IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v254y2022ipbs0360544222012063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Oxygen production routes assessment for oxy-fuel combustion

Author

Listed:
  • García-Luna, S.
  • Ortiz, C.
  • Carro, A.
  • Chacartegui, R.
  • Pérez-Maqueda, L.A.

Abstract

Oxyfuel combustion is a promising alternative to decarbonize the power sector. However, the main barrier to commercial deployment of the technology is the high energy consumption associated with oxygen production (∼200–300 kWh per ton of O2), which penalizes the thermal-to-electric efficiency of 8.5–12% compared to traditional air combustion plants. Typically, oxygen is obtained from a cryogenic air separation process. However, other technologies have been gaining momentum in recent years, such as membrane technologies, chemical looping air separation, and renewable-driven electrolysis. The present work evaluates all these options for O2 production to retrofit a 550 MWe coal-fired power plant with oxyfuel combustion. A techno-economic assessment is carried out to estimate the energy penalty, the O2 production cost (€/ton) and the Levelized Cost of Electricity. The best results are obtained by combining oxygen transport membranes and electrolysis since the energy consumption has been reduced to 98.56 kWh/ton of O2, decreasing by 59.31% the cryogenic distillation energy consumption (242.24 kWh/ton O2), reducing the overall energy penalty compared to cryogenic air separation from 8.88% points to 7.56%points. The oxygen transport membrane presents the lowest cost of electricity in retrofitting cases, 51.48 $/MWh, while cryogenic distillation estimated cost is 52.7 $/MWh. Their costs of avoided CO2 are 31.79 $/ton CO2 and 34.15 $/ton CO2 respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • García-Luna, S. & Ortiz, C. & Carro, A. & Chacartegui, R. & Pérez-Maqueda, L.A., 2022. "Oxygen production routes assessment for oxy-fuel combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:254:y:2022:i:pb:s0360544222012063
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222012063
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vu, Thang Toan & Lim, Young-Il & Song, Daesung & Mun, Tae-Young & Moon, Ji-Hong & Sun, Dowon & Hwang, Yoon-Tae & Lee, Jae-Goo & Park, Young Cheol, 2020. "Techno-economic analysis of ultra-supercritical power plants using air- and oxy-combustion circulating fluidized bed with and without CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    2. Shin, Donghwan & Kang, Sanggyu, 2018. "Numerical analysis of an ion transport membrane system for oxy–fuel combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 875-888.
    3. Bailera, Manuel & Lisbona, Pilar & Romeo, Luis M. & Espatolero, Sergio, 2016. "Power to Gas–biomass oxycombustion hybrid system: Energy integration and potential applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 221-229.
    4. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Landon, Robert Stephen & Kim, Jeongdong & Liu, Yi & Moon, Il, 2022. "Continuous and flexible Renewable-Power-to-Methane via liquid CO2 energy storage: Revisiting the techno-economic potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    5. Fan, Jing-Li & Wei, Shijie & Yang, Lin & Wang, Hang & Zhong, Ping & Zhang, Xian, 2019. "Comparison of the LCOE between coal-fired power plants with CCS and main low-carbon generation technologies: Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 143-155.
    6. Bailera, Manuel & Peña, Begoña & Lisbona, Pilar & Marín, Julián & Romeo, Luis M., 2021. "Lab-scale experimental tests of power to gas-oxycombustion hybridization: System design and preliminary results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    7. Habib, Mohamed A. & Imteyaz, Binash & Nemitallah, Medhat A., 2020. "Second law analysis of premixed and non-premixed oxy-fuel combustion cycles utilizing oxygen separation membranes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    8. Chen, Shiyi & Yu, Ran & Soomro, Ahsanullah & Xiang, Wenguo, 2019. "Thermodynamic assessment and optimization of a pressurized fluidized bed oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 445-455.
    9. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2020. "Energy and cost efficient manganese chemical looping air separation cycle for decarbonized power generation based on oxy-fuel combustion and gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Hanak, Dawid P. & Powell, Dante & Manovic, Vasilije, 2017. "Techno-economic analysis of oxy-combustion coal-fired power plant with cryogenic oxygen storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 193-203.
    11. Castillo, Renzo, 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of a hard coal oxyfuel power plant with high temperature three-end membrane for air separation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(5), pages 1480-1493, May.
    12. Fu, Chao & Gundersen, Truls, 2012. "Using exergy analysis to reduce power consumption in air separation units for oxy-combustion processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 60-68.
    13. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Amorino, Carlo, 2013. "Combustion vs. gasification for a demonstration CCS (carbon capture and storage) project in Italy: A techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 160-169.
    14. Oboirien, B.O. & North, B.C. & Kleyn, T., 2014. "Techno-economic assessments of oxy-fuel technology for South African coal-fired power stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 550-555.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhao, Zhenghong & Zhang, Zewu & Zha, Xiaojian & Gao, Ge & Li, Xiaoshan & Wu, Fan & Luo, Cong & Zhang, Liqi, 2023. "Internal association between combustion behavior and NOx emissions of pulverized coal MILD-oxy combustion affected by adding H2O," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    2. García-Luna, S. & Ortiz, C. & Chacartegui, R. & Pérez-Maqueda, L.A., 2023. "Large-scale oxygen-enriched air (OEA) production from polymeric membranes for partial oxycombustion processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    3. Ortiz, C. & García-Luna, S. & Carro, A. & Chacartegui, R. & Pérez-Maqueda, L., 2023. "Negative emissions power plant based on flexible calcium-looping process integrated with renewables and methane production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Serrano, José Ramón & Arnau, Francisco José & García-Cuevas, Luis Miguel & Gutiérrez, Fabio Alberto, 2022. "Thermo-economic analysis of an oxygen production plant powered by an innovative energy recovery system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    2. Vu, Thang Toan & Lim, Young-Il & Song, Daesung & Mun, Tae-Young & Moon, Ji-Hong & Sun, Dowon & Hwang, Yoon-Tae & Lee, Jae-Goo & Park, Young Cheol, 2020. "Techno-economic analysis of ultra-supercritical power plants using air- and oxy-combustion circulating fluidized bed with and without CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    3. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Lee, Inkyu & Moon, Il, 2022. "Liquid air as an emerging energy vector towards carbon neutrality: A multi-scale systems perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    4. Vega, F. & Baena-Moreno, F.M. & Gallego Fernández, Luz M. & Portillo, E. & Navarrete, B. & Zhang, Zhien, 2020. "Current status of CO2 chemical absorption research applied to CCS: Towards full deployment at industrial scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    5. Seo, Su Been & Kim, Hyung Woo & Kang, Seo Yeong & Go, Eun Sol & Keel, Sang In & Lee, See Hoon, 2021. "Techno-economic comparison between air-fired and oxy-fuel circulating fluidized bed power plants with ultra-supercritical cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    6. Muhammad Haris Hamayun & Naveed Ramzan & Murid Hussain & Muhammad Faheem, 2020. "Evaluation of Two-Column Air Separation Processes Based on Exergy Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Yin, Chungen & Yan, Jinyue, 2016. "Oxy-fuel combustion of pulverized fuels: Combustion fundamentals and modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 742-762.
    8. Habib, Mohamed A. & Imteyaz, Binash & Nemitallah, Medhat A., 2020. "Second law analysis of premixed and non-premixed oxy-fuel combustion cycles utilizing oxygen separation membranes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    9. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    10. Višković, Alfredo & Franki, Vladimir & Valentić, Vladimir, 2014. "CCS (carbon capture and storage) investment possibility in South East Europe: A case study for Croatia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 325-337.
    11. Zhu, Zilong & Chen, Yaping & Wu, Jiafeng & Zhang, Shaobo & Zheng, Shuxing, 2019. "A modified Allam cycle without compressors realizing efficient power generation with peak load shifting and CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 478-487.
    12. Ortiz, C. & García-Luna, S. & Carro, A. & Chacartegui, R. & Pérez-Maqueda, L., 2023. "Negative emissions power plant based on flexible calcium-looping process integrated with renewables and methane production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    13. Barelli, L. & Ottaviano, A., 2014. "Solid oxide fuel cell technology coupled with methane dry reforming: A viable option for high efficiency plant with reduced CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 118-129.
    14. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Xiang, Yue & Wu, Gang & Shen, Xiaodong & Ma, Yuhang & Gou, Jing & Xu, Weiting & Liu, Junyong, 2021. "Low-carbon economic dispatch of electricity-gas systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    16. Nemet, Gregory F. & Baker, Erin & Jenni, Karen E., 2013. "Modeling the future costs of carbon capture using experts' elicited probabilities under policy scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 218-228.
    17. Janusz-Szymańska, Katarzyna & Dryjańska, Aleksandra, 2015. "Possibilities for improving the thermodynamic and economic characteristics of an oxy-type power plant with a cryogenic air separation unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 45-61.
    18. Calin-Cristian Cormos, 2018. "Techno-Economic Evaluations of Copper-Based Chemical Looping Air Separation System for Oxy-Combustion and Gasification Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    19. Mansir, Ibrahim B. & Ben-Mansour, Rached & Habib, Mohamed A., 2018. "Oxy-fuel combustion in a two-pass oxygen transport reactor for fire tube boiler application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 828-840.
    20. Romeo, Luis M. & Cavana, Marco & Bailera, Manuel & Leone, Pierluigi & Peña, Begoña & Lisbona, Pilar, 2022. "Non-stoichiometric methanation as strategy to overcome the limitations of green hydrogen injection into the natural gas grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:254:y:2022:i:pb:s0360544222012063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.