IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/fambus/v12y2021i1s1877858520300887.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental studies in family business research

Author

Listed:
  • Lude, Maximilian
  • Prügl, Reinhard

Abstract

Experimental studies are at the heart of scientific inquiry but have yet to gain their due recognition in the methodological repertoire of family business researchers. In this article we discuss the usefulness of experiments to further the development of family business science. We argue that well-developed experiments can enable family business scholars to not only scrutinize difficult-to-isolate relationships, but explore multilevel and causal processes that form the foundation of family firm heterogeneity. Hence, the purpose of this article is to draw researchers’ attention to the value of experiments in generating new and relevant insights in family firm contexts. Our work is intended to encourage, guide and inspire family business scholars to increase methodological variety in our field by carefully designing, evaluating and carrying out experimental studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lude, Maximilian & Prügl, Reinhard, 2021. "Experimental studies in family business research," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:fambus:v:12:y:2021:i:1:s1877858520300887
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877858520300887
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100361?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hauck, Jana & Suess-Reyes, Julia & Beck, Susanne & Prügl, Reinhard & Frank, Hermann, 2016. "Measuring socioemotional wealth in family-owned and -managed firms: A validation and short form of the FIBER Scale," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 133-148.
    2. Alwine Mohnen & Kathrin Pokorny & Dirk Sliwka, 2008. "Transparency, Inequity Aversion, and the Dynamics of Peer Pressure in Teams: Theory and Evidence," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(4), pages 693-720, October.
    3. Armin Falk & James J. Heckman, 2009. "Lab Experiments are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences," Working Papers 200935, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    4. Stevenson, Regan M. & Josefy, Matthew, 2019. "Knocking at the gate: The path to publication for entrepreneurship experiments through the lens of gatekeeping theory," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 242-260.
    5. Maximilian Lude & Reinhard Prügl, 2019. "Risky Decisions and the Family Firm Bias: An Experimental Study Based on Prospect Theory," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(2), pages 386-408, March.
    6. Francesca Gino & Lamar Pierce, 2010. "Robin Hood Under the Hood: Wealth-Based Discrimination in Illicit Customer Help," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(6), pages 1176-1194, December.
    7. Jess H. Chua & James J. Chrisman & Lloyd P. Steier & Sabine B. Rau, 2012. "Sources of Heterogeneity in Family Firms: An Introduction," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(6), pages 1103-1113, November.
    8. Adam J. Berinsky & Michele F. Margolis & Michael W. Sances, 2014. "Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self‐Administered Surveys," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(3), pages 739-753, July.
    9. Daniel Bello & Kwok Leung & Lee Radebaugh & Rosalie L Tung & Arjen van Witteloostuijn, 2009. "From the Editors: Student samples in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 40(3), pages 361-364, April.
    10. Sohrab Soleimanof & Kulraj Singh & Daniel T. Holt, 2019. "Micro-Foundations of Corporate Entrepreneurship in Family Firms: An Institution-Based Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(2), pages 274-281, March.
    11. Zahra, Shaker A., 2016. "Developing theory-grounded family business research: Some suggestions," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 3-7.
    12. Calder, Bobby J & Phillips, Lynn W & Tybout, Alice M, 1982. "The Concept of External Validity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(3), pages 240-244, December.
    13. Caleb Warren & Margaret C. Campbell, 2014. "What Makes Things Cool? How Autonomy Influences Perceived Coolness," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(2), pages 543-563.
    14. von Hippel, Eric & Franke, Nikolaus & Prügl, Reinhard, 2009. "Pyramiding: Efficient search for rare subjects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 1397-1406, November.
    15. Martin Weber & Heiko Zuchel, 2005. "How Do Prior Outcomes Affect Risk Attitude? Comparing Escalation of Commitment and the House-Money Effect," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 30-43, March.
    16. Ashish Arora & Michelle Gittelman & Sarah Kaplan & John Lynch & Will Mitchell & Nicolaj Siggelkow & Aaron K. Chatterji & Michael Findley & Nathan M. Jensen & Stephan Meier & Daniel Nielson, 2016. "Field experiments in strategy research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 116-132, January.
    17. Zanon, Johanna & Scholl-Grissemann, Ursula & Kallmuenzer, Andreas & Kleinhansl, Nikolas & Peters, Mike, 2019. "How promoting a family firm image affects customer perception in the age of social media," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 28-37.
    18. Thomas M. Zellweger & James J. Chrisman & Jess H. Chua & Lloyd P. Steier, 2019. "Social Structures, Social Relationships, and Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(2), pages 207-223, March.
    19. Editors The, 2008. "From the Editors," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-3, January.
    20. Margarete Schellong & Nils D. Kraiczy & Lucia Malär & Andreas Hack, 2019. "Family Firm Brands, Perceptions of Doing Good, and Consumer Happiness," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(5), pages 921-946, September.
    21. Astrachan, Joseph H., 2010. "Strategy in family business: Toward a multidimensional research agenda," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 6-14, March.
    22. Astrachan, Claudia Binz & Botero, Isabel & Astrachan, Joseph H. & Prügl, Reinhard, 2018. "Branding the family firm: A review, integrative framework proposal, and research agenda," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 3-15.
    23. Martina Sageder & Christine Mitter & Birgit Feldbauer‐Durstmüller, 2018. "Image and reputation of family firms: a systematic literature review of the state of research," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 335-377, January.
    24. Davis, Donna F. & Golicic, Susan L. & Boerstler, Courtney N. & Choi, Sunny & Oh, Hanmo, 2013. "Does marketing research suffer from methods myopia?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1245-1250.
    25. Editors The, 2008. "From the Editors," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-1, July.
    26. Jonathan E. Alevy & Michael S. Haigh & John A. List, 2007. "Information Cascades: Evidence from a Field Experiment with Financial Market Professionals," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 62(1), pages 151-180, February.
    27. Arthur Schram, 2005. "Artificiality: The tension between internal and external validity in economic experiments," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 225-237.
    28. Cohen-Charash, Yochi & Spector, Paul E., 2001. "The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 278-321, November.
    29. Burmeister, Katrin & Schade, Christian, 2007. "Are entrepreneurs' decisions more biased? An experimental investigation of the susceptibility to status quo bias," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 340-362, May.
    30. Patel, Pankaj C. & Fiet, James O., 2010. "Enhancing the internal validity of entrepreneurship experiments by assessing treatment effects at multiple levels across multiple trials," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 127-140, October.
    31. Botero, Isabel C., 2014. "Effects of communicating family ownership and organisational size on an applicant's attraction to a firm: An empirical examination in the USA and China," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 184-196.
    32. Berinsky, Adam J. & Huber, Gregory A. & Lenz, Gabriel S., 2012. "Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(3), pages 351-368, July.
    33. Hannes Hauswald & Andreas Hack & Franz W. Kellermanns & Holger Patzelt, 2016. "Attracting New Talent to Family Firms: Who is Attracted and under what Conditions?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(5), pages 963-989, September.
    34. Lude, Maximilian & Prügl, Reinhard, 2018. "Why the family business brand matters: Brand authenticity and the family firm trust inference," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 121-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jaufenthaler, Philipp, 2023. "A safe haven in times of crisis: The appeal of family companies as employers amid the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 14(1).
    2. D’Allura, Giorgia Maria & Woolum, Andrew H. & Foulk, Trevor A. & Erez, Amir & Pittino, Daniel, 2023. "Event-sampling method with experimental design: A promising method for investigating microfoundational phenomena within family businesses," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 14(2).
    3. Christoph Stock & Laura Pütz & Sabrina Schell & Arndt Werner, 2024. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Family Firms: Status and Future Directions of a Research Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 199-259, February.
    4. Datta, Subhadeep & Mukherjee, Sourjo, 2022. "In families we trust: Family firm branding and consumer’s reaction to product harm crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 257-268.
    5. Stutz, Adrian & Schell, Sabrina & Hack, Andreas, 2022. "In family firms we trust – Experimental evidence on the credibility of sustainability reporting: A replication study with extension," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(4).
    6. Brinkerink, Jasper & De Massis, Alfredo & Kellermanns, Franz, 2022. "One finding is no finding: Toward a replication culture in family business research," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(4).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maximilian Lude & Reinhard Prügl, 2019. "Risky Decisions and the Family Firm Bias: An Experimental Study Based on Prospect Theory," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(2), pages 386-408, March.
    2. Waterwall, Brian & Alipour, Kent K., 2021. "Nonfamily employees’ perceptions of treatment in family businesses: Implications for organizational attraction, job pursuit intentions, work attitudes, and turnover intentions," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3).
    3. Bargoni, Augusto & Kliestik, Tomas & Jabeen, Fauzia & Santoro, Gabriele, 2023. "Family firms’ characteristics and consumer behaviour: An enquiry into millennials’ purchase intention in the online channel," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    4. Jaufenthaler, Philipp, 2023. "A safe haven in times of crisis: The appeal of family companies as employers amid the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 14(1).
    5. Stutz, Adrian & Schell, Sabrina & Hack, Andreas, 2022. "In family firms we trust – Experimental evidence on the credibility of sustainability reporting: A replication study with extension," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(4).
    6. Unai Arzubiaga & Alfredo De Massis & Amaia Maseda & Txomin Iturralde, 2023. "The influence of family firm image on access to financial resources in family SMEs: a signaling theory perspective," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 233-258, January.
    7. Rovelli, Paola & Benedetti, Carlotta & Fronzetti Colladon, Andrea & De Massis, Alfredo, 2022. "As long as you talk about me: The importance of family firm brands and the contingent role of family-firm identity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 692-700.
    8. Binz Astrachan, Claudia & Prügl, Reinhard & Hair, Joseph F. & Babin, Barry J., 2019. "Marketing and branding in family business: Assessing the landscape and charting a path forward," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 3-7.
    9. Hu, Qilin & Hughes, Mathew (Mat) & Hughes, Paul, 2022. "Family-unique resources, marketing resources, and family owners’ willingness to pursue radical innovation: A model and test," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 264-276.
    10. Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Kraus, Sascha & Mahto, Raj V., 2022. "Marketing and family firms: Theoretical roots, research trajectories, and themes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 66-79.
    11. Kinias, Ioannis & Chalis, Spyridon & Glyptis, Loukas, 2023. "Family business research: A systematic review and an uncelebrated role of marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    12. Bargoni, Augusto & Alon, Ilan & Ferraris, Alberto, 2023. "A systematic review of family business and consumer behaviour," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    13. Bargoni, Augusto & Giachino, Chiara & Troise, Ciro & Alam, Gazi Mahabubul & Quaglia, Roberto, 2023. "A digital family affair: Do family firms' characteristics enhance consumers' willingness to pay?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    14. P. Rovelli & C. Benedetti & A. Fronzetti Colladon & A. De Massis, 2021. "As long as you talk about me: The importance of family firm brands and the contingent role of family-firm identity," Papers 2110.13815, arXiv.org.
    15. Rondi, Emanuela & Benedetti, Carlotta & Bettinelli, Cristina & De Massis, Alfredo, 2023. "Falling from grace: Family-based brands amidst scandals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    16. Barroso Martínez, Ascensión & Sanguino Galván, Ramón & Botero, Isabel C. & González-López, Óscar R. & Buenadicha Mateos, María, 2019. "Exploring family business brands: Understanding predictors and effects," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 57-68.
    17. Chaudhary, Sanjay & Dhir, Amandeep & Ferraris, Alberto & Bertoldi, Bernando, 2021. "Trust and reputation in family businesses: A systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 143-161.
    18. Felix Bader & Bastian Baumeister & Roger Berger & Marc Keuschnigg, 2021. "On the Transportability of Laboratory Results," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 50(3), pages 1452-1481, August.
    19. Mangiò, Federico & Mismetti, Marco & Lissana, Elena & Andreini, Daniela, 2023. "That's the Press, Baby! How journalists co-create family business brands meanings: A mixed method analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    20. Datta, Subhadeep & Mukherjee, Sourjo, 2022. "In families we trust: Family firm branding and consumer’s reaction to product harm crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 257-268.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:fambus:v:12:y:2021:i:1:s1877858520300887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/719791/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.