IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v197y2018icp317-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating demand variability and capacity costs due to social network influence: The hidden cost of connection

Author

Listed:
  • Menezes, Mozart B.C.
  • da Silveira, Giovani J.C.
  • Guimarães, Renato

Abstract

Widespread access to social networks has led to renewed interest in social network influence in competitive markets. Digital connections enable customers to choose products based not only on intrinsic preferences, but also on inner-circle signals and market share data. However, these influences may significantly increase variability and complexity in demand forecasting. We propose an analytical model to estimate demand based on these three factors of choice. We focus on extreme weights of each factor where the probability distribution is more easily described. Then, we build solution paths as weights depart from the extreme points. We show that beta-binomial distributions can better describe the probability distribution of demand, and provide the parameters of that distribution, for new products helping operations and supply chain managers to take into account risk when making strategic decisions. To the best of our knowledge, we propose the first model that incorporates those three factors of choice in demand forecast. We also explore extreme cases where choice is mostly determined by intrinsic preference rather than social influence, and vice versa.

Suggested Citation

  • Menezes, Mozart B.C. & da Silveira, Giovani J.C. & Guimarães, Renato, 2018. "Estimating demand variability and capacity costs due to social network influence: The hidden cost of connection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 317-329.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:197:y:2018:i:c:p:317-329
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527318300434
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raghuram Iyengar & Christophe Van den Bulte & Thomas W. Valente, 2011. "Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 195-212, 03-04.
    2. Gianna Boero & Jeremy Smith & Kenneth Wallis, 2005. "The Sensitivity of Chi-Squared Goodness-of-Fit Tests to the Partitioning of Data," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 341-370.
    3. Dhar, Vasant & Chang, Elaine A., 2009. "Does Chatter Matter? The Impact of User-Generated Content on Music Sales," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 300-307.
    4. Laciana, Carlos E. & Rovere, Santiago L. & Podestá, Guillermo P., 2013. "Exploring associations between micro-level models of innovation diffusion and emerging macro-level adoption patterns," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(8), pages 1873-1884.
    5. Maecker, Olaf & Grabenströer, Nadja Sophia & Clement, Michel & Heitmann, Mark, 2013. "Charts and demand: Empirical generalizations on social influence," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 429-431.
    6. Christophe Van den Bulte & Yogesh V. Joshi, 2007. "New Product Diffusion with Influentials and Imitators," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 400-421, 05-06.
    7. Iyengar Raghuram & Van den Bulte Christophe & Eichert John & West Bruce, 2011. "How Social Network and Opinion Leaders Affect the Adoption of New Products," GfK Marketing Intelligence Review, Sciendo, vol. 3(1), pages 16-25, May.
    8. Christophe Van den Bulte & Stefan Stremersch, 2004. "Social Contagion and Income Heterogeneity in New Product Diffusion: A Meta-Analytic Test," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 530-544, July.
    9. A. Barrat & M. Weigt, 2000. "On the properties of small-world network models," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 13(3), pages 547-560, February.
    10. Azucena Gracia & Tiziana de Magistris & Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr., 2012. "Importance of Social Influence in Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Local Food: Are There Gender Differences?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 361-371, June.
    11. Daniel Birke, 2013. "Who you are or whom you know? Consumption interdependences in social networks," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 281-299, April.
    12. Mehdi Mourali & Zhiyong Yang, 2013. "The Dual Role of Power in Resisting Social Influence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(3), pages 539-554.
    13. Sinan Aral & Dylan Walker, 2014. "Tie Strength, Embeddedness, and Social Influence: A Large-Scale Networked Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1352-1370, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Feng & Du, Timon Chih-ting & Wei, Ying, 2019. "Offensive pricing strategies for online platforms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 287-304.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abedi, Vahideh Sadat, 2019. "Compartmental diffusion modeling: Describing customer heterogeneity & communication network to support decisions for new product introductions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 536(C).
    2. Liye Ma & Ramayya Krishnan & Alan L. Montgomery, 2015. "Latent Homophily or Social Influence? An Empirical Analysis of Purchase Within a Social Network," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(2), pages 454-473, February.
    3. Ravi Bapna & Akhmed Umyarov, 2015. "Do Your Online Friends Make You Pay? A Randomized Field Experiment on Peer Influence in Online Social Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(8), pages 1902-1920, August.
    4. Shan Huang & Sinan Aral & Yu Jeffrey Hu & Erik Brynjolfsson, 2020. "Social Advertising Effectiveness Across Products: A Large-Scale Field Experiment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 1142-1165, November.
    5. Nejad, Mohammad G. & Amini, Mehdi & Babakus, Emin, 2015. "Success Factors in Product Seeding: The Role of Homophily," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 68-88.
    6. Pyo, Tae-Hyung & Tamrakar, Chanchal & Lee, Jae Young & Choi, Yun Seob, 2023. "Is social capital always “Capital”?: Measuring and leveraging social capital in online user communities for in-group diffusion," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Zhang, Honghong & Fam, Kim-Shyan & Goh, Tiong-Thye & Dai, Xin, 2018. "When are influentials equally influenceable? The strength of strong ties in new product adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 160-170.
    8. Fruchter, Gila E. & Van den Bulte, Christophe, 2011. "Why the Generalized Bass Model leads to odd optimal advertising policies," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 218-230.
    9. Rishika Rishika & Jui Ramaprasad, 2019. "The Effects of Asymmetric Social Ties, Structural Embeddedness, and Tie Strength on Online Content Contribution Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 3398-3422, July.
    10. Yansong Hu & Christophe Van den Bulte, 2014. "Nonmonotonic Status Effects in New Product Adoption," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 509-533, July.
    11. Peres, Renana & Muller, Eitan & Mahajan, Vijay, 2010. "Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: A critical review and research directions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 91-106.
    12. Elias Carroni & Paolo Pin & Simone Righi, 2020. "Bring a Friend! Privately or Publicly?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(5), pages 2269-2290, May.
    13. Bhukya, Ramulu & Paul, Justin, 2023. "Social influence research in consumer behavior: What we learned and what we need to learn? – A hybrid systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    14. Tianshu Sun & Sean J. Taylor, 2020. "Displaying things in common to encourage friendship formation: A large randomized field experiment," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 237-271, September.
    15. Haibing Gao & Huazhong Zhao & Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Ya (Lisa) Lin & Lai Wei, 2020. "Social Promotion: A Creative Promotional Framework on Consumers’ Social Network Value," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(12), pages 2661-2678, December.
    16. Yuho Chung & Yiwei Li & Jianmin Jia, 2021. "Exploring embeddedness, centrality, and social influence on backer behavior: the role of backer networks in crowdfunding," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 925-946, September.
    17. Gandal, Neil & Bar-Gill, Sagit, 2017. "Online Exploration, Content Choice & Echo Chambers: An Experiment," CEPR Discussion Papers 11909, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Pauwels, Koen & Aksehirli, Zeynep & Lackman, Andrew, 2016. "Like the ad or the brand? Marketing stimulates different electronic word-of-mouth content to drive online and offline performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 639-655.
    19. Sang-Gun Lee & Eui-bang Lee & Chang-Gyu Yang, 2014. "Strategies for ICT product diffusion: the case of the Korean mobile communications market," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 8(1), pages 65-81, March.
    20. T. Marshalkina V. & Т. Маршалкина В., 2015. "Модели Прогнозирования Спроса На Инновационную Продукцию // Models For Innovative Products Demand," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, issue 6, pages 171-178.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:197:y:2018:i:c:p:317-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.