available and could be updated with additional yield data in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurent, A. & Pelzer, E. & Loyce, C. & Makowski, D., 2015. "Ranking yields of energy crops: A meta-analysis using direct and indirect comparisons," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 41-50.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:46:y:2015:i:c:p:41-50
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115001112
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zema, Demetrio Antonio & Bombino, Giuseppe & Andiloro, Serafina & Zimbone, Santo Marcello, 2012. "Irrigation of energy crops with urban wastewater: Effects on biomass yields, soils and heating values," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 55-65.
    2. Buxton, D. R. & Anderson, I. C. & Hallam, Arne, 1998. "Intercropping Sorghum into Alfalfa and Reed Canarygrass to Increase Forage Yield," Staff General Research Papers Archive 1317, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Boehmel, Constanze & Lewandowski, Iris & Claupein, Wilhelm, 2008. "Comparing annual and perennial energy cropping systems with different management intensities," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 96(1-3), pages 224-236, March.
    4. Kandpal, Tara C. & Broman, Lars, 2014. "Renewable energy education: A global status review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 300-324.
    5. Rowe, Rebecca L. & Street, Nathaniel R. & Taylor, Gail, 2009. "Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 271-290, January.
    6. John E. Erickson & Arkorn Soikaew & Lynn E. Sollenberger & Jerry M. Bennett, 2012. "Water Use and Water-Use Efficiency of Three Perennial Bioenergy Grass Crops in Florida," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan Weger & Jaroslav Knápek & Jaroslav Bubeník & Kamila Vávrová & Zdeněk Strašil, 2021. "Can Miscanthus Fulfill Its Expectations as an Energy Biomass Source in the Current Conditions of the Czech Republic?—Potentials and Barriers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Avellán, Tamara & Gremillion, Paul, 2019. "Constructed wetlands for resource recovery in developing countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 42-57.
    3. Kwiatkowski, Jacek & Graban, Łukasz & Stolarski, Mariusz J., 2023. "The energy efficiency of Virginia fanpetals biomass production for solid biofuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    4. Erwan Hermawan & Adiarso Adiarso & Sigit Setiadi & Dudi Hidayat, 2023. "Strategy for the implementation of sustainable green fuels in Indonesia," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(1), pages 103-139.
    5. Monia El Akkari & Fabien Ferchaud & Loïc Strullu & Ian Shield & Aurélie Perrin & Jean Louis Drouet & Pierre Alain Jayet & Benoît Gabrielle, 2020. "Using a Crop Model to Benchmark Miscanthus and Switchgrass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Amanda J Ashworth & Heather D Toler & Fred L Allen & Robert M Augé, 2018. "Global meta-analysis reveals agro-grassland productivity varies based on species diversity over time," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Niksa, Dariusz & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Tworkowski, Józef & Szczukowski, Stefan, 2019. "Willow productivity from small- and large-scale experimental plantations in Poland from 2000 to 2017," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 461-475.
    8. Monia El Akkari & Nosra Ben Fradj & Benoît Gabrielle & Sylvestre Njakou Djomo, 2023. "Spatially-explicit environmental assessment of bioethanol from miscanthus and switchgrass in France [Évaluation environnementale spatialement explicite du bioéthanol produit à partir de miscanthus ," Post-Print hal-04369771, HAL.
    9. Perrin, Aurelie & Wohlfahrt, Julie & Morandi, Fabiana & Østergård, Hanne & Flatberg, Truls & De La Rua, Cristina & Bjørkvoll, Thor & Gabrielle, Benoit, 2017. "Integrated design and sustainable assessment of innovative biomass supply chains: A case-study on miscanthus in France," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 66-77.
    10. Ferrarini, Andrea & Serra, Paolo & Almagro, María & Trevisan, Marco & Amaducci, Stefano, 2017. "Multiple ecosystem services provision and biomass logistics management in bioenergy buffers: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 277-290.
    11. Feng, Qi & An, Chunjiang & Chen, Zhi & Wang, Zheng, 2020. "Can deep tillage enhance carbon sequestration in soils? A meta-analysis towards GHG mitigation and sustainable agricultural management," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    12. Giuseppe Pulighe & Guido Bonati & Stefano Fabiani & Tommaso Barsali & Flavio Lupia & Silvia Vanino & Pasquale Nino & Pasquale Arca & Pier Paolo Roggero, 2016. "Assessment of the Agronomic Feasibility of Bioenergy Crop Cultivation on Marginal and Polluted Land: A GIS-Based Suitability Study from the Sulcis Area, Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Kurucz, Erika & Fári, Miklós G. & Antal, Gabriella & Gabnai, Zoltán & Popp, József & Bai, Attila, 2018. "Opportunities for the production and economics of Virginia fanpetals (Sida hermaphrodita)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 824-834.
    14. Chen, Huaihai & Dai, Zhongmin & Jager, Henriette I. & Wullschleger, Stan D. & Xu, Jianming & Schadt, Christopher W., 2019. "Influences of nitrogen fertilization and climate regime on the above-ground biomass yields of miscanthus and switchgrass: A meta-analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 303-311.
    15. Leirpoll, Malene Eldegard & Næss, Jan Sandstad & Cavalett, Otavio & Dorber, Martin & Hu, Xiangping & Cherubini, Francesco, 2021. "Optimal combination of bioenergy and solar photovoltaic for renewable energy production on abandoned cropland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 45-56.
    16. Róger Moya & Carolina Tenorio & Gloria Oporto, 2019. "Short Rotation Wood Crops in Latin American: A Review on Status and Potential Uses as Biofuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manzone, Marco & Calvo, Angela, 2016. "Energy and CO2 analysis of poplar and maize crops for biomass production in north Italy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 675-681.
    2. Felten, Daniel & Fröba, Norbert & Fries, Jérôme & Emmerling, Christoph, 2013. "Energy balances and greenhouse gas-mitigation potentials of bioenergy cropping systems (Miscanthus, rapeseed, and maize) based on farming conditions in Western Germany," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 160-174.
    3. Pandey, Vimal Chandra & Bajpai, Omesh & Singh, Nandita, 2016. "Energy crops in sustainable phytoremediation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 58-73.
    4. David O. Yawson & Barry J. Mulholland & Tom Ball & Michael O. Adu & Sushil Mohan & Philip J. White, 2017. "Effect of Climate and Agricultural Land Use Changes on UK Feed Barley Production and Food Security to the 2050s," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Wünsch, Karin & Gruber, Sabine & Claupein, Wilhelm, 2012. "Profitability analysis of cropping systems for biogas production on marginal sites in southwestern Germany," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 213-220.
    6. Van Dael, Miet & Lizin, Sebastien & Swinnen, Gilbert & Van Passel, Steven, 2017. "Young people’s acceptance of bioenergy and the influence of attitude strength on information provision," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 417-430.
    7. Robert Perlack, Robert & Eaton, Lawrence & Thurhollow, Anthony & Langholtz, Matt & De La Torre Ugarte, Daniel, 2011. "US billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry," MPRA Paper 89324, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.
    8. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Warmiński, Kazimierz & Tworkowski, Józef & Szczukowski, Stefan & Olba–Zięty, Ewelina & Gołaszewski, Janusz, 2017. "Energy efficiency of perennial herbaceous crops production depending on the type of digestate and mineral fertilizers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 50-60.
    9. Taylor, Gail, 2008. "Bioenergy for heat and electricity in the UK: A research atlas and roadmap," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4383-4389, December.
    10. van der Hilst, F. & Lesschen, J.P. & van Dam, J.M.C. & Riksen, M. & Verweij, P.A. & Sanders, J.P.M. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2012. "Spatial variation of environmental impacts of regional biomass chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2053-2069.
    11. Giuseppe Pulighe & Guido Bonati & Stefano Fabiani & Tommaso Barsali & Flavio Lupia & Silvia Vanino & Pasquale Nino & Pasquale Arca & Pier Paolo Roggero, 2016. "Assessment of the Agronomic Feasibility of Bioenergy Crop Cultivation on Marginal and Polluted Land: A GIS-Based Suitability Study from the Sulcis Area, Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Hauk, Sebastian & Knoke, Thomas & Wittkopf, Stefan, 2014. "Economic evaluation of short rotation coppice systems for energy from biomass—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 435-448.
    13. Paweł Dec & Jacek Wysocki, 2022. "In Search of Non-Obvious Relationships between Greenhouse Gas or Particulate Matter Emissions, Renewable Energy and Corruption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Chadwick, Dara T. & McDonnell, Kevin P. & Brennan, Liam P. & Fagan, Colette C. & Everard, Colm D., 2014. "Evaluation of infrared techniques for the assessment of biomass and biofuel quality parameters and conversion technology processes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 672-681.
    15. Ajlan, Abdullah & Tan, Chee Wei & Abdilahi, Abdirahman Mohamed, 2017. "Assessment of environmental and economic perspectives for renewable-based hybrid power system in Yemen," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 559-570.
    16. Khanali, Majid & Akram, Asadollah & Behzadi, Javad & Mostashari-Rad, Fatemeh & Saber, Zahra & Chau, Kwok-wing & Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan, 2021. "Multi-objective optimization of energy use and environmental emissions for walnut production using imperialist competitive algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    17. Hammond, Jim & Shackley, Simon & Sohi, Saran & Brownsort, Peter, 2011. "Prospective life cycle carbon abatement for pyrolysis biochar systems in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2646-2655, May.
    18. Carbajo, Ruth & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2018. "Renewable energy research and technologies through responsible research and innovation looking glass: Reflexions, theoretical approaches and contemporary discourses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 792-808.
    19. Srikanth Reddy, K. & Panwar, Lokesh & Panigrahi, B.K. & Kumar, Rajesh, 2018. "Modeling and analysis of profit based self scheduling of GENCO in electricity markets with renewable energy penetration and emission constraints," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 48-63.
    20. Xin-Gang, Zhao & Tian-Tian, Feng & Yu, Ma & Yi-Sheng, Yang & Xue-Fu, Pan, 2015. "Analysis on investment strategies in China: the case of biomass direct combustion power generation sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 760-772.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:46:y:2015:i:c:p:41-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.