IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joepsy/v89y2022ics0167487021001045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How decision-makers’ sense and state of power induce propensity to take financial risks

Author

Listed:
  • Sekścińska, Katarzyna
  • Rudzinska-Wojciechowska, Joanna
  • Kusev, Petko

Abstract

We present two studies (N1 = 104, and N2 = 359) investigating how sense of power (trait) and state of power affect participants’ risky financial decisions in the domains of investment and gambling. Moreover, we explored whether a situationally induced state of power moderates the relationship between sense of power (trait) and propensity to take financial risks. The studies demonstrated that the level of sense of power was positively associated with the riskiness of investment portfolios and gambling choices. A similar pattern was observed when a state of power/powerlessness was situationally induced: participants in high-power conditions took greater investment and gambling risks than did those in low-power conditions. Importantly, we found an interaction between trait and state power. For participants in the high-power condition, there was a positive relationship between sense of power and propensity to take financial risks. In contrast, there was no such relationship for those in the low-power condition.

Suggested Citation

  • Sekścińska, Katarzyna & Rudzinska-Wojciechowska, Joanna & Kusev, Petko, 2022. "How decision-makers’ sense and state of power induce propensity to take financial risks," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:89:y:2022:i:c:s0167487021001045
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2021.102474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167487021001045
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.joep.2021.102474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:6:y:2011:i:6:p:552-564 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Kelly Haws & William Bearden & Utpal Dholakia, 2012. "Situational and trait interactions among goal orientations," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 47-60, March.
    3. Shailendra Pratap Jain & Kalpesh Kaushik Desai & Huifang Mao, 2007. "The Influence of Chronic and Situational Self-Construal on Categorization," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(1), pages 66-76, April.
    4. Sekścińska, Katarzyna & Rudzinska-Wojciechowska, Joanna & Jaworska, Diana, 2021. "Self-control and financial risk taking," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    5. Charles A. Holt & Susan K. Laury, 2002. "Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(5), pages 1644-1655, December.
    6. Fast, Nathanael J. & Sivanathan, Niro & Mayer, Nicole D. & Galinsky, Adam D., 2012. "Power and overconfident decision-making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 249-260.
    7. Altunbaş, Yener & Thornton, John & Uymaz, Yurtsev, 2018. "CEO tenure and corporate misconduct: Evidence from US banks," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 1-8.
    8. Ivo Vlaev & Petko Kusev & Neil Stewart & Silvio Aldrovandi & Nick Chater, 2010. "Domain Effects and Financial Risk Attitudes," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(9), pages 1374-1386, September.
    9. Charness, Gary & Gneezy, Uri & Imas, Alex, 2013. "Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 43-51.
    10. Altunbaş, Yener & Thornton, John & Uymaz, Yurtsev, 2020. "The effect of CEO power on bank risk: Do boards and institutional investors matter?✰," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    11. Kuhberger, Anton & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael & Perner, Josef, 1999. "The Effects of Framing, Reflection, Probability, and Payoff on Risk Preference in Choice Tasks, ," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 204-231, June.
    12. Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky & David Dubois, 2012. "Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value," Post-Print hal-00724231, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. de Kwaadsteniet, Erik W. & Gross, Jörg & van Dijk, Eric, 2023. "A “More-is-Better” heuristic in anticommons dilemmas: Psychological insights from a new anticommons bargaining game," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katarzyna Sekścińska & Joanna Rudzinska-Wojciechowska, 2021. "How Power Influences Decision-Makers’ Investment Behavior in the Domains of Loss and Gain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Brunette, Marielle & Jacob, Julien, 2019. "Risk aversion, prudence and temperance: An experiment in gain and loss," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 174-189.
    3. Matteo M. Marini, 2022. "20 years of emotions and risky choices in the lab: A meta-analysis," Working Papers 2022/03, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    4. Chaikal Nuryakin & Natanael Waraney Gerald Massie, 2018. "Does Deposit Insurance Matter? Behavioral Evidence from Indonesia," LPEM FEBUI Working Papers 201827, LPEM, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, revised 2018.
    5. Galliera, Arianna, 2018. "Self-selecting random or cumulative pay? A bargaining experiment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 106-120.
    6. Ranganathan, Kavitha & Lejarraga, Tomás, 2021. "Elicitation of risk preferences through satisficing," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    7. Goytom Abraha Kahsay & Daniel Osberghaus, 2018. "Storm Damage and Risk Preferences: Panel Evidence from Germany," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(1), pages 301-318, September.
    8. Pablo Brañas‐Garza & Matteo M. Galizzi & Jeroen Nieboer, 2018. "Experimental And Self‐Reported Measures Of Risk Taking And Digit Ratio (2d:4d): Evidence From A Large, Systematic Study," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 59(3), pages 1131-1157, August.
    9. Alex Imas & Sally Sadoff & Anya Samek, 2017. "Do People Anticipate Loss Aversion?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1271-1284, May.
    10. Hermansson, Cecilia, 2018. "Can self-assessed financial risk measures explain and predict bank customers’ objective financial risk?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 226-240.
    11. Arslan, Ruben C. & Brümmer, Martin & Dohmen, Thomas & Drewelies, Johanna & Hertwig, Ralph & Wagner, Gert G., 2020. "How people know their risk preference," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10.
    12. repec:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:3:p:234-279 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. James Alm & Antoine Malézieux, 2021. "40 years of tax evasion games: a meta-analysis," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(3), pages 699-750, September.
    14. Peter John Robinson & W. J. Wouter Botzen & Fujin Zhou, 2021. "An experimental study of charity hazard: The effect of risky and ambiguous government compensation on flood insurance demand," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 275-318, December.
    15. Holzmeister, Felix, 2017. "oTree: Ready-made apps for risk preference elicitation methods," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 33-38.
    16. Charness, Gary & Gneezy, Uri & Rasocha, Vlastimil, 2021. "Experimental methods: Eliciting beliefs," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 234-256.
    17. Zheng Li, 2020. "Experimental Evidence on Socioeconomic Differences in Risk‐Taking and Risk Premiums," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 96(313), pages 140-152, June.
    18. Wu, Haixia & Ge, Yan & Li, Jianping, 2023. "Uncertainty, time preference and households’ adoption of rooftop photovoltaic technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    19. Kirchkamp, Oliver & Oechssler, Joerg & Sofianos, Andis, 2021. "The Binary Lottery Procedure does not induce risk neutrality in the Holt & Laury and Eckel & Grossman tasks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 348-369.
    20. Sawosri, Arieska Wening & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2020. "Risk and time preferences of farmers in India and Indonesia," EFForTS Discussion Paper Series 32, University of Goettingen, Collaborative Research Centre 990 "EFForTS, Ecological and Socioeconomic Functions of Tropical Lowland Rainforest Transformation Systems (Sumatra, Indonesia)".
    21. Shambhavi Tiwari & Morten Moshagen & Benjamin E. Hilbig & Ingo Zettler, 2021. "The Dark Factor of Personality and Risk-Taking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Power; Financial risk; Investment; Gambling;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D1 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior
    • D19 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Other
    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance
    • G4 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance
    • G40 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:89:y:2022:i:c:s0167487021001045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.