IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v562y2021ics0378437120306993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling illegal pedestrian crossing behaviors at unmarked mid-block roadway based on extended decision field theory

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yongjie
  • Shen, Binchang
  • Wu, Hao
  • Wang, Chao
  • Su, Qian
  • Chen, Wenqiang

Abstract

There is a huge risk of accidents when pedestrians jaywalk across the road. It is a difficult problem to predict and reduce the behavior of jaywalking. This paper proposes a dynamic decision model of jaywalking for pedestrians based on the extended decision field theory. The model connects pedestrians’ perceptions in three dimensions such as efficiency, safety, and fairness with the dynamic traffic environment, and shows the evolution of pedestrians’ decision-making. The tester’s decision data is collected through a questionnaire survey for the purpose of model parameter estimation and validity testing. The established model is used to analyze the pedestrian’s behavior of jaywalking. The results show that the preference of pedestrians for jaywalking is inversely proportional to the traffic density. As the preference threshold increases, the probability of pedestrians choosing to jaywalk gradually decreases. For the distance between the site of jaywalking and the bus stop, the probability of jaywalking basically follows a normal distribution. The average distance gradually increases, with the increase of the car arrival rate. Additionally, location of the crosswalk has a great impact on the jaywalking behaviors. The potential application of this model is that it can help the traffic management department to predict the probability distribution of jaywalking events in the road network, which is conducive to the traffic management department to optimize the traffic infrastructure settings of potential road sections, and take effective regulatory measures to reduce the occurrence of jaywalkers.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yongjie & Shen, Binchang & Wu, Hao & Wang, Chao & Su, Qian & Chen, Wenqiang, 2021. "Modeling illegal pedestrian crossing behaviors at unmarked mid-block roadway based on extended decision field theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 562(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:562:y:2021:i:c:s0378437120306993
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.125327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437120306993
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Helbing & Illés Farkas & Tamás Vicsek, 2000. "Simulating dynamical features of escape panic," Nature, Nature, vol. 407(6803), pages 487-490, September.
    2. Qin, Huanmei & Gao, Jianqiang & Wu, Yao-Jan & Yan, Hai, 2019. "Analysis on context change and repetitive travel mode choices based on a dynamic, computational model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 155-164.
    3. Chen, Qun & Wang, Yan, 2015. "Cellular automata (CA) simulation of the interaction of vehicle flows and pedestrian crossings on urban low-grade uncontrolled roads," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 432(C), pages 43-57.
    4. Xin, Xiuying & Jia, Ning & Zheng, Liang & Ma, Shoufeng, 2014. "Power-law in pedestrian crossing flow under the interference of vehicles at an un-signalized midblock crosswalk," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 406(C), pages 287-297.
    5. Jin, Sheng & Qu, Xiaobo & Xu, Cheng & Wang, Dian-Hai, 2013. "Dynamic characteristics of traffic flow with consideration of pedestrians’ road-crossing behavior," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(18), pages 3881-3890.
    6. Levy, Nadav & Klein, Ido & Ben-Elia, Eran, 2018. "Emergence of cooperation and a fair system optimum in road networks: A game-theoretic and agent-based modelling approach," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 46-55.
    7. Wang, Peng & Cao, Shuchao & Yao, Ming, 2019. "Fundamental diagrams for pedestrian traffic flow in controlled experiments," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 266-277.
    8. Thomas Otter & Joe Johnson & Jörg Rieskamp & Greg Allenby & Jeff Brazell & Adele Diederich & J. Hutchinson & Steven MacEachern & Shiling Ruan & Jim Townsend, 2008. "Sequential sampling models of choice: Some recent advances," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 255-267, December.
    9. Hancock, Thomas O. & Hess, Stephane & Choudhury, Charisma F., 2018. "Decision field theory: Improvements to current methodology and comparisons with standard choice modelling techniques," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 18-40.
    10. Luo, Lin & Liu, Xiaobo & Fu, Zhijian & Ma, Jian & Liu, Fanxiao, 2020. "Modeling following behavior and right-side-preference in multidirectional pedestrian flows by modified FFCA," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 550(C).
    11. Busemeyer, Jerome R. & Diederich, Adele, 2002. "Survey of decision field theory," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 345-370, July.
    12. Zhao, Jing & Knoop, Victor L. & Wang, Meng, 2020. "Two-dimensional vehicular movement modelling at intersections based on optimal control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-22.
    13. Wang, Yongjie & Yao, Zhouzhou & Wang, Chao & Ren, Jiale & Chen, Qiao, 2020. "The impact of intelligent transportation points system based on Elo rating on emergence of cooperation at Y intersection," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
    14. repec:cup:judgdm:v:6:y:2011:i:8:p:733-739 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. H. Echab & H. Ez-Zahraouy, 2017. "Dynamic characteristics of traffic flow with consideration of crossing pedestrians’ behavior at a nonsignalized T-shaped intersection," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 28(11), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Malenje, Jairus Odawa & Zhao, Jing & Li, Peng & Han, Yin, 2018. "An extended car-following model with the consideration of the illegal pedestrian crossing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 508(C), pages 650-661.
    17. Mitman, Meghan Felig & Ragland, David R & Zegeer, Charles V., 2008. "The Marked Crosswalk Dilemma: Uncovering Some Missing Links in a 35-Year Debate," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt13r7q036, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ran Zhang & Zhonghua Wei & Heng Gu & Shi Qiu, 2021. "Behavior Evolution of Multi-Group in the Process of Pedestrian Crossing Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Sun, Qipeng & He, Chen & Wang, Yongjie & Liu, Hang & Ma, Fei & Wei, Xiao, 2022. "Reducing violation behaviors of pedestrians considering group interests of travelers at signalized crosswalk," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 594(C).
    3. Pérez Cruz, José Roberto & Lakouari, Noureddine & Marzoug, Rachid & Pérez Sansalvador, Julio César, 2023. "Pedestrian–vehicle interactions at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks: Effects on traffic flow, CO2 emissions, and energy dissipation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 630(C).
    4. Sun, Qipeng & Cheng, Qianqian & Wang, Yongjie & Li, Tao & Ma, Fei & Yao, Zhigang, 2022. "Zip-merging behavior at Y-intersection based on intelligent travel points," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 593(C).
    5. Bi, Hui & Li, Aoyong & Zhu, He & Ye, Zhirui, 2023. "Bicycle safety outside the crosswalks: Investigating cyclists' risky street-crossing behavior and its relationship with built environment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Sun, Qipeng & Liu, Hang & Wang, Yongjie & Li, Qiong & Chen, Wenqiang & Bai, Pengxia & Xue, Chenlei, 2022. "Cooperation in the jaywalking dilemma of a road public good due to points guidance," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    7. Chen, Binbin & Li, Wei, 2022. "Improving highway traffic performance: Merging pattern design of a departure zone after tollbooths or ETC," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 608(P1).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hancock, Thomas O. & Hess, Stephane & Marley, A.A.J. & Choudhury, Charisma F., 2021. "An accumulation of preference: Two alternative dynamic models for understanding transport choices," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 250-282.
    2. Wang, Yan & Peng, Zhongyi & Chen, Qun, 2018. "Simulated interactions of pedestrian crossings and motorized vehicles in residential areas," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 1046-1060.
    3. Xianing Wang & Zhan Zhang & Ying Wang & Jun Yang & Linjun Lu, 2022. "A Study on Safety Evaluation of Pedestrian Flows Based on Partial Impact Dynamics by Real-Time Data in Subway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Layegh, Maziyar & Mirbaha, Babak & Rassafi, Amir Abbas, 2020. "Modeling the pedestrian behavior at conflicts with vehicles in multi-lane roundabouts (a cellular automata approach)," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 556(C).
    5. Chen, Qun & Wang, Yan, 2015. "Cellular automata (CA) simulation of the interaction of vehicle flows and pedestrian crossings on urban low-grade uncontrolled roads," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 432(C), pages 43-57.
    6. Hancock, Thomas O. & Hess, Stephane & Choudhury, Charisma F., 2018. "Decision field theory: Improvements to current methodology and comparisons with standard choice modelling techniques," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 18-40.
    7. Yu, Lei, 2020. "A new continuum traffic flow model with two delays," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    8. Zhang, Hui & Xu, Jie & Jia, Limin & Shi, Yihan, 2021. "Research on walking efficiency of passengers around corner of subway station," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 573(C).
    9. Chen, Liang & Sun, Jingjie & Li, Kun & Li, Qiaoru, 2022. "Research on the effectiveness of monitoring mechanism for “yield to pedestrian” based on system dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 591(C).
    10. David A. J. Meester & Stephane Hess & John Buckell & Thomas O. Hancock, 2023. "Can decision field theory enhance our understanding of health‐based choices? Evidence from risky health behaviors," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(8), pages 1710-1732, August.
    11. Szép, Teodóra & van Cranenburgh, Sander & Chorus, Caspar G., 2022. "Decision Field Theory: Equivalence with probit models and guidance for identifiability," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    12. Wang, Weili & Zhang, Jingjing & Li, Haicheng & Xie, Qimiao, 2020. "Experimental study on unidirectional pedestrian flows in a corridor with a fixed obstacle and a temporary obstacle," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    13. Stock, Eduardo Velasco & da Silva, Roberto, 2023. "Lattice gas model to describe a nightclub dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    14. Sarker, Rumana Islam & Kaplan, Sigal & Mailer, Markus & Timmermans, Harry J.P., 2019. "Applying affective event theory to explain transit users’ reactions to service disruptions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 593-605.
    15. Varas, A. & Cornejo, M.D. & Mainemer, D. & Toledo, B. & Rogan, J. & Muñoz, V. & Valdivia, J.A., 2007. "Cellular automaton model for evacuation process with obstacles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 382(2), pages 631-642.
    16. Martinovici, A., 2019. "Revealing attention - how eye movements predict brand choice and moment of choice," Other publications TiSEM 7dca38a5-9f78-4aee-bd81-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Murilo S Baptista & Hai-Peng Ren & Johen C M Swarts & Rodrigo Carareto & Henk Nijmeijer & Celso Grebogi, 2012. "Collective Almost Synchronisation in Complex Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-11, November.
    18. Chen, Changkun & Sun, Huakai & Lei, Peng & Zhao, Dongyue & Shi, Congling, 2021. "An extended model for crowd evacuation considering pedestrian panic in artificial attack," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    19. Michael Batty & Jake Desyllas & Elspeth Duxbury, 2003. "Safety in Numbers? Modelling Crowds and Designing Control for the Notting Hill Carnival," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(8), pages 1573-1590, July.
    20. Ma, Jian & Song, Wei-guo & Zhang, Jun & Lo, Siu-ming & Liao, Guang-xuan, 2010. "k-Nearest-Neighbor interaction induced self-organized pedestrian counter flow," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(10), pages 2101-2117.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:562:y:2021:i:c:s0378437120306993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.