IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v36y2011i2p779-788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study on hydrogen production from steam-glycerol reforming: thermodynamics and experimental

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Haisheng
  • Ding, Yulong
  • Cong, Ngoc T.
  • Dou, Binlin
  • Dupont, Valerie
  • Ghadiri, Mojtaba
  • Williams, Paul T.

Abstract

A detailed comparative study on thermodynamic and experimental analyses of glycerol reforming for hydrogen production has been conducted in terms of the effects of temperature, pressure, water to glycerol feed ratio, feeding reactants to inert gas ratio and feeding gas flow rate (residence time). The thermodynamic analysis was conducted by using a non-stoichiometric methodology based on the minimisation of Gibbs free energy. And the experiments were carried out with a pilot scale set-up. The results show that the thermodynamic and experimental data agree fairly well with each other. The measured hydrogen production is slightly lower than that predicted by the thermodynamic analysis, which is mainly because the conversion of steam is incomplete. High temperature, low pressure, low feeding reactants to inert gas ratio and low gas flow rate are favourable for steam reforming of glycerol for hydrogen production. There is an optimal water to glycerol feed ratio for steam reforming of glycerol for hydrogen production which is about 9.0. The glycerol conversion is a strong function of water to glycerol ratio, whereas a weak function of other parameters over the conditions of this work. A novel adsorption enhanced reaction process incorporating water and heat recovery is proposed for further optimisation of hydrogen production from steam reforming of glycerol.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Haisheng & Ding, Yulong & Cong, Ngoc T. & Dou, Binlin & Dupont, Valerie & Ghadiri, Mojtaba & Williams, Paul T., 2011. "A comparative study on hydrogen production from steam-glycerol reforming: thermodynamics and experimental," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 779-788.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:36:y:2011:i:2:p:779-788
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148110003502
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adhikari, Sushil & Fernando, Sandun D. & Haryanto, Agus, 2008. "Hydrogen production from glycerin by steam reforming over nickel catalysts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 1097-1100.
    2. Saxena, R.C. & Adhikari, D.K. & Goyal, H.B., 2009. "Biomass-based energy fuel through biochemical routes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 167-178, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saebea, Dang & Authayanun, Suthida & Patcharavorachot, Yaneeporn & Paengjuntuek, Woranee & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2013. "Use of different renewable fuels in a steam reformer integrated into a solid oxide fuel cell: Theoretical analysis and performance comparison," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 305-313.
    2. Mohsin Raza & Abrar Inayat & Basim Abu-Jdayil, 2021. "Crude Glycerol as a Potential Feedstock for Future Energy via Thermochemical Conversion Processes: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-27, November.
    3. Silva, Joel M. & Soria, M.A. & Madeira, Luis M., 2015. "Challenges and strategies for optimization of glycerol steam reforming process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1187-1213.
    4. Dou, Binlin & Song, Yongchen & Wang, Chao & Chen, Haisheng & Xu, Yujie, 2014. "Hydrogen production from catalytic steam reforming of biodiesel byproduct glycerol: Issues and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 950-960.
    5. Hajjaji, Noureddine & Chahbani, Amna & Khila, Zouhour & Pons, Marie-Noëlle, 2014. "A comprehensive energy–exergy-based assessment and parametric study of a hydrogen production process using steam glycerol reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 473-483.
    6. Authayanun, Suthida & Mamlouk, Mohamed & Scott, Keith & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2013. "Comparison of high-temperature and low-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems with glycerol reforming process for stationary applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 192-201.
    7. Jiménez, Roberto X. & Young, André F. & Fernandes, Heloisa L.S., 2020. "Propylene glycol from glycerol: Process evaluation and break-even price determination," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 181-191.
    8. Authayanun, Suthida & Saebea, Dang & Patcharavorachot, Yaneeporn & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2014. "Effect of different fuel options on performance of high-temperature PEMFC (proton exchange membrane fuel cell) systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 989-997.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuan, Jin & Leung, Michael K.H. & Leung, Dennis Y.C. & Ni, Meng, 2009. "A review of biomass-derived fuel processors for fuel cell systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(6-7), pages 1301-1313, August.
    2. Al-Jabri, Hareb & Das, Probir & Khan, Shoyeb & AbdulQuadir, Mohammad & Thaher, Mehmoud Ibrahim & Hoekman, Kent & Hawari, Alaa H., 2022. "A comparison of bio-crude oil production from five marine microalgae – Using life cycle analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    3. Qi, Jianhui & Zhao, Jianli & Xu, Yang & Wang, Yongjia & Han, Kuihua, 2018. "Segmented heating carbonization of biomass: Yields, property and estimation of heating value of chars," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 301-311.
    4. Zhang, Zhikun & Zhu, Zongyuan & Shen, Boxiong & Liu, Lina, 2019. "Insights into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 581-598.
    5. Pätäri, Satu & Puumalainen, Kaisu & Jantunen, Ari & Sandstrüm, Jaana, 2011. "The interface of the energy and forest sectors--Potential players in the bioenergy business," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 322-332, May.
    6. Goh, Chun Sheng & Lee, Keat Teong, 2010. "A visionary and conceptual macroalgae-based third-generation bioethanol (TGB) biorefinery in Sabah, Malaysia as an underlay for renewable and sustainable development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 842-848, February.
    7. M. N. Uddin & Kuaanan Techato & Juntakan Taweekun & Md Mofijur Rahman & M. G. Rasul & T. M. I. Mahlia & S. M. Ashrafur, 2018. "An Overview of Recent Developments in Biomass Pyrolysis Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, November.
    8. Kambo, Harpreet Singh & Dutta, Animesh, 2015. "A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 359-378.
    9. Aliyu, Abubakar Sadiq & Dada, Joseph O. & Adam, Ibrahim Khalil, 2015. "Current status and future prospects of renewable energy in Nigeria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 336-346.
    10. Lee, Jechan & Kim, Soosan & You, Siming & Park, Young-Kwon, 2023. "Bioenergy generation from thermochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass-based integrated renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    11. Lim, Jeng Shiun & Abdul Manan, Zainuddin & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah & Hashim, Haslenda, 2012. "A review on utilisation of biomass from rice industry as a source of renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3084-3094.
    12. Jafary, Tahereh & Daud, Wan Ramli Wan & Ghasemi, Mostafa & Kim, Byung Hong & Md Jahim, Jamaliah & Ismail, Manal & Lim, Swee Su, 2015. "Biocathode in microbial electrolysis cell; present status and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 23-33.
    13. Weishu Liu & Mengdi Gu & Guangyuan Hu & Chao Li & Huchang Liao & Li Tang & Philip Shapira, 2014. "Profile of developments in biomass-based bioenergy research: a 20-year perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(2), pages 507-521, May.
    14. Lazaroiu, Gheorghe & Pop, Elena & Negreanu, Gabriel & Pisa, Ionel & Mihaescu, Lucian & Bondrea, Andreya & Berbece, Viorel, 2017. "Biomass combustion with hydrogen injection for energy applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 351-357.
    15. Kong, Pei San & Aroua, Mohamed Kheireddine & Daud, Wan Mohd Ashri Wan, 2016. "Conversion of crude and pure glycerol into derivatives: A feasibility evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 533-555.
    16. Yi Zhang & Mingting Kou & Kaihua Chen & Jiancheng Guan & Yuchen Li, 2016. "Modelling the Basic Research Competitiveness Index (BR-CI) with an application to the biomass energy field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1221-1241, September.
    17. Wen, Wen & Zhang, Qin, 2015. "A design of straw acquisition mode for China's straw power plant based on supply chain coordination," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 369-374.
    18. Marcin Kopiczko & Jaroslaw Jaworski, 2021. "Characteristics of the Parameters of Lithium Iron Phosphate Energy Storage in the Context of their Usefulness in the Management of Distribution Grid," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 817-826.
    19. Teresa Enes & José Aranha & Teresa Fonseca & Domingos Lopes & Ana Alves & José Lousada, 2019. "Thermal Properties of Residual Agroforestry Biomass of Northern Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    20. Liu Li & Chaoying Tang, 2020. "How Does Inter-Organizational Cooperation Impact Organizations’ Scientific Knowledge Generation? Evidence from the Biomass Energy Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:36:y:2011:i:2:p:779-788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.