IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v66y2014icp550-555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-economic assessments of oxy-fuel technology for South African coal-fired power stations

Author

Listed:
  • Oboirien, B.O.
  • North, B.C.
  • Kleyn, T.

Abstract

Oxy-fuel technology is one of the potential solutions to reduce CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants. Although vendors offer a “retrofit package,” to the best of our knowledge there has not been a study undertaken that looks at the technical and economic viability of oxy-fuel technology for CO2 capture for South African coal-fired power stations. This study presents a techno-economic analysis for six coal fired power stations in South Africa. Each of these power stations has a total capacity of about 3600 MW. The analysis was done using the oxy-fuel model developed by Carnegie Mellon University in the USA. The model was used to define the performance and costs of retrofitting the boilers. The results obtained showed that the CO2 emission rate was reduced by a factor of 10 for all the plants when retrofitted to oxy-fuel combustion. Between 27 and 29% of the energy generated was used to capture CO2. The energy loss was correlated to the coal properties. Sulphur content in the coal samples affects the energy used for flue gas cooling but did not affect the energy used for CO2 purification and compression. The study also showed there is a need for the flue gas to be treated for NOx and SOx control. The total capital costs and cost of electricity for the six plants were different, resulting with the cost of electricity varying from 101$/MWh to124$/MWh.

Suggested Citation

  • Oboirien, B.O. & North, B.C. & Kleyn, T., 2014. "Techno-economic assessments of oxy-fuel technology for South African coal-fired power stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 550-555.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:66:y:2014:i:c:p:550-555
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054421301089X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hu, Yukun & Yan, Jinyue & Li, Hailong, 2012. "Effects of flue gas recycle on oxy-coal power generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 255-263.
    2. Pak, Pyong Sik & Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young, 2009. "Characteristics and economic evaluation of a CO2-capturing repowering system with oxy-fuel combustion for utilizing exhaust gas of molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 1903-1909.
    3. Rubin, Edward S. & Chen, Chao & Rao, Anand B., 2007. "Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 4444-4454, September.
    4. Wu, Yinghai & Wang, Chunbo & Tan, Yewen & Jia, Lufei & Anthony, Edward J., 2011. "Characterization of ashes from a 100kWth pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed with oxy-fuel combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(9), pages 2940-2948.
    5. Pak, Pyong Sik & Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young, 2010. "Characteristics and economic evaluation of a power plant applying oxy-fuel combustion to increase power output and decrease CO2 emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3230-3238.
    6. Zhai, Haibo & Rubin, Edward S., 2010. "Performance and cost of wet and dry cooling systems for pulverized coal power plants with and without carbon capture and storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5653-5660, October.
    7. Fu, Chao & Gundersen, Truls, 2012. "Using exergy analysis to reduce power consumption in air separation units for oxy-combustion processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 60-68.
    8. Gerbelová, Hana & Versteeg, Peter & Ioakimidis, Christos S. & Ferrão, Paulo, 2013. "The effect of retrofitting Portuguese fossil fuel power plants with CCS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 280-287.
    9. Davison, John, 2007. "Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1163-1176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhiyu Zhang & Rongrong Zhai & Xinwei Wang & Yongping Yang, 2020. "Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization of Operating Parameters of an Oxyfuel Combustion Power Generation System Based on Single-Factor and Orthogonal Design Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Višković, Alfredo & Franki, Vladimir & Valentić, Vladimir, 2014. "CCS (carbon capture and storage) investment possibility in South East Europe: A case study for Croatia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 325-337.
    3. Peng, Wanxi & Liu, Zhenling & Motahari-Nezhad, Mohsen & Banisaeed, Mohammad & Shahraki, Saeid & Beheshti, Mehdi, 2016. "A detailed study of oxy-fuel combustion of biomass in a circulating fluidized bed (CFB) combustor: Evaluation of catalytic performance of metal nanoparticles (Al, Ni) for combustion efficiency improve," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1139-1147.
    4. Yin, Chungen & Yan, Jinyue, 2016. "Oxy-fuel combustion of pulverized fuels: Combustion fundamentals and modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 742-762.
    5. Zhu, Zilong & Chen, Yaping & Wu, Jiafeng & Zhang, Shaobo & Zheng, Shuxing, 2019. "A modified Allam cycle without compressors realizing efficient power generation with peak load shifting and CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 478-487.
    6. Vu, Thang Toan & Lim, Young-Il & Song, Daesung & Mun, Tae-Young & Moon, Ji-Hong & Sun, Dowon & Hwang, Yoon-Tae & Lee, Jae-Goo & Park, Young Cheol, 2020. "Techno-economic analysis of ultra-supercritical power plants using air- and oxy-combustion circulating fluidized bed with and without CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    7. García-Luna, S. & Ortiz, C. & Carro, A. & Chacartegui, R. & Pérez-Maqueda, L.A., 2022. "Oxygen production routes assessment for oxy-fuel combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    8. Hnydiuk-Stefan, Anna & Składzień, Jan, 2017. "Analysis of supercritical coal fired oxy combustion power plant with cryogenic oxygen unit and turbo-compressor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 271-283.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hnydiuk-Stefan, Anna & Składzień, Jan, 2017. "Analysis of supercritical coal fired oxy combustion power plant with cryogenic oxygen unit and turbo-compressor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 271-283.
    2. Wu Haibo & Liu Zhaohui, 2018. "Economic research relating to a 200 MWe oxy‐fuel combustion power plant," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(5), pages 911-919, October.
    3. Meleesa Naughton & Richard C. Darton & Fai Fung, 2012. "Could Climate Change Limit Water Availability for Coal-Fired Electricity Generation with Carbon Capture and Storage? A UK Case Study," Energy & Environment, , vol. 23(2-3), pages 265-282, May.
    4. Tola, Vittorio & Pettinau, Alberto, 2014. "Power generation plants with carbon capture and storage: A techno-economic comparison between coal combustion and gasification technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1461-1474.
    5. Zhu, Zilong & Chen, Yaping & Wu, Jiafeng & Zhang, Shaobo & Zheng, Shuxing, 2019. "A modified Allam cycle without compressors realizing efficient power generation with peak load shifting and CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 478-487.
    6. Rohlfs, Wilko & Madlener, Reinhard, 2013. "Assessment of clean-coal strategies: The questionable merits of carbon capture-readiness," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 27-36.
    7. Lai, N.Y.G. & Yap, E.H. & Lee, C.W., 2011. "Viability of CCS: A broad-based assessment for Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3608-3616.
    8. Zhang, Minkai & Guo, Yincheng, 2013. "Rate based modeling of absorption and regeneration for CO2 capture by aqueous ammonia solution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 142-152.
    9. Cristóbal, Jorge & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo & Jiménez, Laureano & Irabien, Angel, 2012. "Multi-objective optimization of coal-fired electricity production with CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 266-272.
    10. Siefert, Nicholas S. & Chang, Brian Y. & Litster, Shawn, 2014. "Exergy and economic analysis of a CaO-looping gasifier for IGFC–CCS and IGCC–CCS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 230-245.
    11. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    12. Mayr, Bernhard & Prieler, Rene & Demuth, Martin & Hochenauer, Christoph, 2015. "The usability and limits of the steady flamelet approach in oxy-fuel combustions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1478-1489.
    13. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Tola, Vittorio & Cau, Giorgio, 2017. "Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for CO2-free power generation from coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 426-439.
    14. Pak, Pyong Sik & Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young, 2010. "Characteristics and economic evaluation of a power plant applying oxy-fuel combustion to increase power output and decrease CO2 emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3230-3238.
    15. Almansoori, Ali & Betancourt-Torcat, Alberto, 2015. "Design optimization model for the integration of renewable and nuclear energy in the United Arab Emirates’ power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 234-251.
    16. Wang, Lu & Wei, Yi-Ming & Brown, Marilyn A., 2017. "Global transition to low-carbon electricity: A bibliometric analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 57-68.
    17. Hong-Hua Qiu & Lu-Ge Liu, 2018. "A Study on the Evolution of Carbon Capture and Storage Technology Based on Knowledge Mapping," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    18. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Amorino, Carlo, 2013. "Combustion vs. gasification for a demonstration CCS (carbon capture and storage) project in Italy: A techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 160-169.
    19. Nadine Heitmann & Christine Bertram & Daiju Narita, 2012. "Embedding CCS infrastructure into the European electricity system: a policy coordination problem," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 669-686, August.
    20. Tang, Yuting & Ma, Xiaoqian & Lai, Zhiyi & Zhou, Daoxi & Lin, Hai & Chen, Yong, 2012. "NOx and SO2 emissions from municipal solid waste (MSW) combustion in CO2/O2 atmosphere," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 300-306.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:66:y:2014:i:c:p:550-555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.